Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Fattahi, R.; Parirokh, M.: Restructuring the bibliographic record for better organization, management, and representation of knowledge in the global online environment : a new spproach (2003) 0.01
    0.0075883283 = product of:
      0.015176657 = sum of:
        0.015176657 = product of:
          0.060706627 = sum of:
            0.060706627 = weight(_text_:authors in 2693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060706627 = score(doc=2693,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052875843 = queryNorm
                0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2693, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2693)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The computer technology has considerable potential for better and more efficient management of knowledge and information sources. It is possible to provide easy, integrated and straightforward access to works of knowledge appearing in different expressions, editions, and manifestations (i.e., to bibliographic families). The online environment requires that the bibliographic record, as the surrogate for works of knowledge, should be restructured to provide users with a high-quality finding, identifying and collocating bibliographic tool. Unlike the existing flat structure, the multi-level structure of the Work Record would provide catalog users with the ability to discover if a work has been published/represented in different editions and manifestations and if there is any relationship among different works in a catalog or an the Internet. A similar structure for the Author Record would provide better access to different works by an author or about an author. A new structure for the bibliographic record is suggested through an analysis and categorization of the different relationships that exist in the bibliographic universe. A prototype catalogue developed based an the new structure (available an the Internet at: http://wilma.silas.unsw.edu.au/ students/rfattahi/super.html) illustrates the ability of providing multi-level, yet easy access to voluminous works and voluminous authors. Furthermore, the prototype catalog provides a clearer picture of bibliographic families and helps OPAC users decide an specific editions, manifestations, or items related to a specific work.
  2. Erklärung zu den internationalen Katalogisierungsprinzipien (2009) 0.00
    0.0037276577 = product of:
      0.0074553154 = sum of:
        0.0074553154 = product of:
          0.014910631 = sum of:
            0.014910631 = weight(_text_:d in 3286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014910631 = score(doc=3286,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052875843 = queryNorm
                0.1484275 = fieldWeight in 3286, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Das "Statement of Principles" - allgemein bekannt als "Paris Principles" - wurde 1961 von der International Conference on Cataloguing Principles verabschiedet. Sein Ziel, als Basis für die internationale Standardisierung in der Katalogisierung zu dienen, ist sicherlich erreicht worden: Die meisten Katalogisierungsregelwerke, die in der Folgezeit weltweit entwickelt wurden, folgten den Prinzipien ganz oder wenigstens in hohem Maß. Mehr als vierzig Jahre später ist das Bedürfnis nach gemeinsamen internationalen Katalogisierungsregeln gewachsen, weil Katalogisierer und Benutzer weltweit OPACs (Online Public Access Catalogues = Online-Benutzerkataloge) nutzen. An der Schwelle des 21. Jahrhunderts hat die IFLA einen Vorstoß unternommen, neue Prinzipien zu erarbeiten, die auf Online-Bibliothekskataloge und auch darüber hinaus anwendbar sind. Das oberste Prinzip ist der Komfort des Katalognutzers. Diese Erklärung ersetzt die "Paris Principles" und weitet den Geltungsbereich von rein textlichen Werken auf alle Materialarten aus und von der Bestimmung und Form einer Eintragung auf alle Aspekte von bibliografischen Daten und Normdaten, die in Bibliothekskatalogen genutzt werden. Sie umfasst nicht nur Prinzipien und Ziele (d. h. Funktionen des Katalogs), sondern auch Regelungen, die international in Katalogisierungsregelwerken enthalten sein sollten, und gibt Anleitung für Suchfunktionen. Die Prinzipien bauen auf den großen Katalogtraditionen der Welt sowie auf dem konzeptionellen Modell der Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) der IFLA auf.
    Language
    d
  3. Erklärung zu Internationalen Katalogisierungsprinzipien : Verabschiedeter Entwurf des 1. IFLA Meeting an an International Cataloguing Code, Frankfurt, Deutschland, 2003. Deutsche Übersetzung des "Statement of International Cataloguing Principles" (2004) 0.00
    0.002982126 = product of:
      0.005964252 = sum of:
        0.005964252 = product of:
          0.011928504 = sum of:
            0.011928504 = weight(_text_:d in 2145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011928504 = score(doc=2145,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052875843 = queryNorm
                0.118742 = fieldWeight in 2145, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2145)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
  4. Poser, M.: Analyse und Bewertung ausgewählter Funktionen von ALEPH-Katalogen in Bezug auf Anforderungen und Erwartungen aus Benutzersicht (2008) 0.00
    0.0021086815 = product of:
      0.004217363 = sum of:
        0.004217363 = product of:
          0.008434726 = sum of:
            0.008434726 = weight(_text_:d in 3269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008434726 = score(doc=3269,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052875843 = queryNorm
                0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 3269, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
  5. Oehlschläger, S.: Aus der 48. Sitzung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme am 12. und 13. November 2004 in Göttingen (2005) 0.00
    0.0018638289 = product of:
      0.0037276577 = sum of:
        0.0037276577 = product of:
          0.0074553154 = sum of:
            0.0074553154 = weight(_text_:d in 3556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0074553154 = score(doc=3556,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052875843 = queryNorm
                0.07421375 = fieldWeight in 3556, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3556)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
    Location
    D

Languages

Types