Search (43 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"Normdateien"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Behrens-Neumann, R.: Aus der 56. Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme am 23. April 2009 in Wien : ein Bericht (2009) 0.02
    0.024980778 = product of:
      0.049961556 = sum of:
        0.049961556 = sum of:
          0.0033607571 = weight(_text_:a in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0033607571 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
          0.015602832 = weight(_text_:h in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015602832 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
          0.030997967 = weight(_text_:22 in 3041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030997967 = score(doc=3041,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3041, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3041)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 13:11:01
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 43(2009) H.8/9, S.854-901
    Type
    a
  2. Oehlschläger, S.: Aus der 49. Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme am 23. und 24. November 2005 in Köln (2006) 0.02
    0.015700333 = product of:
      0.031400666 = sum of:
        0.031400666 = sum of:
          0.0016803786 = weight(_text_:a in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0016803786 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.03184872 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
          0.007801416 = weight(_text_:h in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.007801416 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
          0.021918872 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021918872 = score(doc=632,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    MARC21 als Austauschformat Die Expertengruppe Datenformate hat in ihrer 5. Sitzung am 22. November 2005 die Frage der Hierarchienabbildung bei der Übernahme von MARC 21 weiter diskutiert und einer Lösung zugeführt. Für einen geringen Prozentsatz der Daten werden trotz Vorarbeiten der Expertengruppe Probleme bei der Überführung von MARC-21-Daten in MAB2-Strukturen gesehen. Es wurde darauf hingewiesen, dass es im Zusammenhang mit dem Umstieg auf MARC 21 ebenso wie bei der kooperativen Katalogisierung notwendig ist, gemeinsame Regeln festzulegen und Absprachen zwischen den Verbünden zu treffen. Eine unterschiedliche Handhabung des Formats sollte sich von vornherein verbieten. Projekt Kooperative Neukatalogisierung Die Projektgruppe hat zweimal getagt, zuletzt am 3. November 2005. Es liegen erste Ergebnisse vor, und spätestens Anfang Januar 2006 soll das Verfahren erprobt werden. Alle Verbünde signalisieren ihr Interesse an dem geplanten Verfahren, da die Eigenkatalogisierungsrate nach wie vor zu hoch ist. Für die Akzeptanz des Dienstes, der auch zum Synchronisieren der vorhandenen Aufnahmen und zum Austausch von Sacherschließungsdaten genutzt werden soll, ist die Aktualität des geplanten Neukatalogisierungspools essentiell. Ein weiteres Ziel ist auch die Optimierung der Arbeitsabläufe zwischen Verbundzentrale und Bibliotheken. Catalogue Enrichment Zur Anreicherung der Katalogdaten gibt es verschiedene Aktivitäten innerhalb der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme, die koordiniert werden müssen, damit eine Mehrfachdigitalisierung von Inhaltsverzeichnissen, Abstracts und anderen Objekten vermieden werden kann. Die Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme beschließt, eine kleine Arbeitsgruppe einzusetzen, die bis spätestens Anfang Februar 2006 einen Vorschlag mit unterschiedlichen Szenarien für unterschiedliche Umgebungen vorlegen soll. Aufgabe der AG Datenanreicherung ist die Konzeption eines schnellen Dienstes für die Digitalisierung von Abstracts und Inhaltsverzeichnissen sofern sie lizenzrechtlich frei verfügbar sind, die allen Verbünden zur Verfügung gestellt werden sollen. Dazu gehören eine Übersicht über die vorhandenen Daten und eine ausgearbeitete Verfahrensvorschrift für das künftige Vorgehen.
    DDC/Melvil-Nutzungs- und Lizenzsituation Die Deutsche Bibliothek hat den Dienst Melvil vorgestellt, der auf der im Rahmen des Projektes DDC Deutsch erstellten deutschen Übersetzung der 22. Ausgabe der DDC basiert, und die Such- und Sprachgewohnheiten deutschsprachiger Benutzerinnen und Benutzer berücksichtigt. Mit Melvil wurde ein Online-Dienst entwickelt, der Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen außer einem an WebDewey orientierten Klassifikationstool MelvilClass auch ein Retrievaltool MelvilSearch für die verbale Suche nach DDC-erschlossenen Dokumenten und das Browsing in der DDC-Hierarchie zur Verfügung stellt. Über die Schnittstelle MelvilSoap können Bibliotheken und Verbundzentralen, die den Dienst Melvil lizenziert haben, auch DDC-Daten zur weiteren Nutzung herunterladen. Gegenwärtig vergibt Die Deutsche Bibliothek Testlizenzen, ab 2006 kann der Dienst nach einem gestaffelten Modell kostenpflichtig genutzt werden Ergebnisse der Adhoc-Arbeitsgruppe ISBD(CR) Der Standardisierungsausschuss hatte in seiner 9. Sitzung am 15. Dezember 2004 die Anpassung der Splitregeln bei fortlaufenden Sammelwerken an die ISBD(CR) mit dem Ziel der Übernahme beschlossen. Im Januar 2005 richtete die Arbeitsstelle für Standardisierung eine Ad-hoc-AG ISBD(CR) ein, in der Vertreter der ZDB, der Expertengruppe Formalerschließung und der AGDBT (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Datenbankteilnehmer der ZDB) unter der Federführung der Arbeitsstelle für Standardisierung zusammenarbeiteten. Auftragsgemäß konnte dem Standardisierungsausschuss am 2. August 2005 ein entscheidungsreifer Entwurf zur Anwendung der ISBD(CR)-Splitregeln für fortlaufende Sammelwerke vorgelegt werden. Die Unterlage, die dem Standardisierungsausschuss zu seiner 11. Sitzung am 1. Dezember 2005 zugeleitet wurde, wurde den Mitgliedern der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme im Vorfeld der Sitzung zur Kenntnis gegeben. Die zeitnahe Anwendung der ISBD(CR)-Splitregeln würde nicht nur in einem kleinen abgeschlossenen Bereich eine Angleichung an internationale Gepflogenheiten bedeuten, sondern sie hätte auch einige positive Auswirkungen auf die von Zeitschriftentiteln abhängigen ergänzenden Dienstleistungen. So würde z.B. die Verlinkung mit SFX-Diensten erheblich erleichtert."
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 40(2006) H.1, S.58-83
    Type
    a
  3. Tillett, B.B.: Authority control at the international level (2000) 0.01
    0.01257316 = product of:
      0.02514632 = sum of:
        0.02514632 = product of:
          0.03771948 = sum of:
            0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0067215143 = score(doc=191,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
            0.030997967 = weight(_text_:22 in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030997967 = score(doc=191,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    International efforts to provide authority control include the work of IFLA, the AUTHOR Project funded by the European Commission, and related work conducted under the auspices of the ICA/CDS. IFLA developed the guidelines Form and Structure of Corporate Headings, documented the formulation of names along the lines of national origin in its publication Names of Persons, and published Guidelines for Authority and Reference Entries. Attention has shifted from a single authority record for each entity that would be shared internationally through the exchange of records to linking parallel authority records for the same entity. The access control of the future will account for difference in cataloging rules, transliteration standards, and cultural differences within the same language as well as for the need for different languages and scripts and will enable users to display the script and form of a heading that they expect. Project AUTHOR is a shared set of resource national authority files that used selections from the authority files of France, the United Kingdom, Spain, Portugal, and Belgium. The prototype tested an adaptation of Z39.50 server software for authority records and displays for user interface. An international standard for authority control records has been developed for corporate bodies, persons, and families. Through joint meetings efforts have been synchronized to develop authority control at the international level.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  4. Hartmann, S.; Pampel, H.: GND und ORCID : Brückenschlag zwischen zwei Systemen zur Autorenidentifikation (2017) 0.01
    0.010170597 = product of:
      0.020341193 = sum of:
        0.020341193 = product of:
          0.030511789 = sum of:
            0.004032909 = weight(_text_:a in 5115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004032909 = score(doc=5115,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 5115, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5115)
            0.026478881 = weight(_text_:h in 5115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026478881 = score(doc=5115,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 5115, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5115)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 51(2017) H.7, S.575-588
    Type
    a
  5. Wiechmann, B.: Individualisierungstest in Der Deutschen Bibliothek (1999) 0.01
    0.008849675 = product of:
      0.01769935 = sum of:
        0.01769935 = product of:
          0.026549023 = sum of:
            0.0047050603 = weight(_text_:a in 3810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047050603 = score(doc=3810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3810)
            0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 3810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021843962 = score(doc=3810,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 3810, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3810)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 46(1999) H.3, S.227-241
    Type
    a
  6. Naumann, U.: Wird das deutsche Bibliothekswesen autoritär? : Eine Antwort auf Klaus Franken (2002) 0.01
    0.006780398 = product of:
      0.013560796 = sum of:
        0.013560796 = product of:
          0.020341193 = sum of:
            0.0026886058 = weight(_text_:a in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0026886058 = score(doc=229,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
            0.017652588 = weight(_text_:h in 229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017652588 = score(doc=229,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.15527807 = fieldWeight in 229, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=229)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf K. Franken in: Bibliotheksdienst 35(2001) H.10, S.1342-1343.
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 36(2002) H.1, S.52-54
    Type
    a
  7. Wessel, H.-P.: RSWK und RAK - die Geschichte einer unendlichen Annäherung? (2005) 0.01
    0.006780398 = product of:
      0.013560796 = sum of:
        0.013560796 = product of:
          0.020341193 = sum of:
            0.0026886058 = weight(_text_:a in 3666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0026886058 = score(doc=3666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 3666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3666)
            0.017652588 = weight(_text_:h in 3666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017652588 = score(doc=3666,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.15527807 = fieldWeight in 3666, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3666)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 39(2005) H.7, S.898-931
    Type
    a
  8. Pampel, H.; Fenner, M.: ORCID - Offener Standard zur Vernetzung von Forschenden (2016) 0.01
    0.006780398 = product of:
      0.013560796 = sum of:
        0.013560796 = product of:
          0.020341193 = sum of:
            0.0026886058 = weight(_text_:a in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0026886058 = score(doc=2839,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
            0.017652588 = weight(_text_:h in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017652588 = score(doc=2839,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.15527807 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten aus der Chemie, 64(2016) H.1, S.57-58 [http://doi.org/10.1002/nadc.20164042239]
    Type
    a
  9. Franken, K.: Ist Deutschland reif für die internationale Zusammenarbeit? (2001) 0.01
    0.0059328484 = product of:
      0.011865697 = sum of:
        0.011865697 = product of:
          0.017798545 = sum of:
            0.0023525301 = weight(_text_:a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0023525301 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.044588212 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
            0.015446015 = weight(_text_:h in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015446015 = score(doc=230,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.13586831 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch die Erwiderung von U. Naumann in: Bibliotheksdienst 36(2002) H.1, S.52-54.
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 35(2001) H.10, S.1342-1343
    Type
    a
  10. Praxisregeln zu RAK-WB § 311 und RSWK § 106 zur Individualisierung von Personennamen ab 1. Juli 2006 in Kraft (2006) 0.01
    0.005056957 = product of:
      0.010113914 = sum of:
        0.010113914 = product of:
          0.01517087 = sum of:
            0.0026886058 = weight(_text_:a in 5949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0026886058 = score(doc=5949,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 5949, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5949)
            0.012482265 = weight(_text_:h in 5949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012482265 = score(doc=5949,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 5949, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5949)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 40(2006) H.8/9, S.1058-1059
    Type
    a
  11. Oehlschläger, S.: Treffpunkt Standardisierung : Der Standardisierungsausschuss beim 94. Deutschen Bibliothekartag in Düsseldorf (2005) 0.00
    0.0033926102 = product of:
      0.0067852205 = sum of:
        0.0067852205 = product of:
          0.01017783 = sum of:
            0.0023764144 = weight(_text_:a in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0023764144 = score(doc=3691,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.045040898 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
            0.007801416 = weight(_text_:h in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007801416 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Mit großer Spannung wurde der Vortrag von Elisabeth Niggemann und Reiner Diedrichs über das weitere Vorgehen nach Abschluss des Projekts »Umstieg auf internationale Formate und Regelwerke (MARC21, AACR2)« erwartet. Unter dem programmatischen Titel »Hinter dem Horizont geht es weiter« stellten der Vorsitzende der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme und die Generaldirektorin Der Deutschen Bibliothek vor, wie die Internationalisierung der deutschen Standards im Einzelnen aussehen soll, und welche Maßnahmen erforderlich sind. Die Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme hatte in ihrer Herbstsitzung 2004 verschiedene Beschlüsse getroffen, welche die Zusammenarbeit der Verbundsysteme fördern und erleichtern sollen. Dazu gehören u. a. die Entwicklung eines prototypischen Verfahrens für einen Neukatalogisierungsdienst mit einheitlichen Datenstrukturen und einheitlichen Formatanwendungen, die Verwendung von MARC21 als einheitlichem Austauschformat und die Entwicklung eines Matchkey-Verfahrens zur verbundübergreifenden Titelerkennung. Außerdem wurden grundsätzliche Anforderungen an das künftige Regelwerk und für eine Reorganisation der Normdatenarbeit formuliert, die die Ziele der Arbeitsgemeinschaft effektiv unterstützen sollen. Der Standardisierungsausschuss hat diese Beschlüsse in seiner 9. Sitzung im Dezember 2004 begrüßt, bestätigt und konkretisiert. Nun gilt es, die Beschlüsse zügig umzusetzen, um die gesteckten Ziele zu verfolgen: einfacher Zugang zu bibliografischer Information national wie international für wissenschaftliche und andere persönliche Nutzer, leichte Austauschbarkeit von bibliografischer Information zwischen professionellen Benutzergruppen und Anwendern und last but not least Kostenreduktion bei der Erschließung. Im Anschluss stellte Renate Gömpel, Die Deutsche Bibliothek, die IFLA-CDNL Allianz für Bibliografische Standards (ICABS) vor, die während des Weltkongresses Bibliothek und Information in Berlin als ein neues strategisches Vorhaben ins Leben gerufen wurde. Mit ICABS streben die National Library of Australia, die Library of Congress, die British Library, die Koninklijke Bibliotheek der Niederlande und Die Deutsche Bibliothek gemeinsam mit der Biblioteca Nacional Portugals, der IFLA und der Conference of Directors of National Libraries (CDNL) die Fortsetzung und Unterstützung von Schlüsselaktivitäten im Bereich der bibliografischen und der Ressourcenkontrolle sowie damit zusammenhängender Formatstandards an. Die Allianz führt damit die Arbeit der Geschäftsstellen der früheren IFLA-Kernprogramme UBCIM (Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC) und UDT (Universal Dataflow and Telecommunications) fort. In dem Vortrag wurde ein Überblick über Ziele und Vorhaben von ICABS, ihre Organisation sowie deren Arbeit als Dach für facettenreiche Aktivitäten im Bereich bibliografischer Standards gegeben. Koordiniert wird die Arbeit von ICABS durch das Advisory Board, das aus Vertretern aller beteiligten Institutionen und Organisationen besteht und dessen Vorsitz gegenwärtig ebenso wie das Sekretariat bei Der Deutschen Bibliothek angesiedelt ist. Der Standardisierungsausschuss hat bereits erste Planungen für eine Veranstaltung beim 95. Deutschen Bibliothekartag in Dresden angestellt. Dort soll über den Stand der Internationalisierung des deutschen Regelwerks, den Umstieg auf MARC21 und die Weiterentwicklung der Normdateien berichtet werden. Darüber hinaus erwartet die Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer ein Bericht aus dem Joint Steering Committee for Revision of Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (JSC) über den Stand der AACR3. Es wird sicherlich spannend, merken Sie sich diesen Termin vor."
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 17(2005) H.2, S.40-42
    Type
    a
  12. Altenhöner, R; Hengel, C.; Jahns, Y.; Junger, U.; Mahnke, C.; Oehlschläger, S.; Werner, C.: Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 74. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in Quebec, Kanada : Aus den Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control, der Core Activities ICADS und UNIMARC sowie der Information Technology Section (2008) 0.00
    0.0031605982 = product of:
      0.0063211964 = sum of:
        0.0063211964 = product of:
          0.009481794 = sum of:
            0.0016803786 = weight(_text_:a in 2317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0016803786 = score(doc=2317,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.03184872 = fieldWeight in 2317, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2317)
            0.007801416 = weight(_text_:h in 2317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007801416 = score(doc=2317,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.06862386 = fieldWeight in 2317, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2317)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 42(2008) H.10, S.1005-1032
    Type
    a
  13. Taylor, A.G.: Teaching authority control (2004) 0.00
    0.0020747366 = product of:
      0.0041494733 = sum of:
        0.0041494733 = product of:
          0.01244842 = sum of:
            0.01244842 = weight(_text_:a in 5663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01244842 = score(doc=5663,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 5663, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5663)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The teaching of authority control in schools of library and information science has been given little attention until recently. A 2002 article reported that only a little over a third of respondents to a questionnaire believed they had learned about authority control in school. This paper reports a survey of teachers to determine how much authority control is taught in school. Respondents all emphasized the importance of trying to teach authority control to all students of library science and enthusiastically shared their methodologies, while admitting that it is a difficult concept to get across to students. Teachers also face non-understanding from colleagues, lack of course time, and competition from technology courses.
    Type
    a
  14. Tillett, B.B.: Authority control : state of the art and new perspectives (2004) 0.00
    0.0019208328 = product of:
      0.0038416656 = sum of:
        0.0038416656 = product of:
          0.011524997 = sum of:
            0.011524997 = weight(_text_:a in 5655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011524997 = score(doc=5655,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 5655, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5655)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Authority control is necessary for meeting the catalog's objectives of enabling users to find the works of an author and to collocate all works of a person or corporate body. This article looks at the current state of authority control as compared to the visions of the 1979 LITA (Library Information and Technology Association) Institutes and the 1984 Authority Control Interest Group. It explores a new view of IFLA's Universal Bibliographic Control (UBC) and a future vision of a virtual international authority file as a building block for the Semantic Web and reinforces the importance of authority control to improve the precision of searches of large databases or the Internet.
    Type
    a
  15. MacEwan, A.; Angjeli, A.; Gatenby, J.: ¬The International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI) : the evolving future of name authority control (2013) 0.00
    0.0019208328 = product of:
      0.0038416656 = sum of:
        0.0038416656 = product of:
          0.011524997 = sum of:
            0.011524997 = weight(_text_:a in 1939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011524997 = score(doc=1939,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 1939, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1939)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the project to build the initial International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI) database by deploying the techniques used to develop the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF). It focuses particularly on the work of the OCLC team in transforming the VIAF "resource file" model of matched data into a robust, operational, and authoritative file of uniquely assigned ISNIs as a base for an ongoing ISNI assignment system, and on the quality assurance validation of the database provided by the British Library and the Bibliothèque nationale de France. The need for future interaction between ongoing ISNI assignment and name authority control in libraries is also explored.
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue "Cataloging collaborations and partnerships"
    Type
    a
  16. Magliano, C.: Guidelines and methodology for the creation of the SBN authority file (2004) 0.00
    0.0017924039 = product of:
      0.0035848077 = sum of:
        0.0035848077 = product of:
          0.010754423 = sum of:
            0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 5556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010754423 = score(doc=5556,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5556, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5556)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Italy's ICCU (Istituto Centrale per il Catalogo Unico) is coordinating a national effort to build a shared online authority file through the National Library Service (SBN). The status of that project and the implications of maintaining such a resource are described.
    Type
    a
  17. Smiraglia, R.P.: Authority control of works: cataloging's chimera? (2004) 0.00
    0.0017712747 = product of:
      0.0035425494 = sum of:
        0.0035425494 = product of:
          0.010627648 = sum of:
            0.010627648 = weight(_text_:a in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010627648 = score(doc=5678,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.20142901 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Explicit authority control of works is essentially non-existent. Our catalogs are built on a principle of controlling headings, and primarily headings for names of authors. Our syndetic structure creates a spider's web of networked relationships among forms of headings, but it ends there, despite the potential richness of depth among bibliographic entities. Effective authority control of works could yield richness in the catalog that would enhance retrieval capabilities. Works are considered to constitute the intellectual content of informative artifacts that may be collected and ordered for retrieval. In a 1992 study the author examined a random sample of works drawn from the catalog of the Georgetown University Library. For each progenitor work, an instantiation network (also referred to as a bibliographic family) was constituted. A detailed analysis of the linkages that would be required for authority control of these networks is reviewed here. A new study is also presented, in which Library of Congress authority records for the works in this sample are sought and analyzed. Results demonstrate a near total lack of control, with only 5.6% of works for which authority records were found. From a sample of 410 works, of which nearly half have instantiation networks, only 23 works could be said to have implicit authority control. However, many instantiation networks are made up of successive derivations that can be implicitly linked through collocation. The difficult work of explicitly linking instantiations comes with title changes, translations, and containing relations. The empirical evidence in the present study suggests that explicit control of expressions will provide the best control over instantiation networks because it is instantiations such as translations, abridgments, and adaptations that require explicit linking.
    Type
    a
  18. Danskin, A.: ¬The Anglo-American Authority File : a PCC story (2020) 0.00
    0.0017534725 = product of:
      0.003506945 = sum of:
        0.003506945 = product of:
          0.0105208345 = sum of:
            0.0105208345 = weight(_text_:a in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0105208345 = score(doc=121,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines the motivations for the collaboration between the British Library and Library of Congress to develop a joint (Anglo-American) authority file. It describes the obstacles that had to be overcome for the British Library to become a Name Authority Cooperative (NACO) "copy holder", or node. It considers the contribution the British Library made to NACO, the benefits it has derived from participation in Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC), and concludes by looking ahead to the next 25 years.
    Type
    a
  19. Ammannati, G.C.: ¬The Bibliografia Nazionale Italiana and control of access points (2004) 0.00
    0.0016464281 = product of:
      0.0032928563 = sum of:
        0.0032928563 = product of:
          0.009878568 = sum of:
            0.009878568 = weight(_text_:a in 5665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009878568 = score(doc=5665,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 5665, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5665)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In its role as a national bibliographic agency, the Bibliografia Nazionale Italiana (BNI) has never been in a position to fulfill what should be one of its main functions: authority control. Despite the creation of various committees, studies, and projects, and the close relationship between the BNI and the Servizio Bibliotecario Nazionale (SBN), no plan of action with regard to authority control, whether shared or developed in consultation, has been produced to date. Recently, a significant result was achieved: the specification of the new BNI/UNIMARC database, structured according to authority control principles. And in collaboration with the Region of Tuscany, a project for control of access points destined for the users and librarians of that region is in progress, providing the opportunity to initiate the systematic control of BNI access points. The BNI is now in a position to begin to realize the first objective recommended by the IFLA Working Group on an International Authority System more than twenty years ago: to establish authority headings, including cross-references, for its bibliographic records.
    Type
    a
  20. Jensen, P.; Schulz, N.; Scott, M.: ¬The Griffith University Authority Control Project (1998) 0.00
    0.0015522675 = product of:
      0.003104535 = sum of:
        0.003104535 = product of:
          0.009313605 = sum of:
            0.009313605 = weight(_text_:a in 3707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009313605 = score(doc=3707,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3707, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3707)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports an Authority Control Project conducted by Griffith University, Queensland, Australia, in order to find a means to reduce the cost of authority control while maintaining, and preferably enhancing, accessibility of materials. Describes current authority control at Griffith University and discusses the mechanics of the project. Looks at the 4 stages of the project: defining the current situation; defining the future catalogue; examining the 7 options; and deciding on a solution
    Type
    a