-
Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012)
0.07
0.071369946 = product of:
0.10705492 = sum of:
0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01235367 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.094701245 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04915812 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Bloss, M.E.: Testing RDA at Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science : the students' perspectives (2011)
0.03
0.03065083 = product of:
0.045976244 = sum of:
0.021397185 = weight(_text_:information in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021397185 = score(doc=1899,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
0.02457906 = product of:
0.04915812 = sum of:
0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04915812 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science (GSLIS) was one of a funnel group of graduate schools of library and information science selected to test RDA. A seminar specifically for this purpose was conducted from August to December 2010. Fifteen students participated in the test, creating records in AACR2 and in RDA, encoding them in the MARC format, and responding to the required questionnaires. In addition to record creation, the students were also asked to submit a final paper in which they described their experiences and recommended whether or not to accept RDA as a replacement for AACR2.
- Date
- 25. 5.2015 18:36:22
-
Guerrini, M.; Possemato, T.: From record management to data management : RDA and new application models BIBFRAME, RIMMF, and OliSuite/WeCat (2016)
0.03
0.029705016 = product of:
0.044557523 = sum of:
0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 5120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01235367 = score(doc=5120,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5120, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5120)
0.032203853 = product of:
0.064407706 = sum of:
0.064407706 = weight(_text_:management in 5120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064407706 = score(doc=5120,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 5120, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5120)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The reflection provoked by RDA produced the awareness that the flat format of MARC 21 records is inadequate in expressing the relationships between bibliographic entities that the FRBR model and RDA standard consider fundamental. RIMMF and BIBFRAME indicate to software developers a way to think that is consistent with RDA. In Italy, @Cult, a software house and bibliographic agency working for Casalini Libri, has taken on the charge of following and facilitating the transition: OliSuite/WeCat provides an implementation of RDA that integrates vocabularies and ontologies already present in the Web by structuring the information in linked open data.
-
Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014)
0.03
0.028033193 = product of:
0.042049788 = sum of:
0.017470727 = weight(_text_:information in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017470727 = score(doc=2606,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.02457906 = product of:
0.04915812 = sum of:
0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04915812 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have become fluent in information technology such as web design skills, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Stylesheets (CSS), eXensible Markup Language (XML), and programming languages. The knowledge gained from learning information technology can be used to experiment with methods of transforming one metadata schema into another using various software solutions. This paper will discuss the use of eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for repurposing, editing, and reformatting metadata. Catalogers have the requisite skills for working with any metadata schema, and if they are excluded from metadata work, libraries are wasting a valuable human resource.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Altenhöner, R.; Frodl, C.; Gömpel, R.; Jahns, Y.; Junger, U.; Mahnke, C.; Meyer, A.; Pfeifer, B.; Oehlschläger, S.; Svensson, L.G.: Libraries beyond libraries : Integration, Innovation and Information for all Aus den Veranstaltungen der Sektionen Bibliografie, Katalogisierung, Klassifikation und Indexierung, Knowledge Management und Informationstechnologie sowie der Core Activity ICADS der IFLA Division III (Library Services) beim Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 77. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in San Juan, Puerto Rico (2011)
0.03
0.026828196 = product of:
0.040242292 = sum of:
0.017470727 = weight(_text_:information in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017470727 = score(doc=174,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
0.022771563 = product of:
0.045543127 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011)
0.03
0.026272139 = product of:
0.039408207 = sum of:
0.018340444 = weight(_text_:information in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018340444 = score(doc=4199,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.021067765 = product of:
0.04213553 = sum of:
0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213553 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Educational standards are a central focus of the current educational system in the United States, underpinning educational practice, curriculum design, teacher professional development, and high-stakes testing and assessment. Digital library users have requested that this information be accessible in association with digital learning resources to support teaching and learning as well as accountability requirements. Providing this information is complex because of the variability and number of standards documents in use at the national, state, and local level. This article describes a cataloging tool that aids catalogers in the assignment of standards metadata to digital library resources, using natural language processing techniques. The research explores whether the standards suggestor service would suggest the same standards as a human, whether relevant standards are ranked appropriately in the result set, and whether the relevance of the suggested assignments improve when, in addition to resource content, metadata is included in the query to the cataloging tool. The article also discusses how this service might streamline the cataloging workflow.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:25:32
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.395-405
-
Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015)
0.02
0.02462182 = product of:
0.03693273 = sum of:
0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01235367 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
0.02457906 = product of:
0.04915812 = sum of:
0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04915812 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper presents the results of a research study, a survey of library and information science master's degree holders who have taken a beginning cataloging course, to identify the elements of a beginning cataloging course that help students to learn cataloging concepts and skills. The results suggest that cataloging practice (the hands-on creation of bibliographic records or catalog cards), the effectiveness of the instructor, a balance of theory and practice, and placing cataloging in a real-world context contribute to effective learning. However, more research is needed to determine how, and to what the extent, each element should be incorporated into beginning cataloging courses.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015)
0.02
0.02402845 = product of:
0.036042675 = sum of:
0.014974909 = weight(_text_:information in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014974909 = score(doc=2610,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.021067765 = product of:
0.04213553 = sum of:
0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213553 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Aggregates have been a frequent topic of discussion between library science researchers. This study seeks to better understand aggregates through the analysis of a sample of bibliographic records and review of the cataloging treatment of aggregates. The study focuses on determining how common aggregates are in library collections, what types of aggregates exist, how aggregates are described in bibliographic records, and the criteria for identifying aggregates from the information in bibliographic records. A sample of bibliographic records representing textual resources was taken from OCLC's WorldCat database. More than 20 percent of the sampled records represented aggregates and more works were embodied in aggregates than were embodied in single work manifestations. A variety of issues, including cataloging practices and the varying definitions of aggregates, made it difficult to accurately identify and quantify the presence of aggregates using only the information from bibliographic records.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Maurer, M.B.; Panchyshyn, R.S.: Understanding the why : a case study in managing the RDA implementation (2014)
0.02
0.023416823 = product of:
0.035125233 = sum of:
0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01235367 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
0.022771563 = product of:
0.045543127 = sum of:
0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045543127 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article describes in detail the management of a Resource Description and Access (RDA) implementation process by an academic library that was an early adopter of RDA. It identifies the necessary decisions to be made and discusses the rationale behind these decisions during the implementation process. This information can benefit other libraries with managing their local RDA implementations. The authors examine the business case behind implementation from various perspectives such as administrative support, training, documentation, establishment of local procedures and costs. It aims to help cataloging/technical services/metadata managers understand the scope of the process and the impact it will have on their libraries.
-
Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013)
0.02
0.022609001 = product of:
0.0339135 = sum of:
0.017648099 = weight(_text_:information in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017648099 = score(doc=677,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
0.016265402 = product of:
0.032530803 = sum of:
0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032530803 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.
- Series
- Advances in information science
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.651-662
-
D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011)
0.02
0.021104416 = product of:
0.031656623 = sum of:
0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01058886 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.021067765 = product of:
0.04213553 = sum of:
0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213553 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:06:52
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.257-269
-
Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016)
0.02
0.021104416 = product of:
0.031656623 = sum of:
0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01058886 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.021067765 = product of:
0.04213553 = sum of:
0.04213553 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04213553 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The author revisits the development of RDA from its inception in 2005 through to its initial release in 2010. The development effort is set in the context of an evolving digital environment that was transforming both the production and dissemination of information resources and the technologies used to create, store, and access data describing those resources. The author examines the interplay between strategic commitments to align RDA with new conceptual models, emerging database structures, and metadata developments in allied communities, on the one hand, and compatibility with AACR2 legacy databases on the other. Aspects of the development effort examined include the structuring of RDA as a resource description language, organizing the new standard as a working tool, and refining guidelines and instructions for recording RDA data.
- Date
- 17. 5.2016 19:22:40
-
Mayo, D.; Bowers, K.: ¬The devil's shoehorn : a case study of EAD to ArchivesSpace migration at a large university (2017)
0.02
0.019162996 = product of:
0.028744493 = sum of:
0.01247909 = weight(_text_:information in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01247909 = score(doc=3373,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
0.016265402 = product of:
0.032530803 = sum of:
0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032530803 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A band of archivists and IT professionals at Harvard took on a project to convert nearly two million descriptions of archival collection components from marked-up text into the ArchivesSpace archival metadata management system. Starting in the mid-1990s, Harvard was an alpha implementer of EAD, an SGML (later XML) text markup language for electronic inventories, indexes, and finding aids that archivists use to wend their way through the sometimes quirky filing systems that bureaucracies establish for their records or the utter chaos in which some individuals keep their personal archives. These pathfinder documents, designed to cope with messy reality, can themselves be difficult to classify. Portions of them are rigorously structured, while other parts are narrative. Early documents predate the establishment of the standard; many feature idiosyncratic encoding that had been through several machine conversions, while others were freshly encoded and fairly consistent. In this paper, we will cover the practical and technical challenges involved in preparing a large (900MiB) corpus of XML for ingest into an open-source archival information system (ArchivesSpace). This case study will give an overview of the project, discuss problem discovery and problem solving, and address the technical challenges, analysis, solutions, and decisions and provide information on the tools produced and lessons learned. The authors of this piece are Kate Bowers, Collections Services Archivist for Metadata, Systems, and Standards at the Harvard University Archive, and Dave Mayo, a Digital Library Software Engineer for Harvard's Library and Technology Services. Kate was heavily involved in both metadata analysis and later problem solving, while Dave was the sole full-time developer assigned to the migration project.
-
Normore, L.F.: "Here be dragons" : a wayfinding approach to teaching cataloguing (2012)
0.02
0.017587014 = product of:
0.02638052 = sum of:
0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 1903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0088240495 = score(doc=1903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1903)
0.017556472 = product of:
0.035112944 = sum of:
0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 1903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112944 = score(doc=1903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1903)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Teaching cataloguing requires the instructor to make strategic decisions about how to approach the variety and complexity of the field and to provide an adequate theoretical foundation while preparing students for their entry into the world of practice. Accompanying these challenges are the tactical demands of providing this instruction in a distance education environment. Rather than focusing on ways to support learners in catalogue record production, instructors may use a problem solving and decision making approach to instruction. In this paper, a way to conceptualize a decision making approach that builds on a foundation provided by theories of information navigation is described. This approach, which is called "wayfinding", teaches by having students learn to find their way in the sets of rules that are commonly used. The method focuses on instruction about the structural features of rule sets, providing basic definitions of what each of the "places" in the rule sets contain (e.g., "formatting personal names" in Chapter 22 of AACR2R) and about ways to navigate those structures, enabling students to learn not only about common rules but also about less well known cataloguing practices ("dragons"). It provides both pragmatic and pedagogical benefits and helps develop links between cataloguing practices and their theoretical foundations.
-
Savoy, J.: Estimating the probability of an authorship attribution (2016)
0.02
0.017587014 = product of:
0.02638052 = sum of:
0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0088240495 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
0.017556472 = product of:
0.035112944 = sum of:
0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035112944 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 7. 5.2016 21:22:27
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.6, S.1462-1472
-
Signoles, A.; Bitoun, C.; Valderrama, A.: Implementing FRBR to improve retrieval of in-house information in a medium-sized international institute (2012)
0.02
0.01682619 = product of:
0.025239285 = sum of:
0.0122269625 = weight(_text_:information in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0122269625 = score(doc=1911,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.1343758 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
0.013012322 = product of:
0.026024643 = sum of:
0.026024643 = weight(_text_:management in 1911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026024643 = score(doc=1911,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 1911, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1911)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP) is a specialized institute of UNESCO which undertakes training and research in the field of educational planning and management. IIEP disseminates publications which are the outputs of its research findings. The Documentation Centre is responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of several databases. In-house databases include a projects database, consisting of activity records (updated by administrative and research staff), and a grey literature document database and reference archive (mission reports, lessons, masters' papers). The latter contains heterogeneous, multilingual documents which are the outputs of activities. The external database is a publicly accessible bibliographic database which follows AACR. The databases are separate which results in a loss of information. The process was undertaken within the wider context of reorganizing internal cataloguing rules to comply with changing international standards. The objective is to make IIEP's various databases interoperable by factorizing the fragmented elements and reconciling heterogeneous data from multiple sources (different contributors, indexed and non-indexed content). The choice of FRBR can be explained due to the appropriateness of an access point by work. On an information level, it allows the user to optimally retrieve resources through connections between the works. On an institutional level, it would enable the history and evolution of activities and their outputs to be traced. The FRBRized catalogue would be enriched through inter-database relationships and would offer fuller records. The first step was to establish the users' different needs and to develop a typology of the data to be processed. Methodology used was based on the FRBRer model. Then, identifying the entities enabled the work and its levels, the attributes of each group and the relationships to be determined. To account for the processes of time and the complexity of the levels of work, FRBRoo and CIDOC-CRM models were envisaged. Finally, an FRBRoo model was developed.
-
Carrasco, R.C.; Serrano, A.; Castillo-Buergo, R.: ¬A parser for authority control of author names in bibliographic records (2016)
0.02
0.0167263 = product of:
0.02508945 = sum of:
0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 3186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0088240495 = score(doc=3186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3186)
0.016265402 = product of:
0.032530803 = sum of:
0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 3186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032530803 = score(doc=3186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 3186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 52(2016) no.5, S.753-764
-
Lee, D.J.L.; Stvilia, B.: Developing a data identifier taxonomy (2014)
0.01
0.01314717 = product of:
0.039441507 = sum of:
0.039441507 = product of:
0.078883015 = sum of:
0.078883015 = weight(_text_:management in 1976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078883015 = score(doc=1976,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 1976, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1976)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- As the amount of research data management is growing, the use of identity metadata for discovering, linking, and citing research data is growing too. To support the awareness of different identifier systems and the comparison and selection of an identifier for a particular data management environment, there is need for a knowledge base. This article contributes to that goal and analyzes the data management and related literatures to develop a data identifier taxonomy. The taxonomy includes four categories (domain, entity types, activities, and quality dimensions). In addition, the article describes 14 identifiers referenced in the literature and analyzes them along the taxonomy.
-
Bénauda, C.-L.; Bordeianu, S.: OCLC's WorldShare Management Services : a brave new world for catalogers (2015)
0.01
0.01314717 = product of:
0.039441507 = sum of:
0.039441507 = product of:
0.078883015 = sum of:
0.078883015 = weight(_text_:management in 2617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078883015 = score(doc=2617,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 2617, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2617)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Like other recent library management systems, OCLC's WorldShare Management Services (WMS) is cloud-based. But unlike the others, WMS opens WorldCat for applications beyond its traditional role as a source of bibliographic records. It enables catalogers to work directly from the Master Record, which no longer needs to be exported to a local system. This article describes the impact of WMS on the roles and functions of cataloging departments, and asks if it is changing the meaning of cataloging. It concludes that while the workflows are changed dramatically, the profession of cataloging remains relevant.
-
Noruzi, A.: FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2012)
0.01
0.009363452 = product of:
0.028090354 = sum of:
0.028090354 = product of:
0.056180708 = sum of:
0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056180708 = score(doc=4564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0518325 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:13:52
