Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

BIBFRAME Relationships (2014) 0.04

0.042437658 = product of:
  0.084875315 = sum of:
    0.084875315 = product of:
      0.25462595 = sum of:
        0.25462595 = weight(_text_:2014 in 8920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25462595 = score(doc=8920,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.28642097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056283623 = queryNorm
            0.88899195 = fieldWeight in 8920, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8920)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Issue: Draft Specification (25 April 2014).
Year: 2014

Danskin, A.; Gryspeerdt, K.: Changing the Rules? : RDA and cataloguing in Europe. (2014) 0.03

0.033950128 = product of:
  0.067900255 = sum of:
    0.067900255 = product of:
      0.20370075 = sum of:
        0.20370075 = weight(_text_:2014 in 5137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20370075 = score(doc=5137,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.28642097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056283623 = queryNorm
            0.71119356 = fieldWeight in 5137, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5137)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Liber quarterly. 24(2014) no. 2, S.112-123
Year: 2014

Danskin, A.: RDA implementation and application : British Library (2014) 0.03

0.033950128 = product of:
  0.067900255 = sum of:
    0.067900255 = product of:
      0.20370075 = sum of:
        0.20370075 = weight(_text_:2014 in 1562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20370075 = score(doc=1562,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.28642097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056283623 = queryNorm
            0.71119356 = fieldWeight in 1562, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 1(2014) Nr.1, S.187-191
Year: 2014

McGrath, K.: Thoughts on FRBR and moving images (2014) 0.03

0.032872066 = product of:
  0.06574413 = sum of:
    0.06574413 = product of:
      0.19723238 = sum of:
        0.19723238 = weight(_text_:2014 in 2431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19723238 = score(doc=2431,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.28642097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056283623 = queryNorm
            0.68861014 = fieldWeight in 2431, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2431)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Year: 2014

Faßnacht, M.: "Druckt die GND Nummer in der Publikation ab!" : Vereinfachung der Normdatenverwendung in Bibliotheken und Datenbanken (2014) 0.03

0.025462594 = product of:
  0.050925188 = sum of:
    0.050925188 = product of:
      0.15277556 = sum of:
        0.15277556 = weight(_text_:2014 in 2393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15277556 = score(doc=2393,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.28642097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056283623 = queryNorm
            0.5333952 = fieldWeight in 2393, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2393)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 1(2014) Nr.1, S.192-196
Year: 2014

Stephens, O.: Introduction to OpenRefine (2014) 0.03

0.025462594 = product of:
  0.050925188 = sum of:
    0.050925188 = product of:
      0.15277556 = sum of:
        0.15277556 = weight(_text_:2014 in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15277556 = score(doc=2884,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.28642097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056283623 = queryNorm
            0.5333952 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: http://www.meanboyfriend.com/overdue_ideas/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Introduction-to-OpenRefine-handout-CC-BY.pdf
Year: 2014

ORCID (2015) 0.02
```
0.016103957 = product of:
  0.032207914 = sum of:
    0.032207914 = product of:
      0.09662374 = sum of:
        0.09662374 = weight(_text_:2014 in 1870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09662374 = score(doc=1870,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28642097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056283623 = queryNorm
            0.3373487 = fieldWeight in 1870, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1870)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Content

ORCID soll die elektronische Zuordnung von Publikation und Autoren ermöglichen. Dies ist notwendig, da verschiedene Autoren gleiche Namen haben können, Namen sich ändern (z. B. bei Heirat) und Namen in verschiedenen Publikationen unterschiedlich angegeben werden (z. B. einmal die ausgeschriebenen Vornamen, ein anderes Mal aber nur die Initialen). ORCID soll zum De-facto-Standard für die Autorenidentifikation wissenschaftlicher Publikationen werden. Die Etablierung wird von der Non-Profit-Organisation Open Researcher Contributor Identification Initiative organisiert. Zu den Gründungsmitgliedern der Initiative gehören zahlreiche wissenschaftliche Verlagsgruppen (z. B. Elsevier, Nature Publishing Group, Springer) und Forschungsorganisationen (z. B. EMBO, CERN). Die Planungen für ORCID wurden 2010 auf Umfragen gestützt. ORCID ging am 16. Oktober 2012 offiziell an den Start. Am Jahresende 2012 hatte ORCID 42.918 Registrierte, Jahresende 2013 waren es 460.000 Registrierte und im November 2014 hatte ORCID 1 Million Autorenidentifikationen ausgestellt. Vgl. auch den Zusammenhang mit der GND und den Erfassungsleitfaden der DNB unter: https://wiki.dnb.de/x/vYYGAw.
Wiesenmüller, H.: ¬Der RDA-Umstieg in Deutschland : Herausforderungen für das Metadatenmanagement (2015) 0.02
```
0.016103957 = product of:
  0.032207914 = sum of:
    0.032207914 = product of:
      0.09662374 = sum of:
        0.09662374 = weight(_text_:2014 in 2149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09662374 = score(doc=2149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28642097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056283623 = queryNorm
            0.3373487 = fieldWeight in 2149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2149)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Content

Beim vorliegenden Beitrag handelt es sich um die erweiterte und aktualisierte Fassung eines Vortrags, der am 5. Dezember 2014 auf dem Symposium "Forschung für die Praxis - Perspektiven für Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement" an der Hochschule der Medien in Stuttgart gehalten wurde. Vortragsfolien unter https://www.hdm-stuttgart.de/ bi/symposium/skripte/Wiesenmueller_RDA-Umstieg_Forum1_14-12-05.pdf (10.05.2015). Vgl. auch den Veranstaltungsbericht: Vonhof, Cornelia; Stang, Richard; Wiesenmüller, Heidrun: Forschung für die Praxis - Perspektiven für Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement. In: o-bib 2 (2015), H. 1, S. 68-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2015H1S6. Vgl.: http://dx.doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2015H2.
Le Boeuf, P.; Riva, P.; Zumer, M.: FRBR - Library Reference Model : draft for World-Wide Review (2016) 0.02
```
0.016103957 = product of:
  0.032207914 = sum of:
    0.032207914 = product of:
      0.09662374 = sum of:
        0.09662374 = weight(_text_:2014 in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09662374 = score(doc=2881,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28642097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056283623 = queryNorm
            0.3373487 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

The FRBR Review Group worked actively towards a consolidated model starting in 2010, in a series of working meetings held in conjunction with IFLA conferences and at an additional mid-year meeting in April 2012 during which the user task consolidation was first drafted. In 2013 in Singapore, the FRBR Review Group constituted a Consolidation Editorial Group (CEG) to focus on the detailed reassessment of attribute s and relationships, and the drafting of this model document. The CEG (at times with other FRBR Review Group members or invited experts) held five multi-day meetings, as well as discussing progress in detail with the FRBR Review Group as a whole during a working meeting in 2014 in Lyon and another in 2015 in Cape Town.
Buttò, S.: RDA: analyses, considerations and activities by the Central Institute for the Union Catalogue of Italian Libraries and Bibliographic Information (ICCU) (2016) 0.01
```
0.013419965 = product of:
  0.02683993 = sum of:
    0.02683993 = product of:
      0.08051979 = sum of:
        0.08051979 = weight(_text_:2014 in 2958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08051979 = score(doc=2958,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28642097 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056283623 = queryNorm
            0.28112394 = fieldWeight in 2958, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.0888867 = idf(docFreq=740, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2958)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

The report aims to analyze the applicability of the Resource Description and Access (RDA) within the Italian public libraries, and also in the archives and museums in order to contribute to the discussion at international level. The Central Institute for the Union Catalogue of Italian libraries (ICCU) manages the online catalogue of the Italian libraries and the network of bibliographic services. ICCU has the institutional task of coordinating the cataloging and the documentation activities for the Italian libraries. On March 31 st 2014, the Institute signed the Agreement with the American Library Association,Publishing ALA, for the Italian translation rights of RDA, now available and published inRDAToolkit. The Italian translation has been carried out and realized by the Technical Working Group, made up of the main national and academic libraries, cultural Institutions and bibliographic agencies. The Group started working from the need of studying the new code in its textual detail, to better understand the principles, purposes, and applicability and finally its sustainability within the national context in relation to the area of the bibliographic control. At international level, starting from the publication of the Italian version of RDA and through the research carried out by ICCU and by the national Working Groups, the purpose is a more direct comparison with the experiences of the other European countries, also within EURIG international context, for an exchange of experiences aimed at strengthening the informational content of the data cataloging, with respect to history, cultural traditions and national identities of the different countries.

Delsey, T.: ¬The Making of RDA (2016) 0.01

0.011438481 = product of:
  0.022876961 = sum of:
    0.022876961 = product of:
      0.045753922 = sum of:
        0.045753922 = weight(_text_:22 in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045753922 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19709566 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056283623 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 17. 5.2016 19:22:40

Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes