Search (572 results, page 3 of 29)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Morris, D.E.; Hobert, C.B.; Osmus, L.; Wool, G.: Cataloging staff costs revisited (2000) 0.02 
    0.022454113 = product of:
  0.03368117 = sum of:
    0.009195981 = weight(_text_:a in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009195981 = score(doc=171,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
    0.024485188 = product of:
      0.048970375 = sum of:
        0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048970375 = score(doc=171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Staff costs for cataloging have declined at Iowa State University Library. This is demonstrated by data from a longitudinal time and cost study begun in 1987. We discuss the national developments, technological advancements, and reengineering efforts that have supported greater cataloging effectiveness and quality. We use the ISU findings as an example of a nationwide phenomenon resulting from the remarkable ability of catalogers to share work through national bibliographic utilities.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  2. Wiggins, B.: Managing cataloging and cataloging operations : 2000 and beyond at the Library of Congress (2000) 0.02 
    0.022192208 = product of:
  0.03328831 = sum of:
    0.0056313644 = weight(_text_:a in 5393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0056313644 = score(doc=5393,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 5393, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5393)
    0.027656946 = product of:
      0.055313893 = sum of:
        0.055313893 = weight(_text_:de in 5393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055313893 = score(doc=5393,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.28488597 = fieldWeight in 5393, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5393)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The article focuses on initiatives and innovations undertaken at the Library of Congress (LC) during the past decade and the first decade of the new century that affect LC cataloging - including its implementation of a new integrated library system, its digital resources activities, its adoption of the core level bibliographic record, and its role as secretariat of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging. In reviewing these initiatives, the article underscores the challenges LC faces as the de facto national library in managing cataloging and the organization of information. The author highlights how LC enterprises help point the way for cataloging, both at LC and within the larger library community.
    Type
    a
  3. Simpson, B.; Williams, P.: ¬The cataloger's workstation revisited : utilizing cataloger's desktop (2001) 0.02 
    0.021869322 = product of:
  0.032803982 = sum of:
    0.011379444 = weight(_text_:a in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011379444 = score(doc=4121,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
    0.02142454 = product of:
      0.04284908 = sum of:
        0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04284908 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    A few years into the development of Cataloger's Desktop, an electronic cataloging tool aggregator available through the Library of Congress, is an opportune time to assess its impact on cataloging operations. A search for online cataloging tools on the Internet indicates a proliferation of cataloging tool aggregators which provide access to online documentation related to cataloging practices and procedures. Cataloger's Desktop stands out as a leader among these aggregators. Results of a survey to assess 159 academic ARL and large public libraries' reasons for use or non-use of Cataloger's Desktop highlight the necessity of developing strategies for its successful implementation including training staff, providing documentation, and managing technical issues.
    Date
    28. 7.2006 20:09:22
    Type
    a
  4. Hilberer, T.: Aufwand vs. Nutzen : Wie sollen deutsche wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken künftig katalogisieren? (2003) 0.02 
    0.02133859 = product of:
  0.032007884 = sum of:
    0.0013273254 = weight(_text_:a in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0013273254 = score(doc=1733,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.025478978 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
    0.03068056 = sum of:
      0.018437965 = weight(_text_:de in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.018437965 = score(doc=1733,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045180224 = queryNorm
          0.09496199 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
      0.012242594 = weight(_text_:22 in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.012242594 = score(doc=1733,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045180224 = queryNorm
          0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    An einer Weiterentwicklung der RAK in diesem Sinne einer Vereinfachung, Modernisierung und besseren internationalen Kompatibilität wurde unter dem Arbeitstitel RAK2 bereits einige Jahre gearbeitet. Diese Arbeit ist de facto schon im Jahr 2000 von der Deutschen Bibliothek gestoppt worden. Seither führen die Bibliothekare eine unfruchtbare Umstellungsdiskussion, anstatt ein sinnvolles Regelwerk zu erarbeiten. Die erzwungene Pause gibt Gelegenheit, die Zielrichtung neu zu fassen und stärker als bisher geplant auf eine Vereinfachung abzuzielen. Oberster Grundsatz sollte dabei sein, nur das zu leisten, was wirklich vom Nutzer (und nicht nur vom Bibliothekar) gebraucht wird. Mit anderen Worten: die immer spärlicher fließenden Mittel müssen so effektiv wie möglich eingesetzt werden. Da aber die zuständigen bibliothekarischen Institutionen, allen voran die derzeit in Vielem merkwürdig rückwärts gewandte Deutsche Bibliothek, genau diese Weiterentwicklung zu bremsen versuchen, müssen die Impulse von anderer Seite kommen. Es bleibt zu hoffen, dass die Kanzler der Hochschulen und die Aufsicht führenden Ministerien die Bibliotheken doch noch zwingen, ihre Katalogisierungsregeln den Erfordernissen der Nutzer anzupassen, für die sie da sind."
    Date
    22. 6.2003 12:13:13
    Type
    a
  5. Gatti, T.H.: Utilization of students as cataloging assistants at carnegie category I institution libraries (2005) 0.02 
    0.021329116 = product of:
  0.031993672 = sum of:
    0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075084865 = score(doc=43,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
    0.024485188 = product of:
      0.048970375 = sum of:
        0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048970375 = score(doc=43,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    A survey of 261 libraries was undertaken to determine the level of use of and duties performed by student assistants in monographic cataloging operations. Ninety-five of 142 responding libraries (64.1 percent) indicate that they use student assistants for some type of monographic cataloging tasks. These tasks are downloading of bibliographic and authority records, monographic cataloging, classification, subject heading authority control, holdings, database maintenance, and editing of 246 or 505 MARC tags. Some respondents expressed reluctance to use student assistants for higher-level cataloging tasks.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  6. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.02 
    0.021329116 = product of:
  0.031993672 = sum of:
    0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075084865 = score(doc=126,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
    0.024485188 = product of:
      0.048970375 = sum of:
        0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048970375 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  7. Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004) 0.02 
    0.021329116 = product of:
  0.031993672 = sum of:
    0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075084865 = score(doc=132,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
    0.024485188 = product of:
      0.048970375 = sum of:
        0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048970375 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  8. Kim, K.-S.: Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002 (2003) 0.02 
    0.021329116 = product of:
  0.031993672 = sum of:
    0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075084865 = score(doc=152,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
    0.024485188 = product of:
      0.048970375 = sum of:
        0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048970375 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This article provides a review of cataloging and classification publications that appeared in the last two years. The review considers the papers in two categories. Cataloging Theories and Practices covers descriptive cataloging, authority control, classification, subject cataloging, cataloging nonbook materials, electronic resources and metadata, and international cooperation. The second section covers other issues related to cataloging, including management, and education and training. Throughout the review, the author identifies trends and important developments in the area of cataloging and classification.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  9. Madison, O.M.A.: Utilizing the FRBR framework in designing user-focused digital content and access systems (2006) 0.02 
    0.021329116 = product of:
  0.031993672 = sum of:
    0.0075084865 = weight(_text_:a in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0075084865 = score(doc=1085,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
    0.024485188 = product of:
      0.048970375 = sum of:
        0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048970375 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the rapidly expanding environment of emerging electronic content and the importance of librarians to partner with new research and teaching communities in meeting users' needs to find, identify, select, and obtain the information and resources they need. The methodology and framework of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records could serve as a useful tool in building expanded access and content systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  10. IFLA Cataloguing Principles : steps towards an International Cataloguing Code, 5. Report from the 5th IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code : Pretoria, South Africa, 2007 = Rapport de la 5ème Réunion d'Experts de l'IFLA sur un Code International de Catalogage (2008) 0.02 
    0.02129033 = product of:
  0.06387099 = sum of:
    0.06387099 = product of:
      0.12774198 = sum of:
        0.12774198 = weight(_text_:de in 2311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12774198 = score(doc=2311,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.657916 = fieldWeight in 2311, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2311)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  11. Dickinson, J.; Martin, C.K.; Mering, M.: Falling in and out of love : the impact of moving to a remote location on cataloging workflow (2003) 0.02 
    0.021208337 = product of:
  0.031812504 = sum of:
    0.010387965 = weight(_text_:a in 151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010387965 = score(doc=151,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 151, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=151)
    0.02142454 = product of:
      0.04284908 = sum of:
        0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04284908 = score(doc=151,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 151, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=151)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    As academic libraries undergo renovation and building projects, various technical service operations are frequently moved out of the main building and housed in an off-site location. The aim of this research was to discover, by means of a questionnaire, what the impact of such a move is on the workflow of professional catalogers. The researchers concluded that a positive experience on the part of the catalogers depends upon detailed planning, thoughtful administrative support, and an element of luck. However, some problems are unavoidable in moving catalogers away from the main collection.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  12. Letarte, K.M.; Turvey, M.R.; Bornemann, D.; Adams, D.L.: Practitioner perspectives on cataloging education for entry-level academic Librarians (2002) 0.02 
    0.021208337 = product of:
  0.031812504 = sum of:
    0.010387965 = weight(_text_:a in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010387965 = score(doc=158,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
    0.02142454 = product of:
      0.04284908 = sum of:
        0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04284908 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The role of cataloging education within the library profession is a topic of considerable interest and debate. Fifty-five heads of reference and sixty-five heads of cataloging in Association of Research Librarians institutions responded to a survey based upon the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Educational Policy Statement, Appendix: Knowledge and Skills, Intellectual Access and Information Organization, concerning the importance of cataloging competencies for all entry-level academic librarians. The survey found that practitioners agreed upon a definite set of core cataloging competencies that all entry-level academic librarians should possess. This finding holds larger implications for library education for academic librarians and for the profession as a whole.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  13. Grothe, E.: ¬Die kooperative Erschließung von Autographen und Nachlässen im digitalen Zeitalter : Probleme und Perspektiven (2006) 0.02 
    0.019862993 = product of:
  0.029794488 = sum of:
    0.0053093014 = weight(_text_:a in 1758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0053093014 = score(doc=1758,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1758, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1758)
    0.024485188 = product of:
      0.048970375 = sum of:
        0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048970375 = score(doc=1758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1758)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 12:43:43
    Type
    a
  14. Jele, H.: Erkennung bibliographischer Dubletten mittels Trigrammen : Messungen zur Performanz (2009) 0.02 
    0.019862993 = product of:
  0.029794488 = sum of:
    0.0053093014 = weight(_text_:a in 2562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0053093014 = score(doc=2562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2562)
    0.024485188 = product of:
      0.048970375 = sum of:
        0.048970375 = weight(_text_:22 in 2562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048970375 = score(doc=2562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    21. 6.2010 19:30:22
    Type
    a
  15. Bothmann, R.: Cataloging electronic books (2004) 0.02 
    0.019647349 = product of:
  0.029471021 = sum of:
    0.008046483 = weight(_text_:a in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008046483 = score(doc=129,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
    0.02142454 = product of:
      0.04284908 = sum of:
        0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04284908 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Papers on the cataloging of electronic resources have focused on electronic journals and Internet resources such as Web sites and not on electronic books. Electronic books are nonserial monographic resources accessed with a computer either directly or remotely. Rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources have changed and continue to change. This article discusses the electronic book as a unique manifestation and provides practical instruction on the application of current cataloging rules. The cataloging elements covered are control fields and variable data fields, including classification, uniform titles, title information, edition information, type and extent of the resource, publication and distribution information, physical description, series statements, notes, and subject analysis.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  16. ChaPudhry, A.S.; Periasamy, M.: ¬A study of current practices of selected libraries in cataloguing electronic journals (2001) 0.02 
    0.019647349 = product of:
  0.029471021 = sum of:
    0.008046483 = weight(_text_:a in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008046483 = score(doc=746,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
    0.02142454 = product of:
      0.04284908 = sum of:
        0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04284908 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    MARC records and online policy documents of selected libraries were reviewed to study the approaches taken by libraries worldwide to catalogue electronic journals. In general, libraries catalogue those electronic journals that are subscribed by them on priority basis. Most of them annotate the e-journal to the print record, some prefer to catalogue them separately, while the majority of the libraries adopt both approaches. While most of the libraries studied prefer full record, cataloguing e-journals separately with a brief record (at least containing MARC fields 245, 500, and 856) that identifies and locates the resource seems to be the best practice.
    Date
    22. 1.2007 20:46:57
    Type
    a
  17. Carlyle, A.: Understanding FRBR as a conceptual model : FRBR and the bibliographic universe (2006) 0.02 
    0.01926614 = product of:
  0.028899208 = sum of:
    0.010535319 = weight(_text_:a in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010535319 = score(doc=1050,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
    0.01836389 = product of:
      0.03672778 = sum of:
        0.03672778 = weight(_text_:22 in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03672778 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) presents a complex conceptual model. Because of this, it is not easy for everyone to understand. The purpose of this paper is to make some of the more difficult aspects of the FRBR model, in particular the Croup 1 entities work, expression, manifestation, and item, easier to understand by placing FRBR in the context of what it is: a conceptual entity-relationship model. To this end, a definition of the term "model" is presented, a variety of types and junctions of models are introduced, conceptual models are discussed in detail, modeling an abstraction is explained, and different ways of interpreting FRBR are suggested. Various models used in the history of cataloging are introduced to place FRBR in the context of the historical development of document models.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  18. Oehlschläger, S.: IFLA-CDNL Allianz für bibliografische Standards (ICABS) (2004) 0.02 
    0.019153249 = product of:
  0.02872987 = sum of:
    0.0026546507 = weight(_text_:a in 2190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0026546507 = score(doc=2190,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 2190, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2190)
    0.02607522 = product of:
      0.05215044 = sum of:
        0.05215044 = weight(_text_:de in 2190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05215044 = score(doc=2190,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19416152 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.26859307 = fieldWeight in 2190, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2190)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Im August 2003 wurde eine neue Allianz zwischen der IFLA und den Nationalbibliotheken vereinbart, um die Koordinierungsarbeit fortzusetzen und auszubauen, die zuvor von den Geschäftsstellen der IFLA Core Programs UBCIM und UDT geleistet wurde. Die IFLA Core Activity Universal Bibliographic Control and International Marc (UBCIM) wurde vor 30 Jahren gegründet und endete 2003. Der Zweck von UBCIM war es, Aktivitäten zu koordinieren, die auf die Entwicklung von Systemen und Standards für die bibliografische Kontrolle auf nationaler Ebene und den internationalen Austausch von bibliografischen Standards abzielten, einschließlich der Unterstützung fachlicher Aktivitäten von Sections und Divisions der IFLA (z. B. der Division Bibliographic Control und den Sections Information Technology und National Libraries). Darüber hinaus sorgte UBCIM für die Veröffentlichung von Berichten über Projekte, die im Zusammenhang mit internationalen bibliografischen Standards und Formaten stehen sowie für die Veröffentlichung von Proceedings von themenbezogenen Konferenzen und Seminaren. UBCIM war ursprünglich bei der British Library angesiedelt (1973 - 1989) und danach von 1990 bis Anfang 2003 bei Der Deutschen Bibliothek. Anfang 2003 hat die Biblioteca Nacional de Portugal die Verantwortung sowohl für UNIMARC als auch für ICBC (International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control, eine Quartalszeitschrift von IFLA, zuvor von UBCIM) übernommen.
    Als weiterer Bestandteil des neuen Programms wurde ein Großteil des Programms der früheren Core Activity Universal Dataflow and Telecommunications (UDT) übernommen. UDT unterstützte die Analyse und die Förderung von Technologien und Standards, sofern sie der Interoperabilität dienen und sich auf die digitale Umgebung im Bereich der vernetzten Suche von Ressourcen, des Information Retrieval, der Digitalisierung und Metadaten beziehen. UDT arbeitete verbandsweit mit den Sections und Programmes der IFLA zusammen, unterstützte aber besonders die fachlichen Aktivitäten der Information Technology Section. Von seinen Anfängen in den späten 80er-Jahren bis zu seiner Schließung war das Programm an der National Library of Canada (NLC) angesiedelt. UDT entwickelte und pflegte später auch das erste Kommunikationstool der IFLA, IFLANET, das viele Jahre an der NLC gehostet wurde. IFLANET wurde zum Institut de ['Information Scientifique et Technique (INIST) in Frankreich transferiert und ist nicht Bestandteil von ICABS.
    Type
    a
  19. Khurshid, Z.: ¬The impact of information technology an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers (2003) 0.02 
    0.018662978 = product of:
  0.027994465 = sum of:
    0.0065699257 = weight(_text_:a in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0065699257 = score(doc=2323,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
    0.02142454 = product of:
      0.04284908 = sum of:
        0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04284908 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Information technology (IT) encompassing an integrated library system, computer hardware and software, CDROM, Internet, and other domains, including MARC 21 formats, CORC, and metadata standards (Dublin Core, TEI, XML, RDF) has produced far-reaching changes in the job functions of catalogers. Libraries are now coming up with a new set of recruiting requirements for these positions. This paper aims to review job advertisements published in American Libraries (AL) and College and Research Libraries News (C&RL NEWS) to assess the impact of the use of IT in libraries an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers.
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 22(2003) no. March, S.18-21
    Type
    a
  20. Creider, L.S.: Family names and the cataloger (2007) 0.02 
    0.018662978 = product of:
  0.027994465 = sum of:
    0.0065699257 = weight(_text_:a in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0065699257 = score(doc=2285,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045180224 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
    0.02142454 = product of:
      0.04284908 = sum of:
        0.04284908 = weight(_text_:22 in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04284908 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15821345 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, to be known as Resource Description and Access (RDA), has indicated that the replacement for the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) will allow the use of family names as authors and will provide rules for their formation. This paper discusses what a family name describes; examines how information seekers look for family names and what they expect to find; describes the ways in which family names have been established in Anglo-American cataloging and archival traditions; asks how adequately the headings established under these rules help users seek such information; and suggests how revised cataloging rules might better enable users to identify resources that meet their needs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 527
  • m 28
  • el 18
  • b 13
  • s 12
  • r 4
  • p 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications