-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003)
0.02
0.015515282 = product of:
0.031030564 = sum of:
0.01402727 = weight(_text_:information in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01402727 = score(doc=5652,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
0.017003294 = product of:
0.03400659 = sum of:
0.03400659 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03400659 = score(doc=5652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- From a historical perspective, one could consider the modern library catalog to be that bibliographical apparatus that stretches at least from Thomas Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian Library at Oxford to the near present. Mai and other recent authors have suggested postmodern approaches to knowledge organization. In these, we realize that there is no single and unique order of knowledge or documents but rather there are many appropriate orders, all of them contextually dependent. Works (oeuvres, opera, Werke, etc.), as are musical works, literary works, works of art, etc., are and always have been key entities for information retrieval. Yet catalogs in the modern era were designed to inventory (first) and retrieve (second) specific documents. From Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian until the late twentieth century, developments are epistemologically pragmatic--reflected in the structure of catalog records, in the rules for main entry headings, and in the rules for filing in card catalogs. After 1980 developments become empirical-reflected in research conducted by Tillett, Yee, Smiraglia, Leazer, Carlyle, and Vellucci. The influence of empiricism on the pragmatic notion of "the work" has led to increased focus on the concept of the work. The challenge for the postmodern online catalog is to fully embrace the concept of "the work," finally to facilitate it as a prime objective for information retrieval.
- Imprint
- New York : Haworth Information Press
-
Leigh, A.: Lucy is enceinte : the power of an action in defining a work (2002)
0.02
0.015061164 = product of:
0.030122329 = sum of:
0.009718376 = weight(_text_:information in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009718376 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
0.020403953 = product of:
0.040807907 = sum of:
0.040807907 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040807907 = score(doc=5629,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Although performed works are defined based on their collaborative nature and rules for mixed responsibility in AACR2R, descriptive practices are vague when applied to the cataloging of a television series-a type of performed work. Is the umbrella title identical as the title expressed in a bibliographic series? Or is it the collective title of the work and each episode a part? A key factor in this decision is in understanding how performed works are distinct from textual works. By highlighting the seminal television situation comedy I Love Lucy as an example, it is argued that a textual approach provides an incomplete methodology for the retrieval of the component parts of a television series. Descriptive areas in AACR2R are explored, particularly issues related to seriality, whole-part relationships, and the use of work identifiers in the collocation of episodes.
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
-
Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: Measuring typographical errors' impact on retrieval in bibliographic databases (2007)
0.02
0.015061164 = product of:
0.030122329 = sum of:
0.009718376 = weight(_text_:information in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009718376 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
0.020403953 = product of:
0.040807907 = sum of:
0.040807907 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040807907 = score(doc=261,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Typographical errors can block access to records in online catalogs; but, when a word contains a typo and is also spelled correctly elsewhere in the same record, access may not be blocked. To quantify the effect of typographical errors in records on information retrieval, we conducted a study to measure the proportion of records that contain a typographical error but that do not also contain a correct spelling of the same word. This article presents the experimental design, results of the study, and a statistical analysis of the results.We find that the average proportion of records that are blocked by the presence of a typo (that is, records in which a correct spelling of the word does not also occur) ranges from 35% to 99%, depending upon the frequency of the word being searched and the likelihood of the word being misspelled.
