Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Martin, G.: Main entry : the argument for a defence of main entry in the OPAC (1996) 0.01 
    0.013941121 = product of:
  0.027882243 = sum of:
    0.027882243 = product of:
      0.055764485 = sum of:
        0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055764485 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.21-25
  2. Ballard, T.; Grimaldi, A.: Improve OPAC searching by reducing tagging errors in MARC records (1997) 0.01 
    0.013941121 = product of:
  0.027882243 = sum of:
    0.027882243 = product of:
      0.055764485 = sum of:
        0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055764485 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  3. Ayres, F.H.; Nielsen, L.P.S.; Ridley, M.J.: Bibliographic management : a new approach using the manifestations concept and the Bradford OPAC (1996) 0.01 
    0.012198481 = product of:
  0.024396962 = sum of:
    0.024396962 = product of:
      0.048793923 = sum of:
        0.048793923 = weight(_text_:22 in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048793923 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.3-28
  4. Carlyle, A.: Fulfilling the second objective in the online catalog : schemes for organizing author and work records into usable displays (1997) 0.01 
    0.0073834863 = product of:
  0.0147669725 = sum of:
    0.0147669725 = product of:
      0.05906789 = sum of:
        0.05906789 = weight(_text_:authors in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05906789 = score(doc=908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051448494 = queryNorm
            0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The 2nd objective of the catalogue, adopted internationally in the Paris Principles, requires that cataloguing records for particular authors and particular works be easily identified (IFLA 1991). Analysis of the requirements of the 2nd objective of the catalogue shows that it has 2 components: a retrieval component; and a display component; and that it may be interpreted broadly to include related works and works about a work or author. Investigates 2 schemes for their contributions to the creation of online catalogue displays that meet 2nd objective requirements. Analyzes the catalogue filing rule scheme to show that author and work displays in card catalogues have been composed of many groups or classes of materials that may also be used to create organized displays in online catalogues. The groups used in the filing rule scheme are based on relationships among items. Proposes a scheme based on Tillet's bibliographic relationship taxonomy to discover additional types of relationships that may be used to group record in online catalogue displays leading to a new scheme for the creation of organized display in online catalogues. Incorporates elements from both the filing rule scheme and the bibliographic relationship taxonomy to create displays that meet the requirements of the 2nd objective more fully than either scheme does alone

Authors