Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Grenci, M.: ¬The impact of Web publishing on the organization of cataloging functions (2000) 0.03 
    0.030886564 = product of:
  0.09265969 = sum of:
    0.09265969 = product of:
      0.18531938 = sum of:
        0.18531938 = weight(_text_:publishing in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18531938 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24522576 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05019314 = queryNorm
            0.7557093 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.885643 = idf(docFreq=907, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  2. McRee (Mac) Elrod, J.: Classification of Internet resources : an AUTOCAT discussion (2000) 0.03 
    0.027969502 = product of:
  0.083908506 = sum of:
    0.083908506 = weight(_text_:electronic in 5364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.083908506 = score(doc=5364,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.4276021 = fieldWeight in 5364, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5364)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In October of 1999 there was a discussion on AUTOCAT (an e-list for cataloguers) of the advantages and disadvantages of classifying Internet resources catalogued locally, which grew to include a discussion of cataloguing electronic resources generally. This article reviews the background of applying bibliographic description techniques to electronic resources, and summarizes the AUTOCAT discussion. The exchange of opinion confirms that while some librarians see classification as primarily a method of assigning a shelf location for a physical item, many others see classification as a valid subject approach for all the materials either in the library's collection or available to the library's patrons through the library catalogue
  3. Lam, V.-T.: Cataloging Internet resources : Why, what, how (2000) 0.02 
    0.019777425 = product of:
  0.059332274 = sum of:
    0.059332274 = weight(_text_:electronic in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059332274 = score(doc=967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19623034 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05019314 = queryNorm
        0.30236036 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9095051 = idf(docFreq=2409, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Internet resources have brought great excitement but also grave concerns to the library world, especially to the cataloging community. In spite of the various problematic aspects presented by Internet resources (poorly organized, lack of stability, variable quality), catalogers have decided that they are worth cataloging, in particular those meeting library selection criteria. This paper tries to trace the decade-long history of the library comrnunity's efforts in providing an effective way to catalog Internet resources. Basically, its olbjective is to answer the following questions: Why catalog? What to catalog? and, How to catalog. Some issues of cataloging electronic journals and developments of the Dublin Core Metadata system are also discussed.

Authors