Search (123 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994) 0.05
    0.051188197 = sum of:
      0.023479821 = product of:
        0.093919285 = sum of:
          0.093919285 = weight(_text_:authors in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.093919285 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.027708376 = product of:
        0.05541675 = sum of:
          0.05541675 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05541675 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved
    Source
    Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
  2. Schwartz, E.: Like a book on a wire (1993) 0.04
    0.044789672 = sum of:
      0.020544844 = product of:
        0.082179375 = sum of:
          0.082179375 = weight(_text_:authors in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.082179375 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024244828 = product of:
        0.048489656 = sum of:
          0.048489656 = weight(_text_:22 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048489656 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the publishing of books online on the Internet, in the USA. The issues is treated mainly in relation to trade publishers. Outlines various ways in which such publishers have so far used the Internet, for example in the publishing of the full text of works of fiction, for publishing catalogues, and for presenting authors to the public via bulletin boards or electronic conferences. Notes a number or problems which arise: copyright, payment for accessing items, advertising restrictions, and the ease with which the published unit can be tampered with when available on the Internet. Also discusses collaboration and conflicts between publishers and the technology industry
    Source
    Publishers weekly. 240(1993) no.47, 22 Nov., S.33-35,38
  3. Malina, Barbara [Red.]: Open Access : Chancen und Herausforderungen ; ein Handbuch (2007) 0.04
    0.040692158 = product of:
      0.081384316 = sum of:
        0.081384316 = sum of:
          0.056893338 = weight(_text_:z in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056893338 = score(doc=677,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.20848879 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
          0.024490975 = weight(_text_:22 in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024490975 = score(doc=677,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: ZfBB 54(2007) H.4/5, S.306-307 (G. Pflug): "Die UNESCO hat sich auf ihrem Weltgipfel zur Informationsgesellschaft dem Prinzip der frei zugänglichen Volltextspeicherung wissenschaftlicher Information angeschlossen,die zu Beginn der 1990er Jahre sowohl in den USA z. B. von Paul Ginsparg und Peter Suber (SPARC) wie in Ungarn von Stevan Harnad angeregt und entwickelt wurde. Dabei ging es ursprünglich darum, Preprints in den Naturwissenschaften, der Medizin sowie der Technik allgemein zugänglich zu machen, um eine schnellere und einfachere Verbreitung zu ermöglichen. Mit dem neuen Jahrhundert entstand eine Erweiterung des Grundsatzes, die die traditionellen Wissenschaftsverlage aufforderte, ihre in konventioneller Form erschienenen Texte-vor allem ihre Zeitschriften -spätestens sechs Monate nach ihrer Veröffentlichung über das Internet frei zur Verfügung zu stellen. Für die Universitäten in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland stand jedoch, wie die Aktivitäten der Humboldt-Universität in Berlin seit 1997 zeigen, die Veröffentlichung von Dissertationen im Vordergrund, die von der Universitätsbibliothek und dem Rechenzentrum gemeinsam betrieben wird.
    Inhaltsbeschreibung Die verschiedenen Initiativen zum Open Access führen zu zwei Systemen, dem so genannten »grünen Weg«, der bereits in gedruckter Form veröffentlichte Publikationen ins Internet stellt, und dem »goldenen Weg«, bei dem die Volltextspeicherung die einzige oder jedenfalls die vorrangige Form darstellt. Die Internationalisierung des Open Access erfolgte auf drei Konferenzen, die 2001 in Budapest, 2003 in Bethesda und im gleichen Jahr in Berlin stattfanden. Diese Volltextspeicherung war ursprünglich auf die naturwissenschaftlich-technischen Disziplinen konzentriert. Doch treten in zunehmendem Maße auch die Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften dem Prinzip bei. Dabei entstehen natürlich sehr differenzierende Aspekte, zum Beispiel für die Bibliotheken - etwa der Erwerb gedruckter Zeitschriften, Langzeitarchivierung von Interneteintragungen, für den Buchhandel wie für die Autoren - etwa das Urheberrecht, aber auch dort das ökonomische Interesse, wie der Plan des Börsenvereins des Deutschen Buchhandels zu einer eigenen Volltextspeicherung zeigt, dem die Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission eine Ergänzung zum vorliegenden Text nachsandte. Open Access hat mittlerweile ein so weites Interesse gefunden, dass das Auswärtige Amt zusammen mit der Deutschen UNESCO-Kommission 2006 zu einer Konferenz einlud, über deren Ergebnisse die Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission dieses Handbuch veröffentlicht hat, das neben einer definitorischen und einer historischen Einleitung (Norbert Lossau S.18-22 und Peter Schirmbacher S. 22-25) in vier weiteren Kapiteln die Möglichkeiten und Probleme darstellt. Im zweiten Kapitel werden drei verschiedene Modelle vorgestellt: Open-Access-Repositories am Berliner Beispiel des edoc-Servers (Susanne Dobratz S. 28-32), Open-Access-Journale am Beispiel des New Journal of Physics (Eberhard Bodenschatz S.33-36) und ein Verlagsmodell (Springer Open Choice) von Jan Velterop (S. 37-40). Das dritte Kapitel ist den Formen der Realisierung gewidmet, z. B. der Finanzierung (Stefan Gradmann S.42-45), des Urheberrechts (Karl-Nikolaus Peifer S.46-59), der Qualitätssicherung (Eberhard Bodenschatz und Ulrich Pöschl S.50-55), der Langzeitarchivierung (Ute Schwens und Reinhard Altenhöner S. 50-58), der Struktur der Wissenschaftskommunikation (Hans Pfeiffenberger S.59-62), der Datenverarbeitung (Wolfram Horst-mann S. 65) sowie der Akzeptanz (Johannes Fournier S. 66-70).
  4. Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009) 0.04
    0.038391147 = sum of:
      0.017609866 = product of:
        0.070439465 = sum of:
          0.070439465 = weight(_text_:authors in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070439465 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02078128 = product of:
        0.04156256 = sum of:
          0.04156256 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04156256 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A review of recent developments in electronic publishing, with a focus on Open Access (OA) is provided. It describes the two main types of OA, i.e. the `gold' OA journal route and the 'green' repository route, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the two, and the reactions of the publishing industry to these developments. Quality, cost and copyright issues are explored, as well as some of the business models of OA. It is noted that whilst so far there is no evidence that a shift to OA will lead to libraries cancelling subscriptions to toll-access journals, this may happen in the future, and that despite the apparently compelling reasons for authors to move to OA, so far few have shown themselves willing to do so. Conclusions about the future of scholarly publications are drawn.
    Date
    8. 7.2010 19:22:45
  5. Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018) 0.04
    0.03733401 = sum of:
      0.023479821 = product of:
        0.093919285 = sum of:
          0.093919285 = weight(_text_:authors in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.093919285 = score(doc=4631,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.013854188 = product of:
        0.027708376 = sum of:
          0.027708376 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027708376 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like "performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing" are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995) 0.03
    0.03463547 = product of:
      0.06927094 = sum of:
        0.06927094 = product of:
          0.13854188 = sum of:
            0.13854188 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13854188 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
  7. Rieger, W.: SGML für die Praxis : Ansatz und Einsatz von ISO 8879; mit einer Einführung in HTML (1995) 0.03
    0.032183733 = product of:
      0.064367466 = sum of:
        0.064367466 = product of:
          0.12873493 = sum of:
            0.12873493 = weight(_text_:z in 1640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12873493 = score(doc=1640,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.47175628 = fieldWeight in 1640, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    ST 351 Informatik / Monographien / Einzelne Anwendungen der Datenverarbeitung / Textverarbeitung, Desktop Publishing / Einzelne Programme (A-Z)
    ST 351 G47 Informatik / Monographien / Einzelne Anwendungen der Datenverarbeitung / Textverarbeitung, Desktop Publishing / Einzelne Programme (A-Z) / SGML
    RVK
    ST 351 Informatik / Monographien / Einzelne Anwendungen der Datenverarbeitung / Textverarbeitung, Desktop Publishing / Einzelne Programme (A-Z)
    ST 351 G47 Informatik / Monographien / Einzelne Anwendungen der Datenverarbeitung / Textverarbeitung, Desktop Publishing / Einzelne Programme (A-Z) / SGML
  8. Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017) 0.03
    0.03045693 = sum of:
      0.016602742 = product of:
        0.066410966 = sum of:
          0.066410966 = weight(_text_:authors in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.066410966 = score(doc=4051,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23308155 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.013854188 = product of:
        0.027708376 = sum of:
