Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Orbach, B.: Integrating concepts : corporate main entry and graphic materials (1988) 0.05 
    0.054181494 = product of:
  0.21672598 = sum of:
    0.21672598 = weight(_text_:graphic in 408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21672598 = score(doc=408,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045191016 = queryNorm
        0.72424996 = fieldWeight in 408, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=408)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    As an illustration of the general concern about how bibliographic records for graphic materials can be integrated most effectively with records for works in other media, this article presents problems associated with applying existing AACR2 guidelines for choice of entry. Characteristics of original items and historical collections of pictures, the role of corporate bodies in creating such materials, and the degree to which AACR2 provisions for entry under the heading for a corporate body accommodate these features are examined. Recommendations regarding extending AACR2 Rule 21.1B2 and, more generally, regarding the need to examine the meaning and objectives of integrating bibliographic records for various media and actors affecting this process, are made.
  2. Leresche, F.: ¬La normalisation du catalogage en France (1989) 0.04 
    0.04378526 = product of:
  0.17514104 = sum of:
    0.17514104 = weight(_text_:graphic in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17514104 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045191016 = queryNorm
        0.5852823 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Reviews the organisation of the work of cataloguing standardisation in France and in standards published or in preparation. French standards follow IFLA reommendations on rules for bibliographic descriptions and headings. Standardisation of formats is less developed; however MARC is gaininig ground as a national exchange format, whilst USMARC is also used by university and public libraries. French policy on cataloguing standards aims both to promote international exchange of biblio-graphic recordswhile respecting national access requirements, and to simplify cataloguing by promoting the use of medium-level bibliographic records.
  3. Abrera, J.B.; Lin, J.C.: Parallel title problems of interpretation (1981) 0.04 
    0.0383121 = product of:
  0.1532484 = sum of:
    0.1532484 = weight(_text_:graphic in 279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1532484 = score(doc=279,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045191016 = queryNorm
        0.51212204 = fieldWeight in 279, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=279)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This study examines the interrelationship of the rules on parallel title in AACR2. What emerges from the analysis are two principles that were utilized in the codification of the rules: (1) a principle of interrelationship (i.e. transcribing a data element in its relationship to other data elements); and (2) a principle of structured format (i.e. transcribing a data element in a prescribed order). A graphic representation of the possible combinations and positions of the data elements of descriptions in the title and statement of responsibility area (Area 1) shows that the present rules do not ensure consistency in bibliographic recording.
  4. Jeng, L.H.: ¬An expert system for determining title proper in descriptive cataloging : a conceptual model (1986) 0.04 
    0.0383121 = product of:
  0.1532484 = sum of:
    0.1532484 = weight(_text_:graphic in 375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1532484 = score(doc=375,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.29924196 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045191016 = queryNorm
        0.51212204 = fieldWeight in 375, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.6217136 = idf(docFreq=159, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=375)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The human process of determining bibliographic data from title pages of monographs is complex, yet systematic. This paper investigates the intellectual process involved, in conceptual and logical levels, by proposing a model of the expert system for determining title proper as the first element of the first area in ISBD. It assumes that the title page of a monograph consists of more than one block of character or graphic representation. Each block has its physical and content characteristics and can be separated from other blocks by separators. Three categories of expert knowledge are identified, and the system model is discussed along with its individual system component. It applies the "list" concept for the system data structure and addresses the potentiality of this conceptual model.
  5. Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.01 
    0.009184138 = product of:
  0.03673655 = sum of:
    0.03673655 = product of:
      0.0734731 = sum of:
        0.0734731 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0734731 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:22:27
  6. Hustand, S.: Problems of duplicate records (1986) 0.01 
    0.0085600205 = product of:
  0.034240082 = sum of:
    0.034240082 = product of:
      0.068480164 = sum of:
        0.068480164 = weight(_text_:methods in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.068480164 = score(doc=266,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.37691376 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Duplicate records is a familiar problem in bibliographic databases. The problem is obvious when a union catalogue is established by automatically merging two or more separate and independent source of catalogue information. However, even in systems with on-line cataloguing and access to previous records, duplication is a problem. Author / title search search prior to cataloguing does not cut duplication to zero. A great deal of effort has been put into developing methods of duplicate detection. A major problem in this work has been efficiency. Particularly in the on-line setting is this of importance. Most studies have dealt with book and article material. The Research Libraries Group Inc. has described matching algorithms also for films, maps, recordings, scores and serials. Various methods of detecting duplicates will be discussed.
  7. Hurowitz, R.; Kalinsky, K.; McDonald, D.R.; Deventer, B.V.: Future catalogs and bibliographic links at Stanford University Libraries (1981) 0.01 
    0.008070464 = product of:
  0.032281857 = sum of:
    0.032281857 = product of:
      0.064563714 = sum of:
        0.064563714 = weight(_text_:methods in 272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064563714 = score(doc=272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.35535768 = fieldWeight in 272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=272)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The decision by many libraries to adopt AACR2, freeze their catalogs, and initiate new catalogs raises several questions regarding connections of links between the catalogs. This paper examines the intended goal of catalogs, how the existence of more than one catalog affects such goals, and alternative methods of linking catalogs for names, subjects, and titles. In addition, recommendations are presented regarding the optimal method of linking catalogs and changes in organization, staffing, and costs are investigated.
  8. Lambrecht, J.H.: ¬A case for pre-order searching in the catalog department (1988) 0.01 
    0.0070616566 = product of:
  0.028246626 = sum of:
    0.028246626 = product of:
      0.056493253 = sum of:
        0.056493253 = weight(_text_:methods in 433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056493253 = score(doc=433,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.31093797 = fieldWeight in 433, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=433)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Searching and record creation in a total and integrated library system could be accomplished in a number of departments. Local organizational history will inevitably have an impact upon the placement of responsibility for these functions, but should not be the sole criterion. Several factors argue strongly for searching and record creation within the catalog department. Among these are the expertise of the catalog department in creating and maintaining bibliographic records, the increasingly similar methods of pre-order and pre-catalog searching, and the theories upon which total and integrated systems such as NOTIS are based.
  9. Münnich, M.: Katalogisieren auf dem PC : ein Pflichtenheft für die Formalkatalogisierung (1988) 0.01 
    0.006122759 = product of:
  0.024491036 = sum of:
    0.024491036 = product of:
      0.048982073 = sum of:
        0.048982073 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048982073 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856
  10. Rolland-Thomas, P.: AACR2: one step towards an international code (1983) 0.01 
    0.006122759 = product of:
  0.024491036 = sum of:
    0.024491036 = product of:
      0.048982073 = sum of:
        0.048982073 = weight(_text_:22 in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048982073 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    6. 1.2007 19:12:22
  11. Struble, C.A.; Kohberger, P.B.: Statistical survey to determine availability of cataloging copy on OCLC (1987) 0.01 
    0.006122759 = product of:
  0.024491036 = sum of:
    0.024491036 = product of:
      0.048982073 = sum of:
        0.048982073 = weight(_text_:22 in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048982073 = score(doc=358,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.3, S.13-22
  12. Roughton, K.G.: Educating the dinosaur : the evolution of catalog management at the Iowa State University Library (1985) 0.01 
    0.006122759 = product of:
  0.024491036 = sum of:
    0.024491036 = product of:
      0.048982073 = sum of:
        0.048982073 = weight(_text_:22 in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048982073 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:11
  13. Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985) 0.01 
    0.005357414 = product of:
  0.021429656 = sum of:
    0.021429656 = product of:
      0.042859312 = sum of:
        0.042859312 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042859312 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15825124 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:30
  14. McCrank, L.J.: ¬The bibliographic control of rare books : phased cataloging, descriptive standards, and costs (1984) 0.01 
    0.0050440403 = product of:
  0.020176161 = sum of:
    0.020176161 = product of:
      0.040352322 = sum of:
        0.040352322 = weight(_text_:methods in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040352322 = score(doc=338,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18168657 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191016 = queryNorm
            0.22209854 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0204134 = idf(docFreq=2156, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Because rare book cataloging stresses the unique and characteristics of the species in special collections, it tends to be eclectic, chaotic even, in resisting standards and uniform description. Rare book librarians have therefore sought alternatives to AACR2 for bibliographic description at more detailed levels of control than this standard. Slowly a hierarchy of levels for the bibliographic control of books, manuscript and printed, is evolving which has a counterpart in archival control. As librarians choose appropriate levels of description for rare books and manuscripts, cost considerations must play their proper role. A survey of the major rare book and manuscript repositories in the U.S. and Canada provides comparative data for the cost of cataloging at levels higher than AACR2 and delineates other characteristics of RBSC operations for personnel, compensation, unit costs, backlogs, regional variance, standards in practice, accommodation of automation and networking, methods of providing intellectual access, and acquisition activities. This study discusses the concept of phased cataloging and collection management but suggests that current practices are not yet rationalized into an integrated system for the bibliographic control of rare books and archival control of manuscripts and records.

Authors

Languages

  • e 12
  • d 2

Themes