Search (99 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Beacom, M.: Crossing a digital divide : AACR2 and unaddressed problems of networked ressources (2000) 0.02
    0.015210776 = product of:
      0.030421551 = sum of:
        0.030421551 = product of:
          0.045632325 = sum of:
            0.037566677 = weight(_text_:m in 6805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037566677 = score(doc=6805,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 6805, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6805)
            0.00806565 = weight(_text_:a in 6805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00806565 = score(doc=6805,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 6805, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6805)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016) 0.01
    0.014727281 = product of:
      0.029454563 = sum of:
        0.029454563 = product of:
          0.044181842 = sum of:
            0.006985058 = weight(_text_:a in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006985058 = score(doc=2946,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
            0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037196785 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The author revisits the development of RDA from its inception in 2005 through to its initial release in 2010. The development effort is set in the context of an evolving digital environment that was transforming both the production and dissemination of information resources and the technologies used to create, store, and access data describing those resources. The author examines the interplay between strategic commitments to align RDA with new conceptual models, emerging database structures, and metadata developments in allied communities, on the one hand, and compatibility with AACR2 legacy databases on the other. Aspects of the development effort examined include the structuring of RDA as a resource description language, organizing the new standard as a working tool, and refining guidelines and instructions for recording RDA data.
    Date
    17. 5.2016 19:22:40
    Type
    a
  3. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: ¬The international diffusion of RDA : a wide overview on the new guidelines (2016) 0.01
    0.011452621 = product of:
      0.022905242 = sum of:
        0.022905242 = product of:
          0.03435786 = sum of:
            0.02504445 = weight(_text_:m in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02504445 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
            0.009313411 = weight(_text_:a in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009313411 = score(doc=2944,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This issue of Jlis.it is focused on RDA, Resource Description and Access. In light of increasing international acceptance of this new cataloging content standard, the editors of Jlis.it wish to capture the background of how RDA came to be and the implications of its implementation at this time. This special issue offers a wide overview on the new guidelines from their making to their spreading around the world.
    Type
    a
  4. Gorman, M.: RDA: the emperor's new code (2016) 0.01
    0.010882939 = product of:
      0.021765878 = sum of:
        0.021765878 = product of:
          0.032648817 = sum of:
            0.02504445 = weight(_text_:m in 2949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02504445 = score(doc=2949,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 2949, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2949)
            0.007604368 = weight(_text_:a in 2949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604368 = score(doc=2949,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2949, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2949)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that the RDA was an unnecessary waste of time and money. The few improvements it makes in catalogue records could have been accomplished far more cheaply, promptly, and easily by modifying AACR2. Argues that RDA's abandonment of the ISBD is a retrograde and damaging step.
    Type
    a
  5. Riva, P.; Boeuf, P. le; Zumer, M.: IFLA Library Reference Model : a conceptual model for bibliographic information (2017) 0.01
    0.010021043 = product of:
      0.020042086 = sum of:
        0.020042086 = product of:
          0.030063128 = sum of:
            0.021913894 = weight(_text_:m in 5179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021913894 = score(doc=5179,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 5179, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5179)
            0.008149235 = weight(_text_:a in 5179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008149235 = score(doc=5179,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5179, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5179)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Definition of a conceptual reference model to provide a framework for the analysis of non-administrative metadata relating to library resources. The resulting model definition was approved by the FRBR Review Group (November 2016), and then made available to the Standing Committees of the Sections on Cataloguing and Subject Analysis & Access, as well as to the ISBD Review Group, for comment in December 2016. The final document was approved by the IFLACommittee on Standards (August 2017).
  6. Le Boeuf, P.; Riva, P.; Zumer, M.: FRBR - Library Reference Model : draft for World-Wide Review (2016) 0.01
    0.009267004 = product of:
      0.018534008 = sum of:
        0.018534008 = product of:
          0.02780101 = sum of:
            0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018783338 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
            0.009017671 = weight(_text_:a in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009017671 = score(doc=2881,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The FRBR Review Group worked actively towards a consolidated model starting in 2010, in a series of working meetings held in conjunction with IFLA conferences and at an additional mid-year meeting in April 2012 during which the user task consolidation was first drafted. In 2013 in Singapore, the FRBR Review Group constituted a Consolidation Editorial Group (CEG) to focus on the detailed reassessment of attribute s and relationships, and the drafting of this model document. The CEG (at times with other FRBR Review Group members or invited experts) held five multi-day meetings, as well as discussing progress in detail with the FRBR Review Group as a whole during a working meeting in 2014 in Lyon and another in 2015 in Cape Town.
  7. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: RDA: a content standard to ensure the quality of data : history of a relationship (2016) 0.01
    0.0089496635 = product of:
      0.017899327 = sum of:
        0.017899327 = product of:
          0.026848989 = sum of:
            0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 2948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018783338 = score(doc=2948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2948)
            0.00806565 = weight(_text_:a in 2948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00806565 = score(doc=2948,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2948, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2948)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    RDA Resource Description and Access are guidelines for description and access to resources designed for digital environment and released, in its first version, in 2010. RDA is based on FRBR and its derived models, that focus on users' needs and on resources of any kind of content, medium and carrier. The paper discusses relevance of main features of RDA for the future role of libraries in the context of semantic web and metadata creation and exchange. The paper aims to highlight many consequences deriving from RDA being a content standard, and in particular the change from record management to data management, differences among the two functions realized by RDA (to identify and to relate entities) and functions realized by other standard such as MARC21 (to archive data) and ISB (to visualize data) and show how, as all these functions are necessary for the catalog, RDA needs to be integrated by other rules and standard and that these tools allow the fulfilment of the variation principle defined by S.R. Ranganathan.
    Type
    a
  8. Guerrini, M.: Cataloguing based on bibliographic axiology (2010) 0.01
    0.008589465 = product of:
      0.01717893 = sum of:
        0.01717893 = product of:
          0.025768396 = sum of:
            0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018783338 = score(doc=2624,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
            0.006985058 = weight(_text_:a in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006985058 = score(doc=2624,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The article presents the work of Elaine Svenonius The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization, translated in Italian and published by Le Lettere of Florence, within the series Pinakes, with the title Il fondamento intellettuale dell'organizzazione dell'informazione. The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization defines the theoretical aspects of library science, its philosophical basics and principles, the purposes that must be kept in mind, abstracting from the technology used in a library. The book deals with information organization and bibliographic universe, in particular using the bibliographic entities defined in FRBR, at first. Then, it analyzes all the specific languages by which works and subjects are treated. This work, already acknowledged as a classic, organizes, synthesizes and make easily understood the whole complex of knowledge, practices and procedures developed in the last 150 years.
    Type
    a
  9. Byrd, J.; Charbonneau, G.; Charbonneau, M.; Courtney, A.; Johnson, E.; Leonard, K.; Morrison, A.; Mudge, S.; O'Bryan, A.; Opasik, S.; Riley, J.; Turchyn, S.: ¬A white paper on the future of cataloging at Indiana University (2006) 0.01
    0.008386081 = product of:
      0.016772162 = sum of:
        0.016772162 = product of:
          0.025158241 = sum of:
            0.015652781 = weight(_text_:m in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015652781 = score(doc=3225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
            0.00950546 = weight(_text_:a in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00950546 = score(doc=3225,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This is a report by a group "charged to identify current trends that will have a direct impact on cataloging operations and to define possible new roles for the online catalog and cataloging staff at Indiana University." Their one general conclusion after nine months of work is that "The need for cataloging expertise within the I.U. Libraries will not be diminished in the coming years. Rather, catalogers of the future will work in the evolving environment of publishing, scholarly communication, and information technology in new expanded roles. Catalogers will need to be key players in addressing the many challenges facing the libraries and the overall management and organization of information at Indiana University." The report also identifies five strategic directions. The report is an interesting read, and taken with the explosion of related reports (e.g., Calhoun's report to the Library of Congress cited in this issue, the UC Bibliographic Services TF Report), adds yet another perspective to the kinds of changes we must foster to create better library services in a vastly changed environment.
  10. Münnich, M.: Erste Schritte zu einem multilingualen Wörterbuch für Katalogisierungsbegriffe (2001) 0.01
    0.00834815 = product of:
      0.0166963 = sum of:
        0.0166963 = product of:
          0.0500889 = sum of:
            0.0500889 = weight(_text_:m in 6906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0500889 = score(doc=6906,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 6906, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6906)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Witt, M.: Section on cataloguing : report of activities 2000-2001 (2001) 0.01
    0.00834815 = product of:
      0.0166963 = sum of:
        0.0166963 = product of:
          0.0500889 = sum of:
            0.0500889 = weight(_text_:m in 6913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0500889 = score(doc=6913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 6913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6913)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Faßnacht, M.: "Druckt die GND Nummer in der Publikation ab!" : Vereinfachung der Normdatenverwendung in Bibliotheken und Datenbanken (2014) 0.01
    0.007605388 = product of:
      0.015210776 = sum of:
        0.015210776 = product of:
          0.022816163 = sum of:
            0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 2393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018783338 = score(doc=2393,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2393, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2393)
            0.004032825 = weight(_text_:a in 2393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004032825 = score(doc=2393,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 2393, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2393)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  13. Münnich, M.: German authority control and work (1996) 0.01
    0.007304631 = product of:
      0.014609262 = sum of:
        0.014609262 = product of:
          0.043827787 = sum of:
            0.043827787 = weight(_text_:m in 4118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043827787 = score(doc=4118,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 4118, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4118)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Plassard, M.-F.: IFLA core actvity for Universal Bibliographic Control and Internation MARC (2001) 0.01
    0.007304631 = product of:
      0.014609262 = sum of:
        0.014609262 = product of:
          0.043827787 = sum of:
            0.043827787 = weight(_text_:m in 6908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043827787 = score(doc=6908,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 6908, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6908)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Fenner, M.; Hartmann, S.; Müller, U.; Pampel, H.; Reimer, T.; Scholze, F.; Summann, F.: Autorenidentifikation für wissenschaftliche Publikationen : Bericht über den Workshop der DINI-AG Elektronisches Publizieren auf dem 6. Bibliothekskongress (2016) 0.01
    0.006337823 = product of:
      0.012675646 = sum of:
        0.012675646 = product of:
          0.019013468 = sum of:
            0.015652781 = weight(_text_:m in 3309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015652781 = score(doc=3309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 3309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3309)
            0.0033606873 = weight(_text_:a in 3309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0033606873 = score(doc=3309,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 3309, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3309)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  16. Harroch, M.: ¬The importance of leaflets as an historical source and the difficulties in cataloguing them (2000) 0.01
    0.006261113 = product of:
      0.012522226 = sum of:
        0.012522226 = product of:
          0.037566677 = sum of:
            0.037566677 = weight(_text_:m in 5403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037566677 = score(doc=5403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 5403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5403)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Riva, P.; Zumer, M.: Introducing the FRBR library reference model (2015) 0.01
    0.0057263104 = product of:
      0.011452621 = sum of:
        0.011452621 = product of:
          0.01717893 = sum of:
            0.012522225 = weight(_text_:m in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012522225 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.10997493 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
            0.0046567055 = weight(_text_:a in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0046567055 = score(doc=2094,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.088261776 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The FR family of conceptual models has grown to include three separate models prepared independently over many years by different working groups: FRBR for bibliographic data, FRAD for authority data, and FRSAD for subject authority data. Even as FRAD and FRSAD were being finalized in 2009-2010, it became clear that it would be necessary to combine or consolidate the FR family into a single coherent model to clarify the understanding of the overall model and remove barriers to its adoption. The FRBR Review Group has been working towards this since 2011, constituting a Consolidation Editorial Group in 2013. The consolidation task involves not only spelling out how the three existing models fit together, but requires taking a fresh look at the models to incorporate insights gained since their initial publications. This paper, based directly on the work of the Consolidation Editorial Group, provides the first public report of the consolidated model, tentatively referred to as the FRBR-Library Reference Model (FRBR-LRM), and the guiding principles that have been applied in its development.
  18. Stephens, O.: Introduction to OpenRefine (2014) 0.00
    0.0020164126 = product of:
      0.004032825 = sum of:
        0.004032825 = product of:
          0.012098475 = sum of:
            0.012098475 = weight(_text_:a in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012098475 = score(doc=2884,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    OpenRefine is described as a tool for working with 'messy' data - but what does this mean? It is probably easiest to describe the kinds of data OpenRefine is good at working with and the sorts of problems it can help you solve. OpenRefine is most useful where you have data in a simple tabular format but with internal inconsistencies either in data formats, or where data appears, or in terminology used. It can help you: Get an overview of a data set Resolve inconsistencies in a data set Help you split data up into more granular parts Match local data up to other data sets Enhance a data set with data from other sources Some common scenarios might be: 1. Where you want to know how many times a particular value appears in a column in your data. 2. Where you want to know how values are distributed across your whole data set. 3. Where you have a list of dates which are formatted in different ways, and want to change all the dates in the list to a single common date format.
  19. BIBFRAME Relationships (2014) 0.00
    0.001940294 = product of:
      0.003880588 = sum of:
        0.003880588 = product of:
          0.011641764 = sum of:
            0.011641764 = weight(_text_:a in 8920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011641764 = score(doc=8920,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 8920, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8920)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A BIBFRAME Relationship is a relationship between a BIBFRAME Work or Instance and another BIBFRAME Work or Instance. Thus there are four types of relationships: Work to Work - Work to Instance - Instance to Work - Instance to Instance
  20. McGrath, K.; Kules, B.; Fitzpatrick, C.: FRBR and facets provide flexible, work-centric access to items in library collections (2011) 0.00
    0.001920793 = product of:
      0.003841586 = sum of:
        0.003841586 = product of:
          0.011524757 = sum of:
            0.011524757 = weight(_text_:a in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011524757 = score(doc=2430,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045757167 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores a technique to improve searcher access to library collections by providing a faceted search interface built on a data model based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). The prototype provides a Workcentric view of a moving image collection that is integrated with bibliographic and holdings data. Two sets of facets address important user needs: "what do you want?" and "how/where do you want it?" enabling patrons to narrow, broaden and pivot across facet values instead of limiting them to the tree-structured hierarchy common with existing FRBR applications. The data model illustrates how FRBR is being adapted and applied beyond the traditional library catalog.
    Type
    a

Years

Languages

  • e 67
  • d 23
  • i 5
  • a 1
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 61
  • n 5
  • r 3
  • p 2
  • More… Less…