Search (145 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.06
    0.061247054 = product of:
      0.1429098 = sum of:
        0.07337766 = weight(_text_:digital in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07337766 = score(doc=2766,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.4529128 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.052837856 = weight(_text_:techniques in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052837856 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.2920283 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.016694285 = product of:
          0.03338857 = sum of:
            0.03338857 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03338857 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:20:24
  2. Azevedo Lourenço, C. de; Alvarenga, L.: Metadata standard of theses and dissertations according to the entity-relationship model (2009) 0.03
    0.032214418 = product of:
      0.11275046 = sum of:
        0.059912607 = weight(_text_:digital in 3078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059912607 = score(doc=3078,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.36980176 = fieldWeight in 3078, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3078)
        0.052837856 = weight(_text_:techniques in 3078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052837856 = score(doc=3078,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.2920283 = fieldWeight in 3078, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3078)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    With the automation of information systems and with the advent of digital libraries, norms, standards and techniques of library studies have been widely discussed, analyzed, reevaluated and reorganized. In this article the results of doctoral research, in which the Brazilian Metadata Standard for Theses and Dissertations (MTD-BR) was analyzed, is presented. This standard has been utilized in the digital Library of Theses and Dissertations Project, of the Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia, IBICT (Brazilian Institute for Scientific and Technological Information), with the methodology of data modeling, according to the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), which is based on the Entity- Relationship Model. It was concluded that new studies should be carried out applying this methodology to other metadata standards, even if they are analyzed with other data modeling tools, such as the object-oriented model, and considering its relationship with the guidelines, principles and instruments of library studies.
  3. McCallum, S.H.: Library of Congress metadata landscape (2003) 0.02
    0.022667255 = product of:
      0.07933539 = sum of:
        0.03530384 = weight(_text_:digital in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03530384 = score(doc=1760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
        0.044031553 = weight(_text_:techniques in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044031553 = score(doc=1760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.24335694 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress (LC) has many of the same challenges as other libraries, especially large ones. LC has many different types of resources - books, journals, maps, music, manuscripts, audio, moving image, still image, artifacts, electronic - with large collections of each. Different levels of access are needed for this material: for some, collection level bibliographic description is adequate; for many, item level access is adequate; but for others, such as sound recordings, analytic, or sub unit access is highly desirable.The sizes of the LC collections are a major challenge - over 125 million non-electronic and over 3 million electronic items (and growing rapidly). And finally, electronic resources are presenting us with new issues - from metadata to preservation to storage to linking techniques. LC has tried to approach these challenges from a service perspective. Access must be successful for the end user, which mandates as much coherence and consistency in the metadata as possible and access systems that are easy to use. This paper focuses an the Library of Congress' perspective an metadata in the following three areas: (1) descriptive metadata in our current operations, (2) pathways that are developing that will support possible evolution in the future, and (3) broader metadata needs with digital material. The discussion is from a metadata element set and format point of view, not a cataloging data and cataloging rules view. Most acronyms used in this paper are expanded in an Appendix.
  4. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.02
    0.022498628 = product of:
      0.078745194 = sum of:
        0.056486145 = weight(_text_:digital in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056486145 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
        0.022259047 = product of:
          0.044518095 = sum of:
            0.044518095 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044518095 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Madison, O.M.A.: Utilizing the FRBR framework in designing user-focused digital content and access systems (2006) 0.02
    0.022498628 = product of:
      0.078745194 = sum of:
        0.056486145 = weight(_text_:digital in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056486145 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
        0.022259047 = product of:
          0.044518095 = sum of:
            0.044518095 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044518095 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.02
    0.0196863 = product of:
      0.068902045 = sum of:
        0.04942538 = weight(_text_:digital in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04942538 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
        0.019476667 = product of:
          0.038953334 = sum of:
            0.038953334 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038953334 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research-they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006) 0.02
    0.0196863 = product of:
      0.068902045 = sum of:
        0.04942538 = weight(_text_:digital in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04942538 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.30507088 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
        0.019476667 = product of:
          0.038953334 = sum of:
            0.038953334 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038953334 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  8. Lee-Smeltzer, K.-H. (Janet): Cataloging in three academic libraries: operations, trends, and perspectives (2000) 0.02
    0.0175181 = product of:
      0.061313346 = sum of:
        0.04461906 = weight(_text_:processing in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04461906 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
        0.016694285 = product of:
          0.03338857 = sum of:
            0.03338857 = weight(_text_:22 in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03338857 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the cataloging operations and management in three medium-sized academic libraries - Oregon State University, University of Houston, and Colorado State University. It provides an overview of the staffing and organizational structure of the cataloging department in each library. Faced with similar challenges from constantly changing environments brought about by technology and institutional pressure to achieve more with less, library technical services in these three libraries, cataloging in particular, are developing some common strategies for coping. These trends include: (1) changing the roles and responsibilities of both professional and support staff (2) designing workflow around library systems and limited personnel resources, (3) mainstreaming government documents cataloging and processing into technical services, (4) using technology to increase cataloging efficiency, and (5) dealing with bibliographic control of current electronic resources and moving into digitization and metadata arenas.
    Date
    27. 7.2006 18:22:11
  9. Electronic cataloging : AACR2 and metadata for serials and monographs (2003) 0.02
    0.015867079 = product of:
      0.055534773 = sum of:
        0.02471269 = weight(_text_:digital in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02471269 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.15253544 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
        0.030822085 = weight(_text_:techniques in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030822085 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.17034985 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic Cataloging is the undertaking of three pioneers in library science: Sheila S. Intner, Sally C. Tseng, and Mary L. Larsgaard, who co-edited Maps and Related Cartographic Materials: Cataloging Classification, and Bibliographic Control (Haworth, 2000). With illustrations, references, additional reading lists, and case studies, this research tool offers you tips and strategies to make metadata work for you and your library. No one currently involved in information cataloging should be without this book! For a complete list of contents, visit our Web site at www.HaworthPress.com. Electronic Cataloging: AACR2 and Metadata for Serials and Monographs is a collection of papers about recent developments in metadata and its practical applications in cataloging. Acknowledged experts examine a wide variety of techniques for managing serials and monographs using standards and schemas like MARC, AACR2, ISSN, ISBD, and Dublin Core. From the broadest introduction of metadata usage to the revisions of AACR2 through 2000, this book offers vital analysis and strategy for achieving Universal Bibliographic Control. Electronic Cataloging is divided into three parts. The first is an introduction to metadata, what it is, and its relationship to the library in general. The second portion focuses in more an how metadata can be utilized by a library system and the possibilities in the near future. The third portion is very specific, dealing with individual standards of metadata and elements, such as AACR2 and MARC, as well as current policies and prospects for the future. Information covered in Electronic Cataloging includes: an overview of metadata and seriality and why it is important to the cataloging community Universal Bibliographic Control: what has succeeded so far in cataloging and how metadata will evolve the step-by-step process for creating an effective metadata repository for the community the inherent problems that accompany cataloging nonprint research materials, such as electronic serials and the Web metadata schemas and the use of controlled vocabularies and classification systems standards of metadata, including MARC, Dublin Core, RDF, and AACR2, with emphasis an the revisions and efforts made with AACR2 through 2000 an overview of the ISSN (International Serials Standard Number) and its relationships to current codes and metadata standards, including AACR2 and much more!
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Editors' Introduction (Sheila S. Intner, Sally C. Tseng, and Mary Lynette Larsgaard) PART 1. Cataloging in an Electronic Age (Michael Gorman) Why Metadata? Why Me? Why Now? (Brian E. C. Schottlaender) PART 2. Developing a Metadata Strategy (Grace Agnew) Practical Issues in Applying Metadata Schemas and Controlled Vocabularies to Cultural Heritage Information (Murtha Baca) Digital Resources and Metadata Application in the Shanghai Library (Yuanliang Ma and Wei Liu) Struggling Toward Retrieval: Alternatives to Standard Operating Procedures Can Help Librarians and the Public (Sheila S. Intner) PART 3. AACR2 and Other Metadata Standards: The Way Forward (Ann Huthwaite) AACR2 and Metadata: Library Opportunities in the Global Semantic Web (Barbara B. Tillett) Seriality: What Have We Accomplished? What's Next? (Jean Hirons) MARC and Mark-Up (Erik Jul) ISSN: Dumb Number, Smart Solution (Regina Romano Reynolds) Index Reference Notes Included
  10. Ma, Y.-L.; Liu, W.: Digital resources and metadata application in Shanghai Library (2003) 0.02
    0.015788358 = product of:
      0.1105185 = sum of:
        0.1105185 = weight(_text_:digital in 5506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1105185 = score(doc=5506,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.6821592 = fieldWeight in 5506, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5506)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Shanghai Digital Library (SDL) is a component of the China Digital Library Project. This paper introduces the framework, goals, and contents of the China Digital Library Project. The vision, mission, system architecture, digital resources, and related major technology of the SDL project are discussed. Also, the background of the Chinese metadata application and the metadata scheme of the SDL are described, and the features of metadata application in practical cases are analyzed. Finally, current issues of metadata application and their solutions are suggested.
  11. Viswanathan, C.G.: Cataloguing:theory & practice (2007) 0.02
    0.015236385 = product of:
      0.053327344 = sum of:
        0.04358901 = weight(_text_:techniques in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04358901 = score(doc=1475,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.24091107 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
        0.0097383335 = product of:
          0.019476667 = sum of:
            0.019476667 = weight(_text_:22 in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019476667 = score(doc=1475,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Most Likely, this revision of Cataloguing Theory and Practice 6th Edition by Professor C.G. Viswanathan has the distinction of commanding continued use since 1954, both in India and abroad . Besides providing a comprehensive and balanced perspective of library catalogues from Collimates to AACR-2 1988 revision, enabling students and the faculty of library and information science at universities, and practicing cataloguers towards rationalization, the work projects an analysis of pros and cons of continuing the cataloguing procedures and techniques and maintaining it in the traditional form of cards filed in cabinet or to adopt the MARC techniques, and computerise it online with the advanced countries of the West. The impact of computerisation on the users, library staff and library administration with regard to its cost effectiveness has been discussed. Two new chapters. Computerised Catalogue (chapter-8) and Headings for Name Entries (Chapter-26) according to AACR2, 1988 revision has been added. The data and been brought to date. A brief account of the British Library's Cataloguing Conversion Project of the British Museum's General Catalogue to Machine Readable From presents an exciting experience. The Library of Congress MARC System has also been given due consideration. The select working bibliography of a cataloguer has also been revised. he order of the chapters has been, as in previous editions, retained. It is expected that the sixth edition of Cataloguing Theory and Practice' would command the same respect of the author's colleagues, as justify its value as an unfailing companion in all cataloguing assignments.
    Content
    Inhalt: 1. Library Catalogue : Its Nature, Factions, and Importance in a Library System 2. History of Modern Library Catalogues 3. Catalogue Codes: Origin, Growth and Development 4. Principles of Planning and Provision of the Library Catalogue 5.Catalogue Entries and their Functions in Achieving the Objectives of the Library Catalogue 6.Descriptive Cataloguing 7. Physical Forms of the Catalogue-I Manual Catalogues 8. Physical Forms of the Catalogues-II Computerised Cataloges 9. Varieties of Catalogues, their Scope and Functions 10. Subject Cataloguing 11. Cataloguing Department: Organization and Administration. 12. Cost Analysis of Cataloguing Procedures and Suggested Economies 13. Co-operation and Centralization in Cataloguing 14. Union Catalogues and Subject Specialisation 15. Cataloguing of Special Material 16. Arrangement, Filing, Guiding of catalogue and Instructions for its Use 17. Education and Training of Cataloguers 18.Documentation : An Extension of Cataloguing and Classification Applied to Isolates 19.Catalogue Cards, Their Style and Reproduction Methods 20. Work of Personal Authors 21. Choice and Entry of Personal Names 22. Works of Corporate Authors 23. Legal Publications 24. Choice of Headings for Corporate Bodies 25. Works of Unknown Authorship : Entry under Uniform Titles 26. Acces Points to Books and Meta- Books by A-ACR2 27. AACR2 1988 revision : Choice of Access Points to Name Headings and Uniform Titles 28. Added Entries Other Than Subject Entries 29. Subject Entries 30. Analytiacal Entries 31. Series Note and Series Entry 32. Contents, Notes and Annotation 33. References 34. Display of Entries Appendix-I Select Aids and Guides for the Cataloguer Appendix-II Definitions of Terms Commonly used in Cataloguing Appendix-III Cataloguing Examination: Select Questions Appendix-IV Implications of the adoption of A-ACR2
  12. Carlyle, A.: Developing organized information displays for voluminous worls : a study of user clustering behavior (2001) 0.01
    0.014873021 = product of:
      0.10411114 = sum of:
        0.10411114 = weight(_text_:processing in 819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10411114 = score(doc=819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.6261658 = fieldWeight in 819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=819)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.5, S.677-699
  13. Ede, S.: Cataloguing in the digital age (2001) 0.01
    0.014121537 = product of:
      0.09885076 = sum of:
        0.09885076 = weight(_text_:digital in 5222) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09885076 = score(doc=5222,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.61014175 = fieldWeight in 5222, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5222)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  14. Copeland, A.: Works and digital resources in the catalog : electronic versions of Book of Urizen, The Kelmscott Chaucer and Robinson Crusoe (2002) 0.01
    0.014121537 = product of:
      0.09885076 = sum of:
        0.09885076 = weight(_text_:digital in 5620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09885076 = score(doc=5620,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.61014175 = fieldWeight in 5620, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5620)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Content
    The author addresses issues regarding the cataloging of digital manifestations of works. The problem of how to catalog digitized rare books and electronic texts to facilitate access to works while distinguishing editions is discussed. Using digital versions of Blake's Book of Urizen, The Kelmscott Chaucer and Robinson Crusoe as examples, the article focuses on the way current cataloging aids or hinders access to works. Specific problems include: the non-uniform use of uniform titles; varying application of the Library of Congress Rule Interpretation (1.11A) concerning electronic reproductions; the lack of analysis at the work level in digital projects.
  15. Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003) 0.01
    0.014061642 = product of:
      0.049215745 = sum of:
        0.03530384 = weight(_text_:digital in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03530384 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.21790776 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
        0.013911906 = product of:
          0.027823811 = sum of:
            0.027823811 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027823811 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04107254 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  16. Dunsire, G.: Integrating Dublin Core / RDF records with MARC21 via the OCLC Connexion service at the Centre for Digital Library Research (2003) 0.01
    0.013532878 = product of:
      0.09473014 = sum of:
        0.09473014 = weight(_text_:digital in 1497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09473014 = score(doc=1497,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.58470786 = fieldWeight in 1497, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1497)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the use of OCLC's Connexion service (formerly CORC) by the Centre for Digital Library Research at the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland. The Centre has completed, and is currently engaged in, a number of research projects involving the application of Dublin Core and MARC21 in creating metadata for digital resources; these include projects an the Glasgow Digital Library, East Dunbartonshire local history, and a pilot Scottish Cultural Portal.The Connexion service provides a MARC21-DC converter, and the Centre has been investigating its incorporation in workflows for creating and maintaining digital libraries. This has included the use of databases to store metadata, with subsequent output to Dublin Core and conversion to MARC21.
  17. Tomasova, K.: Aplikacia zasad ISBD pri spracovani archivnych dokumentov z oblasti kinematografie (2000) 0.01
    0.012748304 = product of:
      0.08923812 = sum of:
        0.08923812 = weight(_text_:processing in 6324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08923812 = score(doc=6324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.53671354 = fieldWeight in 6324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6324)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Application of ISBD rules to the processing of film archive stock
  18. Miller, R.R.: Principia bibliographica? : balancing principles, practice, and pragmatics in a changing digital environment (2007) 0.01
    0.01222961 = product of:
      0.08560727 = sum of:
        0.08560727 = weight(_text_:digital in 259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08560727 = score(doc=259,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.5283983 = fieldWeight in 259, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=259)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the emphasis on control in cataloging versus the chaos found on the Web. It delves into adversarial relationships between catalogers and technologists. It seeks commonalities and suggests that new alternatives addressing both perspectives might offer superior and more satisfying results. A series of examples juxtapose current practices, enrichment possibilities, and flaws in current digital solutions to suggest potential opportunities where catalogers might excel. Speculation on ways to promote cataloging principles and values via more direct participation in the unruly digital environment hints at a more promising future for our profession.
  19. Beacom, M.: Crossing a digital divide : AACR2 and unaddressed problems of networked ressources (2000) 0.01
    0.012104175 = product of:
      0.084729224 = sum of:
        0.084729224 = weight(_text_:digital in 6805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084729224 = score(doc=6805,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 6805, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6805)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  20. Humphrey, J.: Manuscripts and metadata : Descriptive metadata in three manuscript catalogs: DigCIM, MALVINE, & Digital Scriptorium (2007) 0.01
    0.012104175 = product of:
      0.084729224 = sum of:
        0.084729224 = weight(_text_:digital in 783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084729224 = score(doc=783,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.52297866 = fieldWeight in 783, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=783)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The complexity of cataloging manuscripts, particularly medieval manuscripts, has meant that these materials have remained largely inaccessible to the public. The quantity and quality of the descriptive data, the time and money it takes to catalog manuscripts, and the fragility of the materials themselves explain the dearth of searchable data on these valuable resources. Even when manuscripts have been cataloged, they have often been physically available only to a few elite scholars who are able to gain access to them. Certain institutions have embarked on projects to reverse this situation. This paper deals with three of these projects: the British Library's Digital Catalogue of Illuminated Manuscripts (DigCIM), a European consortium's database entitled Manuscripts And Letters Via Integrated Networks in Europe (MALVINE), and Columbia University's Digital Scriptorium (DS). The author explores the history of each project, compares the metadata utilized by each one through the creation of a crosswalk, and analyzes the usefulness of these catalogs to the user.
    Object
    Digital Scriptorium

Languages

  • e 111
  • d 29
  • f 1
  • s 1
  • slo 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 127
  • m 13
  • b 11
  • s 9
  • el 6
  • r 1
  • More… Less…