Search (99 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Letarte, K.M.; Turvey, M.R.; Bornemann, D.; Adams, D.L.: Practitioner perspectives on cataloging education for entry-level academic Librarians (2002) 0.06 
    0.06102201 = product of:
  0.12204402 = sum of:
    0.10059083 = weight(_text_:policy in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10059083 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
    0.021453189 = product of:
      0.042906377 = sum of:
        0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042906377 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The role of cataloging education within the library profession is a topic of considerable interest and debate. Fifty-five heads of reference and sixty-five heads of cataloging in Association of Research Librarians institutions responded to a survey based upon the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Educational Policy Statement, Appendix: Knowledge and Skills, Intellectual Access and Information Organization, concerning the importance of cataloging competencies for all entry-level academic librarians. The survey found that practitioners agreed upon a definite set of core cataloging competencies that all entry-level academic librarians should possess. This finding holds larger implications for library education for academic librarians and for the profession as a whole.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. ChaPudhry, A.S.; Periasamy, M.: ¬A study of current practices of selected libraries in cataloguing electronic journals (2001) 0.06 
    0.06102201 = product of:
  0.12204402 = sum of:
    0.10059083 = weight(_text_:policy in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10059083 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
    0.021453189 = product of:
      0.042906377 = sum of:
        0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042906377 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    MARC records and online policy documents of selected libraries were reviewed to study the approaches taken by libraries worldwide to catalogue electronic journals. In general, libraries catalogue those electronic journals that are subscribed by them on priority basis. Most of them annotate the e-journal to the print record, some prefer to catalogue them separately, while the majority of the libraries adopt both approaches. While most of the libraries studied prefer full record, cataloguing e-journals separately with a brief record (at least containing MARC fields 245, 500, and 856) that identifies and locates the resource seems to be the best practice.
    Date
    22. 1.2007 20:46:57
  3. Parent, I.: IFLA Section on Cataloguing: "Why in the World?" (2000) 0.03 
    0.031828046 = product of:
  0.12731218 = sum of:
    0.12731218 = sum of:
      0.0905353 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0905353 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04524064 = queryNorm
          0.3642275 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
      0.036776893 = weight(_text_:22 in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036776893 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04524064 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The Bibliographic Control Division of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) consists of three sections: bibliography, cataloguing, and classification. The cataloguing section, which focuses on descriptive cataloguing, is one of the oldest within IFLA, having been founded in 1935 as the IFLA Committee on Uniform Cataloguing Rules. It became the Committee on Cataloguing in 1970. The committee played a key role in planning and convening the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles held in Paris in 1961 and the International Meeting of Cataloguing Experts held in Copenhagen in 1969. The Copenhagen conference provided the impetus to develop the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions (ISBD). The Committee on Cataloguing established a systematic process for the revision of the ISBDs. The cataloguing section focuses on traditional cataloguing standards and on the impact of electronic resources and technology on these standards. The section has initiated several projects at the international level to facilitate access to information.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Madison, O.M.A.: ¬The IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : international standards for bibliographic control (2000) 0.03 
    0.026523374 = product of:
  0.106093496 = sum of:
    0.106093496 = sum of:
      0.075446084 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.075446084 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04524064 = queryNorm
          0.3035229 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
      0.030647412 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030647412 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04524064 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The formal charge for the IFLA study involving international bibliography standards was to delineate the functions that are performed by the bibliographic record with respect to various media, applications, and user needs. The method used was the entity relationship analysis technique. Three groups of entities that are the key objects of interest to users of bibliographic records were defined. The primary group contains four entities: work, expression, manifestation, and item. The second group includes entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, production, or ownership of entities in the first group. The third group includes entities that represent concepts, objects, events, and places. In the study we identified the attributes associated with each entity and the relationships that are most important to users. The attributes and relationships were mapped to the functional requirements for bibliographic records that were defined in terms of four user tasks: to find, identify, select, and obtain. Basic requirements for national bibliographic records were recommended based on the entity analysis. The recommendations of the study are compared with two standards, AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) and the Dublin Core, to place them into pragmatic context. The results of the study are being used in the review of the complete set of ISBDs as the initial benchmark in determining data elements for each format.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Münnich, M.: REUSE or rule harmonization : just a project? (2000) 0.03 
    0.026523374 = product of:
  0.106093496 = sum of:
    0.106093496 = sum of:
      0.075446084 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.075446084 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04524064 = queryNorm
          0.3035229 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
      0.030647412 = weight(_text_:22 in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030647412 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04524064 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    German academic libraries acquire a large number of books from British and American publishers. The bibliographic records of the Library of Congress and the British National Bibliography are offered in most German library networks. Thus, projects REUSE and REUSE+ were undertaken when there was a demand for harmonization of Germany cataloging rules with AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules). Experts in the United States and Germany systematically analyzed bibliographic data and compared the codes on which the data were based. Major and minor differences in cataloging rules were identified. The REUSE group proposed German participation in international authority files and changes in RAK, the German cataloging rules. In REUSE+ the different types of hierarchical bibliographic structures in USMARC and MAB2 and other German formats were analyzed. The German project group made suggestions concerning both the German formats and the USMARC format. Steps toward rule alignment and harmonization of online requirements were made when the German Cataloging Rules Conference made decisions on resolutions prepared by the Working Groups on Descriptive Cataloging that dealt with titles, encoding of form titles and conference terms, prefixes in names, hierarchies, entries under persons and corporate bodies, and the conceptual basis of RAK2 in the context of harmonization. Although problems remain, German rule makers have made progress toward internationality.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Ho, J.: Applying form/genre headings to foreign films : a summary of AUTOCAT and OLAC-LIST discussions (2005) 0.03 
    0.025147708 = product of:
  0.10059083 = sum of:
    0.10059083 = weight(_text_:policy in 5717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10059083 = score(doc=5717,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 5717, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5717)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In several discussions on two electronic lists (AUTOCAT and OLAC-LIST) from 1993 to 2003, librarians expressed interest in using form/genre headings to provide access to foreign films as a separate category of material, as well as by language and country of production, but observed that existing standards do not accommodate these practices. Various options were discussed, including the adaptation of subject headings intended for topical use, geographical subdivision of existing form/genre headings, and the creation of local headings. This paper summarizes the discussions and describes the local policy at Texas A&M University Libraries.
  7. Zhu, L.: Single-record vs. separate-record approaches for cataloging e-serials in the OCLC WorldCat local environment (2009) 0.03 
    0.025147708 = product of:
  0.10059083 = sum of:
    0.10059083 = weight(_text_:policy in 2977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10059083 = score(doc=2977,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 2977, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2977)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Libraries have been making decisions on whether to use a single- or separate-record approach for cataloging e-serials based on what works best in their local library integrated systems and which approach is likely to save cataloging time. However, in the new network-level cataloging and OCLC WorldCat Local environment, we need to make cataloging decisions based on what works best in a network-level platform. This paper discusses the OCLC WorldCat Local environment, the concept of network-level cataloging, and why Washington State University has responded by migrating from a single-record to separate-record cataloging policy for e-serials.
  8. Yee, M.M.: Cataloging compared to descriptive bibliography, abstracting and indexing services, and metadata (2007) 0.02 
    0.02286838 = product of:
  0.09147352 = sum of:
    0.09147352 = product of:
      0.18294704 = sum of:
        0.18294704 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18294704 = score(doc=267,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.736004 = fieldWeight in 267, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=267)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Cataloging is compared to descriptive bibliography, to enumerative bibliography and abstracting and indexing services, as well as to metadata created by Web search engines or nonprofessionals at sites such as Amazon.com. These four types of metadata are compared with regard to object of the description, functions, scope, number of copies examined, collective vs. individual creation, standardization, authority control, evidence, amount of descriptive detail, degression, time span the data is intended to last, and degree of evaluation.
  9. Turvey, M.R.; Letarte, K.M.: Cataloging or knowledge management : perspectives of library educators on cataloging education for entry-level academic librarians (2002) 0.02 
    0.021555178 = product of:
  0.08622071 = sum of:
    0.08622071 = weight(_text_:policy in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08622071 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The topic of cataloging education for catalogers and non-catalogers alike has been a perennial topic for practitioners. This follow-up study explores the views of library educators with regard to cataloging education. Twenty-three educators with primary teaching duties in reference, twenty-nine educators with primary teaching duties in cataloging and seventy educators whose primary teaching duties were in neither reference nor cataloging in ALA-accredited master's degree programs responded to a survey based on the ALCTS Educational Policy Statement, Appendix: Knowledge and Skills, Intellectual Access and Information Organization concerning the importance of cataloging competencies for all entry-level academic librarians. The survey found library educators, in general, agreed with practitioners on the listed cataloging competencies for all entry-level academic librarians.
  10. Haddad, P.: Cataloging and classification of Pacific and Asian language materials at the National Library of Australia (2003) 0.02 
    0.021555178 = product of:
  0.08622071 = sum of:
    0.08622071 = weight(_text_:policy in 5644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08622071 = score(doc=5644,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 5644, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5644)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    From its inception early in the twentieth century, the National Library of Australia has included in its collections materials in the languages of the Pacific region. Following the Second World War, the Library began to collect materials in the languages of East and Southeast Asia. This collection policy presented the Library with a number of choices in the cataloging, classification, and organizing of its collections. Early difficulties in controlling materials, many in non-roman scripts, showed the need to be consistent in bibliographic standards and practices. A concern for the needs of specialist readers led the National Library to provide innovative solutions for accessing script materials in the automated environment.
  11. Haddad, P.: Cataloging and classification of Pacific and Asian language materials at the National Library of Australia : an historical overview (2003) 0.02 
    0.021555178 = product of:
  0.08622071 = sum of:
    0.08622071 = weight(_text_:policy in 5645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08622071 = score(doc=5645,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 5645, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5645)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    From its inception early in the twentieth century, the National Library of Australia has included in its collections materials in the languages of the Pacific region. Following the Second World War, the Library began to collect materials in the languages of East and Southeast Asia. This collection policy presented the Library with a number of choices in the cataloging, classification, and organizing of its collections. Early difficulties in controlling materials, many in non-roman scripts, showed the need to be consistent in bibliographic standards and practices. A concern for the needs of specialist readers led the National Library to provide innovative solutions for accessing script materials in the automated environment.
  12. Kirkland, L.N.: Resources for catalogers : an annotated bibliography (2005) 0.02 
    0.021339376 = product of:
  0.0853575 = sum of:
    0.0853575 = product of:
      0.170715 = sum of:
        0.170715 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 5716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.170715 = score(doc=5716,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.686794 = fieldWeight in 5716, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5716)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Considerable documentation, tools, and manuals are available to aid catalogers, but without some guidance, many have no idea how to use these shelves of reference guides and manuals. This bibliography is intended as a guide to the information and resources available to assist the cataloger in cataloging. The availability of each resource is given (including online availability), along with a brief summary of the type of information that each resource contains.
  13. Kilner, K.: ¬The AustLit Gateway and scholarly bibliography : a specialist implementation of the FRBR (2004) 0.02 
    0.019601468 = product of:
  0.07840587 = sum of:
    0.07840587 = product of:
      0.15681174 = sum of:
        0.15681174 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 5851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15681174 = score(doc=5851,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.63086057 = fieldWeight in 5851, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5851)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses how the AustLit: Australian Literature Gateway's interpretation, enhancement and implementation of the International Federation of Library Association's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR Final Report 1998) model is meeting the needs of Australian literature scholars for accurate bibliographic representation of the histories of literary texts. It also explores how the AustLit Gateway's underpinning research principles, which are based on the tradition of scholarly enumerative and descriptive bibliography, with enhancements from analytical bibliography and literary biography, have impacted upon our implementation of the FRBR model. The major enhancement or alteration to the model is the use of enhanced manifestations, which allow the full representation of all agents' contributions to be shown in a highly granular format by enabling creation events to be incorporated at all levels of the Work, Expression and Manifestation nexus.
  14. Wang, Y.: ¬A look into Chinese persons' names in bibliography practice (2000) 0.02 
    0.018671954 = product of:
  0.074687816 = sum of:
    0.074687816 = product of:
      0.14937563 = sum of:
        0.14937563 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 5401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14937563 = score(doc=5401,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.60094476 = fieldWeight in 5401, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5401)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Many Chinese persons active in different languages have redundant or inappropriate name headings in databases. This paper invents a ''Sheep-Fox Method'' visually describing various forms of Chinese persons' names in different languages and in transliteration, conceptually and factually clarifying complicated relations between the names, name forms, and gives typical examples to indicate appropriate choices in bibliography practice. It also suggests improvements for the practice. The paper discusses matters in Chinese persons' names with the understanding that its method could be universally applied to persons' names in other languages of scripts in general as well.
  15. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.02 
    0.017336795 = product of:
  0.06934718 = sum of:
    0.06934718 = product of:
      0.13869436 = sum of:
        0.13869436 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13869436 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
  16. Dimec, Z.; Zumer, M.; Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Slovenian cataloguing practice and Functional Requirements for Bibliography Records : a comparative analysis (2004) 0.02 
    0.016334558 = product of:
  0.06533823 = sum of:
    0.06533823 = product of:
      0.13067646 = sum of:
        0.13067646 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 5857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13067646 = score(doc=5857,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.52571714 = fieldWeight in 5857, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5857)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The IFLA study Functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR) set a new frame for both cataloguing codes and subject analysis. The Paris Principles defined the functions of the catalogue followed by both cataloguing codes used in Slovenia: P. Kalan's Abecedni imenski katalog and E. Verona's Pravilnik i prirunik za izradbe abecednih kataloga. FRBR defines the functions for records themselves, irrespective of the type of the database consisting of these records. Compared to the requirements for the national bibliographic records as defined by FRBR, the records belonging to the Slovenian national bibliography show more descriptive elements and less notes on bibliographic history, which reflects in lack of uniform titles. As the uniform title itself enables the identification of related works and their expressions, this practice does not satisfy the FRBR requirements. Differences in the extent of records for different types of material derive from decentralised processing at the National and University Library. It is therefore necessary to establish uniform criteria for both the materials included into the Slovenian national bibliography, and the extent of data elements.
  17. Russell, B.M.: Description and access in rare books cataloging : a historical survey (2003) 0.02 
    0.01600453 = product of:
  0.06401812 = sum of:
    0.06401812 = product of:
      0.12803625 = sum of:
        0.12803625 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 5646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12803625 = score(doc=5646,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.5150955 = fieldWeight in 5646, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Rare book cataloging codes and practices have been shaped by a constant interplay between the tradition of descriptive bibliography and the evolution of library cataloging codes. At the same time, technological changes, such as the emergence of bibliographic databases and online catalogs, have led to promises of increased flexibility and usability in records for rare books. This article will focus on the development of modern Anglo-American rare book cataloging, highlighting special access points that often appear to exist outside the mainstream of library cataloging. By focusing on the treatment of several "hallmarks" of rare book records in codes published during the second half of the twentieth century, the development of rare book cataloging and its relationship to the traditions of bibliography and general library emerges.
  18. Russell, B.M.: Description and access in rare books cataloging : an historical survey (2003) 0.02 
    0.01600453 = product of:
  0.06401812 = sum of:
    0.06401812 = product of:
      0.12803625 = sum of:
        0.12803625 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 5647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12803625 = score(doc=5647,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.5150955 = fieldWeight in 5647, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5647)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Rare book cataloging codes and practices have been shaped by a constant interplay between the tradition of descriptive bibliography and the evolution of library cataloging codes. At the same time, technological changes, such as the emergence of bibliographic databases and online catalogs, have led to promises of increased flexibility and usability in records for rare books. This article will focus on the development of modern Anglo-American rare book cataloging, highlighting special access points that often appear to exist outside the mainstream of library cataloging. By focusing on the treatment of several "hallmarks" of rare book records in codes published during the second half of the twentieth century, the development of rare book cataloging and its relationship to the traditions of bibliography and general library emerges.
  19. Gömpel, R.; Hengel, C.; Kunz, M.; Münnich, M.; Solberg, S.; Werner, C.: 68. IFLA General Conference in Glasgow : Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control (2002) 0.02 
    0.015089218 = product of:
  0.06035687 = sum of:
    0.06035687 = product of:
      0.12071374 = sum of:
        0.12071374 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 1198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12071374 = score(doc=1198,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.48563668 = fieldWeight in 1198, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1198)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Enthält Abschnitte zu den Themen: Bibliography Section - Cataloguing Section (Darin Ausführungen zur Diskussion um Regelwerke und Datenformate) - ISBD Reviews Group - IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code - Arbeitsgruppe Guidelines for OPAC displays - UBCIM Working Group FRANAR - Projekt VIAF - Classification and Indexing Section
  20. El-Sherbini, M.: Selected cataloging tools on the Internet (2003) 0.02 
    0.015089218 = product of:
  0.06035687 = sum of:
    0.06035687 = product of:
      0.12071374 = sum of:
        0.12071374 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 1997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12071374 = score(doc=1997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.48563668 = fieldWeight in 1997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This bibliography contains selected cataloging tools an the Internet. It is divided into seven sections as follows: authority management and subject headings tools; cataloging tools by type of materials; dictionaries, encyclopedias, and place names; listservs and workshops; software and vendors; technical service professional organizations; and journals and newsletters. Resources are arranged in alphabetical order under each topic. Selected cataloging tools are annotated. There is some overlap since a given web site can cover many tools.

Authors

Languages

  • e 68
  • d 29
  • f 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes