Search (373 results, page 1 of 19)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015) 0.03 
    0.032498896 = product of:
  0.06499779 = sum of:
    0.06499779 = sum of:
      0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.018783338 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045757167 = queryNorm
          0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
      0.009017671 = weight(_text_:a in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.009017671 = score(doc=2610,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045757167 = queryNorm
          0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
      0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037196785 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045757167 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Aggregates have been a frequent topic of discussion between library science researchers. This study seeks to better understand aggregates through the analysis of a sample of bibliographic records and review of the cataloging treatment of aggregates. The study focuses on determining how common aggregates are in library collections, what types of aggregates exist, how aggregates are described in bibliographic records, and the criteria for identifying aggregates from the information in bibliographic records. A sample of bibliographic records representing textual resources was taken from OCLC's WorldCat database. More than 20 percent of the sampled records represented aggregates and more works were embodied in aggregates than were embodied in single work manifestations. A variety of issues, including cataloging practices and the varying definitions of aggregates, made it difficult to accurately identify and quantify the presence of aggregates using only the information from bibliographic records.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  2. Coyle, K.: FRBR, before and after : a look at our bibliographic models (2016) 0.03 
    0.027441036 = product of:
  0.054882072 = sum of:
    0.054882072 = sum of:
      0.015652781 = weight(_text_:m in 2786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.015652781 = score(doc=2786,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045757167 = queryNorm
          0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 2786, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2786)
      0.00823197 = weight(_text_:a in 2786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.00823197 = score(doc=2786,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045757167 = queryNorm
          0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 2786, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2786)
      0.030997321 = weight(_text_:22 in 2786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030997321 = score(doc=2786,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045757167 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2786, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2786)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This book looks at the ways that we define the things of the bibliographic world, and in particular how our bibliographic models reflect our technology and the assumed goals of libraries. There is, of course, a history behind this, as well as a present and a future. The first part of the book begins by looking at the concept of the 'work' in library cataloging theory, and how that concept has evolved since the mid-nineteenth century to date. Next it talks about models and technology, two areas that need to be understood before taking a long look at where we are today. It then examines the new bibliographic model called Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the technical and social goals that the FRBR Study Group was tasked to address. The FRBR entities are analyzed in some detail. Finally, FRBR as an entity-relation model is compared to a small set of Semantic Web vocabularies that can be seen as variants of the multi-entity bibliographic model that FRBR introduced.
    Date
    12. 2.2016 16:22:58
    Type
    m
  3. Noruzi, A.: FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2012) 0.02 
    0.020116638 = product of:
  0.040233277 = sum of:
    0.040233277 = product of:
      0.06034991 = sum of:
        0.0107542 = weight(_text_:a in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0107542 = score(doc=4564,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
        0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049595714 = score(doc=4564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic relationships are one of the most active research areas in knowledge organization, especially in cataloguing. This study attempts to examine and map the FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) bibliographic relationships with Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships, and to a ssess the congruence between them. The FRBR conceptual model provides a taxonomy of bibliographic relationships in chapter 5, illustrating them in 11 tables. This study shows that there is considerable congruence between these two taxonomies.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:13:52
    Type
    a
  4. Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015) 0.02 
    0.0189013 = product of:
  0.0378026 = sum of:
    0.0378026 = product of:
      0.056703895 = sum of:
        0.013307645 = weight(_text_:a in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013307645 = score(doc=2609,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
        0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04339625 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper presents the results of a research study, a survey of library and information science master's degree holders who have taken a beginning cataloging course, to identify the elements of a beginning cataloging course that help students to learn cataloging concepts and skills. The results suggest that cataloging practice (the hands-on creation of bibliographic records or catalog cards), the effectiveness of the instructor, a balance of theory and practice, and placing cataloging in a real-world context contribute to effective learning. However, more research is needed to determine how, and to what the extent, each element should be incorporated into beginning cataloging courses.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  5. Hamm, S.; Schneider, K.: Automatische Erschließung von Universitätsdissertationen (2015) 0.02 
    0.01832427 = product of:
  0.03664854 = sum of:
    0.03664854 = product of:
      0.054972813 = sum of:
        0.0053771 = weight(_text_:a in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053771 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
        0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049595714 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 27(2015) H.1, S.18-22
    Type
    a
  6. Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012) 0.02 
    0.018307004 = product of:
  0.03661401 = sum of:
    0.03661401 = product of:
      0.05492101 = sum of:
        0.011524757 = weight(_text_:a in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011524757 = score(doc=2546,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
        0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04339625 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    As we move toward implementing RDA: Resource Description and Access, I have been pondering how we might manage the transition to new cataloging rules effectively. I was a practicing cataloger when Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed., was implemented and remember it as a traumatic process. The published literature that I found focused on the impact of the then-new rules on specific formats and genres, but no one seems to have addressed the process of implementation and what type of training worked well (or did not). After a bit of sleuthing, I found a pertinent presentation by Arlene G. Taylor, which she graciously agreed to repurpose as this guest editorial.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  7. Bloss, M.E.: Testing RDA at Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science : the students' perspectives (2011) 0.02 
    0.017972289 = product of:
  0.035944577 = sum of:
    0.035944577 = product of:
      0.053916864 = sum of:
        0.010520617 = weight(_text_:a in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010520617 = score(doc=1899,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
        0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04339625 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science (GSLIS) was one of a funnel group of graduate schools of library and information science selected to test RDA. A seminar specifically for this purpose was conducted from August to December 2010. Fifteen students participated in the test, creating records in AACR2 and in RDA, encoding them in the MARC format, and responding to the required questionnaires. In addition to record creation, the students were also asked to submit a final paper in which they described their experiences and recommended whether or not to accept RDA as a replacement for AACR2.
    Date
    25. 5.2015 18:36:22
    Type
    a
  8. Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012) 0.02 
    0.017972289 = product of:
  0.035944577 = sum of:
    0.035944577 = product of:
      0.053916864 = sum of:
        0.010520617 = weight(_text_:a in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010520617 = score(doc=1934,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
        0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04339625 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Creativity is now a core requirement for successful organizations. Libraries, like all organizations, need to produce and utilize new ideas to improve user service and experiences. With changes in cataloging such as Resource Description and Access (RDA), the opportunity to rethink cataloging practices is here now. Everyone has creative potential, although catalogers may have both a personality and work environment that make it more difficult. To be able to maximize creative capacity, catalogers need the proper work environment, support from their organization, and a plan for accomplishing creative goals. Given that environment, catalogers may create ideas that will shape the future. (RDA).
    Date
    29. 5.2015 11:08:22
    Type
    a
  9. Kratzer, M.; Lohrum, S.; Risch, U.; Thiessen, P.: Zum Stand des Projektes 'Cloudbasierte Infrastruktur für Bibliotheksdaten' (CIB) (2016) 0.02 
    0.017745905 = product of:
  0.03549181 = sum of:
    0.03549181 = product of:
      0.053237714 = sum of:
        0.043827787 = weight(_text_:m in 2473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043827787 = score(doc=2473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 2473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2473)
        0.009409925 = weight(_text_:a in 2473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009409925 = score(doc=2473,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2473, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2473)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  10. Sieber, M.; Hupfer, G.: ¬Die Common Bibliographic Data Zone (CBDZ) : ein Werkstattbericht (2016) 0.02 
    0.017745905 = product of:
  0.03549181 = sum of:
    0.03549181 = product of:
      0.053237714 = sum of:
        0.043827787 = weight(_text_:m in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043827787 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.38491225 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
        0.009409925 = weight(_text_:a in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009409925 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  11. Parka, A.L.; Panchyshyn, R.S.: ¬The path to an RDA hybridized catalog : lessons from the Kent State University Libraries' RDA enrichment project (2016) 0.02 
    0.017181829 = product of:
  0.034363657 = sum of:
    0.034363657 = product of:
      0.051545486 = sum of:
        0.008149235 = weight(_text_:a in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008149235 = score(doc=2632,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
        0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04339625 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article describes in detail the library implementation of a Resource Description and Access (RDA) Enrichment project. The library "hybridized," or enriched legacy data from Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules bibliographic records by the addition of specific RDA elements. The project also cleaned up various other elements in the bibliographic data that were not directly RDA-related. There were over 28 million changes and edits made to these records, changes that would never have been made otherwise because the library lacked the resources to do them independently. The enrichment project made the bibliographic data consistent, and helped prepared the data for its eventual transition to a linked data environment.
    Date
    21. 1.2016 19:08:22
    Type
    a
  12. Pauman Budanovi, M.; Zumer, M.: Investigating mental models of cataloguers as the first step towards the development of intuitive cataloguer's tools (2015) 0.02 
    0.016998043 = product of:
  0.033996087 = sum of:
    0.033996087 = product of:
      0.050994128 = sum of:
        0.044272754 = weight(_text_:m in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044272754 = score(doc=2988,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.3888201 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
        0.0067213746 = weight(_text_:a in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067213746 = score(doc=2988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  13. Knowlton, S.A.: Power and change in the US cataloging community (2014) 0.02 
    0.016683359 = product of:
  0.033366717 = sum of:
    0.033366717 = product of:
      0.050050072 = sum of:
        0.0066538225 = weight(_text_:a in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066538225 = score(doc=2599,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
        0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04339625 = score(doc=2599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The US cataloging community is an interorganizational network with the Library of Congress (LC) as the lead organization, which reserves to itself the power to shape cataloging rules. Peripheral members of the network who are interested in modifying changes to the rules or to the network can use various strategies for organizational change that incorporate building ties to the decision-makers located at the hub of the network. The story of William E. Studwell's campaign for a subject heading code illustrates how some traditional scholarly methods of urging change-papers and presentations-are insufficient to achieve reform in an interorganizational network, absent strategies to build alliances with the decision makers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  14. Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012) 0.02 
    0.016683359 = product of:
  0.033366717 = sum of:
    0.033366717 = product of:
      0.050050072 = sum of:
        0.0066538225 = weight(_text_:a in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066538225 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
        0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04339625 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  15. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.02 
    0.016683359 = product of:
  0.033366717 = sum of:
    0.033366717 = product of:
      0.050050072 = sum of:
        0.0066538225 = weight(_text_:a in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066538225 = score(doc=2606,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
        0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04339625 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become fluent in information technology such as web design skills, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Stylesheets (CSS), eXensible Markup Language (XML), and programming languages. The knowledge gained from learning information technology can be used to experiment with methods of transforming one metadata schema into another using various software solutions. This paper will discuss the use of eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for repurposing, editing, and reformatting metadata. Catalogers have the requisite skills for working with any metadata schema, and if they are excluded from metadata work, libraries are wasting a valuable human resource.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  16. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.02 
    0.016033739 = product of:
  0.032067478 = sum of:
    0.032067478 = product of:
      0.048101213 = sum of:
        0.0047049625 = weight(_text_:a in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047049625 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
        0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04339625 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  17. Stalberg, E.; Cronin, C.: Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control (2011) 0.02 
    0.016033739 = product of:
  0.032067478 = sum of:
    0.032067478 = product of:
      0.048101213 = sum of:
        0.0047049625 = weight(_text_:a in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047049625 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
        0.04339625 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04339625 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  18. Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011) 0.02 
    0.015691716 = product of:
  0.031383432 = sum of:
    0.031383432 = product of:
      0.04707515 = sum of:
        0.009878363 = weight(_text_:a in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009878363 = score(doc=302,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
        0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037196785 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  19. D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011) 0.02 
    0.0154048195 = product of:
  0.030809639 = sum of:
    0.030809639 = product of:
      0.046214458 = sum of:
        0.009017671 = weight(_text_:a in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009017671 = score(doc=4190,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
        0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037196785 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    National exercises for the evaluation of research activity by universities are becoming regular practice in ever more countries. These exercises have mainly been conducted through the application of peer-review methods. Bibliometrics has not been able to offer a valid large-scale alternative because of almost overwhelming difficulties in identifying the true author of each publication. We will address this problem by presenting a heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometric datasets for large-scale research assessments. The application proposed concerns the Italian university system, comprising 80 universities and a research staff of over 60,000 scientists. The key advantage of the proposed approach is the ease of implementation. The algorithms are of practical application and have considerably better scalability and expandability properties than state-of-the-art unsupervised approaches. Moreover, the performance in terms of precision and recall, which can be further improved, seems thoroughly adequate for the typical needs of large-scale bibliometric research assessments.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:06:52
    Type
    a
  20. Coyle, K.: RDA vocabularies for a twenty-first-century data environment (2010) 0.02 
    0.015210776 = product of:
  0.030421551 = sum of:
    0.030421551 = product of:
      0.045632325 = sum of:
        0.037566677 = weight(_text_:m in 4170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037566677 = score(doc=4170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 4170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4170)
        0.00806565 = weight(_text_:a in 4170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00806565 = score(doc=4170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4170)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    m

Authors

Languages

  • e 296
  • d 65
  • i 5
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 331
  • el 66
  • m 23
  • n 8
  • b 4
  • ag 2
  • s 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications