Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Schrader, A.: ORCID DE 2 erfolgreich beendet (2022) 0.01 
    0.007425352 = product of:
  0.022276055 = sum of:
    0.022276055 = product of:
      0.06682816 = sum of:
        0.06682816 = weight(_text_:network in 824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06682816 = score(doc=824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.3444231 = fieldWeight in 824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=824)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    "auch wenn das Projekt ORCID DE abgeschlossen wurde [wir berichteten dazu am 06.12.22 <https://www.orcid-de.org/support/blogbeitraege/projekt-orcid-de-2-erfolgreich-beendet> ], wird selbstverständlich weiter an der Verbreitung von ORCID und seiner Verzahnung mit weiteren PID-Systemen in Deutschland gearbeitet. Daher können wir Ihnen heute mitteilen, dass die DNB vor kurzem einen weiteren Claiming-Service produktiv genommen hat: "GND Network". Forschende können über die bereits bekannten Schritte des ORCID-Search-&-Link-Service mit wenigen Klicks die Metadaten ihrer Publikationen aus zahlreichen Katalogen des GND-Netzwerks in das eigene ORCID-Profil übernehmen. Den ORCID-Nutzenden stehen somit Metadaten vieler weiterer Publikationen zur Verfügung, was es ihnen erleichtert, ihre Publikationsliste im ORCID-Record aktuell zu halten. Mehr dazu lesen Sie hier: https://www.orcid-de.org/support/blogbeitraege/dritter-claiming-service-produktiv".
  2. Buttò, S.: RDA: analyses, considerations and activities by the Central Institute for the Union Catalogue of Italian Libraries and Bibliographic Information (ICCU) (2016) 0.01 
    0.0053038225 = product of:
  0.015911467 = sum of:
    0.015911467 = product of:
      0.047734402 = sum of:
        0.047734402 = weight(_text_:network in 2958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047734402 = score(doc=2958,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 2958, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2958)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The report aims to analyze the applicability of the Resource Description and Access (RDA) within the Italian public libraries, and also in the archives and museums in order to contribute to the discussion at international level. The Central Institute for the Union Catalogue of Italian libraries (ICCU) manages the online catalogue of the Italian libraries and the network of bibliographic services. ICCU has the institutional task of coordinating the cataloging and the documentation activities for the Italian libraries. On March 31 st 2014, the Institute signed the Agreement with the American Library Association,Publishing ALA, for the Italian translation rights of RDA, now available and published inRDAToolkit. The Italian translation has been carried out and realized by the Technical Working Group, made up of the main national and academic libraries, cultural Institutions and bibliographic agencies. The Group started working from the need of studying the new code in its textual detail, to better understand the principles, purposes, and applicability and finally its sustainability within the national context in relation to the area of the bibliographic control. At international level, starting from the publication of the Italian version of RDA and through the research carried out by ICCU and by the national Working Groups, the purpose is a more direct comparison with the experiences of the other European countries, also within EURIG international context, for an exchange of experiences aimed at strengthening the informational content of the data cataloging, with respect to history, cultural traditions and national identities of the different countries.
  3. Riva, P.; Boeuf, P. le; Zumer, M.: IFLA Library Reference Model : a conceptual model for bibliographic information (2017) 0.00 
    0.0046329014 = product of:
  0.013898704 = sum of:
    0.013898704 = product of:
      0.041696113 = sum of:
        0.041696113 = weight(_text_:29 in 5179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041696113 = score(doc=5179,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5179, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5179)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    19. 3.2019 12:26:29
  4. Teal, W.: Alma enumerator : automating repetitive cataloging tasks with Python (2018) 0.00 
    0.0046329014 = product of:
  0.013898704 = sum of:
    0.013898704 = product of:
      0.041696113 = sum of:
        0.041696113 = weight(_text_:29 in 5348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041696113 = score(doc=5348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5348)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    10.11.2018 16:29:37
  5. Pitti, D.V.: Encoded Archival Description : an introduction and overview (1999) 0.00 
    0.003971059 = product of:
  0.011913176 = sum of:
    0.011913176 = product of:
      0.035739526 = sum of:
        0.035739526 = weight(_text_:29 in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035739526 = score(doc=1152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    26.12.2011 16:29:28
  6. Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016) 0.00 
    0.0039353366 = product of:
  0.011806009 = sum of:
    0.011806009 = product of:
      0.035418026 = sum of:
        0.035418026 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035418026 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    17. 5.2016 19:22:40
  7. Horny, S.: Katalogisierung mehrbändiger begrenzter Werke (2006) 0.00 
    0.003309216 = product of:
  0.009927647 = sum of:
    0.009927647 = product of:
      0.029782942 = sum of:
        0.029782942 = weight(_text_:29 in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029782942 = score(doc=674,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    29. 3.2013 12:00:27
  8. Mayo, D.; Bowers, K.: ¬The devil's shoehorn : a case study of EAD to ArchivesSpace migration at a large university (2017) 0.00 
    0.003309216 = product of:
  0.009927647 = sum of:
    0.009927647 = product of:
      0.029782942 = sum of:
        0.029782942 = weight(_text_:29 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029782942 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    31. 1.2017 13:29:56
  9. Mimno, D.; Crane, G.; Jones, A.: Hierarchical catalog records : implementing a FRBR catalog (2005) 0.00 
    0.0026473727 = product of:
  0.007942118 = sum of:
    0.007942118 = product of:
      0.023826351 = sum of:
        0.023826351 = weight(_text_:29 in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023826351 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Date
    26.12.2011 14:08:29
  10. Gonzalez, L.: What is FRBR? (2005) 0.00 
    0.002121529 = product of:
  0.006364587 = sum of:
    0.006364587 = product of:
      0.019093761 = sum of:
        0.019093761 = weight(_text_:network in 3401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019093761 = score(doc=3401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043569047 = queryNorm
            0.0984066 = fieldWeight in 3401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3401)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Content
    National FRBR experiments The larger the bibliographic database, the greater the effect of "FRBR-like" design in reducing the appearance of duplicate records. LC, RLG, and OCLC, all influenced by FRBR, are experimenting with the redesign of their databases. LC's Network Development and MARC Standards Office has posted at its web site the results of some of its investigations into FRBR and MARC, including possible display options for bibliographic information. The design of RLG's public catalog, RedLightGreen, has been described as "FRBR-ish" by Merrilee Proffitt, RLG's program officer. If you try a search for a prolific author or much-published title in RedLightGreen, you'll probably find that the display of search results is much different than what you would expect. OCLC Research has developed a prototype "frbrized" database for fiction, OCLC FictionFinder. Try a title search for a classic title like Romeo and Juliet and observe that OCLC includes, in the initial display of results (described as "works"), a graphic indicator (stars, ranging from one to five). These show in rough terms how many libraries own the work-Romeo and Juliet clearly gets a five. Indicators like this are something resource sharing staff can consider an "ILL quality rating." If you're intrigued by FRBR's possibilities and what they could mean to resource sharing workflow, start talking. Now is the time to connect with colleagues, your local and/or consortial system vendor, RLG, OCLC, and your professional organizations. Have input into how systems develop in the FRBR world."

Authors

Years

Languages

Types