Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999) 0.04
    0.042971283 = product of:
      0.08594257 = sum of:
        0.08594257 = sum of:
          0.02883681 = weight(_text_:m in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02883681 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
          0.057105757 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057105757 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
  2. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.02
    0.020189933 = product of:
      0.040379867 = sum of:
        0.040379867 = product of:
          0.080759734 = sum of:
            0.080759734 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080759734 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  3. Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998) 0.02
    0.017845549 = product of:
      0.035691097 = sum of:
        0.035691097 = product of:
          0.071382195 = sum of:
            0.071382195 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071382195 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
  4. Intner, S.S.; Lazinger, S.S.; Weihs, J.: Metadata and its impact on libraries (2005) 0.02
    0.015702324 = sum of:
      0.012097723 = product of:
        0.04839089 = sum of:
          0.04839089 = weight(_text_:authors in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04839089 = score(doc=339,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0036046011 = product of:
        0.0072092023 = sum of:
          0.0072092023 = weight(_text_:m in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0072092023 = score(doc=339,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.054987464 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST. 58(2007) no.6., S.909-910 (A.D. Petrou): "A division in metadata definitions for physical objects vs. those for digital resources offered in Chapter 1 is punctuated by the use of broader, more inclusive metadata definitions, such as data about data as well as with the inclusion of more specific metadata definitions intended for networked resources. Intertwined with the book's subject matter, which is to "distinguish traditional cataloguing from metadata activity" (5), the authors' chosen metadata definition is also detailed on page 5 as follows: Thus while granting the validity of the inclusive definition, we concentrate primarily on metadata as it is most commonly thought of both inside and outside of the library community, as "structured information used to find, access, use and manage information resources primarily in a digital environment." (International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science, 2003) Metadata principles discussed by the authors include modularity, extensibility, refinement and multilingualism. The latter set is followed by seven misconceptions about metadata. Two types of metadata discussed are automatically generated indexes and manually created records. In terms of categories of metadata, the authors present three sets of them as follows: descriptive, structural, and administrative metadata. Chapter 2 focuses on metadata for communities of practice, and is a prelude to content in Chapter 3 where metadata applications, use, and development are presented from the perspective of libraries. Chapter 2 discusses the emergence and impact of metadata on organization and access of online resources from the perspective of communities for which such standards exist and for the need for mapping one standard to another. Discussion focuses on metalanguages, such as Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) and eXtensible Markup Language (XML), "capable of embedding descriptive elements within the document markup itself' (25). This discussion falls under syntactic interoperability. For semantic interoperability, HTML and other mark-up languages, such as Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) and Computer Interchange of Museum Information (CIMI), are covered. For structural interoperability, Dublin Core's 15 metadata elements are grouped into three areas: content (title, subject, description, type, source, relation, and coverage), intellectual property (creator, publisher, contributor and rights), and instantiation (date, format, identifier, and language) for discussion.
    Chapter 8 discusses issues of archiving and preserving digital materials. The chapter reiterates, "What is the point of all of this if the resources identified and catalogued are not preserved?" (Gorman, 2003, p. 16). Discussion about preservation and related issues is organized in five sections that successively ask why, what, who, how, and how much of the plethora of digital materials should be archived and preserved. These are not easy questions because of media instability and technological obsolescence. Stakeholders in communities with diverse interests compete in terms of which community or representative of a community has an authoritative say in what and how much get archived and preserved. In discussing the above-mentioned questions, the authors once again provide valuable information and lessons from a number of initiatives in Europe, Australia, and from other global initiatives. The Draft Charter on the Preservation of the Digital Heritage and the Guidelines for the Preservation of Digital Heritage, both published by UNESCO, are discussed and some of the preservation principles from the Guidelines are listed. The existing diversity in administrative arrangements for these new projects and resources notwithstanding, the impact on content produced for online reserves through work done in digital projects and from the use of metadata and the impact on levels of reference services and the ensuing need for different models to train users and staff is undeniable. In terms of education and training, formal coursework, continuing education, and informal and on-the-job training are just some of the available options. The intensity in resources required for cataloguing digital materials, the questions over the quality of digital resources, and the threat of the new digital environment to the survival of the traditional library are all issues quoted by critics and others, however, who are concerned about a balance for planning and resources allocated for traditional or print-based resources and newer digital resources. A number of questions are asked as part of the book's conclusions in Chapter 10. Of these questions, one that touches on all of the rest and upon much of the book's content is the question: What does the future hold for metadata in libraries? Metadata standards are alive and well in many communities of practice, as Chapters 2-6 have demonstrated. The usefulness of metadata continues to be high and innovation in various elements should keep information professionals engaged for decades to come. There is no doubt that metadata have had a tremendous impact in how we organize information for access and in terms of who, how, when, and where contact is made with library services and collections online. Planning and commitment to a diversity of metadata to serve the plethora of needs in communities of practice are paramount for the continued success of many digital projects and for online preservation of our digital heritage."
    Type
    m
  5. Kuberek, M.: Gemeinsamer KOBV-Standard (1999) 0.01
    0.014418405 = product of:
      0.02883681 = sum of:
        0.02883681 = product of:
          0.05767362 = sum of:
            0.05767362 = weight(_text_:m in 4171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05767362 = score(doc=4171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 4171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Rogers, D.: Cataloguing Internet resources : the evolution of the Dublin Core metadata set (1997) 0.01
    0.014276439 = product of:
      0.028552879 = sum of:
        0.028552879 = product of:
          0.057105757 = sum of:
            0.057105757 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057105757 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22
  7. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.01
    0.014276439 = product of:
      0.028552879 = sum of:
        0.028552879 = product of:
          0.057105757 = sum of:
            0.057105757 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057105757 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.01
    0.012491884 = product of:
      0.024983767 = sum of:
        0.024983767 = product of:
          0.049967535 = sum of:
            0.049967535 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049967535 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Gömpel, R.; Altenhöner, R.; Kunz, M.; Oehlschläger, S.; Werner, C.: Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in Buenos Aires : Aus den Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control, der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC sowie der Information Technology Section (2004) 0.01
    0.010742821 = product of:
      0.021485642 = sum of:
        0.021485642 = sum of:
          0.0072092023 = weight(_text_:m in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0072092023 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.054987464 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
          0.014276439 = weight(_text_:22 in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014276439 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052685954 = queryNorm
              0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    "Libraries: Tools for Education and Development" war das Motto der 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz, dem Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, der vom 22.-27. August 2004 in Buenos Aires, Argentinien, und damit erstmals in Lateinamerika stattfand. Rund 3.000 Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer, davon ein Drittel aus spanischsprachigen Ländern, allein 600 aus Argentinien, besuchten die von der IFLA und dem nationalen Organisationskomitee gut organisierte Tagung mit mehr als 200 Sitzungen und Veranstaltungen. Aus Deutschland waren laut Teilnehmerverzeichnis leider nur 45 Kolleginnen und Kollegen angereist, womit ihre Zahl wieder auf das Niveau von Boston gesunken ist. Erfreulicherweise gab es nunmehr bereits im dritten Jahr eine deutschsprachige Ausgabe des IFLA-Express. Auch in diesem Jahr soll hier über die Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control berichtet werden. Die Arbeit der Division mit ihren Sektionen Bibliography, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing sowie der neuen Sektion Knowledge Management bildet einen der Schwerpunkte der IFLA-Arbeit, die dabei erzielten konkreten Ergebnisse und Empfehlungen haben maßgeblichen Einfluss auf die tägliche Arbeit der Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. Erstmals wird auch ausführlich über die Arbeit der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC und der Information Technology Section berichtet.
  10. Weber, J.: Nachlässe und Autographen im WWW : Dublin Core in Museen, Archiven und Bibliotheken (2000) 0.01
    0.010707329 = product of:
      0.021414658 = sum of:
        0.021414658 = product of:
          0.042829316 = sum of:
            0.042829316 = weight(_text_:22 in 4458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042829316 = score(doc=4458,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4458, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4458)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 3.2000 19:25:22
  11. DeZelar-Tiedman, C.: Exploring user-contributed metadata's potential to enhance access to literary works (2011) 0.01
    0.010707329 = product of:
      0.021414658 = sum of:
        0.021414658 = product of:
          0.042829316 = sum of:
            0.042829316 = weight(_text_:22 in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042829316 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Boydston, J.M.K.; Leysen, J.M.: Observations on the catalogers' role in descriptive metadata creation in academic libraries (2006) 0.01
    0.010585507 = product of:
      0.021171015 = sum of:
        0.021171015 = product of:
          0.08468406 = sum of:
            0.08468406 = weight(_text_:authors in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08468406 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines the case for the participation of catalogers in the creation of descriptive metadata. Metadata creation is an extension of the catalogers' existing skills, abilities, and knowledge. As such, it should be encouraged and supported. However, issues in this process, such as cost, supply of catalogers, and the need for further training will also be examined. The authors use examples from the literature and their own experiences in descriptive metadata creation. Suggestions for future research on the topic are included.
  13. Pope, J.T.; Holley, R.P.: Google Book Search and metadata (2011) 0.01
    0.010585507 = product of:
      0.021171015 = sum of:
        0.021171015 = product of:
          0.08468406 = sum of:
            0.08468406 = weight(_text_:authors in 1887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08468406 = score(doc=1887,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1887, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1887)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article summarizes published documents on metadata provided by Google for books scanned as part of the Google Book Search (GBS) project and provides suggestions for improvement. The faulty, misleading, and confusing metadata in current Google records can pose potentially serious problems for users of GBS. Google admits that it took data, which proved to be inaccurate, from many sources and is attempting to correct errors. Some argue that metadata is not needed with keyword searching; but optical character recognition (OCR) errors, synonym control, and materials in foreign languages make reliable metadata a requirement for academic researchers. The authors recommend that users should be able to submit error reports to Google to correct faulty metadata.
  14. Kleeck, D. Van; Nakano, H.; Langford, G.; Shelton, T.; Lundgren, J.; O'Dell, A.J.: Managing bibliographic data quality for electronic resources (2017) 0.01
    0.010585507 = product of:
      0.021171015 = sum of:
        0.021171015 = product of:
          0.08468406 = sum of:
            0.08468406 = weight(_text_:authors in 5160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08468406 = score(doc=5160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5160)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents a case study of quality management issues for electronic resource metadata to assess the support of user tasks (find, select, and obtain library resources) and potential for increased efficiencies in acquisitions and cataloging workflows. The authors evaluated the quality of existing bibliographic records (mostly vendor supplied) for e-resource collections as compared with records for the same collections in OCLC's WorldShare Collection Manager (WCM). Findings are that WCM records better support user tasks by containing more summaries and tables of contents; other checkpoints are largely comparable between the two source record groups. The transition to WCM records is discussed.
  15. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004) 0.01
    0.008922774 = product of:
      0.017845549 = sum of:
        0.017845549 = product of:
          0.035691097 = sum of:
            0.035691097 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035691097 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Wisser, K.M.; O'Brien Roper, J.: Maximizing metadata : exploring the EAD-MARC relationship (2003) 0.01
    0.008922774 = product of:
      0.017845549 = sum of:
        0.017845549 = product of:
          0.035691097 = sum of:
            0.035691097 = weight(_text_:22 in 154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035691097 = score(doc=154,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18449724 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 154, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=154)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Baca, M.: Practical issues in applying metadata schemas and controlled vocabularies to cultural heritage information (2003) 0.01
    0.006308052 = product of:
      0.012616104 = sum of:
        0.012616104 = product of:
          0.025232209 = sum of:
            0.025232209 = weight(_text_:m in 5505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025232209 = score(doc=5505,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 5505, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5505)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Derrot, S.; Koskas, M.: My fair metadata : cataloging legal deposit Ebooks at the National Library of France (2016) 0.01
    0.006308052 = product of:
      0.012616104 = sum of:
        0.012616104 = product of:
          0.025232209 = sum of:
            0.025232209 = weight(_text_:m in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025232209 = score(doc=5140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Preminger, M.; Rype, I.; Ådland, M.K.; Massey, D.; Tallerås, K.: ¬The public library metadata landscape : the case of Norway 2017-2018 (2020) 0.01
    0.006308052 = product of:
      0.012616104 = sum of:
        0.012616104 = product of:
          0.025232209 = sum of:
            0.025232209 = weight(_text_:m in 5802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025232209 = score(doc=5802,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 5802, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5802)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Zapounidou, S.; Sfakakis, M.; Papatheodorou, C.: Library data integration : towards BIBFRAME mapping to EDM (2014) 0.01
    0.0054069017 = product of:
      0.010813803 = sum of:
        0.010813803 = product of:
          0.021627607 = sum of:
            0.021627607 = weight(_text_:m in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021627607 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052685954 = queryNorm
                0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Years

Languages

  • e 20
  • d 4

Types

  • a 20
  • m 4
  • b 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…