-
Engels, T.C.E; Istenic Starcic, A.; Kulczycki, E.; Pölönen, J.; Sivertsen, G.: Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)
0.08
0.07584723 = sum of:
0.024065398 = product of:
0.09626159 = sum of:
0.09626159 = weight(_text_:authors in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09626159 = score(doc=4631,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.051781833 = sum of:
0.02338242 = weight(_text_:j in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02338242 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
0.028399412 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028399412 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like "performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing" are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017)
0.07
0.06879864 = sum of:
0.017016808 = product of:
0.06806723 = sum of:
0.06806723 = weight(_text_:authors in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06806723 = score(doc=4051,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.051781833 = sum of:
0.02338242 = weight(_text_:j in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02338242 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.028399412 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028399412 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
- Abstract
- Purpose The introduction of "altmetrics" as new tools to analyze scientific impact within the reward system of science has challenged the hegemony of citations as the predominant source for measuring scientific impact. Mendeley readership has been identified as one of the most important altmetric sources, with several features that are similar to citations. The purpose of this paper is to perform an in-depth analysis of the differences and similarities between the distributions of Mendeley readership and citations across fields. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyze two issues by using in each case a common analytical framework for both metrics: the shape of the distributions of readership and citations, and the field normalization problem generated by differences in citation and readership practices across fields. In the first issue the authors use the characteristic scores and scales method, and in the second the measurement framework introduced in Crespo et al. (2013). Findings There are three main results. First, the citations and Mendeley readership distributions exhibit a strikingly similar degree of skewness in all fields. Second, the results on "exchange rates (ERs)" for Mendeley readership empirically supports the possibility of comparing readership counts across fields, as well as the field normalization of readership distributions using ERs as normalization factors. Third, field normalization using field mean readerships as normalization factors leads to comparably good results. Originality/value These findings open up challenging new questions, particularly regarding the possibility of obtaining conflicting results from field normalized citation and Mendeley readership indicators; this suggests the need for better determining the role of the two metrics in capturing scientific recognition.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994)
0.05
0.05246481 = sum of:
0.024065398 = product of:
0.09626159 = sum of:
0.09626159 = weight(_text_:authors in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09626159 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.028399412 = product of:
0.056798823 = sum of:
0.056798823 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056798823 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The nature and implications of electrocopying are summarised. After a brief review of the principles of copyright, the issue of whether electrocopying infringes copyright is debated. Publishers are aware of the threat that electrocopying poses to their business. The various options available to publishers for responding to electrocopying are summarised. Patterns of scholarly communications and the relationships between authors, publishers and libraries are being challenged. Constructive dialogue is necessary if the issues are to be resolved
- Source
- Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
-
Brusilovsky, P.; Eklund, J.; Schwarz, E.: Web-based education for all : a tool for development adaptive courseware (1998)
0.05
0.051781833 = product of:
0.10356367 = sum of:
0.10356367 = sum of:
0.04676484 = weight(_text_:j in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04676484 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
0.056798823 = weight(_text_:22 in 3620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056798823 = score(doc=3620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3620)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Speier, C.; Palmer, J.; Wren, D.; Hahn, S.: Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication : a question of prestige and legitimacy (1999)
0.05
0.051781833 = product of:
0.10356367 = sum of:
0.10356367 = sum of:
0.04676484 = weight(_text_:j in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04676484 = score(doc=3674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
0.056798823 = weight(_text_:22 in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056798823 = score(doc=3674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 14:43:47
-
Wakeling, S.; Creaser, C.; Pinfield, S.; Fry, J.; Spezi, V.; Willett, P.; Paramita, M.: Motivations, understandings, and experiences of open-access mega-journal authors : results of a large-scale survey (2019)
0.05
0.051456477 = sum of:
0.036842465 = product of:
0.14736986 = sum of:
0.14736986 = weight(_text_:authors in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14736986 = score(doc=5317,freq=12.0), product of:
0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.61688256 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014614012 = product of:
0.029228024 = sum of:
0.029228024 = weight(_text_:j in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029228024 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Open-access mega-journals (OAMJs) are characterized by their large scale, wide scope, open-access (OA) business model, and "soundness-only" peer review. The last of these controversially discounts the novelty, significance, and relevance of submitted articles and assesses only their "soundness." This article reports the results of an international survey of authors (n = 11,883), comparing the responses of OAMJ authors with those of other OA and subscription journals, and drawing comparisons between different OAMJs. Strikingly, OAMJ authors showed a low understanding of soundness-only peer review: two-thirds believed OAMJs took into account novelty, significance, and relevance, although there were marked geographical variations. Author satisfaction with OAMJs, however, was high, with more than 80% of OAMJ authors saying they would publish again in the same journal, although there were variations by title, and levels were slightly lower than subscription journals (over 90%). Their reasons for choosing to publish in OAMJs included a wide variety of factors, not significantly different from reasons given by authors of other journals, with the most important including the quality of the journal and quality of peer review. About half of OAMJ articles had been submitted elsewhere before submission to the OAMJ with some evidence of a "cascade" of articles between journals from the same publisher.
-
Schwartz, E.: Like a book on a wire (1993)
0.05
0.045906708 = sum of:
0.021057224 = product of:
0.084228896 = sum of:
0.084228896 = weight(_text_:authors in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084228896 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.024849484 = product of:
0.049698967 = sum of:
0.049698967 = weight(_text_:22 in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049698967 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses the publishing of books online on the Internet, in the USA. The issues is treated mainly in relation to trade publishers. Outlines various ways in which such publishers have so far used the Internet, for example in the publishing of the full text of works of fiction, for publishing catalogues, and for presenting authors to the public via bulletin boards or electronic conferences. Notes a number or problems which arise: copyright, payment for accessing items, advertising restrictions, and the ease with which the published unit can be tampered with when available on the Internet. Also discusses collaboration and conflicts between publishers and the technology industry
- Source
- Publishers weekly. 240(1993) no.47, 22 Nov., S.33-35,38
-
Peek, R.; Pomerantz, J.; Paling, S.: ¬The traditional scholarly journal publishers legitimize the Web (1998)
0.04
0.04151684 = sum of:
0.021057224 = product of:
0.084228896 = sum of:
0.084228896 = weight(_text_:authors in 2019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084228896 = score(doc=2019,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2019, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2019)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020459617 = product of:
0.040919233 = sum of:
0.040919233 = weight(_text_:j in 2019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040919233 = score(doc=2019,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2019, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2019)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article examines the entry of the major academic publishing houses into the WWW publishing. The study identified that during 1997, traditional academic publishers made significant commitments to putting tables of content, abstracts, and the full-text of their print journals on the Web. At the same time, new services and organizations emerged that could ultimately compete with, or eliminate, the need for certain segments of the industry. The authors suggest that these early experiments in Web publishing began unevenly with areas that needed improvement. The article concludes with a discussion about the implications of the traditional academic publisher's presence on the Web
-
Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009)
0.04
0.039348606 = sum of:
0.018049048 = product of:
0.07219619 = sum of:
0.07219619 = weight(_text_:authors in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07219619 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021299558 = product of:
0.042599116 = sum of:
0.042599116 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042599116 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A review of recent developments in electronic publishing, with a focus on Open Access (OA) is provided. It describes the two main types of OA, i.e. the `gold' OA journal route and the 'green' repository route, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of the two, and the reactions of the publishing industry to these developments. Quality, cost and copyright issues are explored, as well as some of the business models of OA. It is noted that whilst so far there is no evidence that a shift to OA will lead to libraries cancelling subscriptions to toll-access journals, this may happen in the future, and that despite the apparently compelling reasons for authors to move to OA, so far few have shown themselves willing to do so. Conclusions about the future of scholarly publications are drawn.
