-
Younger, J.A.: Resources description in the digital age (1997)
0.06
0.060990475 = product of:
0.12198095 = sum of:
0.068930924 = weight(_text_:digital in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068930924 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.05305003 = weight(_text_:library in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05305003 = score(doc=7684,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.40253976 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Describes the evolving ways of making documents and document like objects bibliographically accessible by the library cataloguing community and reports initiatives. Includes: definition of a basic set of data elements known as the Dublin Core; examination of library cataloguing objectives and record structures; proposals for persistent addresses for resources; and support for the idea of data registry to facilitate interoperability among metadata schemes
- Source
- Library trends. 45(1997) no.3, S.462-487
-
Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997)
0.05
0.049107663 = product of:
0.09821533 = sum of:
0.060314562 = weight(_text_:digital in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060314562 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19770671 = queryWeight, product of:
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.03790077 = weight(_text_:library in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03790077 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Comments on the value of abstracts or summary notes to information available online via the Internet and WWW and concludes that automated abstracting techniques would be highly useful if routinely applied to cataloguing or metadata for Internet documents and documents in other databases. Information seekers need external summary information to assess content and value of retrieved documents. Examines traditional models for writers, in library audiovisual cataloguing, periodical databases and archival work, along with innovative new model databases featuring robust cataloguing summaries. Notes recent developments in automated techniques, computational research, and machine summarization of digital images. Recommendations are made for future designers of cataloguing and metadata standards
-
Maguire, C.: Metadata in Australia (1997)
0.04
0.03621646 = product of:
0.07243292 = sum of:
0.03790077 = weight(_text_:library in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03790077 = score(doc=2578,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
0.034532152 = product of:
0.069064304 = sum of:
0.069064304 = weight(_text_:project in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069064304 = score(doc=2578,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- A 1 day seminar was held in Aug 1997, in Synney, Australia, sponsored by the Information science Section of the australia Library and Information Association, on metadata. It focused on building a conceptual framework for metadata. The National Library is developing PANDORA (Preserving and Accessing Networked documentary Resources of Australia) an electronic archive designed to provide long term access to significant Australian online publications. An architecture for access to government information has been developed. The Distributed System Technology Centre's Resource Discivery Project Unit has developed an information presentation tool called HyperIndex and a meta-data searcher called HotOIL
-
Banerjee, K.: Describing electronic documents in the online catalog : current issues (1997)
0.03
0.03104268 = product of:
0.06208536 = sum of:
0.032486375 = weight(_text_:library in 1439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032486375 = score(doc=1439,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.24650425 = fieldWeight in 1439, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1439)
0.029598987 = product of:
0.059197973 = sum of:
0.059197973 = weight(_text_:project in 1439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059197973 = score(doc=1439,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.27981415 = fieldWeight in 1439, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1439)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The relationship between library catalogues and electronic resources differs from that between catalogues and physical materials, particularly with regard to cataloguing rules, which were originally designed to help users of card catalogues to find physical works on library shelves. However, these rules apply awkwardly to electronic resources because functionally different electronic works raise special cataloguinf issues. Discusses the problems of describing remote electronic resources in online catalogues with particular reference to the InterCat project: a nationwide experiment to create a database of Internet resources in MARC format, containing description, location and access information (including PURLs = Persitent URLs)). Concludes that descriptive information helps the user identify the works needed, but that it is practical to provide only minimal desriptive information for remote electronic resources in the catalogue record. To a limited extent, the access lost from reduced description can be replaced with new cataloguing techniques designed to stabilize the catalogue record
-
Dublin Core and Web metadata standards converge in Helsinki (1997)
0.03
0.030666022 = product of:
0.061332043 = sum of:
0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 1767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026799891 = score(doc=1767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 1767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1767)
0.034532152 = product of:
0.069064304 = sum of:
0.069064304 = weight(_text_:project in 1767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069064304 = score(doc=1767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 1767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- A 5th metadata workshop was held in Helsinki in Oct 1997, cosponsored by the National Library of Finland and OCLC, and 75 experts continued work begun in 1995 to try and reach consensus on conventions for describing resources on the Internet. Representatives of the W3C Metadata Project presented the 1st draft of a new specification for extended Web metadata: the Resource Description Framework (RDF), and demonstrated how this meets the infrastructure and encoding arrangements identified at the series of international Dublin Core workshops. W3C is an industry consortium run jointly by institutions in the USA, France and Japan, and currently has 210 members
-
Schaefer, M.T.: Demystifying metadata : initiatives for web document description (1998)
0.03
0.030666022 = product of:
0.061332043 = sum of:
0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026799891 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.034532152 = product of:
0.069064304 = sum of:
0.069064304 = weight(_text_:project in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069064304 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Examines international efforts to promote metadata as a common, interactive resource description tool for the Internet. These efforts centre on the Dublin Core Element Set, but include qualifiers such as those promoted by the Canberra Qualifiers. The LoC Network Development and MARC Standards Office maintains the Dublin Core / MARC / GILS (Government Information Location Standards) crosswalk which maps the common and correlative elements of each system. Describes current international initiatives and issues. Describes the Nordic metadata project which is aiming to create the basic elements of a metadata production and utilization system based on the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set. Describes the WWW consortium efforts in this area
- Source
- Information retrieval and library automation. 33(1998) no.11, S.1-5
-
Hakala, J.: Internet metadata and library cataloguing (1999)
0.01
0.013399946 = product of:
0.053599782 = sum of:
0.053599782 = weight(_text_:library in 4565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053599782 = score(doc=4565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 4565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4565)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Velluci, S.L.: Options for organizing electronic resources : the coexistence of metadata (1997)
0.01
0.013399946 = product of:
0.053599782 = sum of:
0.053599782 = weight(_text_:library in 6863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053599782 = score(doc=6863,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.40671125 = fieldWeight in 6863, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6863)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- At present cataloguing of Internet resources are on 2 levels. At level 1, the description of resources is contained in local library catalogues, along with bibliographic surrogates for all other materials that the library access, based on AACR2/MARC systems. At level 2, Internet resources are organized independently of any library agency. These include separate catalogues of selected resources, subject browsing lists and robot-generated search tools, and focus exclusively on Internet resources. A 3rd level needs to be developed - a metacatalogue - whereby a user can identify specific library catalogues to include in a search query of other Internet databases
-
Lam, V.-T.: Cataloging Internet resources : Why, what, how (2000)
0.01
0.011604695 = product of:
0.04641878 = sum of:
0.04641878 = weight(_text_:library in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04641878 = score(doc=967,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.3522223 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Internet resources have brought great excitement but also grave concerns to the library world, especially to the cataloging community. In spite of the various problematic aspects presented by Internet resources (poorly organized, lack of stability, variable quality), catalogers have decided that they are worth cataloging, in particular those meeting library selection criteria. This paper tries to trace the decade-long history of the library comrnunity's efforts in providing an effective way to catalog Internet resources. Basically, its olbjective is to answer the following questions: Why catalog? What to catalog? and, How to catalog. Some issues of cataloging electronic journals and developments of the Dublin Core Metadata system are also discussed.
-
Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998)
0.01
0.008488459 = product of:
0.033953834 = sum of:
0.033953834 = product of:
0.06790767 = sum of:
0.06790767 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06790767 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
-
Weibel, S.; Miller, E.: Cataloging syntax and public policy meet in PICS (1997)
0.01
0.0076571116 = product of:
0.030628446 = sum of:
0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030628446 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- The PICS, an initiative of W3C, is a technology that supports the association of descriptive labels with Web resources. By providing a single common transport syntax for metadata, PICS will support the growth of metadata systems (including library cataloguing) that are interoperable and widely supported in Web information systems. Within the PICS framework, a great diversity of resource description models can be implemented, from simple rating schemes to complex data content standards
-
Rogers, D.: Cataloguing Internet resources : the evolution of the Dublin Core metadata set (1997)
0.01
0.0067907665 = product of:
0.027163066 = sum of:
0.027163066 = product of:
0.054326132 = sum of:
0.054326132 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054326132 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17551683 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22
-
Tammaro, A.M.: Catalogando, catalogando ... metacatalogando (1997)
0.01
0.006699973 = product of:
0.026799891 = sum of:
0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026799891 = score(doc=902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A crucial question for librarians is whether to catalogue Internet information sources, and electronic sources in general, which may contain metainformation of the texts of articles. Librarians can help researchers with data identification and access in 4 ways: making OPAC available on the Internet; providing a complete selection of Gopher, Ftp, WWW, etc. site lists; maintaining a Web site, coordinateted by the library, that functions as an Internet access point; and organising access to existing search engines that do automatic indexing. Briefly reviews several metadata formats, including USMARC field 856, IAFA templates, SOIP (Harvest), TEI Headers, Capcas Head and URC
-
Haas, S.: Metadata mania : an overview (1998)
0.01
0.0057428335 = product of:
0.022971334 = sum of:
0.022971334 = weight(_text_:library in 2222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022971334 = score(doc=2222,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.050121464 = queryNorm
0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 2222, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2222)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes the structure of metadata formats with particular reference to the taxonomy of data formats set out by the BIBLINK report of the UK Office for Library and Information Networking and based on their underlying complexity. Referes to 3 main types of metadata: Dublin Core; MARC and Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC). Provides practical examples of the actual codings used, illustrated with reference to the Dublin Core, Marc and FGDC elements in selected Web sites. Ends with a glossary and a list of Web sites containing background information on metadata, such as the IAMSLIC metadata homepage
