-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.01
0.0064596576 = product of:
0.029068459 = sum of:
0.014982964 = product of:
0.029965928 = sum of:
0.029965928 = weight(_text_:web in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029965928 = score(doc=2652,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014085495 = product of:
0.02817099 = sum of:
0.02817099 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02817099 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Folksonomy is the result of describing Web resources with tags created by Web users. Although it has become a popular application for the description of resources, in general terms Folksonomies are not being conveniently integrated in metadata. However, if the appropriate metadata elements are identified, then further work may be conducted to automatically assign tags to these elements (RDF properties) and use them in Semantic Web applications. This article presents research carried out to continue the project Kinds of Tags, which intends to identify elements required for metadata originating from folksonomies and to propose an application profile for DC Social Tagging. The work provides information that may be used by software applications to assign tags to metadata elements and, therefore, means for tags to be conveniently gathered by metadata interoperability tools. Despite the unquestionably high value of DC and the significance of the already existing properties in DC Terms, the pilot study show revealed a significant number of tags for which no corresponding properties yet existed. A need for new properties, such as Action, Depth, Rate, and Utility was determined. Those potential new properties will have to be validated in a later stage by the DC Social Tagging Community.
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Watters, C.; Nizam, N.: Knowledge organization on the Web : the emergent role of social classification (2012)
0.00
0.0023306834 = product of:
0.02097615 = sum of:
0.02097615 = product of:
0.0419523 = sum of:
0.0419523 = weight(_text_:web in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0419523 = score(doc=828,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- There are close to a billion websites on the Internet with approximately 400 million users worldwide [www.internetworldstats.com]. People go to websites for a wide variety of different information tasks, from finding a restaurant to serious research. Many of the difficulties with searching the Web, as it is structured currently, can be attributed to increases to scale. The content of the Web is now so large that we only have a rough estimate of the number of sites and the range of information is extremely diverse, from blogs and photos to research articles and news videos.
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies & Social Tagging (2023)
0.00
0.0023306834 = product of:
0.02097615 = sum of:
0.02097615 = product of:
0.0419523 = sum of:
0.0419523 = weight(_text_:web in 796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0419523 = score(doc=796,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 796, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=796)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Die Erforschung und der Einsatz von Folksonomies und Social Tagging als nutzerzentrierte Formen der Inhaltserschließung und Wissensrepräsentation haben in den 10 Jahren ab ca. 2005 ihren Höhenpunkt erfahren. Motiviert wurde dies durch die Entwicklung und Verbreitung des Social Web und der wachsenden Nutzung von Social-Media-Plattformen (s. Kapitel E 8 Social Media und Social Web). Beides führte zu einem rasanten Anstieg der im oder über das World Wide Web auffindbaren Menge an potenzieller Information und generierte eine große Nachfrage nach skalierbaren Methoden der Inhaltserschließung.
-
Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011)
0.00
0.0021748515 = product of:
0.019573662 = sum of:
0.019573662 = product of:
0.039147325 = sum of:
0.039147325 = weight(_text_:web in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039147325 = score(doc=343,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Folksonomies ermöglichen den Nutzern in Kollaborativen Informationsdiensten den Zugang zu verschiedenartigen Informationsressourcen. In welchen Fällen beide Bestandteile des Web 2.0 am besten für das Information Retrieval geeignet sind und wo sie die Websuche ggf. ersetzen können, wird in diesem Beitrag diskutiert. Dazu erfolgt eine detaillierte Betrachtung der Reichweite von Social-Bookmarking-Systemen und Sharing-Systemen sowie der Retrievaleffektivität von Folksonomies innerhalb von Kollaborativen Informationsdiensten.
- Source
- Handbuch Internet-Suchmaschinen, 2: Neue Entwicklungen in der Web-Suche. Hrsg.: D. Lewandowski
-
Lee, Y.Y.; Yang, S.Q.: Folksonomies as subject access : a survey of tagging in library online catalogs and discovery layers (2012)
0.00
0.001153389 = product of:
0.010380501 = sum of:
0.010380501 = product of:
0.020761002 = sum of:
0.020761002 = weight(_text_:web in 309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020761002 = score(doc=309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Beyond libraries - subject metadata in the digital environment and semantic web. IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn
-
Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008)
0.00
0.001106661 = product of:
0.009959949 = sum of:
0.009959949 = product of:
0.019919898 = sum of:
0.019919898 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019919898 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Chopin, K.: Finding communities : alternative viewpoints through weblogs and tagging (2008)
0.00
9.611576E-4 = product of:
0.008650418 = sum of:
0.008650418 = product of:
0.017300837 = sum of:
0.017300837 = weight(_text_:web in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017300837 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper aims to discuss and test the claim that user-based tagging allows for access to a wider variety of viewpoints than is found using other forms of online searching. Design/methodology/approach - A general overview of the nature of weblogs and user-based tagging is given, along with other relevant concepts. A case is then analyzed where viewpoints towards a specific issue are searched for using both tag searching (Technorati) and general search engine searching (Google and Google Blog Search). Findings - The claim to greater accessibility through user-based tagging is not overtly supported with these experiments. Further results for both general and tag-specific searching goes against some common assumptions about the types of content found on weblogs as opposed to more general web sites. Research limitations/implications - User-based tagging is still not widespread enough to give conclusive data for analysis. As this changes, further research in this area, using a variety of search subjects, is warranted. Originality/value - Although proponents of user-based tagging attribute many qualities to the practice, these qualities have not been properly documented or demonstrated. This paper partially rectifies this gap by testing one of the claims made, that of accessibility to alternate views, thus adding to the discussion on tagging for both researchers and other interested parties.
