Search (302 results, page 1 of 16)

0.11229433 = sum of:
  0.051508963 = product of:
    0.20603585 = sum of:
      0.20603585 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20603585 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.060785368 = product of:
    0.121570736 = sum of:
      0.121570736 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.121570736 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22

0.09382111 = sum of:
  0.03642234 = product of:
    0.14568935 = sum of:
      0.14568935 = weight(_text_:authors in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14568935 = score(doc=322,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.56985176 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.057398766 = product of:
    0.11479753 = sum of:
      0.11479753 = weight(_text_:y in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11479753 = score(doc=322,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.4253601 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Defines some problems and proposes methods for the classification and characterization of corporate authors on the basis of aspects that have caused the greatest problems in the past: jurisdictional area; its peculiarity, nature or condition; and its organizational chart within a hierarchical structure. Explains the resulting classification and characterization of corporate authors with examples

0.08779145 = product of:
  0.1755829 = sum of:
    0.1755829 = sum of:
      0.11479753 = weight(_text_:y in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11479753 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.4253601 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
      0.060785368 = weight(_text_:22 in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060785368 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

DLA bulletin. 17(1997) no.1, S.22-24

0.07275909 = sum of:
  0.022535171 = product of:
    0.090140685 = sum of:
      0.090140685 = weight(_text_:authors in 5648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.090140685 = score(doc=5648,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5648, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5648)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.050223917 = product of:
    0.10044783 = sum of:
      0.10044783 = weight(_text_:y in 5648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10044783 = score(doc=5648,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.3721901 = fieldWeight in 5648, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5648)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Biblioteca Nacional of Madrid and the U.S. National Library of Medicine, followed by libraries worldwide, have changed the authorship of the 1587 Nueva filosofía de la naturaleza del hombre from Oliva Sabuco to her father, Miguel Sabuco y Alvarez. The authors present arguments offered by others supporting this change and examine newly uncovered archival documents to show that the change of named author to Miguel Sabuco is founded on mistaken arguments based on misconstrued evidence and that the burden of proof has been met to restore the attribution of this work to Oliva Sabuco.

0.07275909 = sum of:
  0.022535171 = product of:
    0.090140685 = sum of:
      0.090140685 = weight(_text_:authors in 5649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.090140685 = score(doc=5649,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5649, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5649)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.050223917 = product of:
    0.10044783 = sum of:
      0.10044783 = weight(_text_:y in 5649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10044783 = score(doc=5649,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.3721901 = fieldWeight in 5649, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5649)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Biblioteca Nacional of Madrid and the U.S. National Library of Medicine, followed by libraries worldwide, have changed the authorship of the 1587 Nueva filosofía de la naturaleza del hombre from Oliva Sabuco to her father, Miguel Sabuco y Alvarez. The authors present arguments offered by others supporting this change and examine newly uncovered archival documents to show that the change of named author to Miguel Sabuco is founded on mistaken arguments based on misconstrued evidence and that the burden of proof has been met to restore the attribution of this work to Oliva Sabuco.

0.06683037 = sum of:
  0.016096551 = product of:
    0.064386204 = sum of:
      0.064386204 = weight(_text_:authors in 1884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.064386204 = score(doc=1884,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1884, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1884)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.05073382 = product of:
    0.10146764 = sum of:
      0.10146764 = weight(_text_:y in 1884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10146764 = score(doc=1884,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 1884, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1884)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In this article, the authors report a series of evaluations of two metadata schemes developed for Moving Image Collections (MIC), an integrated online catalog of moving images. Through two online surveys and one experiment spanning various stages of metadata implementation, the MIC evaluation team explored a user-centered approach in which the four generic user tasks suggested by IFLA FRBR (International Association of Library Associations Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records) were embedded in data collection and analyses. Diverse groups of users rated usefulness of individual metadata fields for finding, identifying, selecting, and obtaining moving images. The results demonstrate a consistency across these evaluations with respect to (a) identification of a set of useful metadata fields highly rated by target users for each of the FRBR generic tasks, and (b) indication of a significant interaction between MIC metadata fields and the FRBR generic tasks. The findings provide timely feedback for the MIC implementation specifically, and valuable suggestions to other similar metadata application settings in general. They also suggest the feasibility of using the four IFLA FRBR generic tasks as a framework for user-centered functional metadata evaluations.

0.063754275 = sum of:
  0.027880048 = product of:
    0.11152019 = sum of:
      0.11152019 = weight(_text_:authors in 5616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11152019 = score(doc=5616,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.43620193 = fieldWeight in 5616, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5616)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.03587423 = product of:
    0.07174846 = sum of:
      0.07174846 = weight(_text_:y in 5616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07174846 = score(doc=5616,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 5616, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5616)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In June 1995 the ABEI (Italian Catholic Librarians Association) established a working group in order to create an authority list of Catholic authors, (persons and corporate bodies) and of liturgical and religious anonymous works, titled ACOLIT, Autori Cattolici e Opere Liturgiche in Italiano (Catholic Authors and Liturgical Works in Italian). ACOLIT contains: (1) personal authors (particularly of the apostolic period and the Middle Ages); (2) popes and antipopes; (3) religious congregations, orders and societies; (4) Catholic Church and Roman Curia; (5) Catholic associations; (6) the Bible; (7) liturgical works; (8) religious anonymous works. Headings are established according to the RICA (Regole Italiane di Catalogazione per Autori), but also to the Norme per il catalogo degli stampati by the Vatican Library, the AACR2R, the RAK, the Reglas de catalogaci = F3n. Ed. refundita y rev., and the guidelines and decisions of IFLA. The work group has elaborated original considerations, particularly for the Bible. The group argues the choice and forth of the names of popes, Catholic Church and Roman Curia of the RICA and suggests that classical and Medieval writers should be formulated in Italian not in Latin, and that the indirect form, surname-name, should be used for saints who have a surname. ACOLIT has accepted the GARE punctuation (Guidelines for authority and reference entries/ recommended by the Working Group on an International Authority System; approved by the Standing Committees of the IFLA Section on Cataloguing and the IFLA Section on Information Technology). The print edition is planned for June 1997. ACOLIT will present headings in three sections: (1) Personal writers; (2) Corporate bodies; (1) Bible Liturgical and religious anonymous works, ABEI will also publish an electronic edition (CD ROM), periodically revised. The research will extend to Christian writers and -in the future- to writers of all religions.

0.059463482 = product of:
  0.118926965 = sum of:
    0.118926965 = product of:
      0.47570786 = sum of:
        0.47570786 = weight(_text_:2200 in 2199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.47570786 = score(doc=2199,freq=1.0), product of:
            0.49387625 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056080777 = queryNorm
            0.96321267 = fieldWeight in 2199, product of:
              1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                1.0 = termFreq=1.0
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2199)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

2200

0.05846314 = sum of:
  0.031869546 = product of:
    0.12747818 = sum of:
      0.12747818 = weight(_text_:authors in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12747818 = score(doc=6740,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.026593598 = product of:
    0.053187195 = sum of:
      0.053187195 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053187195 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

0.05846314 = sum of:
  0.031869546 = product of:
    0.12747818 = sum of:
      0.12747818 = weight(_text_:authors in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12747818 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.026593598 = product of:
    0.053187195 = sum of:
      0.053187195 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053187195 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.056147166 = sum of:
  0.025754482 = product of:
    0.103017926 = sum of:
      0.103017926 = weight(_text_:authors in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.103017926 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.030392684 = product of:
    0.060785368 = sum of:
      0.060785368 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060785368 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.

Source

Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856

0.050223917 = product of:
  0.10044783 = sum of:
    0.10044783 = product of:
      0.20089567 = sum of:
        0.20089567 = weight(_text_:y in 6665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20089567 = score(doc=6665,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056080777 = queryNorm
            0.7443802 = fieldWeight in 6665, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6665)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.050111264 = sum of:
  0.027316753 = product of:
    0.10926701 = sum of:
      0.10926701 = weight(_text_:authors in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10926701 = score(doc=6521,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.022794513 = product of:
    0.045589026 = sum of:
      0.045589026 = weight(_text_:22 in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045589026 = score(doc=6521,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Examines changes in the rules for cataloguing certein categories of printed material, anonymous works, including: those described as being 'by the author of' another named work; pseudonymous works; edited works (collections of writings of several authors); and conference proceedings. Discusses the relevant rules from the British Museum, the 1908 joint code, the Bodleian, Cambridge University Library and AACR2, Samples of London publications taken in specimen years between 1841 and 1991 show that there has been a decrease in anonymous works and in works with personal authors, offset by a sharp increase in multiple authorship, edited works and conference proceedings. Concludes that these changes have taken place in response to external forces. Some changes have been because the rules have been found to be unworkable or based on unnecessary or false distinctions which were impossible for the cataloguer to interpret