-
Weber, J.: Nachlässe und Autographen im WWW : Dublin Core in Museen, Archiven und Bibliotheken (2000)
0.01
0.014527107 = product of:
0.029054213 = sum of:
0.009718376 = weight(_text_:information in 4458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009718376 = score(doc=4458,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4458, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4458)
0.019335838 = product of:
0.038671676 = sum of:
0.038671676 = weight(_text_:22 in 4458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038671676 = score(doc=4458,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4458, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4458)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Vielen Bibliotheksbenutzern wird inzwischen mehr und mehr bewußt: Alle Vernetzungsbestrebungen in Bibliotheksbereich, die lokale Traditionen zugunsten eines überregionalen Nachweises der Bestände aufgeben, handeln auch gegen die Benutzerinteressen. Wir werden uns zunehmend klar darüber, daß von den meisten wissenschaftlern der lokale Online-Katalog allein für Literaturrecherchen herangezogen wird, und zwar aus dem Grund, daß das gesuchte Buch so schnell und unkompliziert wie möglich zur Hand sein soll. Diese Feststellung impliziert auch den Gedanken, daß die Aufgabe guter lokaler Katalogisierungstraditionen möglicherweise ein unwiederbringlicher Verlust ist, ein Schritt hin zu einer schlechteren und oberflächlicheren Information. Wie sich eine überregionale Verbesserung der Nachweissituation unter gleichzeitiger Bewahrung lokaler Traditionen darstellen kann, ist Gegenstand der folgenden Ausführungen. Sie bahandeln das Thema aus dem Blickwinkel der Bilbiotheken, Archive und Museen, deren aufgabe im Nachweis und der Bewahrung von Unikaten besteht. die hier behandelte Metadatendiskussion bezieht sich also auf die Beschreibungskriterien nicht für digitales Material, sondern für Manuskripte, Briefe, Gegenstände
- Date
- 12. 3.2000 19:25:22
-
Lee-Smeltzer, K.-H. (Janet): Cataloging in three academic libraries: operations, trends, and perspectives (2000)
0.01
0.014527107 = product of:
0.029054213 = sum of:
0.009718376 = weight(_text_:information in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009718376 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
0.019335838 = product of:
0.038671676 = sum of:
0.038671676 = weight(_text_:22 in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038671676 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 27. 7.2006 18:22:11
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Managing cataloging and the organization of information: philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century. Part II: Specialized and academic libraries in the United States"
-
Parent, I.: IFLA Section on Cataloguing: "Why in the World?" (2000)
0.01
0.014527107 = product of:
0.029054213 = sum of:
0.009718376 = weight(_text_:information in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009718376 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
0.019335838 = product of:
0.038671676 = sum of:
0.038671676 = weight(_text_:22 in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038671676 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The Bibliographic Control Division of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) consists of three sections: bibliography, cataloguing, and classification. The cataloguing section, which focuses on descriptive cataloguing, is one of the oldest within IFLA, having been founded in 1935 as the IFLA Committee on Uniform Cataloguing Rules. It became the Committee on Cataloguing in 1970. The committee played a key role in planning and convening the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles held in Paris in 1961 and the International Meeting of Cataloguing Experts held in Copenhagen in 1969. The Copenhagen conference provided the impetus to develop the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions (ISBD). The Committee on Cataloguing established a systematic process for the revision of the ISBDs. The cataloguing section focuses on traditional cataloguing standards and on the impact of electronic resources and technology on these standards. The section has initiated several projects at the international level to facilitate access to information.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007)
0.01
0.014527107 = product of:
0.029054213 = sum of:
0.009718376 = weight(_text_:information in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009718376 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.019335838 = product of:
0.038671676 = sum of:
0.038671676 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038671676 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003)
0.01
0.014228255 = product of:
0.02845651 = sum of:
0.011453216 = weight(_text_:information in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011453216 = score(doc=5631,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.017003294 = product of:
0.03400659 = sum of:
0.03400659 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03400659 = score(doc=5631,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- From a historical perspective, one could consider the modern library catalog to be that bibliographical apparatus that stretches at least from Thomas Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian Library at Oxford to the near present. Mai and other recent authors have suggested postmodern approaches to knowledge organization. In these, we realize that there is no single and unique order of knowledge or documents but rather there are many appropriate orders, all of them contextually dependent. Works (oeuvres, opera, Werke, etc.), as are musical works, literary works, works of art, etc., are and always have been key entities for information retrieval. Yet catalogs in the modern era were designed to inventory (first) and retrieve (second) specific documents. From Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian until the late twentieth century, developments are epistemologically pragmatic--reflected in the structure of catalog records, in the rules for main entry headings, and in the rules for filing in card catalogs. After 1980 developments become empirical-reflected in research conducted by Tillett, Yee, Smiraglia, Leazer, Carlyle, and Vellucci. The influence of empiricism on the pragmatic notion of "the work" has led to increased focus on the concept of the work. The challenge for the postmodern online catalog is to fully embrace the concept of "the work," finally to facilitate it as a prime objective for information retrieval.
-
Petrucciani, A.: ¬The other half of cataloguing : new models and perspectives for the control of authors and works (2004)
0.01
0.014228255 = product of:
0.02845651 = sum of:
0.011453216 = weight(_text_:information in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011453216 = score(doc=5669,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.017003294 = product of:
0.03400659 = sum of:
0.03400659 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03400659 = score(doc=5669,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Today's electronic catalogue makes retrieval of specific records very simple and quick in most (not all) cases, but searches aimed at the reliable retrieval of all material answering a well-defined need (author, work, theme, form, etc.) are still long and tiring, and sometimes impossible, in crowded bibliographic databases. In spite of its great relevance, authority control has been and still is the "poor relative" of cataloguing, the often neglected or overlooked "other half" if we compare it to the creation of bibliographic records. The FRBR study and the new authority control standards (GARR and UNIMARC Authorities) are important steps towards future perspectives. Even today, cataloguing codes do not make clear the difference between the access points for bibliographic records and the relationships (work-to-work, author-to-work, etc.) that are independent from spoecific publications. With the development of richer authority records and relationships, the bibliographic record might be relieved of information related to entities different from publications and of all the functions more suitably worked out upstream or downstream in access systems or by links to the images and/or the texts of the publications themselves. A "light" bibliographic record would no longer be the paramount component of library information systems; it would keep its central role rather as nimble, swift turntable between access and content organization systems and systems for management and display of digital resources themselves.
-
Copeland, A.: Works and digital resources in the catalog : electronic versions of Book of Urizen, The Kelmscott Chaucer and Robinson Crusoe (2002)
0.01
0.014085256 = product of:
0.028170511 = sum of:
0.011338106 = weight(_text_:information in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011338106 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.016832404 = product of:
0.033664808 = sum of:
0.033664808 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033664808 = score(doc=5620,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
-
Turner, J.; Goodrum, A.: Modeling videos as works (2002)
0.01
0.014085256 = product of:
0.028170511 = sum of:
0.011338106 = weight(_text_:information in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011338106 = score(doc=5624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
0.016832404 = product of:
0.033664808 = sum of:
0.033664808 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033664808 = score(doc=5624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: "Bridget's Revelationes, Ockham's Tractatus, and Doctrines and Covenanants" : qualitative analysis and epistemological perspectives on theological works (2002)
0.01
0.014085256 = product of:
0.028170511 = sum of:
0.011338106 = weight(_text_:information in 5627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011338106 = score(doc=5627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5627)
0.016832404 = product of:
0.033664808 = sum of:
0.033664808 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033664808 = score(doc=5627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5627)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
-
Petek, M.: Derivative bibliographic relationships in the Slovenian online catalogue COBIB (2007)
0.01
0.013025207 = product of:
0.026050415 = sum of:
0.01402727 = weight(_text_:information in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01402727 = score(doc=832,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
0.012023145 = product of:
0.02404629 = sum of:
0.02404629 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02404629 = score(doc=832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this research is to provide information about derivative bibliographic relationships in the online catalogue COBIB, to investigate size and complexity of bibliographic families and to determine whether bibliographic characteristics are associated with the extent of derivations. Design/methodology/approach - A bibliographic entity consisting of a work and item is represented by bibliographic records. A random sample of records is converted into a sample of progenitor works and bibliographic families for each progenitor are constructed. Findings - 25.75 per cent of progenitor works are derivative; successive derivations with 67.02 per cent appear most frequently. The size of bibliographic families ranges from 1 to 16; older progenitors have larger families. The majority of families have one type of relationship; there is one case with four types. A large proportion, 59.06 per cent, of derivative relationships is not expressed explicitly by catalogue. Research limitations/implications - Research of bibliographic records representing more than one work is needed. It is also important to find out what catalogue users are looking for: a work or an item? Practical implications - A model for COBIB is suggested; it enables an equal identification of works, items and relationships. A cataloguer must create an authority record for each work and link it with corresponding bibliographic records for items. Originality/value - Information about relationships should be incorporated into the catalogue and corresponding records linked. Explicit control of derivative relationships would be of great help to catalogue users and would make information retrieval improved and more precise; it would also allow more efficient use of knowledge and library materials.
-
Ruiz-Perez, R.: Consequences of applying cataloguing codes for author entries to the Spanish National Library online catalogs (2001)
0.01
0.012911166 = product of:
0.025822332 = sum of:
0.009162573 = weight(_text_:information in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009162573 = score(doc=5435,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
0.016659759 = product of:
0.033319518 = sum of:
0.033319518 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033319518 = score(doc=5435,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.23154683 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In this empirical study of a sample of catalog records I investigate the implications for information retrieval of the rules for choosing author access points in online catalogs. Aims: To obtain data that can be used to inform a revision of current cataloguing rules, and to propose more functional criteria aimed at improving the retrieval of information located on the basis of author names. Material and methods: A total of 838 records from the Biblioteca Nacional Española (Spanish National Library) were examined to analyze the use of authorities as access points. Authors were classified as creative or non-creative to facilitate the analysis. The variables investigated were author source location, potential author access points, actual entries used in the record, and loss of potential entry points. Results: A total of 3566 potential author access points were identified (mean of 4.25 per record). The title page yielded 57.3% of all potential access points, the table of contents yielded 33.5%, and other sources accounted for the remaining 9.1%. A total of 2125 potential authors were not used as access points in the records (overall loss of 59.5%). A total of 960 authors named on the title page were not used as entries (30.23% loss). In works with up to three authors per responsibility function, 24.8% of the authors were not used as entry points. In works with more than three authors, 75.2% of the potential access points were unused. Discussion and conclusions: A significant proportion of potential access points from the table of contents and the title page went unused. If the access points from these sources were used, author indexes would be more complete and accurate, and retrieval with online catalogs would be more efficient. I suggest that losses for creative authors were caused by neglect of the table of contents as a source of entries, strict application of the rule of three, and other specific factors. Losses for non-creative authors were caused by ambiguities and gaps in current cataloguing rules for choosing added author entries. The findings support the urgent need to revise cataloguing rules for author access points to make them more flexible, more practical, and more in line with actual responsibility functions and types of authorship.
-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004)
0.01
0.012105923 = product of:
0.024211846 = sum of:
0.008098647 = weight(_text_:information in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008098647 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.0161132 = product of:
0.0322264 = sum of:
0.0322264 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0322264 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper presents findings of a survey an the state of cataloging and metadata education. in ALA-accredited library and information science progranis in North America. The survey was conducted in response to Action Item 5.1 of the "Bibliographic Control of Web Resources: A Library of Congress Action Plan," which focuses an providing metadata education to new LIS professionals. The study found LIS programs increased their reliance an introductory courses to cover cataloging and metadata, but fewer programs than before had a cataloging course requirement. The knowledge of cataloging delivered in introductory courses was basic, and the coverage of metadata was limited to an overview. Cataloging courses showed similarity in coverage and practice and focused an print mater!als. Few cataloging educators provided exercises in metadata record creation using non-AACR standards. Advanced cataloging courses provided in-depth coverage of subject cataloging and the cataloging of nonbook resources, but offered very limited coverage of metadata. Few programs offered full courses an metadata, and even fewer offered advanced metadata courses. Metadata topics were well integrated into LIS curricula, but coverage of metadata courses varied from program to program, depending an the interests of instructors. Educators were forward-looking and agreed an the inclusion of specific knowledge and skills in metadata instruction. A series of actions were proposed to assist educators in providing students with competencies in cataloging and metadata.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003)
0.01
0.012105923 = product of:
0.024211846 = sum of:
0.008098647 = weight(_text_:information in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008098647 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.0161132 = product of:
0.0322264 = sum of:
0.0322264 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0322264 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Catalogs have for centuries been the main tool that enabled users to search for items in a library by author, title, or subject. A catalog can be interpreted as a set of bibliographic records, where each record acts as a surrogate for a publication. Every record describes a specific publication and contains the data that is used to create the indexes of search systems and the information that is presented to the user. Bibliographic records are often captured and exchanged by the use of the MARC format. Although there are numerous rdquodialectsrdquo of the MARC format in use, they are usually crafted on the same basis and are interoperable with each other -to a certain extent. The data model of a MARC-based catalog, however, is rdquo[...] extremely non-normalized with excessive replication of datardquo [1]. For instance, a literary work that exists in numerous editions and translations is likely to yield a large result set because each edition or translation is represented by an individual record, that is unrelated to other records that describe the same work.
- Source
- Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
-
Oehlschläger, S.: IFLA-CDNL Allianz für bibliografische Standards (ICABS) (2004)
0.01
0.011288175 = product of:
0.02257635 = sum of:
0.012957836 = weight(_text_:information in 2190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012957836 = score(doc=2190,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2190, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2190)
0.009618516 = product of:
0.019237032 = sum of:
0.019237032 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019237032 = score(doc=2190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 2190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Im August 2003 wurde eine neue Allianz zwischen der IFLA und den Nationalbibliotheken vereinbart, um die Koordinierungsarbeit fortzusetzen und auszubauen, die zuvor von den Geschäftsstellen der IFLA Core Programs UBCIM und UDT geleistet wurde. Die IFLA Core Activity Universal Bibliographic Control and International Marc (UBCIM) wurde vor 30 Jahren gegründet und endete 2003. Der Zweck von UBCIM war es, Aktivitäten zu koordinieren, die auf die Entwicklung von Systemen und Standards für die bibliografische Kontrolle auf nationaler Ebene und den internationalen Austausch von bibliografischen Standards abzielten, einschließlich der Unterstützung fachlicher Aktivitäten von Sections und Divisions der IFLA (z. B. der Division Bibliographic Control und den Sections Information Technology und National Libraries). Darüber hinaus sorgte UBCIM für die Veröffentlichung von Berichten über Projekte, die im Zusammenhang mit internationalen bibliografischen Standards und Formaten stehen sowie für die Veröffentlichung von Proceedings von themenbezogenen Konferenzen und Seminaren. UBCIM war ursprünglich bei der British Library angesiedelt (1973 - 1989) und danach von 1990 bis Anfang 2003 bei Der Deutschen Bibliothek. Anfang 2003 hat die Biblioteca Nacional de Portugal die Verantwortung sowohl für UNIMARC als auch für ICBC (International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control, eine Quartalszeitschrift von IFLA, zuvor von UBCIM) übernommen.
Als weiterer Bestandteil des neuen Programms wurde ein Großteil des Programms der früheren Core Activity Universal Dataflow and Telecommunications (UDT) übernommen. UDT unterstützte die Analyse und die Förderung von Technologien und Standards, sofern sie der Interoperabilität dienen und sich auf die digitale Umgebung im Bereich der vernetzten Suche von Ressourcen, des Information Retrieval, der Digitalisierung und Metadaten beziehen. UDT arbeitete verbandsweit mit den Sections und Programmes der IFLA zusammen, unterstützte aber besonders die fachlichen Aktivitäten der Information Technology Section. Von seinen Anfängen in den späten 80er-Jahren bis zu seiner Schließung war das Programm an der National Library of Canada (NLC) angesiedelt. UDT entwickelte und pflegte später auch das erste Kommunikationstool der IFLA, IFLANET, das viele Jahre an der NLC gehostet wurde. IFLANET wurde zum Institut de ['Information Scientifique et Technique (INIST) in Frankreich transferiert und ist nicht Bestandteil von ICABS.
-
Jones, E.: ¬The FRBR model as applied to continuing resources (2005)
0.01
0.011279238 = product of:
0.045116954 = sum of:
0.045116954 = product of:
0.09023391 = sum of:
0.09023391 = weight(_text_:22 in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09023391 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hirons, J.; Hawkins, L.; French, P.: AACR2 and you : revisiting AACR2 to accomodate seriality (2000)
0.01
0.011279238 = product of:
0.045116954 = sum of:
0.045116954 = product of:
0.09023391 = sum of:
0.09023391 = weight(_text_:22 in 6339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09023391 = score(doc=6339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 18. 8.2002 17:22:13
-
Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001)
0.01
0.011279238 = product of:
0.045116954 = sum of:
0.045116954 = product of:
0.09023391 = sum of:
0.09023391 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09023391 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