          0.027708376 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027708376 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051127672 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The introduction of "altmetrics" as new tools to analyze scientific impact within the reward system of science has challenged the hegemony of citations as the predominant source for measuring scientific impact. Mendeley readership has been identified as one of the most important altmetric sources, with several features that are similar to citations. The purpose of this paper is to perform an in-depth analysis of the differences and similarities between the distributions of Mendeley readership and citations across fields. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze two issues by using in each case a common analytical framework for both metrics: the shape of the distributions of readership and citations, and the field normalization problem generated by differences in citation and readership practices across fields. In the first issue the authors use the characteristic scores and scales method, and in the second the measurement framework introduced in Crespo et al. (2013). Findings There are three main results. First, the citations and Mendeley readership distributions exhibit a strikingly similar degree of skewness in all fields. Second, the results on "exchange rates (ERs)" for Mendeley readership empirically supports the possibility of comparing readership counts across fields, as well as the field normalization of readership distributions using ERs as normalization factors. Third, field normalization using field mean readerships as normalization factors leads to comparably good results. Originality/value These findings open up challenging new questions, particularly regarding the possibility of obtaining conflicting results from field normalized citation and Mendeley readership indicators; this suggests the need for better determining the role of the two metrics in capturing scientific recognition.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  9. Zschunke, P.; Svensson, P.: Bücherbrett für alle Fälle : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000) 0.03
    0.029389173 = product of:
      0.058778346 = sum of:
        0.058778346 = product of:
          0.11755669 = sum of:
            0.11755669 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11755669 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
    18. 6.2000 9:11:22
  10. Wiesenmüller, H.: Langzeitarchivierung von Online-Publikationen an Regionalbibliotheken : Das Projekt 'Baden-Württembergisches Online-Archiv' (BOA) (2004) 0.03
    0.028446669 = product of:
      0.056893338 = sum of:
        0.056893338 = product of:
          0.113786675 = sum of:
            0.113786675 = weight(_text_:z in 2283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113786675 = score(doc=2283,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.41697758 = fieldWeight in 2283, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2283)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Elektronisches Publizieren im Internet ist heute in vielen Bereichen Realität geworden - bei der 'grauen Literatur` vielleicht mehr noch als bei den Verlagen. Immer häufiger erhält man z. B. bei Zeitschriften die Auskunft "erscheint nur noch online". Dabei sind es keineswegs nur Mitteilungsblätter und Jahresberichte kleiner Vereine, die nicht mehr gedruckt werden - auch eine Institution wie beispielsweise das Statistische Landesamt Baden-Württemberg will wichtige Publikationen wie die Statistischen Berichte` künftig ausschließlich im Internet anbieten. Ebenso ist es bei der Arbeit in den bibliographischen Stellen (z. B. Landesbibliographie, Hölderlin-Bibliographie), Sonderabteilungen und Fachreferaten alltäglich geworden, auf einschlägige und inhaltlich substanzielle Online-Ressourcen zu stoßen, die man gerne festhalten und dauerhaft archivieren würde. Der praktische Umgang damit war bisher jedoch meist von einer gewissen Hilflosigkeit geprägt; die Materialien wurden - mit wenigen Ausnahmen' - allenfalls in Linklisten aufgenommen oder gar auf Papier ausgedruckt. Gleichzeitig wuchs in den vergangenen Jahren die Einsicht, dass - trotz aller technischen Schwierigkeiten und der allgegenwärtigen Personalknappheit - der Sammel- und Archivierungsauftrag der regionalen Pflichtexemplarbibliotheken vor den Netzpublikationen nicht Halt machen dürfe. Die beiden badenwürttembergischen Landesbibliotheken in Karlsruhe und Stuttgart wollten sich der neuen Verantwortung offensiv stellen, wobei sich als natürlicher Kooperationspartner das Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum in Konstanz anbot. Im Oktober 2002 - kurz vor dem von Der Deutschen Bibliothek initiierten Workshop 'Langzeitverfügbarkeit elektronischer Dokumente' - wurde deshalb eine Vereinbarung zwischen der Badischen Landesbibliothek (BLB), der Württembergischen Landesbibliothek (WLB) und dem Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg (BSZ) geschlossen. Das Ziel war die gemeinsame Entwicklung einer technischen Plattform und eines Geschäftsgangs für die Erschließung und Speicherung relevanter Netzpublikationen. Seit Herbst 2003 trägt das Projekt den Namen 'Baden-Württembergisches Online-Archiv' (BOA) und ist unter der URL http://www.boa-bw.de erreichbar
  11. Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993) 0.03
    0.027708376 = product of:
      0.05541675 = sum of:
        0.05541675 = product of:
          0.1108335 = sum of:
            0.1108335 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1108335 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
  12. Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992) 0.03
    0.027708376 = product of:
      0.05541675 = sum of:
        0.05541675 = product of:
          0.1108335 = sum of:
            0.1108335 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1108335 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
  13. Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998) 0.03
    0.027708376 = product of:
      0.05541675 = sum of:
        0.05541675 = product of:
          0.1108335 = sum of:
            0.1108335 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1108335 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
  14. Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017) 0.02
    0.024490975 = product of:
      0.04898195 = sum of:
        0.04898195 = product of:
          0.0979639 = sum of:
            0.0979639 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0979639 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 4.2017 10:42:05
    22. 4.2017 10:48:38
  15. Dechsling, R.: Softwaretypen : Datenbank, Hypertext oder linearer Text? (1994) 0.02
    0.024244828 = product of:
      0.048489656 = sum of:
        0.048489656 = product of:
          0.09697931 = sum of:
            0.09697931 = weight(_text_:22 in 8074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09697931 = score(doc=8074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8074)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Börsenblatt. Nr.50 vom 24.6.1994, S.19-22
  16. Electronic publishing and electronic information communication (1996) 0.02
    0.024244828 = product of:
      0.048489656 = sum of:
        0.048489656 = product of:
          0.09697931 = sum of:
            0.09697931 = weight(_text_:22 in 6664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09697931 = score(doc=6664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.181-247
  17. Schmitz, H.: Lese- und Lernstoff allerwege : NuvoMedia bietet 'RocketBook' an, Bertelsmann ist dabei (1998) 0.02
    0.024244828 = product of:
      0.048489656 = sum of:
        0.048489656 = product of:
          0.09697931 = sum of:
            0.09697931 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09697931 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 2.1996 22:34:46
  18. Büttner, S.: Bibliotheken und digitales Publizieren (2006) 0.02
    0.0241378 = product of:
      0.0482756 = sum of:
        0.0482756 = product of:
          0.0965512 = sum of:
            0.0965512 = weight(_text_:z in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0965512 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2728844 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.35381722 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.337313 = idf(docFreq=577, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Im Mittelpunkt des klassischen Paradigmas der bibliothekarischen Arbeit standen bibliothekarischen Regeln als Sollvorstellungen, die der Nutzer verstehen sollte, bevor die vielfältigen Dienste genutzt werden konnten. In dem Beitrag wird der Frage nachgegangen, inwieweit das digitale Publizieren die Aufgaben der Bibliothek beeinflusst. Dazu wird zunächst herausgearbeitet, dass es sich bei dem Paradigmenwechsel um eine grundlegende Veränderung der Struktur und Arbeitsweise handelt. Die neuen Technologien (z. B. Google) haben sich der Realität angepasst und damit die Herangehensweise der Nutzer bei der Informationssuche und deren Erwartungen an Dienstleister. Daraus ergibt sich eine Reihe neuer Aufgaben, von denen folgende kurz diskutiert werden: Dienstleister in der wissenschaftlichen Kommunikation, Zugriff auf die Informationen und Primärdaten. Neben dem Zugriff auf Informationen und Medien muss es aber zunehmend um die Schaffung eines Umfeldes für wissenschaftliche Inspiration gehen.
  19. Swiaczny, F.: Elektronisches Publizieren bei MATEO (1998) 0.02
    0.02078128 = product of:
      0.04156256 = sum of:
        0.04156256 = product of:
          0.08312512 = sum of:
            0.08312512 = weight(_text_:22 in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08312512 = score(doc=2356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.1, S.35-38
  20. Friesel, U.: ¬Das Buch wie Cola aus dem Automaten : Book-on-Demand: Gedruckt aus dem Internet, was gewünscht wird, und zwar sofort (1999) 0.02
    0.02078128 = product of:
      0.04156256 = sum of:
        0.04156256 = product of:
          0.08312512 = sum of:
            0.08312512 = weight(_text_:22 in 3902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08312512 = score(doc=3902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1790404 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051127672 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17. 7.1996 9:33:22

Years

Languages

  • e 69
  • d 53

Types

  • a 109
  • el 11
  • m 8
  • s 3
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications