Search (35 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Rogers, D.: Cataloguing Internet resources : the evolution of the Dublin Core metadata set (1997) 0.01 
    0.0050170454 = product of:
  0.025085226 = sum of:
    0.025085226 = product of:
      0.05017045 = sum of:
        0.05017045 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05017045 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22
  2. Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999) 0.01 
    0.0050170454 = product of:
  0.025085226 = sum of:
    0.025085226 = product of:
      0.05017045 = sum of:
        0.05017045 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05017045 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
  3. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.01 
    0.0050170454 = product of:
  0.025085226 = sum of:
    0.025085226 = product of:
      0.05017045 = sum of:
        0.05017045 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05017045 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013) 0.00 
    0.004679445 = product of:
  0.023397226 = sum of:
    0.023397226 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023397226 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04628742 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.
  5. Haas, S.: Metadata mania : an overview (1998) 0.00 
    0.004621727 = product of:
  0.023108633 = sum of:
    0.023108633 = product of:
      0.046217266 = sum of:
        0.046217266 = weight(_text_:web in 2222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046217266 = score(doc=2222,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2222, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2222)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Describes the structure of metadata formats with particular reference to the taxonomy of data formats set out by the BIBLINK report of the UK Office for Library and Information Networking and based on their underlying complexity. Referes to 3 main types of metadata: Dublin Core; MARC and Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC). Provides practical examples of the actual codings used, illustrated with reference to the Dublin Core, Marc and FGDC elements in selected Web sites. Ends with a glossary and a list of Web sites containing background information on metadata, such as the IAMSLIC metadata homepage
  6. Jul, E.: Cataloguing Internet resources : survey and prospects (1997) 0.00 
    0.004357406 = product of:
  0.021787029 = sum of:
    0.021787029 = product of:
      0.043574058 = sum of:
        0.043574058 = weight(_text_:web in 7199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043574058 = score(doc=7199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 7199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7199)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Describes key events in the development of cataloguing of Internet resources and ssurveys current activities. The fundamental questions are: are Internet resources worth cataloguing; is traditional MARC/AACR2 cataloguing appropriate for Internet resources; and how should resources that change location be dealt with? Libraries should start by cataloguing an Internet resource. Bibliographic records can be used to drive Web applications. Metadata holds considerable promise
  7. Efthimiadis, E.N.; Carlyle, A.: Organizing Internet resources : metadata and the Web (1997) 0.00 
    0.004357406 = product of:
  0.021787029 = sum of:
    0.021787029 = product of:
      0.043574058 = sum of:
        0.043574058 = weight(_text_:web in 2561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043574058 = score(doc=2561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2561)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  8. Tammaro, A.M.: Catalogando, catalogando ... metacatalogando (1997) 0.00 
    0.0038127303 = product of:
  0.019063652 = sum of:
    0.019063652 = product of:
      0.038127303 = sum of:
        0.038127303 = weight(_text_:web in 902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038127303 = score(doc=902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=902)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    A crucial question for librarians is whether to catalogue Internet information sources, and electronic sources in general, which may contain metainformation of the texts of articles. Librarians can help researchers with data identification and access in 4 ways: making OPAC available on the Internet; providing a complete selection of Gopher, Ftp, WWW, etc. site lists; maintaining a Web site, coordinateted by the library, that functions as an Internet access point; and organising access to existing search engines that do automatic indexing. Briefly reviews several metadata formats, including USMARC field 856, IAFA templates, SOIP (Harvest), TEI Headers, Capcas Head and URC
  9. Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997) 0.00 
    0.0038127303 = product of:
  0.019063652 = sum of:
    0.019063652 = product of:
      0.038127303 = sum of:
        0.038127303 = weight(_text_:web in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038127303 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  10. Derrot, S.; Koskas, M.: My fair metadata : cataloging legal deposit Ebooks at the National Library of France (2016) 0.00 
    0.0038127303 = product of:
  0.019063652 = sum of:
    0.019063652 = product of:
      0.038127303 = sum of:
        0.038127303 = weight(_text_:web in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038127303 = score(doc=5140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    French law on digital legal deposit covers websites and online content as well as ebooks. It imposes no obligation to produce a bibliography, indexing being sufficient. But despite their innovative characteristics, ebooks are still books, and their metadata is closer to that of printed materials than to the web indexing. To set up an ebook deposit workflow, the BnF benefits from its experience with digital documents and its tradition of legal deposit. This is to present the questions that it faces when dealing with the cataloging of ebooks and the management of their metadata, and the solutions that are emerging.
  11. Weber, J.: Nachlässe und Autographen im WWW : Dublin Core in Museen, Archiven und Bibliotheken (2000) 0.00 
    0.003762784 = product of:
  0.01881392 = sum of:
    0.01881392 = product of:
      0.03762784 = sum of:
        0.03762784 = weight(_text_:22 in 4458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03762784 = score(doc=4458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4458)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    12. 3.2000 19:25:22
  12. DeZelar-Tiedman, C.: Exploring user-contributed metadata's potential to enhance access to literary works (2011) 0.00 
    0.003762784 = product of:
  0.01881392 = sum of:
    0.01881392 = product of:
      0.03762784 = sum of:
        0.03762784 = weight(_text_:22 in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03762784 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Huthwaite, A.: AACR2 and other metadata standards : the way forward (2003) 0.00 
    0.0032680542 = product of:
  0.01634027 = sum of:
    0.01634027 = product of:
      0.03268054 = sum of:
        0.03268054 = weight(_text_:web in 5508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03268054 = score(doc=5508,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 5508, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5508)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Changes in the environment in which the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, second edition (AACR2), currently operates are examined, including the growth in electronic publishing and use of the Internet, and the development and increasing use of a range of other metadata standards, such as the Dublin Core. AACR2 and other metadata standards, particularly the Dublin Core, are compared. It is argued that AACR2 should continue to be used for describing selected Web-based resources. Criteria for deciding whether to use AACR2 or another metadata standard are defined, drawing on the experiences of two Brisbane universities in developing mechanisms for providing access to electronic resources. Five options are evaluated: catalog only (direct entry); catalog only (indirect entry); subject gateway only; catalog and subject gateway combined; and shared databases, such as CORC. The option chosen by the two universities is identified and explained. Revisions to the rules in AACR2 for cataloging electronic resources resulting from decisions made through 2000 are described. Possible future revisions are also explored.
  14. Han, M.-J.K.; Ream-Sotomayor, N.E.; Lampron, P.; Kudeki, D.: "Making Metadata Maker" (2016) 0.00 
    0.0032680542 = product of:
  0.01634027 = sum of:
    0.01634027 = product of:
      0.03268054 = sum of:
        0.03268054 = weight(_text_:web in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03268054 = score(doc=2883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Cataloging and metadata operations in academic libraries are focusing on original cataloging of their unique and hidden collections that have not been available to users because of a lack of metadata. However, creating MARC format metadata is an expensive process; libraries need professional catalogers with appropriate experience and knowledge or must train staff to do the work. To improve the cataloging and metadata creation workflow, the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign Library developed a web application, Metadata Maker, which allows anyone to create metadata in four different formats, including MARC21 for an online public access catalog, regardless of their familiarity with metadata standards or systems that utilize the metadata. Released as an open source application, Metadata Maker supports diacritics and Unicode non-Roman language encoding, and creates metadata records that ensure discovery and access of unique library collections.
  15. Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003) 0.00 
    0.0031356532 = product of:
  0.015678266 = sum of:
    0.015678266 = product of:
      0.031356532 = sum of:
        0.031356532 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031356532 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 29
  • d 4
  • chi 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 29
  • m 4
  • s 2
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications