Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Pooja, K.M.; Mondal, S.; Chandra, J.: ¬A graph combination with edge pruning-based approach for author name disambiguation (2020) 0.00
    0.003843119 = product of:
      0.023058712 = sum of:
        0.023058712 = product of:
          0.046117425 = sum of:
            0.046117425 = weight(_text_:web in 59) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046117425 = score(doc=59,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 59, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=59)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Author name disambiguation (AND) is a challenging problem due to several issues such as missing key identifiers, same name corresponding to multiple authors, along with inconsistent representation. Several techniques have been proposed but maintaining consistent accuracy levels over all data sets is still a major challenge. We identify two major issues associated with the AND problem. First, the namesake problem in which two or more authors with the same name publishes in a similar domain. Second, the diverse topic problem in which one author publishes in diverse topical domains with a different set of coauthors. In this work, we initially propose a method named ATGEP for AND that addresses the namesake issue. We evaluate the performance of ATGEP using various ambiguous name references collected from the Arnetminer Citation (AC) and Web of Science (WoS) data set. We empirically show that the two aforementioned problems are crucial to address the AND problem that are difficult to handle using state-of-the-art techniques. To handle the diverse topic issue, we extend ATGEP to a new variant named ATGEP-web that considers external web information of the authors. Experiments show that with enough information available from external web sources ATGEP-web can significantly improve the results further compared with ATGEP.
  2. Schreur, P.E.: ¬The use of Linked Data and artificial intelligence as key elements in the transformation of technical services (2020) 0.00
    0.002406173 = product of:
      0.0144370375 = sum of:
        0.0144370375 = product of:
          0.028874075 = sum of:
            0.028874075 = weight(_text_:web in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028874075 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Library Technical Services have benefited from numerous stimuli. Although initially looked at with suspicion, transitions such as the move from catalog cards to the MARC formats have proven enormously helpful to libraries and their patrons. Linked data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold the same promise. Through the conversion of metadata surrogates (cataloging) to linked open data, libraries can represent their resources on the Semantic Web. But in order to provide some form of controlled access to unstructured data, libraries must reach beyond traditional cataloging to new tools such as AI to provide consistent access to a growing world of full-text resources.
  3. Morris, V.: Automated language identification of bibliographic resources (2020) 0.00
    0.002110802 = product of:
      0.012664813 = sum of:
        0.012664813 = product of:
          0.037994437 = sum of:
            0.037994437 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037994437 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    2. 3.2020 19:04:22
  4. Miksa, S.D.: Cataloging principles and objectives : history and development (2021) 0.00
    0.0020624339 = product of:
      0.012374603 = sum of:
        0.012374603 = product of:
          0.024749206 = sum of:
            0.024749206 = weight(_text_:web in 702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024749206 = score(doc=702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=702)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloging principles and objectives guide the formation of cataloging rules governing the organization of information within the library catalog, as well as the function of the catalog itself. Changes in technologies wrought by the internet and the web have been the driving forces behind shifting cataloging practice and reconfigurations of cataloging rules. Modern cataloging principles and objectives started in 1841 with the creation of Panizzi's 91 Rules for the British Museum and gained momentum with Charles Cutter's Rules for Descriptive Cataloging (1904). The first Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) was adopted in 1961, holding their place through such codifications as AACR and AACR2 in the 1970s and 1980s. Revisions accelerated starting in 2003 with the three original FR models. The Library Reference Model (LRM) in 2017 acted as a catalyst for the evolution of principles and objectives culminating in the creation of Resource Description and Access (RDA) in 2013.
  5. Fernanda de Jesus, A.; Ferreira de Castro, F.: Proposal for the publication of linked open bibliographic data (2024) 0.00
    0.0020624339 = product of:
      0.012374603 = sum of:
        0.012374603 = product of:
          0.024749206 = sum of:
            0.024749206 = weight(_text_:web in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024749206 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Linked Open Data (LOD) are a set of principles for publishing structured, connected data available for reuse under an open license. The objective of this paper is to analyze the publishing of bibliographic data such as LOD, having as a product the elaboration of theoretical-methodological recommendations for the publication of these data, in an approach based on the ten best practices for publishing LOD, from the World Wide Web Consortium. The starting point was the conduction of a Systematic Review of Literature, where initiatives to publish bibliographic data such as LOD were identified. An empirical study of these institutions was also conducted. As a result, theoretical-methodological recommendations were obtained for the process of publishing bibliographic data such as LOD.
  6. Preminger, M.; Rype, I.; Ådland, M.K.; Massey, D.; Tallerås, K.: ¬The public library metadata landscape : the case of Norway 2017-2018 (2020) 0.00
    0.0018637171 = product of:
      0.011182303 = sum of:
        0.011182303 = product of:
          0.033546906 = sum of:
            0.033546906 = weight(_text_:29 in 5802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033546906 = score(doc=5802,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5802, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5802)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2020 19:29:18
  7. Holden, C.: ¬The bibliographic work : history, theory, and practice (2021) 0.00
    0.0018637171 = product of:
      0.011182303 = sum of:
        0.011182303 = product of:
          0.033546906 = sum of:
            0.033546906 = weight(_text_:29 in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033546906 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    25. 9.2022 19:54:29
  8. Aalberg, T.; O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.: Extending the LRM Model to integrating resources (2021) 0.00
    0.0018637171 = product of:
      0.011182303 = sum of:
        0.011182303 = product of:
          0.033546906 = sum of:
            0.033546906 = weight(_text_:29 in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033546906 = score(doc=295,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    28. 6.2021 19:29:58
  9. Yon, A.; Willey, E.: Using the Cataloguing Code of Ethics principles for a retrospective project analysis (2022) 0.00
    0.0018637171 = product of:
      0.011182303 = sum of:
        0.011182303 = product of:
          0.033546906 = sum of:
            0.033546906 = weight(_text_:29 in 729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033546906 = score(doc=729,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 729, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=729)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2022 17:15:25
  10. Perera, T.: Description specialists and inclusive description work and/or initiatives : an exploratory study (2022) 0.00
    0.0018637171 = product of:
      0.011182303 = sum of:
        0.011182303 = product of:
          0.033546906 = sum of:
            0.033546906 = weight(_text_:29 in 974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033546906 = score(doc=974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=974)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2022 18:01:16
  11. Oudenaar, H.; Bullard, J.: NOT A BOOK : goodreads and the risks of social cataloging with insufficient direction (2024) 0.00
    0.0018637171 = product of:
      0.011182303 = sum of:
        0.011182303 = product of:
          0.033546906 = sum of:
            0.033546906 = weight(_text_:29 in 1156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033546906 = score(doc=1156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1156)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22.11.2023 18:29:56
  12. Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023) 0.00
    0.0015831016 = product of:
      0.009498609 = sum of:
        0.009498609 = product of:
          0.028495826 = sum of:
            0.028495826 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028495826 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2023 12:00:14
  13. Soos, C.; Leazer, H.H.: Presentations of authorship in knowledge organization (2020) 0.00
    0.0013312267 = product of:
      0.00798736 = sum of:
        0.00798736 = product of:
          0.023962079 = sum of:
            0.023962079 = weight(_text_:29 in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023962079 = score(doc=21,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    31.10.2020 18:53:29
  14. Kim, J.(im); Kim, J.(enna): Effect of forename string on author name disambiguation (2020) 0.00
    0.0013192514 = product of:
      0.007915508 = sum of:
        0.007915508 = product of:
          0.023746524 = sum of:
            0.023746524 = weight(_text_:22 in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023746524 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    11. 7.2020 13:22:58
  15. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.00
    0.0013192514 = product of:
      0.007915508 = sum of:
        0.007915508 = product of:
          0.023746524 = sum of:
            0.023746524 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023746524 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03505379 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36