Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Fattahi, R.: ¬A uniform approach to the indexing of cataloguing data in online library systems (1997) 0.04
    0.038344346 = product of:
      0.07668869 = sum of:
        0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01029941 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
        0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066389285 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that in library cataloguing and for optional functionality of bibliographic records the indexing of fields and subfields should follow a uniform approach. This would maintain effectiveness in searching, retrieval and display of bibliographic information both within systems and between systems. However, a review of different postings to the AUTOCAT and USMARC discussion lists indicates that the indexing and tagging of cataloguing data do not, at present, follow a consistent approach in online library systems. If the rationale of cataloguing principles is to bring uniformity in bibliographic description and effectiveness in access, they should also address the question of uniform approaches to the indexing of cataloguing data. In this context and in terms of the identification and handling of data elements, cataloguing standards (codes, MARC formats and the Z39.50 standard) should be brought closer, in that they should provide guidelines for the designation of data elements for machine readable records
  2. Eliot, J.: MARC and OPAC systems : discussion document (1994) 0.04
    0.038329873 = product of:
      0.1533195 = sum of:
        0.1533195 = weight(_text_:standards in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1533195 = score(doc=10,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.68232906 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A discussion document produced following a meeting the Users of Book Industry Standards (UBIS) Bibliographic Standards Working Group at the University of London as part of a project to consider the Survey on the use of UK-MARC by Russell Sweeney published in 1991 by the British Library National Bibliographic Service. Considers the suitability, or otherwise, of the UKMARC format for use in OPACs. Summarizes the issues involved, discussing: the UKMARC exchange format, tagging and coding structure (record complexity, analytical entries, non filing indicators), data content (statements of responsibility, main versus added entry) and records standards
  3. Pelayo, J.J.J.; Cano, F.J.B.: Propuesta para la optimizacion de asientos catalograficos en catalogos en linea de primera generacion (1997) 0.02
    0.022129761 = product of:
      0.088519044 = sum of:
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=736,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Makes a proposal for the optimization of first generation online catalogues which tries to unify the different institutional projects for the establishment of simplified ISBD standards and MARC formats, as well as the results of occasional studies and researches on cataloguing codification. Offers a feasible solution, for immediate application, for a definitive transition from card catalogue to automated catalogue
  4. Martin, G.: Main entry : the argument for a defence of main entry in the OPAC (1996) 0.01
    0.0068306234 = product of:
      0.027322493 = sum of:
        0.027322493 = product of:
          0.054644987 = sum of:
            0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054644987 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.21-25
  5. Ballard, T.; Grimaldi, A.: Improve OPAC searching by reducing tagging errors in MARC records (1997) 0.01
    0.0068306234 = product of:
      0.027322493 = sum of:
        0.027322493 = product of:
          0.054644987 = sum of:
            0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054644987 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  6. Ayres, F.H.; Nielsen, L.P.S.; Ridley, M.J.: Bibliographic management : a new approach using the manifestations concept and the Bradford OPAC (1996) 0.01
    0.0059767957 = product of:
      0.023907183 = sum of:
        0.023907183 = product of:
          0.047814365 = sum of:
            0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047814365 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.3-28
  7. Khalid, H.M.; Mahmood, K.: Cataloguing practice in university libraries : a comparison of three developing countries (Pakistan, Malaysia, Saudia Arabia) (1997) 0.00
    0.0030039945 = product of:
      0.012015978 = sum of:
        0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 3018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012015978 = score(doc=3018,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3018, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3018)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Surveys the status of catalguing practice in university libraries in 3 Asian developing countries, Pakistan, Malaysia, and Saudia Arabia. Examines the extent of the usage of international cataloguing tools such as cataloguing codes (AACR, ISBD), classification schemes (DDC, LCC) and subject heading lists (Sears, LCSH). Results indicate that there is an overall uniformity in the use of such tools, with a trend towards automation of cataloguing services with more access points for catalogue searching. Online catalogues are also replacing all traditional catalogue forms (card, printed, and microform). Findings show that, in using information technology in technical services, Malaysian university libraries are more advanced than those of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia
  8. Ayres, F.H.; Nielsen, L.P.S.; Ridley, M.J.: Design and display issues for a manifestation-based catalogue at Bradford (1997) 0.00
    0.0025748524 = product of:
      0.01029941 = sum of:
        0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 7910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01029941 = score(doc=7910,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 7910, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7910)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the technical aspects of a feasibility study to test a new concept in bibliographic control based on the manifestations of a work. Conventional catalogues are based on the main entry principle which follows from the concept that there should be 1 main entry for each work. The Bradford OPAC project, at Bradford University, UK, aimed to develop a new type of hierarchical bibliographic record structure to cope with the problem of applying the main entry principle to multiple cataloguing records which are manisfestations of the same work. The project involved the storage of MARC data sets of bibliographic records, taken from the Bradford University Library OPAC and the OCLC WorldCat database, in a relational database (MS Access) on a PC. This was then used for an experimental Windows based OPAC, to evaluate the overall success of the idea and any problem areas identified with a view to a more substantial study. The project also aimed to test whether intelligent and responsive software, using a graphic user interface and based on sets of manifestations, could provide a better route to information than a display based on a single work
  9. Ercegovac, Z.: Minimal level cataloging : what does it mean for maps in the contexts of card catalogs, online catalogs, and digital libraries? (1998) 0.00
    0.0025748524 = product of:
      0.01029941 = sum of:
        0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01029941 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.8, S.706-719