Search (101 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985) 0.05
    0.05393014 = product of:
      0.10786028 = sum of:
        0.059891056 = weight(_text_:use in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059891056 = score(doc=366,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.47364265 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
        0.020662563 = weight(_text_:of in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020662563 = score(doc=366,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
        0.007724685 = product of:
          0.01544937 = sum of:
            0.01544937 = weight(_text_:on in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01544937 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.019581974 = product of:
          0.039163947 = sum of:
            0.039163947 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039163947 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    LIAS, the Pennsylvania State University's (Penn State) integrated interactive online system, provides for messaging by the user to inform library staff of errors found in bibliographic records. The message is sent by use of the OOPS command, and results in a printout which is used by processing staff for online catalog maintenance. This article describes LIAS, the use of the OOPS command, the processing of the resulting OOPS reports, an assessment of the effect of its use, and some speculation on the expansion of the LIAS message system for use in catalog maintenance.
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:30
  2. Weihs, J.; Lewis, S.: Nonbook materials : the organization of integrated collections (1989) 0.05
    0.051312212 = product of:
      0.13683257 = sum of:
        0.04277933 = weight(_text_:use in 6103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04277933 = score(doc=6103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3383162 = fieldWeight in 6103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6103)
        0.02231347 = weight(_text_:of in 6103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02231347 = score(doc=6103,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 6103, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6103)
        0.07173977 = product of:
          0.14347954 = sum of:
            0.14347954 = weight(_text_:line in 6103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14347954 = score(doc=6103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.61958486 = fieldWeight in 6103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    The third ed. of 'Nonbook materials' is updated to bring the practice of nonbook cataloguing into line with the principles set out in the 1988 revision of AACR2. A standard in its field, 'Nonbook materials' is intended for use in all libraries and media centres
  3. Rowley, J.E.: Towards AACR3 : a review of the implications of OPACs for cataloguing codes and practices (1989) 0.04
    0.04084199 = product of:
      0.16336796 = sum of:
        0.023614356 = weight(_text_:of in 4062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023614356 = score(doc=4062,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 4062, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4062)
        0.1397536 = sum of:
          0.024969954 = weight(_text_:on in 4062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024969954 = score(doc=4062,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 4062, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4062)
          0.11478364 = weight(_text_:line in 4062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11478364 = score(doc=4062,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.4956679 = fieldWeight in 4062, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4062)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The publication of the 1988 revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) represents an occasion for reflection on the nature and function of cataloguing rules in the 1990s. There is little evidence to suggest that the 1988 revision takes account of the new opportunities offered to cataloguers by the advent of on-line public access catalogues (OPACs).
  4. Hustand, S.: Problems of duplicate records (1986) 0.04
    0.03954617 = product of:
      0.15818468 = sum of:
        0.017710768 = weight(_text_:of in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017710768 = score(doc=266,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
        0.1404739 = sum of:
          0.018727465 = weight(_text_:on in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018727465 = score(doc=266,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.12174644 = weight(_text_:line in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12174644 = score(doc=266,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.52573526 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Duplicate records is a familiar problem in bibliographic databases. The problem is obvious when a union catalogue is established by automatically merging two or more separate and independent source of catalogue information. However, even in systems with on-line cataloguing and access to previous records, duplication is a problem. Author / title search search prior to cataloguing does not cut duplication to zero. A great deal of effort has been put into developing methods of duplicate detection. A major problem in this work has been efficiency. Particularly in the on-line setting is this of importance. Most studies have dealt with book and article material. The Research Libraries Group Inc. has described matching algorithms also for films, maps, recordings, scores and serials. Various methods of detecting duplicates will be discussed.
    Source
    Future of online catalogs. Essen Symposium, 30.9.-3.10.1985. Ed. by A.H. Helal, J.W. Weiss
  5. Süle, G.: Problems of duplicate records, standards and quality control (1986) 0.04
    0.03940109 = product of:
      0.15760437 = sum of:
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 2060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=2060,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2060, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2060)
        0.1397536 = sum of:
          0.024969954 = weight(_text_:on in 2060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024969954 = score(doc=2060,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 2060, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2060)
          0.11478364 = weight(_text_:line in 2060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11478364 = score(doc=2060,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23157367 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041294612 = queryNorm
              0.4956679 = fieldWeight in 2060, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2060)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The reasons why duplicate records should be avoided in an on-line catalogue are discussed. A mechanism has to be developed either to warn the cataloguer when he is about to enter a duplicate record or to prohibit duplicate entries entirely. Since different interpretations of cataloguing rules may lead to different and thus duplicate records, an institution, committee, or the like is needed to decide on the application of the rules and eliminate records, if necessary.
    Source
    Future of online catalogs. Essen Symposium, 30.9.-3.10.1985. Ed. by A.H. Helal, J.W. Weiss
  6. Zotter-Stratka, H.: ¬The joy of cataloguing : am Beispiel BIBOS (1988) 0.03
    0.0282611 = product of:
      0.075362936 = sum of:
        0.042349376 = weight(_text_:use in 1519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042349376 = score(doc=1519,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.33491597 = fieldWeight in 1519, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1519)
        0.022089208 = weight(_text_:of in 1519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022089208 = score(doc=1519,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 1519, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1519)
        0.010924355 = product of:
          0.02184871 = sum of:
            0.02184871 = weight(_text_:on in 1519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02184871 = score(doc=1519,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 1519, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1519)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Although it was decided more than a year ago to adopt BIBOS Catloguing System for use in Austrian academic libraries, the Working Group on Cataloguing has been voicing doubts as its use begins. Lists these doubts. Deals in detail wih the problem of the hierarchical structure of BIBOS into which records of multi-volume works have to be fitted. In Sept 88 the computer company (EDV GmbH) itself came forward with a technical improvement which would allow the build up of records from the smaller fields, instead of imposing the shape of records from the ultimate data set, which had on occasion even led to contravention of the nominative cataloguing rules, RAK-WB. Cataloguing in the interim period will be complex. The working group has still made no final decision.
  7. Leung, S.W.: MARC CIP records and MARC LC records : an evaluative study of their discrepancies (1983) 0.03
    0.027151328 = product of:
      0.07240354 = sum of:
        0.042349376 = weight(_text_:use in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042349376 = score(doc=327,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.33491597 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
        0.019129815 = weight(_text_:of in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019129815 = score(doc=327,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
        0.010924355 = product of:
          0.02184871 = sum of:
            0.02184871 = weight(_text_:on in 327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02184871 = score(doc=327,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 327, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=327)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    In the last ten years, Cataloging in Publication (CIP) records have gained increasing acceptance and use in libraries, especially for cataloging purposes. Nevertheless, there is a general perception that the accuracy of CIP records can be further improved. Because improvement is only possible with more concrete information identifying specific problem areas, this study is designed to provide catalogers and cataloging managers more empirical data on the frequency and types of discrepancy between MARC CIP records and subsequent MARC LC records. This study differs from an earlier study which involved CIP records that appeared on the verso of the title page of publications. In addition, this study will make some observations regarding more effective use of the CIP records, primarily for cataloging purposes.
  8. Lauf-Immesberger, K.: Tagung in Gütersloh : EDV Programme für Bibliotheken (1988) 0.03
    0.02571151 = product of:
      0.06856403 = sum of:
        0.011044604 = weight(_text_:of in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011044604 = score(doc=5688,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
        0.013379549 = product of:
          0.026759097 = sum of:
            0.026759097 = weight(_text_:on in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026759097 = score(doc=5688,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.29462588 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.044139877 = product of:
          0.088279754 = sum of:
            0.088279754 = weight(_text_:computers in 5688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088279754 = score(doc=5688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21710795 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.40661687 = fieldWeight in 5688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.257537 = idf(docFreq=625, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5688)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    On 23 June 88 Gütersloh City Library hosted an in-service training session on BASIS (Library Analytical System for Information Storage) programs for acquisitioning and cataloguing as well as on Gütersloh's own integrated book issue system called AVALON, organised through the Scool for Library & Documentation at Cologne Polytechnic. Discusses the programs installed at Gütersloh for BASIS in the early 70s by the North Rhine Westphalia Automation Working Group along with computer personnel and librarians, as well as link-up possibilities with main frame computers issuing book overdues, time and staff implications, the development of AVALON wich, though integrated into BASIS, can still be installed without BASIS, and a glimpse at possible library applications and the requirements of hardware and software linked with this.
  9. Leresche, F.: ¬La normalisation du catalogage en France (1989) 0.02
    0.024999827 = product of:
      0.06666621 = sum of:
        0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03422346 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
        0.019957775 = weight(_text_:of in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019957775 = score(doc=1561,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
        0.012484977 = product of:
          0.024969954 = sum of:
            0.024969954 = weight(_text_:on in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024969954 = score(doc=1561,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the organisation of the work of cataloguing standardisation in France and in standards published or in preparation. French standards follow IFLA reommendations on rules for bibliographic descriptions and headings. Standardisation of formats is less developed; however MARC is gaininig ground as a national exchange format, whilst USMARC is also used by university and public libraries. French policy on cataloguing standards aims both to promote international exchange of biblio-graphic recordswhile respecting national access requirements, and to simplify cataloguing by promoting the use of medium-level bibliographic records.
  10. Kranz, J.: Microcomputer software cataloging : the need for consistency (1988) 0.02
    0.024271447 = product of:
      0.06472386 = sum of:
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
        0.027053645 = weight(_text_:of in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027053645 = score(doc=437,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
        0.007724685 = product of:
          0.01544937 = sum of:
            0.01544937 = weight(_text_:on in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01544937 = score(doc=437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic records for microcomputer software in the OCLC Online Union Catalog are evaluated primarily for the purpose of focusing catalogers' attention on selected record areas in need of more consistent treatment. The degree of cataloging inconsistency evident in these records is examined with respect to the application of rules and prescriptions embodied in AACR2 Chapter 9, the ALA Guidelines for cataloging microcomputer software, and the application of Library of Congress subject cataloging practice to these materials. A secondary purpose of this quantitative/qualitative study is to provide a general assessment of the overall composition of microcomputer software cataloging during this transition period between the use of available but disparate sources of descriptive cataloging guidance and their eventual consolidation in the future edition of AACR2.
  11. Hershey, J.: ¬The impact of the implementation of NOTIS on the technical services workflow at the Milton S. Eisenhower Library, Johns Hopkins University (1988) 0.02
    0.024209704 = product of:
      0.064559214 = sum of:
        0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03422346 = score(doc=429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=429)
        0.017850775 = weight(_text_:of in 429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017850775 = score(doc=429,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 429, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=429)
        0.012484977 = product of:
          0.024969954 = sum of:
            0.024969954 = weight(_text_:on in 429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024969954 = score(doc=429,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 429, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=429)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Describes changes made in the workflow in Technical Services in the Eisenhower Library at Johns Hopkins University following the implementation of the NOTIS acquisitions system. A goal is to use the same bibliographic record for ordering and cataloging whenever possible. It is expected that the workflow of the Cataloging and Acquisitions Departments will be interdependent and evaluated on an ongoing basis.
  12. Barnett, J.B.: Use study of OCLC cataloging in the marine sciences (1989) 0.02
    0.023015318 = product of:
      0.092061274 = sum of:
        0.06844692 = weight(_text_:use in 447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06844692 = score(doc=447,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.5413059 = fieldWeight in 447, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=447)
        0.023614356 = weight(_text_:of in 447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023614356 = score(doc=447,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 447, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=447)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The original cataloging records of a marine science library were examined to determine frequency of use. The present study, patterned after an earlier study of municipal reference materials, shows an overall use rate of 45%. Patterns of subsequent use of original cataloging records suggest cataloging priorities, and changes to records indicate areas for attention to database quality control.
  13. Kranz, J.: Enhanced access to pamphlets : the application of AACR2 first level of description (1985) 0.02
    0.021500837 = product of:
      0.057335563 = sum of:
        0.025667597 = weight(_text_:use in 349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025667597 = score(doc=349,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 349, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=349)
        0.025046807 = weight(_text_:of in 349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025046807 = score(doc=349,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.38787308 = fieldWeight in 349, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=349)
        0.006621159 = product of:
          0.013242318 = sum of:
            0.013242318 = weight(_text_:on in 349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013242318 = score(doc=349,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 349, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=349)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    A broad and diverse compendium of underutilized information is available in pamphlet format in the academic library. Its enhanced use is impeded by the lack of an effective means of catalog access. The traditional library practice of accessing pamphlets by a single subject heading assignment/arrangement greatly limits accessibility. The alternative of full cataloging regularly accorded books is generally provided only for selected pamphlets for reasons of cost. It is suggested that the provision of AACR2 first level of description may be a desirable and practical compromise between single subject assignment and full cataloging. The availability and ease of access to the information required for inclusion in cataloging of this type is examined based on a survey of pamphlets cataloged for the collections of the University Libraries at California State University, Northridge.
  14. Struble, C.A.; Kohberger, P.B.: Statistical survey to determine availability of cataloging copy on OCLC (1987) 0.02
    0.020558309 = product of:
      0.054822154 = sum of:
        0.019957775 = weight(_text_:of in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019957775 = score(doc=358,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
        0.012484977 = product of:
          0.024969954 = sum of:
            0.024969954 = weight(_text_:on in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024969954 = score(doc=358,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0223794 = product of:
          0.0447588 = sum of:
            0.0447588 = weight(_text_:22 in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0447588 = score(doc=358,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports the results of a year-long survey conducted at the University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) to determine what level of cataloging copy (Library of Congress, member input, or none) is present on OCLC at the time an item is received in Technical Services and after a six-month waiting period. These results were used to divert selected monographs from the normal workflow in order to expedite their cataloging and to release needed shelf space for other items.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.3, S.13-22
  15. Münnich, M.: Katalogisieren auf dem PC : ein Pflichtenheft für die Formalkatalogisierung (1988) 0.02
    0.01918702 = product of:
      0.051165387 = sum of:
        0.019957775 = weight(_text_:of in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019957775 = score(doc=2502,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
        0.008828212 = product of:
          0.017656423 = sum of:
            0.017656423 = weight(_text_:on in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017656423 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.090823986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0223794 = product of:
          0.0447588 = sum of:
            0.0447588 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0447588 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1446067 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041294612 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856
  16. Gertz, J.; Stout, L.J.: ¬The MARC Archival and Manuskripts Control (AMC) Format : a new direction in cataloging (1989) 0.01
    0.014021526 = product of:
      0.056086104 = sum of:
        0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03422346 = score(doc=426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=426)
        0.021862645 = weight(_text_:of in 426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021862645 = score(doc=426,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 426, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=426)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The development and use of the MARC Archival and Manuscript Control (AMC) format is described. The format's unique characteristics stem largely from the needs of the archivl community for both a uniform means of control of materials at the collection level and a powerful tool for exchanging information about archival holdings. Uniques aspects of AMC cataloguing are described, including differing approaches to access points, form of entry, title, physical description, notes, subject headings, and call numbers.
  17. Darling, K.; Allen, A.: Using the OCLC CJK350 at the University of Oregon Library (1988) 0.01
    0.013545308 = product of:
      0.054181233 = sum of:
        0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03422346 = score(doc=427,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 427, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=427)
        0.019957775 = weight(_text_:of in 427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019957775 = score(doc=427,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 427, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=427)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the use of the OCLC CJK350 cataloging system at the University of Oregon Library beginning with the field test in 1986. Hardware, software, catalog maintenance and workflow are discussed. Suggestions are made for other libraries considering automation of the cataloging of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean vernacular materials.
  18. Hunter, E.J.; Bakewell, K.G.B.: Cataloguing (1983) 0.01
    0.012678601 = product of:
      0.050714403 = sum of:
        0.025667597 = weight(_text_:use in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025667597 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.20298971 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
        0.025046807 = weight(_text_:of in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025046807 = score(doc=2054,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.38787308 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Originally published in 1979 as a title in the Outlines of Modern Librarianship' series this new edition has been expanded and updated in the light of recent developments in this rapidly developing field of librarianship, with particular reference to automation. As a consequence, this edition is substantially more than an outline of the subject. The authors take the reader through a comprehensive exposition of cataloguing - the definitions, arrangement and role of the catalogue: the history of its development; standardization and AACR2; the subject approach via pre-and post-coordinate indexing; analysis; filing rules and methods; the physical forms of the catalogue; the use of the computer in cataloguing; the role of networks; the management of cataloguing; and the relevance of book indexing. There is a detailed index, as well as a list of abbreviations and acronyms and a glossary of terms.
  19. Duke, J.K.: Authors and names : multiple pseudonyms in AACR2 (1981) 0.01
    0.012420671 = product of:
      0.049682684 = sum of:
        0.03422346 = weight(_text_:use in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03422346 = score(doc=271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
        0.0154592255 = weight(_text_:of in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0154592255 = score(doc=271,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The history of cataloging pseudonyms is reviewed. The second edition of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules reverses a century-long cataloging practice by allowing authors who use several pseudonyms to be entered in the catalog under each name. The AACR2 rule violates the catalog's objectives as formulated by Lubetzky, and is contradictory to AACR2's own internal logic. The number of disadvantages to the rule far outweigh any advantages. The rule should be replaced.
  20. Saye, J.D.: ¬The cataloging experience in library and information science education : an educator's perspective (1987) 0.01
    0.012268836 = product of:
      0.049075343 = sum of:
        0.029945528 = weight(_text_:use in 387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029945528 = score(doc=387,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12644777 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.23682132 = fieldWeight in 387, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=387)
        0.019129815 = weight(_text_:of in 387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019129815 = score(doc=387,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041294612 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 387, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=387)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents one approach to the teaching of both the basic and advanced courses in cataloging. In addressing the basic course, short-term and long-term objectives of the course are identified for four categories of students-Cataloging Specialists, General/Special Librarians, Non-Cataloging Specialists and Non-Library Information Specialists. The philosophy underlying this mode of instruction places emphasis upon group interaction and making the course enjoyable for the student, thus increasing interest while imparting more information and better preparing the four groups of students for work in organizing information. Stress is placed upon student participation and the use of realistic situations to instruct and evaluate student performance.

Authors

Languages

  • e 96
  • d 5
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 92
  • m 8
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications