-
Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012)
0.08
0.0774276 = product of:
0.1548552 = sum of:
0.069153175 = weight(_text_:services in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069153175 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.08570203 = sum of:
0.04121528 = weight(_text_:management in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04121528 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.04448675 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04448675 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 56(2012) no.3, S.155-170
-
Mitchell, A.M.; Thompson, J.M.; Wu, A.: Agile cataloging : staffing and skills for a bibliographic future (2010)
0.06
0.05935045 = product of:
0.1187009 = sum of:
0.09372067 = weight(_text_:services in 4159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09372067 = score(doc=4159,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.5442138 = fieldWeight in 4159, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4159)
0.024980234 = product of:
0.049960468 = sum of:
0.049960468 = weight(_text_:management in 4159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049960468 = score(doc=4159,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 4159, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4159)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- One of the foremost challenges facing technical services in academic libraries is integrating digital resources and services with existing work without a concomitant personnel expansion. The library's bibliographic data are manipulated and delivered through myriad systems and services, including proxy servers, electronic resource management systems, federated search and link resolver tools, integrated library systems, bibliographic utilities, and dozens of external data providers. In this increasingly complex environment, libraries require flexible data management and flexible staffing, which in turn relies on a reservoir of informed staff and managers who understand the many pieces of the technical services puzzle. This article discusses efforts at the University of Houston Libraries, a mid-size research library, to enhance organizational capacity for evolving cataloging roles and to foster organizational relationships that support progress in technical services functions.
-
Stalberg, E.; Cronin, C.: Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control (2011)
0.05
0.05346919 = product of:
0.10693838 = sum of:
0.084695004 = weight(_text_:services in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084695004 = score(doc=2592,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.4918039 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.022243375 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04448675 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In June 2009, the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Heads of Technical Services in Large Research Libraries Interest Group established the Task Force on Cost/Value Assessment of Bibliographic Control to address recommendation 5.1.1.1 of On the Record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, which focused on developing measures for costs, benefits, and value of bibliographic control. This paper outlines results of that task force's efforts to develop and articulate metrics for evaluating the cost and value of cataloging activities specifically, and offers some next steps that the community could take to further the profession's collective understanding of the costs and values associated with bibliographic control.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 55(2011) no.3, S.124-137
-
Bénauda, C.-L.; Bordeianu, S.: OCLC's WorldShare Management Services : a brave new world for catalogers (2015)
0.05
0.05242333 = product of:
0.10484666 = sum of:
0.069153175 = weight(_text_:services in 2617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069153175 = score(doc=2617,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 2617, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2617)
0.03569348 = product of:
0.07138696 = sum of:
0.07138696 = weight(_text_:management in 2617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07138696 = score(doc=2617,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 2617, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2617)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Like other recent library management systems, OCLC's WorldShare Management Services (WMS) is cloud-based. But unlike the others, WMS opens WorldCat for applications beyond its traditional role as a source of bibliographic records. It enables catalogers to work directly from the Master Record, which no longer needs to be exported to a local system. This article describes the impact of WMS on the roles and functions of cataloging departments, and asks if it is changing the meaning of cataloging. It concludes that while the workflows are changed dramatically, the profession of cataloging remains relevant.
-
Sapon-White, R.: E-book cataloging workflows at Oregon State University (2014)
0.04
0.039169952 = product of:
0.078339905 = sum of:
0.059274152 = weight(_text_:services in 2604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059274152 = score(doc=2604,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.344191 = fieldWeight in 2604, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2604)
0.019065749 = product of:
0.038131498 = sum of:
0.038131498 = weight(_text_:22 in 2604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038131498 = score(doc=2604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Among the many issues associated with integrating e-books into library collections and services, the revision of existing workflows in cataloging units has received little attention. The experience designing new workflows for e-books at Oregon State University Libraries since 2008 is described in detail from the perspective of three different sources of e-books. These descriptions highlight where the workflows applied to each vendor's stream differ. A workflow was developed for each vendor, based on the quality and source of available bibliographic records and the staff member performing the task. Involving cataloging staff as early as possible in the process of purchasing e-books from a new vendor ensures that a suitable workflow can be designed and implemented as soon as possible. This ensures that the representation of e-books in the library catalog is not delayed, increasing the likelihood that users will readily find and use these resources that the library has purchased.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 58(2014) no.2, S.127-136
-
Martin, K.E.; Mundle, K.: Positioning libraries for a new bibliographic universe (2014)
0.04
0.039169952 = product of:
0.078339905 = sum of:
0.059274152 = weight(_text_:services in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059274152 = score(doc=2608,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.344191 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.019065749 = product of:
0.038131498 = sum of:
0.038131498 = weight(_text_:22 in 2608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038131498 = score(doc=2608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys the English-language literature on cataloging and classification published during 2011 and 2012, covering both theory and application. A major theme of the literature centered on Resource Description and Access (RDA), as the period covered in this review includes the conclusion of the RDA test, revisions to RDA, and the implementation decision. Explorations in the theory and practical applications of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), upon which RDA is organized, are also heavily represented. Library involvement with linked data through the creation of prototypes and vocabularies are explored further during the period. Other areas covered in the review include: classification, controlled vocabularies and name authority, evaluation and history of cataloging, special formats cataloging, cataloging and discovery services, non-AACR2/RDA metadata, cataloging workflows, and the education and careers of catalogers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 58(2014) no.4, S.233-249
-
Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012)
0.04
0.03557103 = product of:
0.07114206 = sum of:
0.048898686 = weight(_text_:services in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048898686 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
0.022243375 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04448675 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 56(2012) no.3, S.122-126
-
Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010)
0.04
0.03557103 = product of:
0.07114206 = sum of:
0.048898686 = weight(_text_:services in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048898686 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.022243375 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04448675 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 54(2010) no.2, S.90-114
-
Knowlton, S.A.: Power and change in the US cataloging community (2014)
0.04
0.03557103 = product of:
0.07114206 = sum of:
0.048898686 = weight(_text_:services in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048898686 = score(doc=2599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
0.022243375 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = weight(_text_:22 in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04448675 = score(doc=2599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 58(2014) no.2, S.111-126
-
Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014)
0.04
0.03557103 = product of:
0.07114206 = sum of:
0.048898686 = weight(_text_:services in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048898686 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.022243375 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04448675 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 58(2014) no.3, S.187-208
-
Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015)
0.04
0.03557103 = product of:
0.07114206 = sum of:
0.048898686 = weight(_text_:services in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048898686 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
0.022243375 = product of:
0.04448675 = sum of:
0.04448675 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04448675 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 59(2015) no.4, S.187-199
-
Altenhöner, R.; Frodl, C.; Gömpel, R.; Jahns, Y.; Junger, U.; Mahnke, C.; Meyer, A.; Pfeifer, B.; Oehlschläger, S.; Svensson, L.G.: Libraries beyond libraries : Integration, Innovation and Information for all Aus den Veranstaltungen der Sektionen Bibliografie, Katalogisierung, Klassifikation und Indexierung, Knowledge Management und Informationstechnologie sowie der Core Activity ICADS der IFLA Division III (Library Services) beim Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 77. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in San Juan, Puerto Rico (2011)
0.03
0.034753162 = product of:
0.069506325 = sum of:
0.048898686 = weight(_text_:services in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048898686 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
0.02060764 = product of:
0.04121528 = sum of:
0.04121528 = weight(_text_:management in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04121528 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Maurer, M.B.; Panchyshyn, R.S.: Understanding the why : a case study in managing the RDA implementation (2014)
0.03
0.034753162 = product of:
0.069506325 = sum of:
0.048898686 = weight(_text_:services in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048898686 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
0.02060764 = product of:
0.04121528 = sum of:
0.04121528 = weight(_text_:management in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04121528 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article describes in detail the management of a Resource Description and Access (RDA) implementation process by an academic library that was an early adopter of RDA. It identifies the necessary decisions to be made and discusses the rationale behind these decisions during the implementation process. This information can benefit other libraries with managing their local RDA implementations. The authors examine the business case behind implementation from various perspectives such as administrative support, training, documentation, establishment of local procedures and costs. It aims to help cataloging/technical services/metadata managers understand the scope of the process and the impact it will have on their libraries.
-
Parent, M.: Implementing RDA in a time of change : RDA and system migration at RMIT University (2014)
0.03
0.034753162 = product of:
0.069506325 = sum of:
0.048898686 = weight(_text_:services in 1994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048898686 = score(doc=1994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 1994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1994)
0.02060764 = product of:
0.04121528 = sum of:
0.04121528 = weight(_text_:management in 1994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04121528 = score(doc=1994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The National Library of Australia was among national libraries who implemented Resource Description and Access (RDA) in early 2013. RMIT University in Melbourne chose to implement with the National Library, despite an upcoming migration from a Voyager Integrated Library Management System (ILMS) to Alma library services platform. This article describes the experience of RMIT in implementing RDA while also investing resources in a systems change. It addresses staff training, policy development, and processes to automate the conversion of Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, Second Edition (AACR2) records. It includes lessons learned as advice to institutions who have yet to implement RDA.
-
Mayo, D.; Bowers, K.: ¬The devil's shoehorn : a case study of EAD to ArchivesSpace migration at a large university (2017)
0.03
0.032057434 = product of:
0.06411487 = sum of:
0.049395125 = weight(_text_:services in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049395125 = score(doc=3373,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.28682584 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
0.014719742 = product of:
0.029439485 = sum of:
0.029439485 = weight(_text_:management in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029439485 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15810528 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- A band of archivists and IT professionals at Harvard took on a project to convert nearly two million descriptions of archival collection components from marked-up text into the ArchivesSpace archival metadata management system. Starting in the mid-1990s, Harvard was an alpha implementer of EAD, an SGML (later XML) text markup language for electronic inventories, indexes, and finding aids that archivists use to wend their way through the sometimes quirky filing systems that bureaucracies establish for their records or the utter chaos in which some individuals keep their personal archives. These pathfinder documents, designed to cope with messy reality, can themselves be difficult to classify. Portions of them are rigorously structured, while other parts are narrative. Early documents predate the establishment of the standard; many feature idiosyncratic encoding that had been through several machine conversions, while others were freshly encoded and fairly consistent. In this paper, we will cover the practical and technical challenges involved in preparing a large (900MiB) corpus of XML for ingest into an open-source archival information system (ArchivesSpace). This case study will give an overview of the project, discuss problem discovery and problem solving, and address the technical challenges, analysis, solutions, and decisions and provide information on the tools produced and lessons learned. The authors of this piece are Kate Bowers, Collections Services Archivist for Metadata, Systems, and Standards at the Harvard University Archive, and Dave Mayo, a Digital Library Software Engineer for Harvard's Library and Technology Services. Kate was heavily involved in both metadata analysis and later problem solving, while Dave was the sole full-time developer assigned to the migration project.
-
Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011)
0.03
0.030489452 = product of:
0.060978904 = sum of:
0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041913155 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.019065749 = product of:
0.038131498 = sum of:
0.038131498 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038131498 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 55(2011) no.1, S.17-32
-
DeZelar-Tiedman, C.: Exploring user-contributed metadata's potential to enhance access to literary works (2011)
0.03
0.030489452 = product of:
0.060978904 = sum of:
0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041913155 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
0.019065749 = product of:
0.038131498 = sum of:
0.038131498 = weight(_text_:22 in 2595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038131498 = score(doc=2595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2595)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 55(2011) no.4, S.221-233
-
Baga, J.; Hoover, L.; Wolverton, R.E.: Online, practical, and free cataloging resources (2013)
0.03
0.030489452 = product of:
0.060978904 = sum of:
0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041913155 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
0.019065749 = product of:
0.038131498 = sum of:
0.038131498 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038131498 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 57(2013) no.2, S.100-117
-
O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015)
0.03
0.030489452 = product of:
0.060978904 = sum of:
0.041913155 = weight(_text_:services in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041913155 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.019065749 = product of:
0.038131498 = sum of:
0.038131498 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038131498 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1642603 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 59(2015) no.3, S.120-129
-
Pellack, L.J.; Kappmeyer, L.O.: ¬The ripple effect of women's name changes in indexing, citation, and authority control (2011)
0.02
0.015124108 = product of:
0.06049643 = sum of:
0.06049643 = weight(_text_:services in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06049643 = score(doc=4347,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17221296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.046906993 = queryNorm
0.3512885 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This study investigated name changes of women authors to determine how they were represented in indexes and cited references and identify problem areas. A secondary purpose of the study was to investigate whether or not indexing services were using authority control and how this influenced the search results. The works of eight library science authors who had published under multiple names were examined. The researchers compared author names as they appeared on title pages of publications versus in four online databases and in bibliographies by checking 380 publications and 1,159 citations. Author names were correctly provided 81.22% of the time in indexing services and 90.94% in citation lists. The lowest accuracy (54.55%) occurred when limiting to publications found in Library Literature. The highest accuracy (94.18%) occurred with works published before a surname changed. Author names in indexes and citations correctly matched names on journal articles more often than for any other type of publication. Indexes and citation style manuals treated author names in multiple ways, often altering names substantially from how they appear on the title page. Recommendations are made for changes in editorial styles by indexing services and by the authors themselves to help alleviate future confusion in author name searching.
