Search (89 results, page 2 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Haider, S.: Library cataloging, classification, and metadata research : a bibliography of doctoral dissertations - a supplement, 1982-2020Salman (2021) 0.00
    0.002328401 = product of:
      0.004656802 = sum of:
        0.004656802 = product of:
          0.013970406 = sum of:
            0.013970406 = weight(_text_:a in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013970406 = score(doc=674,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.26478532 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  2. McCue, J.A.: Why should a cataloging department hire a metadata specialist? : and, are there any out there? (1997) 0.00
    0.0022179869 = product of:
      0.0044359737 = sum of:
        0.0044359737 = product of:
          0.013307921 = sum of:
            0.013307921 = weight(_text_:a in 2982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013307921 = score(doc=2982,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 2982, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2982)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Addresses the question of why a technical services department would hire a metadata specialist and whether a metadata specialist is really a cataloguer in disguise. Evidence suggests that cataoguing departments are recruiting and training staff for positions requiring broader computer experience and an awareness of larger metadata issues. Also explores whether students are attracted to these positions and whether library schools are preparing technical services staff for these challenges
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the USAIN/IAALD Joint Conference held in tuscon, Arizona, 3-5 April 1997, the theme of which was 'The information frontier: linking people and resources in a changing world'
    Type
    a
  3. Clemson, P.A.: ¬An inside approach to a networked document cataloging (1997) 0.00
    0.0019208328 = product of:
      0.0038416656 = sum of:
        0.0038416656 = product of:
          0.011524997 = sum of:
            0.011524997 = weight(_text_:a in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011524997 = score(doc=702,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information professions identified the need for a set of standard metadata almost as soon as the WWW became a reality. Several initiatives have already identified the types of bibliographic information that would be necessary to describe and locate an electronic publication. The descriptors identified in the OCLC/NCSA Dublin Core are combined with those assembled by the Coalition of Networked Information and the Internet Engineering Task force to produce a list of electronic citation elements. Advocates embedding these citation elements within electrinic documents through the use of HTML<META>tags and other markup techniques. There is also a call to cataloguing librarians to contribute their expertise in information resources management to document being prepared for the WWW in order to influence the quality of electronic publication from the insides
    Type
    a
  4. Nichols introduces MARCit (1998) 0.00
    0.0019011315 = product of:
      0.003802263 = sum of:
        0.003802263 = product of:
          0.011406789 = sum of:
            0.011406789 = weight(_text_:a in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011406789 = score(doc=1438,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the release of MARCit, a software package that enables the cataloguing of Internet resources into MARC format bibliographic records
    Type
    a
  5. Cunningham, A.: Dynamic descriptions : recent developments in standards for archival description and metadata (2000) 0.00
    0.0019011315 = product of:
      0.003802263 = sum of:
        0.003802263 = product of:
          0.011406789 = sum of:
            0.011406789 = weight(_text_:a in 2473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011406789 = score(doc=2473,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 2473, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2473)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Haider, S.: Library cataloging, classification, and metadata research : a bibliography of doctoral dissertations (2020) 0.00
    0.0019011315 = product of:
      0.003802263 = sum of:
        0.003802263 = product of:
          0.011406789 = sum of:
            0.011406789 = weight(_text_:a in 5750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011406789 = score(doc=5750,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 5750, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5750)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  7. Weibel, S.; Miller, E.: Cataloging syntax and public policy meet in PICS (1997) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=1561,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    The PICS, an initiative of W3C, is a technology that supports the association of descriptive labels with Web resources. By providing a single common transport syntax for metadata, PICS will support the growth of metadata systems (including library cataloguing) that are interoperable and widely supported in Web information systems. Within the PICS framework, a great diversity of resource description models can be implemented, from simple rating schemes to complex data content standards
    Type
    a
  8. Efthimiadis, E.N.; Carlyle, A.: Organizing Internet resources : metadata and the Web (1997) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 2561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=2561,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 2561, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2561)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Introduces a special section on organizing Internet resources. Approaches based on fulltext indexing of the content of Internet sites are not an adequate solution for providing access to Internet resources. Adding metadata can provide an overview of a subject area and improve the user's ability to discriminate among similar sources. Introduces the articles in this section that explore issues associated with the provision of metadata
    Type
    a
  9. Agnew, G.: Developing a metadata strategy (2003) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 5504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=5504,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5504, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5504)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper covers the steps in building a metadata repository, including modeling the information needs of your community, selecting and adapting a metadata standard, documenting your metadata, populating the database, and sharing your metadata with other repositories and metadata initiatives. In addition, advances and options that can be applied to metadata for multimedia, particularly video, are presented.
    Type
    a
  10. Taniguchi, S.: Understanding RDA as a DC application profile (2013) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 1906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=1906,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1906, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1906)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The applicability of Dublin Core Application Profiles (DCAP) and the Singapore Framework for DCAPs to Resource Description and Access (RDA) were assessed. First, a draft RDA application profile is outlined, which reveals their applicability to RDA as a whole. Then, the current situation and issues involved in defining and specifying the RDA vocabularies, description structures, and syntaxes, all of which form the RDA application profile, are reviewed, for four levels of the RDA description structure; that is, the levels of aggregates and components of statements.
    Type
    a
  11. Edmunds, J.: Roadmap to nowhere : BIBFLOW, BIBFRAME, and linked data for libraries (2017) 0.00
    0.0017783458 = product of:
      0.0035566916 = sum of:
        0.0035566916 = product of:
          0.010670074 = sum of:
            0.010670074 = weight(_text_:a in 3523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010670074 = score(doc=3523,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 3523, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3523)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    On December 12, 2016, Carl Stahmer and MacKenzie Smith presented at the CNI Members Fall Meeting about the BIBFLOW project, self-described on Twitter as "a two-year project of the UC Davis University Library and Zepheira investigating the future of library technical services." In her opening remarks, Ms. Smith, University Librarian at UC Davis, stated that one of the goals of the project was to devise a roadmap "to get from where we are today, which is kind of the 1970s with a little lipstick on it, to 2020, which is where we're going to be very soon." The notion that where libraries are today is somehow behind the times is one of the commonly heard rationales behind a move to linked data. Stated more precisely: - Libraries devote considerable time and resources to producing high-quality bibliographic metadata - This metadata is stored in unconnected silos - This metadata is in a format (MARC) that is incompatible with technologies of the emerging Semantic Web - The visibility of library metadata is diminished as a result of the two points above Are these assertions true? If yes, is linked data the solution?
    Type
    a
  12. Weibel, S.: ¬The Dublin Core : a simple content description model for electronic resources (1997) 0.00
    0.0017534725 = product of:
      0.003506945 = sum of:
        0.003506945 = product of:
          0.0105208345 = sum of:
            0.0105208345 = weight(_text_:a in 2563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0105208345 = score(doc=2563,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2563, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2563)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Dublin Core is a 15 element set intended to facilitate discovery of electronic resources. Its characteristics are: simplicity, semantic interoperability, international consensus, flexibility, metadata modularity on the Web and a metadata architecture for the Web. The WWW Consortium is developing the Resource Description Framework to support different metadata needs. It will support 3 resource description models: embedded metadata, third party metadata, and view filter. Development continues into: refinement of elements, user education and application guides, metadata registries, tools and standardization. Includes a list of related Web sites and details of the core elements
    Type
    a
  13. Velluci, S.L.: Options for organizing electronic resources : the coexistence of metadata (1997) 0.00
    0.0017534725 = product of:
      0.003506945 = sum of:
        0.003506945 = product of:
          0.0105208345 = sum of:
            0.0105208345 = weight(_text_:a in 6863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0105208345 = score(doc=6863,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 6863, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6863)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    At present cataloguing of Internet resources are on 2 levels. At level 1, the description of resources is contained in local library catalogues, along with bibliographic surrogates for all other materials that the library access, based on AACR2/MARC systems. At level 2, Internet resources are organized independently of any library agency. These include separate catalogues of selected resources, subject browsing lists and robot-generated search tools, and focus exclusively on Internet resources. A 3rd level needs to be developed - a metacatalogue - whereby a user can identify specific library catalogues to include in a search query of other Internet databases
    Type
    a
  14. Neville, L.: Internet resources : issues of access and possible solutions (1997) 0.00
    0.0015842763 = product of:
      0.0031685526 = sum of:
        0.0031685526 = product of:
          0.0095056575 = sum of:
            0.0095056575 = weight(_text_:a in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0095056575 = score(doc=911,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the organization of Internet resources for access, including the non permanancy and volatility of resources. Examines the developments of the Dublin Core metadata set, cataloguing practices to new technologies, and dicusses the practicalities of such a system
    Type
    a
  15. Tammaro, A.M.: Catalogando, catalogando ... metacatalogando (1997) 0.00
    0.0015683535 = product of:
      0.003136707 = sum of:
        0.003136707 = product of:
          0.009410121 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=902,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A crucial question for librarians is whether to catalogue Internet information sources, and electronic sources in general, which may contain metainformation of the texts of articles. Librarians can help researchers with data identification and access in 4 ways: making OPAC available on the Internet; providing a complete selection of Gopher, Ftp, WWW, etc. site lists; maintaining a Web site, coordinateted by the library, that functions as an Internet access point; and organising access to existing search engines that do automatic indexing. Briefly reviews several metadata formats, including USMARC field 856, IAFA templates, SOIP (Harvest), TEI Headers, Capcas Head and URC
    Type
    a
  16. Revelli, C.: Integrare o sostituire? : Un dilemma per la norme catalografiche (1997) 0.00
    0.0015683535 = product of:
      0.003136707 = sum of:
        0.003136707 = product of:
          0.009410121 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 1624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=1624,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1624, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1624)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses a range of professional librarians' opinions on the urgent need either to adopt or replace the current cataloguing rules, a theme closely linked to the identity crisis facing libraries and librarians in the online electronic era. Topics examined include: Gorman and Oddy's views on restructuring AACR principles; the 13 metadata elements contained in the Dublin Core document (1995); catalogue search by known item; keyword search versus subject search; and the US Library of Congress's Program for cooperation cataloging
    Footnote
    Über. d. Titels: To amagamate or to replace? A dilemma for cataloguing rules
    Type
    a
  17. Stubley, P.: Cataloguing standards and metadata for e-commerce (1999) 0.00
    0.0015683535 = product of:
      0.003136707 = sum of:
        0.003136707 = product of:
          0.009410121 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 1915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=1915,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1915, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1915)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  18. Maguire, C.: Metadata in Australia (1997) 0.00
    0.0015683535 = product of:
      0.003136707 = sum of:
        0.003136707 = product of:
          0.009410121 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 2578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=2578,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2578, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2578)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A 1 day seminar was held in Aug 1997, in Synney, Australia, sponsored by the Information science Section of the australia Library and Information Association, on metadata. It focused on building a conceptual framework for metadata. The National Library is developing PANDORA (Preserving and Accessing Networked documentary Resources of Australia) an electronic archive designed to provide long term access to significant Australian online publications. An architecture for access to government information has been developed. The Distributed System Technology Centre's Resource Discivery Project Unit has developed an information presentation tool called HyperIndex and a meta-data searcher called HotOIL
    Type
    a
  19. Wu, C.-J.: Metadata and future developments in cataloguing (1997) 0.00
    0.0015683535 = product of:
      0.003136707 = sum of:
        0.003136707 = product of:
          0.009410121 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 2826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=2826,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2826, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata is a resource which can assist the information retrieval of digital documents on the Internet. In designing a metadata system, it is necessary to consider the characteristics of digital documents, such as the variety of file formats, frequent format transformation and the difficulty of distinguishing between the different versions. Provides a brief analysis of some existing metadata formats, and introduces several pronciples for the future development of cataloguing on the Internet. Briefly describes the Metadata Experimental System (MES) currently under development, and located at the author's homepage
    Type
    a
  20. Hakala, J.: Internet metadata and library cataloguing (1999) 0.00
    0.0015683535 = product of:
      0.003136707 = sum of:
        0.003136707 = product of:
          0.009410121 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 4565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=4565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4565)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 77
  • d 9
  • chi 1
  • i 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 84
  • m 4
  • s 2
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • More… Less…