Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.01 
    0.007805319 = product of:
  0.05463723 = sum of:
    0.05463723 = product of:
      0.08195584 = sum of:
        0.041163065 = weight(_text_:29 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041163065 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13239008 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
        0.040792778 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040792778 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13179328 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  2. Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012) 0.01 
    0.006829654 = product of:
  0.047807574 = sum of:
    0.047807574 = product of:
      0.07171136 = sum of:
        0.03601768 = weight(_text_:29 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03601768 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13239008 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
        0.03569368 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03569368 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13179328 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    29. 5.2015 11:08:22
  3. Miksa, S.D.: Educators: what are the cataloging issues students get excited about? : professional and intellectual appeals of cataloging and students' misconceptions of cataloging (2008) 0.01 
    0.00599311 = product of:
  0.020975884 = sum of:
    0.0089699915 = weight(_text_:information in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0089699915 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
    0.0120058935 = product of:
      0.03601768 = sum of:
        0.03601768 = weight(_text_:29 in 786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03601768 = score(doc=786,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13239008 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 786, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=786)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the professional and intellectual appeals demonstrated by cataloging students, as well as some common misconceptions. Given the current digital environment and the "Amazoogle" effect, students face many challenges when striving to complete a basic course in descriptive and subject cataloging. In the process, they face issues of varieties of information objects, how to tame tools such as AACR2 and LCSH, and how MARC encoding fits into the overall process of cataloging. They also must learn to re-conceptualize their ideas of copy cataloging and learn to appreciate the authoritative power that comes with using and applying cataloger's judgment.
    Date
    29. 9.2008 14:58:13
  4. Seikel, M.: General notes in catalog records versus FRBR user tasks (2013) 0.01 
    0.00599311 = product of:
  0.020975884 = sum of:
    0.0089699915 = weight(_text_:information in 1929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0089699915 = score(doc=1929,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1929, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1929)
    0.0120058935 = product of:
      0.03601768 = sum of:
        0.03601768 = weight(_text_:29 in 1929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03601768 = score(doc=1929,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13239008 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1929, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1929)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    This article analyzes the literature concerning uses of notes in bibliographic records and also certain grammatical conventions used by catalogers to communicate information about the resources they are describing. It shows that these types of data do not aid the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) user tasks in the resource discovery process. It also describes how general notes are addressed in Resource Description Access (RDA), and advocates that cataloging practices involving most general notes and such conventions as bracketing and abbreviations should be discontinued with the widespread use of RDA.
    Date
    29. 5.2015 13:21:31
  5. Smiraglia, R.P.: Rethinking what we catalog : documents as cultural artifacts (2008) 0.00 
    0.004280793 = product of:
  0.014982775 = sum of:
    0.006407136 = weight(_text_:information in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006407136 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
    0.008575639 = product of:
      0.025726916 = sum of:
        0.025726916 = weight(_text_:29 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025726916 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13239008 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Cataloging is at its most interesting when it is comprehended as part of a larger, meaningful, objective. Resource description is a complex task; but the essence of librarianship is curatorship of a collection, and that sense of curatorial responsibility is one of the things that makes resource description into cataloging-that is, professional responsibility is the difference between the task of transcription and the satisfaction of professional decisions well-made. Part of the essential difference is comprehension of the cultural milieu from which specific resources arise, and the modes of scholarship that might be used to nudge them to reveal their secrets for the advancement of knowledge. In this paper I describe a course designed to lend excitement and professional judgment to the education of future catalogers and collection managers by conveying the notion that all documents are, in fact, cultural artifacts. Part of a knowledge-sensitive curriculum for knowledge organization, the purpose of this course is to go beyond the concept of documents as mere packets of information to demonstrate that each is a product of its time and circumstances. Bibliographic skill leads to greater comfort with the intellectual and cultural forces that impel the creation of documents. Students become comfortable with the curatorial side of cataloging - the placement of each document in its cultural milieu as the goal of resource description, rather than the act of description itself.
    Date
    29. 9.2008 14:59:03
  6. Guerrini, M.: ¬The functions of the catalogue from ICCP to FRBR (2000) 0.00 
    0.0034650816 = product of:
  0.02425557 = sum of:
    0.02425557 = product of:
      0.07276671 = sum of:
        0.07276671 = weight(_text_:29 in 3947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07276671 = score(doc=3947,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13239008 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 3947, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3947)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    29. 8.2005 11:30:41
    29. 8.2005 13:23:12
  7. Layne, S.S.: Brian E. Schottlaender : politics and philosophy of bibliographic control, a conversation (1999) 0.00 
    0.0034302555 = product of:
  0.024011787 = sum of:
    0.024011787 = product of:
      0.07203536 = sum of:
        0.07203536 = weight(_text_:29 in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07203536 = score(doc=5622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13239008 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    21. 4.2002 11:29:35
  8. Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.00 
    0.00291377 = product of:
  0.020396389 = sum of:
    0.020396389 = product of:
      0.061189163 = sum of:
        0.061189163 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061189163 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13179328 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:22:27
  9. Petrucciani, A.: Quality of library catalogs and value of (good) catalogs (2015) 0.00 
    0.002562855 = product of:
  0.017939983 = sum of:
    0.017939983 = weight(_text_:information in 1878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017939983 = score(doc=1878,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1878, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1878)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The quality of large catalogs is uneven and often low, but this issue is underrated and understudied. Library catalogs often fail to communicate correct and clear information to users and their low quality is not simply due to faults, duplications, and so on but also to unwise cataloging standards and policies. While there is plenty of uncontrolled information about books and other publications, the need for good-quality bibliographic information is apparent and library catalogs may provide a trustworthy map of the publishing output, with full control of editions, works, authors, and so on and effective navigation functions, which are lacking in today's information-rich environment.
  10. Oddy, P.: ¬The case for international cooperation in cataloguing : from copy cataloguing to multilingual subject access - experiences within the British Library (1999) 0.00 
    0.001960146 = product of:
  0.013721022 = sum of:
    0.013721022 = product of:
      0.041163065 = sum of:
        0.041163065 = weight(_text_:29 in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041163065 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13239008 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Program. 33(1999) no.1, S.29-39
  11. Altenhöner, R.; Frodl, C.; Gömpel, R.; Jahns, Y.; Junger, U.; Mahnke, C.; Meyer, A.; Pfeifer, B.; Oehlschläger, S.; Svensson, L.G.: Libraries beyond libraries : Integration, Innovation and Information for all Aus den Veranstaltungen der Sektionen Bibliografie, Katalogisierung, Klassifikation und Indexierung, Knowledge Management und Informationstechnologie sowie der Core Activity ICADS der IFLA Division III (Library Services) beim Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 77. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in San Juan, Puerto Rico (2011) 0.00 
    0.0018122118 = product of:
  0.012685482 = sum of:
    0.012685482 = weight(_text_:information in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012685482 = score(doc=174,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  12. Zhang, Y.; Salaba, A.: What do users tell us about FRBR-based catalogs? (2012) 0.00 
    0.0017151277 = product of:
  0.0120058935 = sum of:
    0.0120058935 = product of:
      0.03601768 = sum of:
        0.03601768 = weight(_text_:29 in 1924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03601768 = score(doc=1924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13239008 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1924)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    29. 5.2015 10:48:25
  13. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.00 
    0.0016996992 = product of:
  0.011897894 = sum of:
    0.011897894 = product of:
      0.03569368 = sum of:
        0.03569368 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03569368 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13179328 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Rijk Spanhoff, E. de: Principle issues : catalog paradigms, old and new (2002) 0.00 
    0.0014701096 = product of:
  0.010290766 = sum of:
    0.010290766 = product of:
      0.030872298 = sum of:
        0.030872298 = weight(_text_:29 in 5481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030872298 = score(doc=5481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13239008 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037635546 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5481)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    29. 7.2006 19:35:37
  15. Coyle, K.; Hillmann, D.: Resource Description and Access (RDA) : cataloging rules for the 20th century (2007) 0.00 
    0.0012944371 = product of:
  0.009061059 = sum of:
    0.009061059 = weight(_text_:information in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009061059 = score(doc=2525,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    There is evidence that many individuals and organizations in the library world do not support the work taking place to develop a next generation of the library cataloging rules. The authors describe the tensions existing between those advocating an incremental change to cataloging process and others who desire a bolder library entry into the digital era. Libraries have lost their place as primary information providers, surpassed by more agile (and in many cases wealthier) purveyors of digital information delivery services. Although libraries still manage materials that are not available elsewhere, the library's approach to user service and the user interface is not competing successfully against services like Amazon or Google. If libraries are to avoid further marginalization, they need to make a fundamental change in their approach to user services. The library's signature service, its catalog, uses rules for cataloging that are remnants of a long departed technology: the card catalog. Modifications to the rules, such as those proposed by the Resource Description and Access (RDA) development effort, can only keep us rooted firmly in the 20th, if not the 19th century. A more radical change is required that will contribute to the library of the future, re-imagined and integrated with the chosen workflow of its users.
  16. Wakeling, S.; Clough, P.; Connaway, L.S.; Sen, B.; Tomás, D.: Users and uses of a global union catalog : a mixed-methods study of WorldCat.org (2017) 0.00 
    0.0012944371 = product of:
  0.009061059 = sum of:
    0.009061059 = weight(_text_:information in 3794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009061059 = score(doc=3794,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3794, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3794)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    This paper presents the first large-scale investigation of the users and uses of WorldCat.org, the world's largest bibliographic database and global union catalog. Using a mixed-methods approach involving focus group interviews with 120 participants, an online survey with 2,918 responses, and an analysis of transaction logs of approximately 15 million sessions from WorldCat.org, the study provides a new understanding of the context for global union catalog use. We find that WorldCat.org is accessed by a diverse population, with the three primary user groups being librarians, students, and academics. Use of the system is found to fall within three broad types of work-task (professional, academic, and leisure), and we also present an emergent taxonomy of search tasks that encompass known-item, unknown-item, and institutional information searches. Our results support the notion that union catalogs are primarily used for known-item searches, although the volume of traffic to WorldCat.org means that unknown-item searches nonetheless represent an estimated 250,000 sessions per month. Search engine referrals account for almost half of all traffic, but although WorldCat.org effectively connects users referred from institutional library catalogs to other libraries holding a sought item, users arriving from a search engine are less likely to connect to a library.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.9, S.2166-2181
  17. Riemer, J.J.: CONSER'S aggregator survey and the work of the PCC Task Group (1999) 0.00 
    0.0012814275 = product of:
  0.0089699915 = sum of:
    0.0089699915 = weight(_text_:information in 5360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0089699915 = score(doc=5360,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5360, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5360)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The author presents the results of the December 1998 CONSER "Survey on Providing Access to Serial Titles within Aggregator Databases." Major findings include 71% of respondents desiring to see full-text serial titles incorporated into the online catalog and nearly 75% interested in acquiring record sets. Also included are an analysis of the numerous survey comments received, strategies toward creating the necessary records and integrating them into OPACs, examples of aggregator analytic records, and other background information on the work of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging's Task Group on Journals in Aggregator Databases.
  18. Clarke, R.I.: Breaking records : the history of bibliographic records and their influence in conceptualizing bibliographic data (2015) 0.00 
    0.0012814275 = product of:
  0.0089699915 = sum of:
    0.0089699915 = weight(_text_:information in 1877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0089699915 = score(doc=1877,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1877, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1877)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    A bibliographic record is a conceptual whole that includes all bibliographic information about a resource together in one place. With the Semantic Web, individual data statements are linked across the web. This position article argues that the traditional conceptualization of bibliographic records affects the affordances and limitations of that data. A historical analysis of the development of bibliographic records contrasted with the Semantic Web model reveals how the "record" model shaped library cataloging and the implications on library catalogs today. Reification of the record model for bibliographic data hampers possibilities for innovation in cataloging, inspiring a reconceptualization of bibliographic description.
  19. Polidoro, P.: Using qualitative methods to analyze online catalog interfaces (2015) 0.00 
    0.0012814275 = product of:
  0.0089699915 = sum of:
    0.0089699915 = weight(_text_:information in 1879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0089699915 = score(doc=1879,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1879, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1879)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Many experts have proposed an evolution toward "next generation catalogs," whose main features are partly inspired by commercial websites such as Google or Amazon. This article examines pros and cons of this integration. It also aims to show how a qualitative approach helps to broaden understanding of web communication mechanisms. After discussing some examples of "next generation catalog" features, I analyze the interface of an online catalog responding to different users' information needs and seeking behaviors. In the conclusion I suggest that the right approach to integration is a "translation" (not a "copy and paste") between commercial and library logics.
  20. Puglisi, P.: "¬The day has not yet come ..." : book-jackets in library catalogs (2015) 0.00 
    0.0010983663 = product of:
  0.007688564 = sum of:
    0.007688564 = weight(_text_:information in 1883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007688564 = score(doc=1883,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.066068366 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037635546 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1883, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1883)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    In 1971 the eminent American scholar G. Thomas Tanselle wrote: "the day has not yet come when one can learn anything of a library's holdings of jackets by consulting its catalogue." Forty-four years later, library catalogs still do not allow that. Book-jackets, whose "original sin" is their being physically separate from the book, are nevertheless essential documents for the history of publishing. This article aims to show the necessity for access to the information about a single book's book-jacket directly from the library catalog; it considers the reasons why catalogers usually "distrust" book-jackets; and it aims to determine whether there is any change in attitude about taking book-jackets into account in cataloging.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

Themes