Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Ballard, T.; Grimaldi, A.: Improve OPAC searching by reducing tagging errors in MARC records (1997) 0.05 
    0.049538486 = product of:
  0.09907697 = sum of:
    0.09907697 = sum of:
      0.0424972 = weight(_text_:online in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0424972 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05220068 = queryNorm
          0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
      0.05657977 = weight(_text_:22 in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05657977 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05220068 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    One of the most common errors in cataloguing library materials involves miscoding of the nonfiling indicator of title fields. Notes the extent of the problem and its negative effect on searching in the library's online catalogue and surveys how librarians have approached solutions to the problems. Describes how the major library automation system address this problem
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  2. Ruiz-Pérez, R.: Choice of author access points for online catalogs of monographs in Spanish (1998) 0.02 
    0.018592525 = product of:
  0.03718505 = sum of:
    0.03718505 = product of:
      0.0743701 = sum of:
        0.0743701 = weight(_text_:online in 5315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0743701 = score(doc=5315,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 5315, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5315)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. Kniesner, D.; Willman, C.: ¬The analytical reference in serials cataloging : a new access point in online catalogs (1995) 0.02 
    0.01502503 = product of:
  0.03005006 = sum of:
    0.03005006 = product of:
      0.06010012 = sum of:
        0.06010012 = weight(_text_:online in 3827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06010012 = score(doc=3827,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 3827, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3827)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Analytical references are needed in online library catalogues in order to provide volume specific author and title access to volumes in monographic series that have been catalogues as periodicals. Demonstrates how Oregon Health Science University Library has used the MARC bibliographic format to provide a record consisting almost entirely of indexed access points, in essence, many cross references assembled into one record, all pointing to a serial. Further proposes that AACR2 rules 13.2A and 21.30M1 be extended to prescribe analytical added entries as well as analytical references
  4. Verwer, R.: Waar is W.F. Hermans? : het bedrog van de OPC (1996) 0.02 
    0.01502503 = product of:
  0.03005006 = sum of:
    0.03005006 = product of:
      0.06010012 = sum of:
        0.06010012 = weight(_text_:online in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06010012 = score(doc=4919,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A study of the online catalogues of major academic libraries and databases in the Netherlands shows considerable variation in the form of name used for the author W.F. Hermans. The problem lies with a lack of authority control in headings used in the Dutch national union Pica catalogue. Reactions from 2 cataloguers point to the difficulties in maintaining catalogues in the face of reduced funding and to the important role played by the Pica project in improving library services and reducing cataloguing backlogs
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Where is W.F. Hermans?: The difficulties with the online public catalogue
  5. Pelayo, J.J.J.; Cano, F.J.B.: Propuesta para la optimizacion de asientos catalograficos en catalogos en linea de primera generacion (1997) 0.02 
    0.01502503 = product of:
  0.03005006 = sum of:
    0.03005006 = product of:
      0.06010012 = sum of:
        0.06010012 = weight(_text_:online in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06010012 = score(doc=736,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Makes a proposal for the optimization of first generation online catalogues which tries to unify the different institutional projects for the establishment of simplified ISBD standards and MARC formats, as well as the results of occasional studies and researches on cataloguing codification. Offers a feasible solution, for immediate application, for a definitive transition from card catalogue to automated catalogue
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Proposal for the optimization of catalogue records in online catalogues
  6. Raine, H.; Stalker, L.: Rare book records in online systems (1996) 0.02 
    0.01502503 = product of:
  0.03005006 = sum of:
    0.03005006 = product of:
      0.06010012 = sum of:
        0.06010012 = weight(_text_:online in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06010012 = score(doc=911,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Rare book cataloguers have on various occasions expressed frustration that their carefully constructed rare book records 'disappear' into 'vanilla' catalogues designed and maintained by system vendors or by local system staff with only the most general knowledge of cataloguing. Reports the results of a 1993 survey of online systems used for rare book cataloguing and takes a first step toward making a set of recommendations regarding the display and indexing of rare book records in such systems
  7. Carlyle, A.: Fulfilling the second objective in the online catalog : schemes for organizing author and work records into usable displays (1997) 0.01 
    0.014847913 = product of:
  0.029695826 = sum of:
    0.029695826 = product of:
      0.05939165 = sum of:
        0.05939165 = weight(_text_:online in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05939165 = score(doc=908,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.37489069 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The 2nd objective of the catalogue, adopted internationally in the Paris Principles, requires that cataloguing records for particular authors and particular works be easily identified (IFLA 1991). Analysis of the requirements of the 2nd objective of the catalogue shows that it has 2 components: a retrieval component; and a display component; and that it may be interpreted broadly to include related works and works about a work or author. Investigates 2 schemes for their contributions to the creation of online catalogue displays that meet 2nd objective requirements. Analyzes the catalogue filing rule scheme to show that author and work displays in card catalogues have been composed of many groups or classes of materials that may also be used to create organized displays in online catalogues. The groups used in the filing rule scheme are based on relationships among items. Proposes a scheme based on Tillet's bibliographic relationship taxonomy to discover additional types of relationships that may be used to group record in online catalogue displays leading to a new scheme for the creation of organized display in online catalogues. Incorporates elements from both the filing rule scheme and the bibliographic relationship taxonomy to create displays that meet the requirements of the 2nd objective more fully than either scheme does alone
  8. Martin, G.: Main entry : the argument for a defence of main entry in the OPAC (1996) 0.01 
    0.014144942 = product of:
  0.028289884 = sum of:
    0.028289884 = product of:
      0.05657977 = sum of:
        0.05657977 = weight(_text_:22 in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05657977 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.21-25
  9. Ercegovac, Z.: Minimal level cataloging : what does it mean for maps in the contexts of card catalogs, online catalogs, and digital libraries? (1998) 0.01 
    0.013801372 = product of:
  0.027602743 = sum of:
    0.027602743 = product of:
      0.055205487 = sum of:
        0.055205487 = weight(_text_:online in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055205487 = score(doc=1149,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.34846687 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this article, we examine some of the proposals which have dealt with the problems in cataloging in 2 different technological contexts: printed-card catalogs and online catalogs. We first look at some of the measures which attempted to deal with the 'crisis in cataloging' at the Library of Congress in the 1940s. Then we address some of the current problems in cataloging in the era of OPACs. In particular, we discuss the extent to which minimal-level cataloging, as defines by AACR and implemented in the OCLC database, works for maps. Our discussion is organized around 2 main groups of access points: controlled vocabulary data elements, including name data elements, and free-text data elements. In closing, we discuss prospects that the next generation of online catalogs uisng the Z39.50 protocol and SGML format might offer to minimal-level cataloging for maps
  10. Ayres, F.H.; Nielsen, L.P.S.; Ridley, M.J.: Bibliographic management : a new approach using the manifestations concept and the Bradford OPAC (1996) 0.01 
    0.012376824 = product of:
  0.024753649 = sum of:
    0.024753649 = product of:
      0.049507298 = sum of:
        0.049507298 = weight(_text_:22 in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049507298 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18279788 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.3-28
  11. Fattahi, R.: ¬A uniform approach to the indexing of cataloguing data in online library systems (1997) 0.01 
    0.011268772 = product of:
  0.022537544 = sum of:
    0.022537544 = product of:
      0.04507509 = sum of:
        0.04507509 = weight(_text_:online in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04507509 = score(doc=131,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.284522 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Argues that in library cataloguing and for optional functionality of bibliographic records the indexing of fields and subfields should follow a uniform approach. This would maintain effectiveness in searching, retrieval and display of bibliographic information both within systems and between systems. However, a review of different postings to the AUTOCAT and USMARC discussion lists indicates that the indexing and tagging of cataloguing data do not, at present, follow a consistent approach in online library systems. If the rationale of cataloguing principles is to bring uniformity in bibliographic description and effectiveness in access, they should also address the question of uniform approaches to the indexing of cataloguing data. In this context and in terms of the identification and handling of data elements, cataloguing standards (codes, MARC formats and the Z39.50 standard) should be brought closer, in that they should provide guidelines for the designation of data elements for machine readable records
  12. Khalid, H.M.; Mahmood, K.: Cataloguing practice in university libraries : a comparison of three developing countries (Pakistan, Malaysia, Saudia Arabia) (1997) 0.01 
    0.009296263 = product of:
  0.018592525 = sum of:
    0.018592525 = product of:
      0.03718505 = sum of:
        0.03718505 = weight(_text_:online in 3018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03718505 = score(doc=3018,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842392 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05220068 = queryNorm
            0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 3018, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3018)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Surveys the status of catalguing practice in university libraries in 3 Asian developing countries, Pakistan, Malaysia, and Saudia Arabia. Examines the extent of the usage of international cataloguing tools such as cataloguing codes (AACR, ISBD), classification schemes (DDC, LCC) and subject heading lists (Sears, LCSH). Results indicate that there is an overall uniformity in the use of such tools, with a trend towards automation of cataloguing services with more access points for catalogue searching. Online catalogues are also replacing all traditional catalogue forms (card, printed, and microform). Findings show that, in using information technology in technical services, Malaysian university libraries are more advanced than those of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia

Authors

Languages