Search (61 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.03 
    0.02947729 = product of:
  0.05895458 = sum of:
    0.05895458 = sum of:
      0.022136377 = weight(_text_:m in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.022136377 = score(doc=883,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045757167 = queryNorm
          0.19441006 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.005820882 = weight(_text_:a in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.005820882 = score(doc=883,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045757167 = queryNorm
          0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.030997321 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030997321 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.045757167 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36
    Type
    a
  2. Morris, V.: Automated language identification of bibliographic resources (2020) 0.02 
    0.01832427 = product of:
  0.03664854 = sum of:
    0.03664854 = product of:
      0.054972813 = sum of:
        0.0053771 = weight(_text_:a in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053771 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
        0.049595714 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049595714 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    2. 3.2020 19:04:22
    Type
    a
  3. Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023) 0.02 
    0.015087478 = product of:
  0.030174956 = sum of:
    0.030174956 = product of:
      0.045262434 = sum of:
        0.00806565 = weight(_text_:a in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00806565 = score(doc=941,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
        0.037196785 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037196785 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Inferring the gender of named entities present in a text has several practical applications in information sciences. Existing approaches toward name gender identification rely exclusively on using the gender distributions from labeled data. In the absence of such labeled data, these methods fail. In this article, we propose a two-stage model that is able to infer the gender of names present in text without requiring explicit name-gender labels. We use coreference resolution as the backbone for our proposed model. To aid coreference resolution where the existing contextual information does not suffice, we use a retrieval-assisted context aggregation framework. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art name gender inference is possible without supervision. Our proposed method matches or outperforms several supervised approaches and commercially used methods on five English language datasets from different domains.
    Date
    22. 3.2023 12:00:14
    Type
    a
  4. Pauman Budanovic, M.; Zumer, M.: Prototype cataloging interface based on the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). Part 1 : conceptual design (2021) 0.01 
    0.013046721 = product of:
  0.026093442 = sum of:
    0.026093442 = product of:
      0.03914016 = sum of:
        0.030990927 = weight(_text_:m in 700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030990927 = score(doc=700,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.27217406 = fieldWeight in 700, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=700)
        0.008149235 = weight(_text_:a in 700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008149235 = score(doc=700,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 700, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=700)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to present a prototype cataloging interface, which provides easier data entry, follows the cataloger's thought process and is based on the advantages of the IFLA LRM model. The paper summarizes all stages of the conceptual design and shows how the LRM was implemented. The main purpose of the cataloging interface design is to show how a LRM-based cataloging module might look like and how it could improve the existing cataloging process.
    Type
    a
  5. Kim, J.(im); Kim, J.(enna): Effect of forename string on author name disambiguation (2020) 0.01 
    0.0125728985 = product of:
  0.025145797 = sum of:
    0.025145797 = product of:
      0.037718695 = sum of:
        0.0067213746 = weight(_text_:a in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067213746 = score(doc=5930,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
        0.030997321 = weight(_text_:22 in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030997321 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1602338 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In author name disambiguation, author forenames are used to decide which name instances are disambiguated together and how much they are likely to refer to the same author. Despite such a crucial role of forenames, their effect on the performance of heuristic (string matching) and algorithmic disambiguation is not well understood. This study assesses the contributions of forenames in author name disambiguation using multiple labeled data sets under varying ratios and lengths of full forenames, reflecting real-world scenarios in which an author is represented by forename variants (synonym) and some authors share the same forenames (homonym). The results show that increasing the ratios of full forenames substantially improves both heuristic and machine-learning-based disambiguation. Performance gains by algorithmic disambiguation are pronounced when many forenames are initialized or homonyms are prevalent. As the ratios of full forenames increase, however, they become marginal compared to those by string matching. Using a small portion of forename strings does not reduce much the performances of both heuristic and algorithmic disambiguation methods compared to using full-length strings. These findings provide practical suggestions, such as restoring initialized forenames into a full-string format via record linkage for improved disambiguation performances.
    Date
    11. 7.2020 13:22:58
    Type
    a
  6. Pauman Budanovic, M.; Zumer, M.: Prototype cataloging interface based on the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM). Part 2 : usability evaluation (2021) 0.01 
    0.012548249 = product of:
  0.025096498 = sum of:
    0.025096498 = product of:
      0.037644748 = sum of:
        0.030990927 = weight(_text_:m in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030990927 = score(doc=714,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.27217406 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
        0.0066538225 = weight(_text_:a in 714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066538225 = score(doc=714,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 714, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=714)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on usability evaluation that was carried out to evaluate the LRM-based prototype interface, presented in Part 1. A combination of focus group, Wizard of Oz method, and think-aloud protocol was used. The study was conducted in May 2019 with seven Slovenian catalogers from Maribor Public Library. Although participants had some difficulties understanding the LRM model, the user interface proved to be quite easy to use, quick to understand, and transparent. The functionality of the proposed prototype proved to be adequate, since the catalogers successfully and independently completed all the tasks without major problems and errors.
    Type
    a
  7. Preminger, M.; Rype, I.; Ådland, M.K.; Massey, D.; Tallerås, K.: ¬The public library metadata landscape : the case of Norway 2017-2018 (2020) 0.01 
    0.010021043 = product of:
  0.020042086 = sum of:
    0.020042086 = product of:
      0.030063128 = sum of:
        0.021913894 = weight(_text_:m in 5802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021913894 = score(doc=5802,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 5802, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5802)
        0.008149235 = weight(_text_:a in 5802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008149235 = score(doc=5802,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5802, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5802)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to gauge the cataloging practices within the public library sector seen from the catalog with Norway as a case, based on a sample of records from public libraries and cataloging agencies. Findings suggest that libraries make few changes to records they import from central agencies, and that larger libraries make more changes than smaller libraries. Findings also suggest that libraries catalog and modify records with their patrons in mind, and though the extent is not large, cataloging proficiency is still required in the public library domain, at least in larger libraries, in order to ensure correct and consistent metadata.
    Type
    a
  8. Sfakakis, M.; Zapounidou, S.; Papatheodorou, C.: Mapping derivative relationships from BIBFRAME 2.0 to RDA (2020) 0.01 
    0.009522572 = product of:
  0.019045144 = sum of:
    0.019045144 = product of:
      0.028567716 = sum of:
        0.021913894 = weight(_text_:m in 294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021913894 = score(doc=294,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 294, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=294)
        0.0066538225 = weight(_text_:a in 294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066538225 = score(doc=294,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 294, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=294)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The mapping from BIBFRAME 2.0 to Resource Description and Access (RDA) is studied focusing on core entities, inherent relationships, and derivative relationships. The proposed mapping rules are evaluated with two gold datasets. Findings indicate that 1) core entities, inherent and derivative relationships may be mapped to RDA, 2) the use of the bf:hasExpression property may cluster bf:Works with the same ideational content and enable their mapping to RDA Works with their Expressions, and 3) cataloging policies have a significant impact on the interoperability between RDA and BIBFRAME datasets. This work complements the investigation of semantic interoperability between the two models previously presented in this journal.
    Type
    a
  9. Aalberg, T.; O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.: Extending the LRM Model to integrating resources (2021) 0.01 
    0.009522572 = product of:
  0.019045144 = sum of:
    0.019045144 = product of:
      0.028567716 = sum of:
        0.021913894 = weight(_text_:m in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021913894 = score(doc=295,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
        0.0066538225 = weight(_text_:a in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066538225 = score(doc=295,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Integrating resources are distinct in that they change over time in such a way that their previous content is replaced with updated content. This study examines how integrating resources can be modeled using the entities and relationships of the IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM) and clarifies how they can be identified. While monographs have been extensively analyzed, integrating resources have received very little attention. Applying the model unmodified to integrating resources is neither practical nor theoretically sound. With the addition of two proposed relationships, the model can be extended to accommodate the diachronic relationship intrinsic between expressions and manifestations exhibited by integrating resources.
    Type
    a
  10. Fisher, M.; Rafferty, P.: Current issues with cataloging printed music : challenges facing staff and systems (2024) 0.01 
    0.008872952 = product of:
  0.017745905 = sum of:
    0.017745905 = product of:
      0.026618857 = sum of:
        0.021913894 = weight(_text_:m in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021913894 = score(doc=1151,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
        0.0047049625 = weight(_text_:a in 1151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047049625 = score(doc=1151,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1151, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1151)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  11. Alker-Windbichler, S.; Bauer, K.-H.; Bruckner, W.; Cerny, N.; Kiegler-Griensteidl, M.; Labner, J.: Exemplarspezifische Erschließung im Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbund : Ergebnisse einer Arbeitsgruppe der Zentralen Redaktion (2022) 0.01 
    0.008162205 = product of:
  0.01632441 = sum of:
    0.01632441 = product of:
      0.024486614 = sum of:
        0.018783338 = weight(_text_:m in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018783338 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
        0.005703276 = weight(_text_:a in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005703276 = score(doc=485,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Location
    A
    Type
    a
  12. Menzel, S.; Schnaitter, H.; Zinck, J.; Petras, V.; Neudecker, C.; Labusch, K.; Leitner, E.; Rehm, G.: Named Entity Linking mit Wikidata und GND : das Potenzial handkuratierter und strukturierter Datenquellen für die semantische Anreicherung von Volltexten (2021) 0.01 
    0.006337823 = product of:
  0.012675646 = sum of:
    0.012675646 = product of:
      0.019013468 = sum of:
        0.015652781 = weight(_text_:m in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015652781 = score(doc=373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
        0.0033606873 = weight(_text_:a in 373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033606873 = score(doc=373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=373)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung. Hrsg.: M. Franke-Maier, u.a
    Type
    a
  13. Oliver, C: Introducing RDA : a guide to the basics after 3R (2021) 0.01 
    0.006337823 = product of:
  0.012675646 = sum of:
    0.012675646 = product of:
      0.019013468 = sum of:
        0.015652781 = weight(_text_:m in 716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015652781 = score(doc=716,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 716, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=716)
        0.0033606873 = weight(_text_:a in 716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033606873 = score(doc=716,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 716, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=716)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    m
  14. ¬The library's guide to graphic novels (2020) 0.01 
    0.006004797 = product of:
  0.012009594 = sum of:
    0.012009594 = product of:
      0.01801439 = sum of:
        0.010956947 = weight(_text_:m in 717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010956947 = score(doc=717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11386436 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.09622806 = fieldWeight in 717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=717)
        0.007057444 = weight(_text_:a in 717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007057444 = score(doc=717,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.13376464 = fieldWeight in 717, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=717)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The circ stats say it all: graphic novels' popularity among library users keeps growing, with more being published (and acquired by libraries) each year. The unique challenges of developing and managing a graphics novels collection have led the Association of Library Collections and Technical Services (ALCTS) to craft this guide, presented under the expert supervision of editor Ballestro, who has worked with comics for more than 35 years. Examining the ever-changing ways that graphic novels are created, packaged, marketed, and released, this resource gathers a range of voices from the field to explore such topics as: a cultural history of comics and graphic novels from their World War II origins to today, providing a solid grounding for newbies and fresh insights for all; catching up on the Big Two's reboots: Marvel's 10 and DC's 4; five questions to ask when evaluating nonfiction graphic novels and 30 picks for a core collection; key publishers and cartoonists to consider when adding international titles; developing a collection that supports curriculum and faculty outreach to ensure wide usage, with catalogers' tips for organizing your collection and improving discovery; real-world examples of how libraries treat graphic novels, such as an in-depth profile of the development of Penn Library's Manga collection; how to integrate the emerging field of graphic medicine into the collection; and specialized resources like The Cartoonists of Color and Queer Cartoonists databases, the open access scholarly journal Comic Grid, and the No Flying, No Tights website. Packed with expert guidance and useful information, this guide will assist technical services staff, catalogers, and acquisition and collection management librarians.
    Content
    Inhalt: Between the Panels: A Cultural History of Comic Books and Graphic Novels / by Joshua Everett -- Graphic Novel Companies, Reboots, and Numbering / by John Ballestro -- Creating and Developing a Graphic Literature Collection in an Academic Library / by Andrea Kingston -- Non-Fiction Graphic Novels / by Carli Spina -- Fiction Graphic Novels / by Kayla Kuni -- International Comics and Graphic Novels / by Emily Drew, Lucia Serantes, and Amie Wright -- Building a Japanese Manga Collection for Non-Traditional Patrons in an Academic Library / by Molly Desjardins and Michael P. Williams -- Graphic Medicine in Your Library: Ideas and Strategies for Collecting Comics about Healthcare / by Alice Jaggers, Matthew Noe, and Ariel Pomputius -- The Nuts and Bolts of Comics Cataloging / by Allison Bailund, Hallie Clawson, and Staci Crouch -- Teaching and Programming with Graphic Novels in Academic Libraries / by Jacob Gordon and Sarah Kern.
    Type
    m
  15. Haider, S.: Library cataloging, classification, and metadata research : a bibliography of doctoral dissertations - a supplement, 1982-2020Salman (2021) 0.00 
    0.0023283528 = product of:
  0.0046567055 = sum of:
    0.0046567055 = product of:
      0.013970116 = sum of:
        0.013970116 = weight(_text_:a in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013970116 = score(doc=674,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.26478532 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  16. Serra, L.G.; Schneider, J.A.; Santarém Segundo, J.E.: Person identifiers in MARC 21 records in a semantic environment (2020) 0.00 
    0.001920793 = product of:
  0.003841586 = sum of:
    0.003841586 = product of:
      0.011524757 = sum of:
        0.011524757 = weight(_text_:a in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011524757 = score(doc=127,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article discusses how libraries can include person identifiers in the MARC format. It suggests using URIs in fields and subfields to help transition the data to an RDF model, and to help prepare the catalog for a Linked Data. It analyzes the selection of URIs and Real-World Objects, and the use of tag 024 to describe person identifiers in authority records. When a creator or collaborator is identified in a work, the identifiers are transferred from authority to the bibliographic record. The article concludes that URI-based descriptions can provide a better experience for users, offering other methods of discovery.
    Type
    a
  17. Haider, S.: Library cataloging, classification, and metadata research : a bibliography of doctoral dissertations (2020) 0.00 
    0.001901092 = product of:
  0.003802184 = sum of:
    0.003802184 = product of:
      0.011406552 = sum of:
        0.011406552 = weight(_text_:a in 5750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011406552 = score(doc=5750,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 5750, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5750)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  18. Holden, C.: ¬The bibliographic work : history, theory, and practice (2021) 0.00 
    0.0017534362 = product of:
  0.0035068723 = sum of:
    0.0035068723 = product of:
      0.010520617 = sum of:
        0.010520617 = weight(_text_:a in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010520617 = score(doc=120,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The bibliographic work has assumed a great deal of importance in modern cataloging. But the concept of the work has existed for over a century, and even some of the earliest catalog codes differentiate between the intellectual work and its instances. This article will delve into the history and theory of the work, providing a basic overview of the concept as well as a summary of the myriad uses of the work throughout the history of cataloging. In addition to monographs, this paper will look at the work as applied to music, moving images, serials, and aggregates.
    Type
    a
  19. Danskin, A.: ¬The Anglo-American Authority File : a PCC story (2020) 0.00 
    0.0017534362 = product of:
  0.0035068723 = sum of:
    0.0035068723 = product of:
      0.010520617 = sum of:
        0.010520617 = weight(_text_:a in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010520617 = score(doc=121,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article examines the motivations for the collaboration between the British Library and Library of Congress to develop a joint (Anglo-American) authority file. It describes the obstacles that had to be overcome for the British Library to become a Name Authority Cooperative (NACO) "copy holder", or node. It considers the contribution the British Library made to NACO, the benefits it has derived from participation in Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC), and concludes by looking ahead to the next 25 years.
    Type
    a
  20. Yon, A.; Willey, E.: Using the Cataloguing Code of Ethics principles for a retrospective project analysis (2022) 0.00 
    0.0017534362 = product of:
  0.0035068723 = sum of:
    0.0035068723 = product of:
      0.010520617 = sum of:
        0.010520617 = weight(_text_:a in 729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010520617 = score(doc=729,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05276016 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045757167 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 729, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=729)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study uses the recently released Cataloguing Code of Ethics to evaluate a project which explored how to ethically, efficiently, and accurately add demographic terms for African-American authors to catalog records. By reviewing the project through the lens of these principles the authors were able to examine how their practice was ethical in some ways but could have been improved in others. This helped them identify areas of potential improvement in their current and future research and practice and explore ethical difficulties in cataloging resources with records that are used globally, especially in a linked data environment.
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

  • e 53
  • d 8

Types

  • a 57
  • el 6
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications