Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Formale Begriffsanalyse"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Data analysis based on a conceptual file (1991) 0.05
    0.046822604 = product of:
      0.10925274 = sum of:
        0.037039317 = product of:
          0.074078634 = sum of:
            0.074078634 = weight(_text_:p in 3140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074078634 = score(doc=3140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 3140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3140)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.061439343 = weight(_text_:u in 3140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061439343 = score(doc=3140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 3140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3140)
        0.010774084 = weight(_text_:a in 3140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010774084 = score(doc=3140,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3140, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3140)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Source
    Classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization. Ed.: H.H. Bock u. P. Ihm
    Type
    a
  2. Luksch, P.; Wille, R.: ¬A mathematical model for conceptual knowledge systems (1991) 0.03
    0.028709427 = product of:
      0.06698866 = sum of:
        0.026190752 = product of:
          0.052381504 = sum of:
            0.052381504 = weight(_text_:p in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052381504 = score(doc=3033,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.3932592 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.030719671 = weight(_text_:u in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030719671 = score(doc=3033,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
        0.010078233 = weight(_text_:a in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010078233 = score(doc=3033,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Objects, attributes, and concepts are basic notations of conceptual knowledge; they are linked by the following four basic relations: an object has an attribute, an object belongs to a concept, an attribute abstracts from a concept, and a concept is a subconcept of another concept. These structural elements are well mathematized in formal concept analysis. Therefore, conceptual knowledge systems can be mathematically modelled in the frame of formal concept analysis. How such modelling may be performed is indicated by an example of a conceptual knowledge system. The formal definition of the model finally clarifies in which ways representation, inference, acquisition, and communication of conceptual knowledge can be mathematically treated
    Source
    Classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization: models and methods with applications. Proc. of the 14th annual conf. of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Univ. of Marburg, 12.-14.3.1990. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. P. Ihm
    Type
    a
  3. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.02
    0.023959395 = product of:
      0.055905253 = sum of:
        0.030719671 = weight(_text_:u in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030719671 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
        0.0076184273 = weight(_text_:a in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076184273 = score(doc=2654,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
        0.017567152 = product of:
          0.035134304 = sum of:
            0.035134304 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035134304 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
    Type
    a
  4. Zickwolff, M.: Zur Rolle der Formalen Begriffsanalyse in der Wissensakquisition (1994) 0.02
    0.019730791 = product of:
      0.06905777 = sum of:
        0.061439343 = weight(_text_:u in 8938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061439343 = score(doc=8938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.50648975 = fieldWeight in 8938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8938)
        0.0076184273 = weight(_text_:a in 8938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0076184273 = score(doc=8938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 8938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8938)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Grundfragen und Aufgaben. Hrsg.: R. Wille u. M. Zickwolff
    Type
    a
  5. Wille, R.: Begriffliche Datensysteme als Werkzeuge der Wissenskommunikation (1992) 0.02
    0.01768492 = product of:
      0.06189722 = sum of:
        0.05266229 = weight(_text_:u in 8826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05266229 = score(doc=8826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 8826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8826)
        0.0092349285 = weight(_text_:a in 8826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0092349285 = score(doc=8826,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 8826, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8826)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Mensch und Maschine: Informationelle Schnittstellen der Kommunikation. Proc. des 3. Int. Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'92), 5.-7.11.1992 in Saarbrücken. Hrsg.: H.H. Zimmermann, H.-D. Luckhardt u. A. Schulz
    Type
    a
  6. Rusch, A.; Wille, R.: Knowledge spaces and formal concept analysis (1996) 0.02
    0.01768492 = product of:
      0.06189722 = sum of:
        0.05266229 = weight(_text_:u in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05266229 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.0092349285 = weight(_text_:a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0092349285 = score(doc=5895,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Data analysis and information systems, statistical and conceptual approaches: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., University of Basel, March 8-10, 1995. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. W. Polasek
    Type
    a
  7. Kollewe, W.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - ein Werkzeug zur begrifflichen Analyse und Erkundung von Daten (1994) 0.02
    0.016912106 = product of:
      0.05919237 = sum of:
        0.05266229 = weight(_text_:u in 8942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05266229 = score(doc=8942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 8942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8942)
        0.006530081 = weight(_text_:a in 8942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006530081 = score(doc=8942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 8942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8942)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Grundfragen und Aufgaben. Hrsg.: R. Wille u. M. Zickwolff
    Type
    a
  8. Wille, R.; Wachter, C.: Begriffsanalyse von Dokumenten (1992) 0.02
    0.016912106 = product of:
      0.05919237 = sum of:
        0.05266229 = weight(_text_:u in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05266229 = score(doc=341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
        0.006530081 = weight(_text_:a in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006530081 = score(doc=341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Information und Dokumentation in den 90er Jahren: neue Herausforderung, neue Technologien. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1991, Universität Ulm, 30.9.-2.10.1991. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
    Type
    a
  9. Skorsky, M.: Graphische Darstellung eines Thesaurus (1997) 0.02
    0.016912106 = product of:
      0.05919237 = sum of:
        0.05266229 = weight(_text_:u in 1051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05266229 = score(doc=1051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 1051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1051)
        0.006530081 = weight(_text_:a in 1051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006530081 = score(doc=1051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1051)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Information und Dokumentation: Qualität und Qualifikation. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1997, Universität Regensburg, 24.-26.9.1997. Hrsg.: M. Ockenfeld u. G.J. Mantwill
    Type
    a
  10. Reinartz, T.P.; Zickwolff, M.: ¬Two conceptual approaches to acquire human expert knowledge in a complex real world domain (1996) 0.01
    0.014737436 = product of:
      0.05158102 = sum of:
        0.043885246 = weight(_text_:u in 5908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043885246 = score(doc=5908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 5908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5908)
        0.007695774 = weight(_text_:a in 5908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007695774 = score(doc=5908,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 5908, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5908)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Data analysis and information systems, statistical and conceptual approaches: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V., University of Basel, March 8-10, 1995. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. W. Polasek
    Type
    a
  11. Kollewe, W.; Sander, C.; Schmiede, R.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA als Instrument der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung (1995) 0.01
    0.014093423 = product of:
      0.04932698 = sum of:
        0.043885246 = weight(_text_:u in 927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043885246 = score(doc=927,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 927, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=927)
        0.0054417336 = weight(_text_:a in 927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054417336 = score(doc=927,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 927, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=927)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Aufbau und Erschließung begrifflicher Datenbanken: Beiträge zur bibliothekarischen Klassifikation. Eine Auswahl von Vorträgen der Jahrestagungen 1993 (Kaiserslautern) und 1994 (Oldenburg) der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation. Hrsg.: H. Havekost u. H.-J. Wätjen
    Type
    a
  12. Groh, B.; Strahringer, S.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA-systems based on thesauri (1998) 0.01
    0.014093423 = product of:
      0.04932698 = sum of:
        0.043885246 = weight(_text_:u in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043885246 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
        0.0054417336 = weight(_text_:a in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054417336 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Conceptual structures: theory, tools and applications. 6th International Conference on conceptual Structures, ICCS'98, Montpellier, France, August, 10-12, 1998, Proceedings. Ed.: M.L. Mugnier u. M. Chein
    Type
    a
  13. Priss, U.: ¬A graphical interface for conceptually navigating faceted thesauri (1998) 0.01
    0.0114429435 = product of:
      0.0400503 = sum of:
        0.030719671 = weight(_text_:u in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030719671 = score(doc=6658,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
        0.009330629 = weight(_text_:a in 6658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009330629 = score(doc=6658,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 6658, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6658)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a graphical interface for the navigation and construction of faceted thesauri that is based on formal concept analysis. Each facet of a thesaurus is represented as a mathematical lattice that is further subdivided into components. Users can graphically navigate through the Java implementation of the interface by clicking on terms that connect facets and components. Since there are many applications for thesauri in the knowledge representation field, such a graphical interface has the potential of being very useful
    Type
    a
  14. Scheich, P.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Conceptual data systems (1993) 0.01
    0.010936591 = product of:
      0.038278066 = sum of:
        0.031747986 = product of:
          0.06349597 = sum of:
            0.06349597 = weight(_text_:p in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06349597 = score(doc=5262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13319843 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.006530081 = weight(_text_:a in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006530081 = score(doc=5262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Type
    a
  15. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.01
    0.008517491 = product of:
      0.029811215 = sum of:
        0.0097344695 = weight(_text_:a in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0097344695 = score(doc=1901,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
        0.020076746 = product of:
          0.040153492 = sum of:
            0.040153492 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040153492 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12972787 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03704574 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    TOSCANA is a computer program which allows an online interaction with larger data bases to analyse and explore data conceptually. It uses labelled line diagrams of concept lattices to communicate knowledge coded in given data. The basic problem to create online presentations of concept lattices is solved by composing prepared diagrams to nested line diagrams. A larger number of applications in different areas have already shown that TOSCANA is a useful tool for many purposes
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81
    Type
    a
  16. Priss, U.; Jacob, E.: Utilizing faceted structures for information systems design (1999) 0.01
    0.0068811947 = product of:
      0.02408418 = sum of:
        0.017554099 = weight(_text_:u in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017554099 = score(doc=2470,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.121304214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
        0.006530081 = weight(_text_:a in 2470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006530081 = score(doc=2470,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2470, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2470)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Even for the experienced information professional, designing an efficient multi-purpose information access structure can be a very difficult task. This paper argues for the use of a faceted thesaurus as the basis for organizing a small-scale institutional website. We contend that a faceted approach to knowledge organization can make the process of organization less random and more manageable. We begin by reporting on an informal survey of three institutional websites. This study underscores the problems of organization that can impact access to information. We then formalize the terminology of faceted thesauri and demonstrate its application with several examples.
    The writers show that a faceted navigation structure makes web sites easier to use. They begin by analyzing the web sites of three library and information science faculties, and seeing if the sites easily provide the answers to five specific questions, e.g., how the school ranks in national evaluations. (It is worth noting that the web site of the Faculty of Information Studies and the University of Toronto, where this bibliography is being written, would fail on four of the five questions.) Using examples from LIS web site content, they show how facets can be related and constructed, and use concept diagrams for illustration. They briefly discuss constraints necessary when joining facets: for example, enrolled students can be full- or part-time, but prospective and alumni students cannot. It should not be possible to construct terms such as "part-time alumni" (see Yannis Tzitzikas et al, below in Background). They conclude that a faceted approach is best for web site navigation, because it can clearly show where the user is in the site, what the related pages are, and how to get to them. There is a short discussion of user interfaces, and the diagrams in the paper will be of interest to anyone making a facet-based web site. This paper is clearly written, informative, and thought-provoking. Uta Priss's web site lists her other publications, many of which are related and some of which are online: http://www.upriss.org.uk/top/research.html.
    Type
    a
  17. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.00
    0.001539155 = product of:
      0.010774084 = sum of:
        0.010774084 = weight(_text_:a in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010774084 = score(doc=595,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Type
    a
  18. Ganter, B.: Algorithmen zur formalen Begriffsanalyse (1991) 0.00
    0.0012438248 = product of:
      0.008706774 = sum of:
        0.008706774 = weight(_text_:a in 3038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008706774 = score(doc=3038,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3038, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3038)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Type
    a
  19. Wille, R.: Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems (1992) 0.00
    0.0012438248 = product of:
      0.008706774 = sum of:
        0.008706774 = weight(_text_:a in 3142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008706774 = score(doc=3142,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3142, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3142)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Type
    a
  20. Sedelow, W.A.: ¬The formal analysis of concepts (1993) 0.00
    0.0012438248 = product of:
      0.008706774 = sum of:
        0.008706774 = weight(_text_:a in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008706774 = score(doc=620,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.04271548 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03704574 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The present paper focuses on the extraction, by means of a formal logical/mathematical methodology (i.e. automatically, exclusively by rule), of concept content, as in, for example, continuous discourse. The approach to a fully formal defintion of concept content ultimately is owing to a German government initiative to establish 'standards' regarding concepts, in conjunction with efforts to stipulate precisely (and then, derivatively, through computer prgrams) data and information needs according to work role in certain government offices
    Type
    a