- Date
- 8. 7.2010 19:22:45
-
Susol, J.: Access to information in electronic age : situation in Slovakia (2000)
0.04
0.035585865 = sum of:
0.018049048 = product of:
0.07219619 = sum of:
0.07219619 = weight(_text_:authors in 5495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07219619 = score(doc=5495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5495)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.017536815 = product of:
0.03507363 = sum of:
0.03507363 = weight(_text_:j in 5495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03507363 = score(doc=5495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 5495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5495)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Electronic publishing brings about some substantial shifts in technological as well as socio-political patterns that were in place during the era of paper publications. The tension between producer and consumer side of the information cycle is the most significant feature of this change. Authors and publishers try to maximise their revenues from the marketing of information and backed by the possibilities of technology they force major changes in legislation governing the area of (public) information access. In this environment, the society's interest in a wide-spread accessibility of electronic data must be balanced by substantial financial investments - a solution that only the rich economies of the world can feel comfortable with
-
Veittes, M.: Electronic Book (1995)
0.04
0.035499264 = product of:
0.07099853 = sum of:
0.07099853 = product of:
0.14199705 = sum of:
0.14199705 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14199705 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22
-
Bleuel, J.: Online Publizieren im Internet : elektronische Zeitschriften und Bücher (1995)
0.03
0.032363646 = product of:
0.06472729 = sum of:
0.06472729 = sum of:
0.029228024 = weight(_text_:j in 1708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029228024 = score(doc=1708,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1708, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1708)
0.035499264 = weight(_text_:22 in 1708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035499264 = score(doc=1708,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1708, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1708)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 16:15:37
-
Zschunke, P.; Svensson, P.: Bücherbrett für alle Fälle : Geräte-Speicher fassen Tausende von Seiten (2000)
0.03
0.030122126 = product of:
0.06024425 = sum of:
0.06024425 = product of:
0.1204885 = sum of:
0.1204885 = weight(_text_:22 in 4823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1204885 = score(doc=4823,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4823, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
18. 6.2000 9:11:22
-
Fry, J.; Spezi, V.; Probets, S.; Creaser, C.: Towards an understanding of the relationship between disciplinary research cultures and open access repository behaviors (2016)
0.03
0.029654887 = sum of:
0.0150408745 = product of:
0.060163498 = sum of:
0.060163498 = weight(_text_:authors in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060163498 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2388945 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014614012 = product of:
0.029228024 = sum of:
0.029228024 = weight(_text_:j in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029228024 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article explores the cultural characteristics of three open access (OA)-friendly disciplines (physics, economics, and clinical medicine) and the ways in which those characteristics influence perceptions, motivations, and behaviors toward green OA. The empirical data are taken from two online surveys of European authors. Taking a domain analytic approach, the analysis draws on Becher and Trowler's (2001) and Whitley's (2000) theories to gain a deeper understanding of why OA repositories (OAR) play a particularly important role in the chosen disciplines. The surveys provided a unique opportunity to compare perceptions, motivations, and behaviors of researchers at the discipline level with the parent metadiscipline. It should be noted that participants were not drawn from a stratified sample of all the different subdisciplines that constitute each discipline, and therefore the generalizability of the findings to the discipline may be limited. The differential role of informal and formal communication in each of the three disciplines has shaped green OA practices. For physicists and economists, preprints are an essential feature of their respective OAR landscapes, whereas for clinical medics final published articles have a central role. In comparing the disciplines with their parent metadisciplines there were some notable similarities/differences, which have methodological implications for studying research cultures.
-
Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993)
0.03
0.028399412 = product of:
0.056798823 = sum of:
0.056798823 = product of:
0.11359765 = sum of:
0.11359765 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11359765 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
-
Polatscheck, K.: Elektronische Versuchung : Test des Sony Data Discman: eine digitale Konkurrenz für Taschenbücher? (1992)
0.03
0.028399412 = product of:
0.056798823 = sum of:
0.056798823 = product of:
0.11359765 = sum of:
0.11359765 = weight(_text_:22 in 6381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11359765 = score(doc=6381,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6381, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6381)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Zeit. Nr.xx vom ???, S.22
-
Desmarais, N.: Data preparation for electronic publications (1998)
0.03
0.028399412 = product of:
0.056798823 = sum of:
0.056798823 = product of:
0.11359765 = sum of:
0.11359765 = weight(_text_:22 in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11359765 = score(doc=4702,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.59-75
-
Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017)
0.03
0.025890917 = product of:
0.051781833 = sum of:
0.051781833 = sum of:
0.02338242 = weight(_text_:j in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02338242 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16650963 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.14042683 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
0.028399412 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028399412 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
-
Wolchover, N.: Wie ein Aufsehen erregender Beweis kaum Beachtung fand (2017)
0.03
0.02510177 = product of:
0.05020354 = sum of:
0.05020354 = product of:
0.10040708 = sum of:
0.10040708 = weight(_text_:22 in 3582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10040708 = score(doc=3582,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3582, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3582)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.2017 10:42:05
22. 4.2017 10:48:38
-
Dechsling, R.: Softwaretypen : Datenbank, Hypertext oder linearer Text? (1994)
0.02
0.024849484 = product of:
0.049698967 = sum of:
0.049698967 = product of:
0.099397935 = sum of:
0.099397935 = weight(_text_:22 in 8074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099397935 = score(doc=8074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1835056 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052402776 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8074)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Börsenblatt. Nr.50 vom 24.6.1994, S.19-22
