Search (373 results, page 1 of 19)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993) 0.10
    0.10455035 = sum of:
      0.047956824 = product of:
        0.1918273 = sum of:
          0.1918273 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1918273 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.05659352 = product of:
        0.11318704 = sum of:
          0.11318704 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11318704 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
  2. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.09
    0.093321994 = sum of:
      0.021194125 = product of:
        0.0847765 = sum of:
          0.0847765 = weight(_text_:authors in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0847765 = score(doc=883,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.07212787 = sum of:
        0.03675692 = weight(_text_:k in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03675692 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052213363 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.03537095 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03537095 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052213363 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36
  3. Talmacs, K.: Cataloguing at the crossroads : or, rules were made to be broken (1996) 0.06
    0.057702295 = product of:
      0.11540459 = sum of:
        0.11540459 = sum of:
          0.058811072 = weight(_text_:k in 498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058811072 = score(doc=498,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 498, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=498)
          0.05659352 = weight(_text_:22 in 498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05659352 = score(doc=498,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 498, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=498)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.76-85
  4. Kim, K.-S.: Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002 (2003) 0.06
    0.057702295 = product of:
      0.11540459 = sum of:
        0.11540459 = sum of:
          0.058811072 = weight(_text_:k in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058811072 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
          0.05659352 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05659352 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.06
    0.057702295 = product of:
      0.11540459 = sum of:
        0.11540459 = sum of:
          0.058811072 = weight(_text_:k in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058811072 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.05659352 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05659352 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
  6. Hamm, S.; Schneider, K.: Automatische Erschließung von Universitätsdissertationen (2015) 0.06
    0.057702295 = product of:
      0.11540459 = sum of:
        0.11540459 = sum of:
          0.058811072 = weight(_text_:k in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.058811072 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
          0.05659352 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05659352 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 27(2015) H.1, S.18-22
  7. Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996) 0.05
    0.054431435 = sum of:
      0.029671771 = product of:
        0.118687086 = sum of:
          0.118687086 = weight(_text_:authors in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.118687086 = score(doc=6740,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024759663 = product of:
        0.049519327 = sum of:
          0.049519327 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049519327 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  8. Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012) 0.05
    0.054431435 = sum of:
      0.029671771 = product of:
        0.118687086 = sum of:
          0.118687086 = weight(_text_:authors in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.118687086 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024759663 = product of:
        0.049519327 = sum of:
          0.049519327 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049519327 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Münnich, M.: Katalogisieren auf dem PC : ein Pflichtenheft für die Formalkatalogisierung (1988) 0.05
    0.052275173 = sum of:
      0.023978412 = product of:
        0.09591365 = sum of:
          0.09591365 = weight(_text_:authors in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09591365 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02829676 = product of:
        0.05659352 = sum of:
          0.05659352 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05659352 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856
  10. Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004) 0.05
    0.050489508 = product of:
      0.100979015 = sum of:
        0.100979015 = sum of:
          0.051459692 = weight(_text_:k in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051459692 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
          0.049519327 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049519327 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015) 0.05
    0.050489508 = product of:
      0.100979015 = sum of:
        0.100979015 = sum of:
          0.051459692 = weight(_text_:k in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051459692 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
          0.049519327 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049519327 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Walker, K.; Kwasnik, B.: Providing access to collected works (2002) 0.05
    0.047487102 = sum of:
      0.025432948 = product of:
        0.10173179 = sum of:
          0.10173179 = weight(_text_:authors in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10173179 = score(doc=5630,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.022054153 = product of:
        0.044108305 = sum of:
          0.044108305 = weight(_text_:k in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044108305 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    How are the boundaries of information objects to be defined in the networked electronic environment and what is the role of our retrieval systems in providing access where these boundaries are uncertain? The authors consider these questions in light of longstanding problems surrounding the definition of the "work" in the print environment. In particular, they examine the role of the index in providing access to the collected works of the individual writer. They review the discussion in the indexing literature of the "long index," and the close relationship between the functions of indexer and editor in collected works projects. And they treat the role of the index in constituting as a self-contained corpus the disparate types of text that make up a writer's lifetime output. Finally, by way of example, the authors turn to the extensive indexes to Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic writings.
  13. Choi, K.; Yusof, H.M.; Ibrahim, F.: RDA: National Library Board Singapore's learning journey (2014) 0.05
    0.047487102 = sum of:
      0.025432948 = product of:
        0.10173179 = sum of:
          0.10173179 = weight(_text_:authors in 1984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10173179 = score(doc=1984,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1984, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1984)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.022054153 = product of:
        0.044108305 = sum of:
          0.044108305 = weight(_text_:k in 1984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044108305 = score(doc=1984,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 1984, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1984)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In May 2012, National Library Board (NLB) Singapore decided to implement Resource Description and Access (RDA) for NLB and targeted its implementation on April 1, 2013. This article presents NLB's RDA journey as it documents and highlights the library's experience in executing RDA in a seamless, systematic approach. The authors share how NLB formulated its implementation strategy and action plan, the adoption and development of the plan, as well as the discussions and milestone decisions made. Based on the Library of Congress' training materials, NLB customized and packaged its training programs to suit the specific needs of NLB staff. NLB also made local decisions needed before cataloging in RDA, communicated its decisions to a user group, and obtained feedback from them. This article also describes the challenges faced, and how NLB overcame them. As RDA is still a work in progress, NLB recognizes that more effort is required to take RDA to the next level. Finally, the authors share NLB's future plans for RDA.
  14. Bowman, J.H.: Changing cataloging rules in relation to changing patterns of publication (1996) 0.05
    0.046655517 = sum of:
      0.025432948 = product of:
        0.10173179 = sum of:
          0.10173179 = weight(_text_:authors in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10173179 = score(doc=6521,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021222569 = product of:
        0.042445138 = sum of:
          0.042445138 = weight(_text_:22 in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042445138 = score(doc=6521,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Examines changes in the rules for cataloguing certein categories of printed material, anonymous works, including: those described as being 'by the author of' another named work; pseudonymous works; edited works (collections of writings of several authors); and conference proceedings. Discusses the relevant rules from the British Museum, the 1908 joint code, the Bodleian, Cambridge University Library and AACR2, Samples of London publications taken in specimen years between 1841 and 1991 show that there has been a decrease in anonymous works and in works with personal authors, offset by a sharp increase in multiple authorship, edited works and conference proceedings. Concludes that these changes have taken place in response to external forces. Some changes have been because the rules have been found to be unworkable or based on unnecessary or false distinctions which were impossible for the cataloguer to interpret
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.29-50
  15. Nistico, R.: Studio e indicizzazione delle dediche librarie (1998) 0.05
    0.045740776 = sum of:
      0.02098111 = product of:
        0.08392444 = sum of:
          0.08392444 = weight(_text_:authors in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08392444 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024759663 = product of:
        0.049519327 = sum of:
          0.049519327 = weight(_text_:22 in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049519327 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Book dedications by authors, often in verse form and appearing just before the title page, are one of the 6 elements describes by the French scholar Genette as paratextual. For some reasons dedications have failed to interest librarians, yet books containing them can be a valid object of bibliographic study, for the reasons that they carry special markings: are an example of a specific literary or semantic class; and reveal linguistic/stylistic features. Examines the history of literary dedications, citing examples by well-known writers, and suggests that cataloguing software should have a special field to record dedication
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:41:06
  16. Botero, C.; Thorburn, C.; Williams, N.: Series in an online integrated system : an option beyond the MARC authority record (1990) 0.05
    0.045740776 = sum of:
      0.02098111 = product of:
        0.08392444 = sum of:
          0.08392444 = weight(_text_:authors in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08392444 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024759663 = product of:
        0.049519327 = sum of:
          0.049519327 = weight(_text_:22 in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049519327 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The authors describe the creation of online series authority records on the University of Florida Libraries' NOTIS-based LUIS system. It is an original method that uses serial bibliographic records as a basis for series authority records. We hope that our explanation of this pioneering method will be useful in varying degrees to other libraries attempting to convert their series authorities to an online environment. We also hope that this paper will prompt discussion among catalogers about series authorities in the online environment.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:29:22
  17. Dillon, M.; Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : the convergence of libraries and Internet resources (1996) 0.05
    0.045740776 = sum of:
      0.02098111 = product of:
        0.08392444 = sum of:
          0.08392444 = weight(_text_:authors in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08392444 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024759663 = product of:
        0.049519327 = sum of:
          0.049519327 = weight(_text_:22 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049519327 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews issues related to the cataloging of Internet resources and considers shortand long-term directions for cataloging and the general provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. The strengths and weakness of using a library catalog model to improve access to Internet resources are discussed and compared with a review of related efforts. Based on experience gained through two OCLC Internet cataloging projects, the authors recommend continued and vigorous appplication of library cataloging standards and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogs, cataloging, and libraries in general will continue to evolve.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.197-238
  18. Creider, L.S.: Family names and the cataloger (2007) 0.05
    0.045740776 = sum of:
      0.02098111 = product of:
        0.08392444 = sum of:
          0.08392444 = weight(_text_:authors in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08392444 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.024759663 = product of:
        0.049519327 = sum of:
          0.049519327 = weight(_text_:22 in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049519327 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, to be known as Resource Description and Access (RDA), has indicated that the replacement for the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) will allow the use of family names as authors and will provide rules for their formation. This paper discusses what a family name describes; examines how information seekers look for family names and what they expect to find; describes the ways in which family names have been established in Anglo-American cataloging and archival traditions; asks how adequately the headings established under these rules help users seek such information; and suggests how revised cataloging rules might better enable users to identify resources that meet their needs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Lee-Smeltzer, K.-H. (Janet): Cataloging in three academic libraries: operations, trends, and perspectives (2000) 0.04
    0.04327672 = product of:
      0.08655344 = sum of:
        0.08655344 = sum of:
          0.044108305 = weight(_text_:k in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044108305 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
          0.042445138 = weight(_text_:22 in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042445138 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 7.2006 18:22:11
  20. Antelman, K.: Identifying the serial work as a bibliographic entity (2004) 0.04
    0.04327672 = product of:
      0.08655344 = sum of:
        0.08655344 = sum of:
          0.044108305 = weight(_text_:k in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.044108305 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
          0.042445138 = weight(_text_:22 in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042445138 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052213363 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Languages

Types

  • a 318
  • m 40
  • b 15
  • el 15
  • s 12
  • ? 2
  • n 2
  • r 2
  • x 2
  • ag 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications