-
Martin, G.: Main entry : the argument for a defence of main entry in the OPAC (1996)
0.06
0.060736552 = product of:
0.121473104 = sum of:
0.121473104 = sum of:
0.0649845 = weight(_text_:g in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0649845 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19574708 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
0.0564886 = weight(_text_:22 in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0564886 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.21-25
-
Ballard, T.; Grimaldi, A.: Improve OPAC searching by reducing tagging errors in MARC records (1997)
0.01
0.01412215 = product of:
0.0282443 = sum of:
0.0282443 = product of:
0.0564886 = sum of:
0.0564886 = weight(_text_:22 in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0564886 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 3.1997 16:22:15
-
Ayres, F.H.; Nielsen, L.P.S.; Ridley, M.J.: Bibliographic management : a new approach using the manifestations concept and the Bradford OPAC (1996)
0.01
0.012356881 = product of:
0.024713762 = sum of:
0.024713762 = product of:
0.049427524 = sum of:
0.049427524 = weight(_text_:22 in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049427524 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.3-28
-
Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985)
0.01
0.012356881 = product of:
0.024713762 = sum of:
0.024713762 = product of:
0.049427524 = sum of:
0.049427524 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049427524 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18250333 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:30
-
Petrucciani, A.: Quality of library catalogs and value of (good) catalogs (2015)
0.01
0.010471107 = product of:
0.020942215 = sum of:
0.020942215 = product of:
0.08376886 = sum of:
0.08376886 = weight(_text_:authors in 1878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08376886 = score(doc=1878,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23758973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1878, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1878)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The quality of large catalogs is uneven and often low, but this issue is underrated and understudied. Library catalogs often fail to communicate correct and clear information to users and their low quality is not simply due to faults, duplications, and so on but also to unwise cataloging standards and policies. While there is plenty of uncontrolled information about books and other publications, the need for good-quality bibliographic information is apparent and library catalogs may provide a trustworthy map of the publishing output, with full control of editions, works, authors, and so on and effective navigation functions, which are lacking in today's information-rich environment.
-
Carlyle, A.: Fulfilling the second objective in the online catalog : schemes for organizing author and work records into usable displays (1997)
0.01
0.0074793627 = product of:
0.014958725 = sum of:
0.014958725 = product of:
0.0598349 = sum of:
0.0598349 = weight(_text_:authors in 908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0598349 = score(doc=908,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23758973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 908, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=908)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The 2nd objective of the catalogue, adopted internationally in the Paris Principles, requires that cataloguing records for particular authors and particular works be easily identified (IFLA 1991). Analysis of the requirements of the 2nd objective of the catalogue shows that it has 2 components: a retrieval component; and a display component; and that it may be interpreted broadly to include related works and works about a work or author. Investigates 2 schemes for their contributions to the creation of online catalogue displays that meet 2nd objective requirements. Analyzes the catalogue filing rule scheme to show that author and work displays in card catalogues have been composed of many groups or classes of materials that may also be used to create organized displays in online catalogues. The groups used in the filing rule scheme are based on relationships among items. Proposes a scheme based on Tillet's bibliographic relationship taxonomy to discover additional types of relationships that may be used to group record in online catalogue displays leading to a new scheme for the creation of organized display in online catalogues. Incorporates elements from both the filing rule scheme and the bibliographic relationship taxonomy to create displays that meet the requirements of the 2nd objective more fully than either scheme does alone
-
Fattahi, R.; Parirokh, M.: Restructuring the bibliographic record for better organization, management, and representation of knowledge in the global online environment : a new spproach (2003)
0.01
0.0074793627 = product of:
0.014958725 = sum of:
0.014958725 = product of:
0.0598349 = sum of:
0.0598349 = weight(_text_:authors in 2693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0598349 = score(doc=2693,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23758973 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052116565 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 2693, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2693)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The computer technology has considerable potential for better and more efficient management of knowledge and information sources. It is possible to provide easy, integrated and straightforward access to works of knowledge appearing in different expressions, editions, and manifestations (i.e., to bibliographic families). The online environment requires that the bibliographic record, as the surrogate for works of knowledge, should be restructured to provide users with a high-quality finding, identifying and collocating bibliographic tool. Unlike the existing flat structure, the multi-level structure of the Work Record would provide catalog users with the ability to discover if a work has been published/represented in different editions and manifestations and if there is any relationship among different works in a catalog or an the Internet. A similar structure for the Author Record would provide better access to different works by an author or about an author. A new structure for the bibliographic record is suggested through an analysis and categorization of the different relationships that exist in the bibliographic universe. A prototype catalogue developed based an the new structure (available an the Internet at: http://wilma.silas.unsw.edu.au/ students/rfattahi/super.html) illustrates the ability of providing multi-level, yet easy access to voluminous works and voluminous authors. Furthermore, the prototype catalog provides a clearer picture of bibliographic families and helps OPAC users decide an specific editions, manifestations, or items related to a specific work.
