Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Folksonomies"
  1. Rafferty, P.: Tagging (2018) 0.06
    0.060366962 = product of:
      0.120733924 = sum of:
        0.120733924 = product of:
          0.24146785 = sum of:
            0.24146785 = weight(_text_:500 in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24146785 = score(doc=4647,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059071355 = queryNorm
                0.6686521 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2018-6-500.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.6, S.500-516
  2. Munk, T.B.; Moerk, K.: Folksonomies, tagging communities, and tagging strategies : an empirical study (2007) 0.03
    0.030489922 = product of:
      0.060979843 = sum of:
        0.060979843 = product of:
          0.12195969 = sum of:
            0.12195969 = weight(_text_:500 in 1091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12195969 = score(doc=1091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36112627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059071355 = queryNorm
                0.33772033 = fieldWeight in 1091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.113391 = idf(docFreq=265, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The subject of this article is folksonomies on the Internet. One of the largest folksonomies on the Internet in terms of number of users and tagged websites is the computer program del.icio.us, where more than 100,000 people have tagged the websites that they and others find using their own keywords. How this is done in practice and the patterns to be found are the focus of this article. The empirical basis is the collection of 76,601 different keywords with a total frequency of 178,215 from 500 randomly chosen taggers on del.icio.us at the end of 2005. The keywords collected were then analyzed quantitatively statistically by uncovering their frequency and percentage distribution and through a statistical correspondence analysis in order to uncover possible patterns in the users' tags. Subsequently, a qualitative textual analysis of the tags was made in order to find out by analysis which tagging strategies are represented in the data material. This led to four conclusions. 1) the distribution of keywords follows classic power law; 2) distinct tagging communities are identifiable; 3) the most frequently used tags are situated on a general-specific axis; and 4) nine distinct tagging strategies are observed. These four conclusions are put into perspective collectively in respect of a number of more general and theoretical considerations concerning folksonomies and the classification systems of the future.
  3. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02
    0.024010058 = product of:
      0.048020117 = sum of:
        0.048020117 = product of:
          0.096040234 = sum of:
            0.096040234 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.096040234 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059071355 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  4. Sauperl, A.: UDC and Folksonomies (2010) 0.02
    0.015364516 = product of:
      0.030729031 = sum of:
        0.030729031 = product of:
          0.09218709 = sum of:
            0.09218709 = weight(_text_:objects in 4069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09218709 = score(doc=4069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31396845 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059071355 = queryNorm
                0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 4069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4069)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Social tagging systems, known as "folksonomies," represent an important part of web resource discovery as they enable free and unrestricted browsing through information space. Folksonomies consisting of subject designators (tags) assigned by users, however, have one important drawback: they do not express semantic relationships, either hierarchical or associative, between tags. As a consequence, the use of tags to browse information resources requires moving from one resource to another, based on coincidence and not on the pre-established meaningful or logical connections that may exist between related resources. We suggest that the semantic structure of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) may be used in complementing and supporting tag-based browsing. In this work, two specific questions were investigated: 1) Are terms used as tags in folksonomies included in the UDC?; and, 2) Which facets of UDC match the characteristics of documents or information objects that are tagged in folksonomies? A collection of the most popular tags from Amazon, LibraryThing, Delicious, and 43Things was investigated. The universal nature of UDC was examined through the universality of topics and facets covering diverse human interests which are at the same time interconnected and form a rich and intricate semantic structure. The results suggest that UDC-supported folksonomies could be implemented in resource discovery, in particular in library portals and catalogues.
  5. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.01
    0.014148063 = product of:
      0.028296126 = sum of:
        0.028296126 = product of:
          0.056592252 = sum of:
            0.056592252 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056592252 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059071355 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  6. Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006) 0.01
    0.014005868 = product of:
      0.028011736 = sum of:
        0.028011736 = product of:
          0.05602347 = sum of:
            0.05602347 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05602347 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059071355 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  7. Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008) 0.01
    0.012005029 = product of:
      0.024010058 = sum of:
        0.024010058 = product of:
          0.048020117 = sum of:
            0.048020117 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048020117 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059071355 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2008 12:39:22
  8. Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008) 0.01
    0.010004192 = product of:
      0.020008383 = sum of:
        0.020008383 = product of:
          0.040016767 = sum of:
            0.040016767 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040016767 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059071355 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  9. Braun, M.: Lesezeichen zum Stöbern : "Social bookmark"-Seiten setzen auf die Empfehlungen ihrer Nutzer (2007) 0.01
    0.008003353 = product of:
      0.016006706 = sum of:
        0.016006706 = product of:
          0.032013413 = sum of:
            0.032013413 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032013413 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20685782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.059071355 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22