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.29-50

0.04970879 = product of:
  0.09941758 = sum of:
    0.09941758 = product of:
      0.19883516 = sum of:
        0.19883516 = weight(_text_:y in 1126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19883516 = score(doc=1126,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.26988316 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056080777 = queryNorm
            0.73674536 = fieldWeight in 1126, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1126)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez

0.04912877 = sum of:
  0.022535171 = product of:
    0.090140685 = sum of:
      0.090140685 = weight(_text_:authors in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.090140685 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.026593598 = product of:
    0.053187195 = sum of:
      0.053187195 = weight(_text_:22 in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053187195 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Book dedications by authors, often in verse form and appearing just before the title page, are one of the 6 elements describes by the French scholar Genette as paratextual. For some reasons dedications have failed to interest librarians, yet books containing them can be a valid object of bibliographic study, for the reasons that they carry special markings: are an example of a specific literary or semantic class; and reveal linguistic/stylistic features. Examines the history of literary dedications, citing examples by well-known writers, and suggests that cataloguing software should have a special field to record dedication

Date

22. 2.1999 20:41:06

0.04912877 = sum of:
  0.022535171 = product of:
    0.090140685 = sum of:
      0.090140685 = weight(_text_:authors in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.090140685 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.026593598 = product of:
    0.053187195 = sum of:
      0.053187195 = weight(_text_:22 in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053187195 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The authors describe the creation of online series authority records on the University of Florida Libraries' NOTIS-based LUIS system. It is an original method that uses serial bibliographic records as a basis for series authority records. We hope that our explanation of this pioneering method will be useful in varying degrees to other libraries attempting to convert their series authorities to an online environment. We also hope that this paper will prompt discussion among catalogers about series authorities in the online environment.

Date

8. 1.2007 12:29:22

0.04912877 = sum of:
  0.022535171 = product of:
    0.090140685 = sum of:
      0.090140685 = weight(_text_:authors in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.090140685 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.026593598 = product of:
    0.053187195 = sum of:
      0.053187195 = weight(_text_:22 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053187195 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper reviews issues related to the cataloging of Internet resources and considers shortand long-term directions for cataloging and the general provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. The strengths and weakness of using a library catalog model to improve access to Internet resources are discussed and compared with a review of related efforts. Based on experience gained through two OCLC Internet cataloging projects, the authors recommend continued and vigorous appplication of library cataloging standards and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogs, cataloging, and libraries in general will continue to evolve.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.197-238

0.04912877 = sum of:
  0.022535171 = product of:
    0.090140685 = sum of:
      0.090140685 = weight(_text_:authors in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.090140685 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.026593598 = product of:
    0.053187195 = sum of:
      0.053187195 = weight(_text_:22 in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053187195 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, to be known as Resource Description and Access (RDA), has indicated that the replacement for the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) will allow the use of family names as authors and will provide rules for their formation. This paper discusses what a family name describes; examines how information seekers look for family names and what they expect to find; describes the ways in which family names have been established in Anglo-American cataloging and archival traditions; asks how adequately the headings established under these rules help users seek such information; and suggests how revised cataloging rules might better enable users to identify resources that meet their needs.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.042981748 = product of:
  0.085963495 = sum of:
    0.085963495 = product of:
      0.17192699 = sum of:
        0.17192699 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17192699 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.056080777 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2000 19:22:27

0.04175939 = sum of:
  0.022763962 = product of:
    0.09105585 = sum of:
      0.09105585 = weight(_text_:authors in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09105585 = score(doc=883,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25566185 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.018995428 = product of:
    0.037990857 = sum of:
      0.037990857 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037990857 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19638532 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.056080777 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.

Date

22. 1.2023 18:40:36