Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"Normdateien"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Handis, M.W.: Greek subject and name authorities, and the Library of Congress (2020) 0.00
    0.0039058835 = product of:
      0.01171765 = sum of:
        0.01171765 = product of:
          0.0234353 = sum of:
            0.0234353 = weight(_text_:of in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0234353 = score(doc=5801,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Some international libraries are still using the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, 2nd edition revised, for cataloging even though the Library of Congress and other large libraries have retired it in favor of Resource Description and Access. One of these libraries is the National Library of Greece, which consults the Library of Congress database before establishing authorities. There are cultural differences in names and subjects between the Library of Congress and the National Library, but some National Library terms may be more appropriate for users than the Library of Congress-established forms.
  2. Dagher, I.; Soufi, D.: Authority control of Arabic psonal names : RDA and beyond (2021) 0.00
    0.003382594 = product of:
      0.010147782 = sum of:
        0.010147782 = product of:
          0.020295564 = sum of:
            0.020295564 = weight(_text_:of in 707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020295564 = score(doc=707,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 707, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=707)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the basics of creating name authority records for Arabic personal names in accordance with Resource Description and Access instructions and Program for Cooperative Cataloging guidelines. A background into the use of romanization for non-Latin scripts in bibliographic and authority records is provided to establish the context. Issues with romanization that are particular to Arabic are addressed. Separate sections on modern and classical names provide an overview of the major challenges, and strategies to enhance discovery are outlined. The paper concludes with an examination of the possible benefits of identity management and other changes in the authority control landscape for names in non-Latin script.
  3. Abrahamse, B.: Corporate bodies : access points and authority control (2021) 0.00
    0.0027618767 = product of:
      0.00828563 = sum of:
        0.00828563 = product of:
          0.01657126 = sum of:
            0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01657126 = score(doc=698,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The concept of authorship is central to how libraries organize their collections. But libraries do not only collect resources created by individuals, they also collect documents issued by organizations. Library catalogers use the concept of a "corporate body" to treat organizations as authors for the purpose of making their documents discoverable to users. This essay looks at the key features of establishing authorized access points (AAPs) and applying authority control for corporate bodies. It examines how practices with regard to corporate bodies have changed over time and considers the changes catalogers might expect to see in the future.
  4. Danskin, A.: ¬The Anglo-American Authority File : a PCC story (2020) 0.00
    0.0013809383 = product of:
      0.004142815 = sum of:
        0.004142815 = product of:
          0.00828563 = sum of:
            0.00828563 = weight(_text_:of in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00828563 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.120940685 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines the motivations for the collaboration between the British Library and Library of Congress to develop a joint (Anglo-American) authority file. It describes the obstacles that had to be overcome for the British Library to become a Name Authority Cooperative (NACO) "copy holder", or node. It considers the contribution the British Library made to NACO, the benefits it has derived from participation in Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC), and concludes by looking ahead to the next 25 years.