-
Heller, L.: Warum Wissenschaftler nicht mehr einfach nur publizieren : Beobachtungen anhand aktueller digitaler Trends (2009)
0.06
0.064482816 = product of:
0.12896563 = sum of:
0.12896563 = sum of:
0.07260629 = weight(_text_:l in 3021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07260629 = score(doc=3021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.35131297 = fieldWeight in 3021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3021)
0.056359343 = weight(_text_:22 in 3021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359343 = score(doc=3021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2009 13:38:36
-
Nguyen, T.-L.; Wu, X.; Sajeev, S.: Object-oriented modeling of multimedia documents (1998)
0.06
0.056422465 = product of:
0.11284493 = sum of:
0.11284493 = sum of:
0.063530505 = weight(_text_:l in 3598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063530505 = score(doc=3598,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 3598, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3598)
0.049314424 = weight(_text_:22 in 3598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049314424 = score(doc=3598,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3598, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3598)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011)
0.06
0.056422465 = product of:
0.11284493 = sum of:
0.11284493 = sum of:
0.063530505 = weight(_text_:l in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063530505 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.30739886 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.049314424 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049314424 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:23:07
-
Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994)
0.05
0.052058868 = sum of:
0.023879195 = product of:
0.09551678 = sum of:
0.09551678 = weight(_text_:authors in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09551678 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.028179672 = product of:
0.056359343 = sum of:
0.056359343 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359343 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved
- Source
- Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
-
Heller, L.: Literatur- und Informationsversorgung in der Spitzenforschung (2009)
0.05
0.04836211 = product of:
0.09672422 = sum of:
0.09672422 = sum of:
0.054454714 = weight(_text_:l in 3022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054454714 = score(doc=3022,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.26348472 = fieldWeight in 3022, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3022)
0.042269506 = weight(_text_:22 in 3022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042269506 = score(doc=3022,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3022, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3022)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2009 13:40:29
-
Schwartz, E.: Like a book on a wire (1993)
0.05
0.04555151 = sum of:
0.020894295 = product of:
0.08357718 = sum of:
0.08357718 = weight(_text_:authors in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08357718 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.024657212 = product of:
0.049314424 = sum of:
0.049314424 = weight(_text_:22 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049314424 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses the publishing of books online on the Internet, in the USA. The issues is treated mainly in relation to trade publishers. Outlines various ways in which such publishers have so far used the Internet, for example in the publishing of the full text of works of fiction, for publishing catalogues, and for presenting authors to the public via bulletin boards or electronic conferences. Notes a number or problems which arise: copyright, payment for accessing items, advertising restrictions, and the ease with which the published unit can be tampered with when available on the Internet. Also discusses collaboration and conflicts between publishers and the technology industry
- Source
- Publishers weekly. 240(1993) no.47, 22 Nov., S.33-35,38
-
Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009)
0.04
0.03904415 = sum of:
0.017909396 = product of:
0.071637586 = sum of:
0.071637586 = weight(_text_:authors in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071637586 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021134753 = product of:
0.042269506 = sum of:
0.042269506 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042269506 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A review of recent developments in electronic publishing, with a focus on Open Access (OA) is provided. It describes the two main types of OA, i.e. the `gold' OA journal route and the 'green' repository route, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the two, and the reactions of the publishing industry to these developments. Quality, cost and copyright issues are explored, as well as some of the business models of OA. It is noted that whilst so far there is no evidence that a shift to OA will lead to libraries cancelling subscriptions to toll-access journals, this may happen in the future, and that despite the apparently compelling reasons for authors to move to OA, so far few have shown themselves willing to do so. Conclusions about the future of scholarly publications are drawn.
- Date
- 8. 7.2010 19:22:45
-
Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)
0.04
0.03796903 = sum of:
0.023879195 = product of:
0.09551678 = sum of:
0.09551678 = weight(_text_:authors in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09551678 = score(doc=4631,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014089836 = product of:
0.028179672 = sum of:
0.028179672 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028179672 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like "performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing" are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Jahn, N.; Matthias, L.; Laakso, M.: Toward transparency of hybrid open access through publisher-provided metadata : an article-level study of Elsevier (2022)
0.04
0.03761396 = sum of:
0.014924496 = product of:
0.059697986 = sum of:
0.059697986 = weight(_text_:authors in 448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059697986 = score(doc=448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=448)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.022689465 = product of:
0.04537893 = sum of:
0.04537893 = weight(_text_:l in 448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04537893 = score(doc=448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=448)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- With the growth of open access (OA), the financial flows in scholarly journal publishing have become increasingly complex, but comprehensive data on and transparency of these flows are still lacking. The opacity is especially concerning for hybrid OA, where subscription-based journals publish individual articles as OA if an optional fee is paid. This study addresses the lack of transparency by leveraging Elsevier article metadata and provides the first publisher-level study of hybrid OA uptake and invoicing. Our results show that Elsevier's hybrid OA uptake has grown steadily but slowly from 2015 to 2019, doubling the number of hybrid OA articles published per year and increasing the share of OA articles in Elsevier's hybrid journals from 2.6 to 3.7% of all articles. Further, we find that most hybrid OA articles were invoiced directly to authors, followed by articles invoiced through agreements with research funders, institutions, or consortia, with only a few funding bodies driving hybrid OA uptake. As such, our findings point to the role of publishing agreements and OA policies in hybrid OA publishing. Our results further demonstrate the value of publisher-provided metadata to improve the transparency in scholarly publishing.
-
Morrison, H.; Borges, L.; Zhao, X.; Kakou, T.L.; Shanbhoug, A.N.: Change and growth in open access journal publishing and charging trends 2011-2021 (2022)
0.04
0.03761396 = sum of:
0.014924496 = product of:
0.059697986 = sum of:
0.059697986 = weight(_text_:authors in 741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059697986 = score(doc=741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=741)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.022689465 = product of:
0.04537893 = sum of:
0.04537893 = weight(_text_:l in 741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04537893 = score(doc=741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=741)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study examines trends in open access article processing charges (APCs) from 2011 to 2021, building on a 2011 study by Solomon and Björk. Two methods are employed, a modified replica and a status update of the 2011 journals. Data are drawn from multiple sources and datasets are available as open data. Most journals do not charge APCs; this has not changed. The global average per-journal APC increased slightly, from 906 to 958 USD, while the per-article average increased from 904 to 1,626 USD, indicating that authors choose to publish in more expensive journals. Publisher size, type, impact metrics and subject affect charging tendencies, average APC, and pricing trends. Half the journals from the 2011 sample are no longer listed in DOAJ in 2021, due to ceased publication or publisher de-listing. Conclusions include a caution about the potential of the APC model to increase costs beyond inflation. The university sector may be the most promising approach to economically sustainable no-fee OA journals. Universities publish many OA journals, nearly half of OA articles, tend not to charge APCs and when APCs are charged, the prices are very low on average.
-
Brock, L.: Electronic publishing : baseline data 1993 (1993)
0.04
0.036303144 = product of:
0.07260629 = sum of:
0.07260629 = product of:
0.14521258 = sum of:
0.14521258 = weight(_text_:l in 6406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14521258 = score(doc=6406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.70262593 = fieldWeight in 6406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6406)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995)
0.04
0.03522459 = product of:
0.07044918 = sum of:
0.07044918 = product of:
0.14089836 = sum of:
0.14089836 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14089836 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
-
Bloos, L.: Tönende Dokumente (1994)
0.03
0.031765252 = product of:
0.063530505 = sum of:
0.063530505 = product of:
0.12706101 = sum of:
0.12706101 = weight(_text_:l in 7183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12706101 = score(doc=7183,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20667124 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.6147977 = fieldWeight in 7183, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7183)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017)
0.03
0.030974977 = sum of:
0.01688514 = product of:
0.06754056 = sum of:
0.06754056 = weight(_text_:authors in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06754056 = score(doc=4051,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23704608 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014089836 = product of:
0.028179672 = sum of:
0.028179672 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028179672 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose The introduction of "altmetrics" as new tools to analyze scientific impact within the reward system of science has challenged the hegemony of citations as the predominant source for measuring scientific impact. Mendeley readership has been identified as one of the most important altmetric sources, with several features that are similar to citations. The purpose of this paper is to perform an in-depth analysis of the differences and similarities between the distributions of Mendeley readership and citations across fields. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze two issues by using in each case a common analytical framework for both metrics: the shape of the distributions of readership and citations, and the field normalization problem generated by differences in citation and readership practices across fields. In the first issue the authors use the characteristic scores and scales method, and in the second the measurement framework introduced in Crespo et al. (2013). Findings There are three main results. First, the citations and Mendeley readership distributions exhibit a strikingly similar degree of skewness in all fields. Second, the results on "exchange rates (ERs)" for Mendeley readership empirically supports the possibility of comparing readership counts across fields, as well as the field normalization of readership distributions using ERs as normalization factors. Third, field normalization using field mean readerships as normalization factors leads to comparably good results. Originality/value These findings open up challenging new questions, particularly regarding the possibility of obtaining conflicting results from field normalized citation and Mendeley readership indicators; this suggests the need for better determining the role of the two metrics in capturing scientific recognition.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Zschunke, P.; Svensson, P.: Bücherbrett für alle Fälle : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000)
0.03
0.029889056 = product of:
0.059778113 = sum of:
0.059778113 = product of:
0.119556226 = sum of:
0.119556226 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.119556226 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
18. 6.2000 9:11:22
-
Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993)
0.03
0.028179672 = product of:
0.056359343 = sum of:
0.056359343 = product of:
0.11271869 = sum of:
0.11271869 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11271869 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
-
Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992)
0.03
0.028179672 = product of:
0.056359343 = sum of:
0.056359343 = product of:
0.11271869 = sum of:
0.11271869 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11271869 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
-
Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998)
0.03
0.028179672 = product of:
0.056359343 = sum of:
0.056359343 = product of:
0.11271869 = sum of:
0.11271869 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11271869 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
-
Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017)
0.02
0.024907546 = product of:
0.049815092 = sum of:
0.049815092 = product of:
0.099630184 = sum of:
0.099630184 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099630184 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.2017 10:42:05
22. 4.2017 10:48:38
-
Dechsling, R.: Softwaretypen : Datenbank, Hypertext oder linearer Text? (1994)
0.02
0.024657212 = product of:
0.049314424 = sum of:
0.049314424 = product of:
0.09862885 = sum of:
0.09862885 = weight(_text_:22 in 8074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09862885 = score(doc=8074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208572 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05199731 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8074)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Börsenblatt. Nr.50 vom 24.6.1994, S.19-22
