-
Rolland-Thomas, P.: AACR2: one step towards an international code (1983)
0.07
0.067190364 = product of:
0.13438073 = sum of:
0.019429686 = weight(_text_:to in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019429686 = score(doc=310,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
0.114951044 = sum of:
0.063979395 = weight(_text_:language in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063979395 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18449916 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.34677336 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
0.05097165 = weight(_text_:22 in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05097165 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16467917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, second edition, aim at universal applicability. Some problems brought forth through the translation process and the laws in the workability of rules in a nonEnglish working language are examined. This leads to acknowledge the failure of AACR2 to acquire an international adaptability. Enquiry into the needs of potential users is advised.
- Date
- 6. 1.2007 19:12:22
-
Struble, C.A.; Kohberger, P.B.: Statistical survey to determine availability of cataloging copy on OCLC (1987)
0.03
0.028103428 = product of:
0.056206856 = sum of:
0.030721031 = weight(_text_:to in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030721031 = score(doc=358,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.3593239 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
0.025485825 = product of:
0.05097165 = sum of:
0.05097165 = weight(_text_:22 in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05097165 = score(doc=358,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16467917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper reports the results of a year-long survey conducted at the University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) to determine what level of cataloging copy (Library of Congress, member input, or none) is present on OCLC at the time an item is received in Technical Services and after a six-month waiting period. These results were used to divert selected monographs from the normal workflow in order to expedite their cataloging and to release needed shelf space for other items.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.3, S.13-22
-
Svenonius, E.; Baughman, B.; Molto, M.: Title page sanctity? : the distribution of access points in a sample of English language monographs (1986)
0.02
0.02425123 = product of:
0.04850246 = sum of:
0.014572265 = weight(_text_:to in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014572265 = score(doc=361,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.17044228 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
0.033930197 = product of:
0.067860395 = sum of:
0.067860395 = weight(_text_:language in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067860395 = score(doc=361,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18449916 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.3678087 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The problem addressed in this paper is that of simplifying access point determination. A critique is made of the simple, mechanical rule whereby every name appearing in certain designatable locations within a publication qualifies as an access point. Then a more acceptable version of the every-name-an-access-point rule is tested empirically against a sample of 400 English language monographs. Conclusions reached concern (1) the responsibility profiles of these monographs, i.e., how many authors, editors, illustrators and emanators are typically associated with them and in what combinations, and (2) the relative productivity of different locations within them, e.g., title pages and tables of contents, as sources of access points. The study was conceived to be exploratory in nature and its findings suggest further research that could be done to provide empirical validation for rules for access point determination.
-
Roughton, K.G.: Educating the dinosaur : the evolution of catalog management at the Iowa State University Library (1985)
0.02
0.022457756 = product of:
0.044915512 = sum of:
0.019429686 = weight(_text_:to in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019429686 = score(doc=364,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.22725637 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
0.025485825 = product of:
0.05097165 = sum of:
0.05097165 = weight(_text_:22 in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05097165 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16467917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Traditional cataloging support services such as typing and filing are gradually being eliminated in favor of more sophisticated skills. Library staff members who are specialized in imminently obsolete skills must be re-educated to become productive participants in the "Golden Age" of technology. The Catalog Management section at the Iowa State University Library is attempting to make this process painless and exciting for all of its employees.
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:11
-
Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985)
0.02
0.017160801 = product of:
0.034321602 = sum of:
0.012021505 = weight(_text_:to in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012021505 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.14060771 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.022300096 = product of:
0.044600192 = sum of:
0.044600192 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044600192 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16467917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- LIAS, the Pennsylvania State University's (Penn State) integrated interactive online system, provides for messaging by the user to inform library staff of errors found in bibliographic records. The message is sent by use of the OOPS command, and results in a printout which is used by processing staff for online catalog maintenance. This article describes LIAS, the use of the OOPS command, the processing of the resulting OOPS reports, an assessment of the effect of its use, and some speculation on the expansion of the LIAS message system for use in catalog maintenance.
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 13:22:30
-
Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986)
0.01
0.009557184 = product of:
0.038228735 = sum of:
0.038228735 = product of:
0.07645747 = sum of:
0.07645747 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07645747 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16467917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 14:22:27
-
Süle, G.: Problems of duplicate records, standards and quality control (1986)
0.01
0.0084133 = product of:
0.0336532 = sum of:
0.0336532 = weight(_text_:to in 2060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0336532 = score(doc=2060,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.39361957 = fieldWeight in 2060, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2060)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The reasons why duplicate records should be avoided in an on-line catalogue are discussed. A mechanism has to be developed either to warn the cataloguer when he is about to enter a duplicate record or to prohibit duplicate entries entirely. Since different interpretations of cataloguing rules may lead to different and thus duplicate records, an institution, committee, or the like is needed to decide on the application of the rules and eliminate records, if necessary.
-
Yee, M.M.: Attempts to deal with the 'crisis in cataloging' at the Library of Congress in the 1940s (1987)
0.01
0.006869431 = product of:
0.027477724 = sum of:
0.027477724 = weight(_text_:to in 6167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027477724 = score(doc=6167,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.32138905 = fieldWeight in 6167, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6167)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Hudson, J.: Revisions to contributed cataloging in a cooperative cataloging database (1981)
0.01
0.006869431 = product of:
0.027477724 = sum of:
0.027477724 = weight(_text_:to in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027477724 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.32138905 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Graham, C.: Rethinking national policy for cataloging microform reproductions (1986)
0.01
0.006869431 = product of:
0.027477724 = sum of:
0.027477724 = weight(_text_:to in 371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027477724 = score(doc=371,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.32138905 = fieldWeight in 371, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=371)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Current national cataloging policy requires the creation of unique cataloging records for an original publication and each of its microfilm reproductions. Such redundant entries are difficult to decipher and expensive to produce and maintain. The case of serial publications is most urgent, especially due to the proliferation of preservation microfilming efforts and union list projects. The master record concept used in the United States Newspaper Project offers a viable alternative method. Librarians should lobby to have the single record approach adopted as national policy.
-
Carter, C.A.: On-the-job training for catalog librarians : a case history of a formal approach to training (1987)
0.01
0.0067202253 = product of:
0.026880901 = sum of:
0.026880901 = weight(_text_:to in 386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026880901 = score(doc=386,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.3144084 = fieldWeight in 386, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=386)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A training program for new catalogers is described which uses class sessions and a training manual in addition to actual cataloging. The exercises in the manual are designed to stimulate discussion, with the ultimate aim of developing judgment and an ability to analyze, as well as ensuring the mastery of cataloging principles. Classes were held over a period of twelve to thirteen weeks; some were attended by a few experienced paraprofessional and clerical staff members as well as by new librarians. The primary benefit of a formal training program is that, ideally, it provides not only a structured learning situation but also promotes the understanding of cataloging as a structured system.
-
Münnich, M.: Katalogisieren auf dem PC : ein Pflichtenheft für die Formalkatalogisierung (1988)
0.01
0.006371456 = product of:
0.025485825 = sum of:
0.025485825 = product of:
0.05097165 = sum of:
0.05097165 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05097165 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16467917 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Theoretical considerations in the bibliographic control of music materials in libraries (1985)
0.01
0.0060107526 = product of:
0.02404301 = sum of:
0.02404301 = weight(_text_:to in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02404301 = score(doc=343,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic control does not differ in substance from one type of material to another. Therefore it is not possible to separate the bibliographic control of music materials entirely from the larger domain of bibliographic control activity. The literature of music librarianship is examined for relevant theoretical explanations. Specific problems of description and access are used to show that, in general, the requirements for bibliographic control of music fit neatly into the theoretical structure for all bibliographic control. The primary purpose of descriptive cataloging of musical objects is to identify and differentiate among objects in a library collection. Where the concept of responsibility is relevant, access is provided through the names of composers or performers. Systematic access is provided through co-equal facets: medium, manifestation, and form.
-
André, P.W.; Janakiev, E.; Case, M.M.; Randall, K.M.: Serials control in an online integrated system : can latest entry cataloging help? (1986)
0.01
0.0060107526 = product of:
0.02404301 = sum of:
0.02404301 = weight(_text_:to in 381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02404301 = score(doc=381,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 381, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=381)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- An experiment in latest entry cataloging of selected serial title changes is currently being conducted at Northwestern University Library. The integrated structure of Northwestern's automated system NOTIS and its applications to serials processing were primary factors leading to the investigation of latest entry cataloging as an alternative to the current standard of successive entry cataloging for serial title changes. A systematic investigation was conducted through most of 1985 and allowed project staff to identify and evaluate a number of concerns and problems. The study team is encouraged with the results, but will continue gathering cataloging statistics and will conduct user studies before adopting latest entry cataloging as a permanent option.
-
Hudson, J.: On-the-job training for cataloging and classification (1987)
0.01
0.0060107526 = product of:
0.02404301 = sum of:
0.02404301 = weight(_text_:to in 389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02404301 = score(doc=389,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 389, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=389)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Training for cataloging and classification within the Cataloging Department is discussed for two levels of staff, copy catalogers and original catalogers. A general pattern which moves from learning to catalog straightforward materials which require minimal editing to processing materials which are progressively more complex is described for copy catalogers. A survey of heads of cataloging departments reveals that there is a general feeling that cataloging and classification are being shortchanged in library school training and recommendations for such training are made. Training programs for original catalogers also follow a pattern, from working with LC copy to preparing original cataloging records. Some variations to the training patterns for each group are noted. The article concludes with a discussion of continuing education for both groups.
-
Havens, C.: Cataloging a special art collection (1989)
0.01
0.0060107526 = product of:
0.02404301 = sum of:
0.02404301 = weight(_text_:to in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02404301 = score(doc=444,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.28121543 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Since 1986, a project has been underway to catalogue a private collection of the massive body of work of the artist Anne Ward Huey. The project has progressed from a handwritten card file to a computer file using AACR2 and OCLC tags and format. A compact disc or videotape file is also presently projected. In addition to taking traditional libray cataloguing out of the library setting, the project has addressed a number of problems involved in cataloguing silkscreen prints, and the records created by the project also contain information that AACR2 does not specifically address but that artists consider important. Recommends that the cataloguing rules be revised to encompass these specific aspects of cataloguing art work.
-
Hunter, E.: ¬An introduction to AACR2 : a programed guide to the second edition of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules 1988 revision (1989)
0.01
0.0059491023 = product of:
0.02379641 = sum of:
0.02379641 = weight(_text_:to in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02379641 = score(doc=753,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.2783311 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A programmed guide through the latest revisions to AACR2. For students and new practioners
-
Duke, J.K.: Authors and names : multiple pseudonyms in AACR2 (1981)
0.01
0.0059491023 = product of:
0.02379641 = sum of:
0.02379641 = weight(_text_:to in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02379641 = score(doc=271,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.2783311 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The history of cataloging pseudonyms is reviewed. The second edition of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules reverses a century-long cataloging practice by allowing authors who use several pseudonyms to be entered in the catalog under each name. The AACR2 rule violates the catalog's objectives as formulated by Lubetzky, and is contradictory to AACR2's own internal logic. The number of disadvantages to the rule far outweigh any advantages. The rule should be replaced.
-
Walfish, B.: Hebrew and Yiddish personal name authorities under AACR2 (1983)
0.01
0.0059491023 = product of:
0.02379641 = sum of:
0.02379641 = weight(_text_:to in 314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02379641 = score(doc=314,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.2783311 = fieldWeight in 314, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=314)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper deals with problems encountered in applying AACR2 as interpreted by the Library of Congress to Hebrew and Yiddish personal names. It also discusses some problems relating to the romanization of such names and proposes some solutions. A plea is made for the eventual development of the capability to handle vernacular records for non-Roman languages in machine-readable form.
-
Baughman, B.: AACR2 main entry free? (1984)
0.01
0.0059491023 = product of:
0.02379641 = sum of:
0.02379641 = weight(_text_:to in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02379641 = score(doc=336,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08549677 = queryWeight, product of:
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.04702661 = queryNorm
0.2783311 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.818051 = idf(docFreq=19512, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this paper is to explore some of the implications of abandoning the main entry in online catalogs. The approach we take is to explore the consequences of deleting direct and indirect references to main entry in Chapter 21 in the second edition of the Anglo-American Calaloguing Rules (AACR2). Three classes of problematic rules result when this deletion is performed. First there are rules, which when converted, become awkward or non-sensical. Second there are rules which under conversion become overly complex. Third there are converted rules which cannot be easily operationalized.
