Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.01 
    0.011537264 = product of:
  0.023074528 = sum of:
    0.023074528 = product of:
      0.046149056 = sum of:
        0.046149056 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046149056 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1703981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048659734 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. DeZelar-Tiedman, C.: Exploring user-contributed metadata's potential to enhance access to literary works (2011) 0.01 
    0.009889083 = product of:
  0.019778166 = sum of:
    0.019778166 = product of:
      0.039556332 = sum of:
        0.039556332 = weight(_text_:22 in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039556332 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1703981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048659734 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Pope, J.T.; Holley, R.P.: Google Book Search and metadata (2011) 0.01 
    0.009776571 = product of:
  0.019553142 = sum of:
    0.019553142 = product of:
      0.07821257 = sum of:
        0.07821257 = weight(_text_:authors in 1887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07821257 = score(doc=1887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22183068 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048659734 = queryNorm
            0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1887)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article summarizes published documents on metadata provided by Google for books scanned as part of the Google Book Search (GBS) project and provides suggestions for improvement. The faulty, misleading, and confusing metadata in current Google records can pose potentially serious problems for users of GBS. Google admits that it took data, which proved to be inaccurate, from many sources and is attempting to correct errors. Some argue that metadata is not needed with keyword searching; but optical character recognition (OCR) errors, synonym control, and materials in foreign languages make reliable metadata a requirement for academic researchers. The authors recommend that users should be able to submit error reports to Google to correct faulty metadata.
  4. Kleeck, D. Van; Nakano, H.; Langford, G.; Shelton, T.; Lundgren, J.; O'Dell, A.J.: Managing bibliographic data quality for electronic resources (2017) 0.01 
    0.009776571 = product of:
  0.019553142 = sum of:
    0.019553142 = product of:
      0.07821257 = sum of:
        0.07821257 = weight(_text_:authors in 5160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07821257 = score(doc=5160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22183068 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048659734 = queryNorm
            0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5160)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article presents a case study of quality management issues for electronic resource metadata to assess the support of user tasks (find, select, and obtain library resources) and potential for increased efficiencies in acquisitions and cataloging workflows. The authors evaluated the quality of existing bibliographic records (mostly vendor supplied) for e-resource collections as compared with records for the same collections in OCLC's WorldShare Collection Manager (WCM). Findings are that WCM records better support user tasks by containing more summaries and tables of contents; other checkpoints are largely comparable between the two source record groups. The transition to WCM records is discussed.

Authors