Search (389 results, page 1 of 20)

0.104524076 = sum of:
  0.047944777 = product of:
    0.1917791 = sum of:
      0.1917791 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1917791 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.056579303 = product of:
    0.113158606 = sum of:
      0.113158606 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.113158606 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22

0.101698086 = product of:
  0.20339617 = sum of:
    0.20339617 = sum of:
      0.104382396 = weight(_text_:p in 6339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.104382396 = score(doc=6339,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 6339, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6339)
      0.09901378 = weight(_text_:22 in 6339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09901378 = score(doc=6339,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6339, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6339)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

18. 8.2002 17:22:13

0.072878584 = sum of:
  0.0105944 = product of:
    0.0423776 = sum of:
      0.0423776 = weight(_text_:authors in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0423776 = score(doc=207,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.17807868 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.062284183 = sum of:
    0.037279427 = weight(_text_:p in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.037279427 = score(doc=207,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052200247 = queryNorm
        0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
    0.025004756 = weight(_text_:22 in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025004756 = score(doc=207,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052200247 = queryNorm
        0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)

Classification

025.3/071 22

DDC

025.3/071 22

Footnote

Rez. in: KO 33(2006) no.2, S.119-20 (S.S. Intner): "This survey of cataloging education around the world offers readers a rich menu of experiences, educational offerings, and approaches to the subject of cataloging education as it is currently practiced in 24 countries of the world, excluding the United States and Canada. The exclusion does not mean that English-speaking countries are entirely absent from the book, however. Two nations outside North America, South Africa (in one chapter) and Australia (in two chapters), are covered. The chapters are organized geographically, beginning with the African continent, and followed by several each under headings for Asia, Australia (two chapters), Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. Nations whose cataloging education programs are described include (in order of presentation) Botswana, Nigeria, South Africa, China (both the People's Republic of China and Taiwan), India, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Austria and Germany (described together in one chapter), Poland, Slovenia, Spain, the British Isles (England, Scotland, and Wales), Argentina, Mexico, Peru, Egypt, Iran, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. As readers might expect, many chapters reflect common experiences among the countries, particularly regarding the proliferation of subjects in competition with cataloging and classification in library school curricula. There are also some common problems, such as dealing with the changes in education and training prompted by automation. Generally, computer-based cataloging is not a new issue anywhere, although in some areas of the world, catalogers still work with manual systems. Describing cataloging education in Nigeria, J. I. Iwe states: "... the card catalogue is still being used in all libraries, including the University of Calabar library where the only library school in the state exists (p. 33)." In other places, computer infrastructure has developed to a level that supports coursework online. As Linda M. Cloete writes, "The ultimate goal of the training resource program is to develop an online, fully interactive course: an online virtual cataloging classroom (p. 66)."
The eternal debate in the teaching of cataloging over theory versus practice emerges in this volume. As Li Si suggests in describing cataloging education in the People's Republic of China, the matter might be laid at the door of the faculty, stating, "Although the majority of teaching faculty members in the library and information science programs have a solid theoretical foundation from their school education and training, they do not normally possess practical work experience in their field of specialty and they are not familiar with the application of technologies in the field. In order to enhance their practical skills, these faculty members should be given the opportunity to work in libraries... This way, they would be able to put theory into practice and gain rich, practical field experience, thus improving the relevance and quality of their teaching (p. 97)." One wonders how warmly faculty members would welcome that kind of opportunity! On the other hand, in many places, onthe-job training is weak, as Shoichi Taniguchi describes it in Japan, "on the job training and continuing education are neither encouraged nor promoted (p. 132)." Among the most interesting and important aspects of this book are the tables of hard data it presents. Almost every chapter reports on surveys done by the authors on the state of library education in general and/or the kinds of offerings in cataloging and classification available within their countries. Some authors also include statistics on the numbers of persons receiving certificates, diplomas, and/or master's degrees, which is useful in understanding the different levels of expertise being developed over time. While one could argue that there are gaps in coverage, with large, influential countries such as France and Italy in Europe, Brazil, Bolivia, and Chile in South America, and Thailand and Myanmar in Asia, left out of the book, for the most part there is good representation from different parts of the globe. Education for Library Cataloging is a good choice as a textbook for coursework in International Librarianship as well as a primer in what to expect if one's information center is affiliated with partners outside the United States and Canada. This book should be seen as an important "must read" for all library students and practitioners concerned about issues of increasing globalization in bibliographic control. It is highly recommended."

0.07264149 = product of:
  0.14528298 = sum of:
    0.14528298 = sum of:
      0.074558854 = weight(_text_:p in 7631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.074558854 = score(doc=7631,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 7631, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7631)
      0.07072413 = weight(_text_:22 in 7631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07072413 = score(doc=7631,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7631, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7631)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.4, S.72 (R. Templeton); Technical services quarterly 11(1994) no.3, S.91-92 (P. Holzenberg)

0.07264149 = product of:
  0.14528298 = sum of:
    0.14528298 = sum of:
      0.074558854 = weight(_text_:p in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.074558854 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.39725178 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
      0.07072413 = weight(_text_:22 in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07072413 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

30. 8.2005 9:12:22

0.058113195 = product of:
  0.11622639 = sum of:
    0.11622639 = sum of:
      0.059647083 = weight(_text_:p in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059647083 = score(doc=2335,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
      0.056579303 = weight(_text_:22 in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056579303 = score(doc=2335,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17.10.1995 18:22:54

0.058113195 = product of:
  0.11622639 = sum of:
    0.11622639 = sum of:
      0.059647083 = weight(_text_:p in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.059647083 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
      0.056579303 = weight(_text_:22 in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056579303 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

6. 1.2007 19:12:22

0.055759918 = sum of:
  0.029664319 = product of:
    0.118657276 = sum of:
      0.118657276 = weight(_text_:authors in 729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.118657276 = score(doc=729,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 729, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=729)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.026095599 = product of:
    0.052191198 = sum of:
      0.052191198 = weight(_text_:p in 729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052191198 = score(doc=729,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 729, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=729)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This study uses the recently released Cataloguing Code of Ethics to evaluate a project which explored how to ethically, efficiently, and accurately add demographic terms for African-American authors to catalog records. By reviewing the project through the lens of these principles the authors were able to examine how their practice was ethical in some ways but could have been improved in others. This helped them identify areas of potential improvement in their current and future research and practice and explore ethical difficulties in cataloging resources with records that are used globally, especially in a linked data environment.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 60(2022) no.1, p.112-137

0.054417767 = sum of:
  0.029664319 = product of:
    0.118657276 = sum of:
      0.118657276 = weight(_text_:authors in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.118657276 = score(doc=6740,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024753446 = product of:
    0.04950689 = sum of:
      0.04950689 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04950689 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

0.054417767 = sum of:
  0.029664319 = product of:
    0.118657276 = sum of:
      0.118657276 = weight(_text_:authors in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.118657276 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024753446 = product of:
    0.04950689 = sum of:
      0.04950689 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04950689 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.052262038 = sum of:
  0.023972388 = product of:
    0.09588955 = sum of:
      0.09588955 = weight(_text_:authors in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09588955 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.028289651 = product of:
    0.056579303 = sum of:
      0.056579303 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056579303 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.

Source

Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856

0.050849043 = product of:
  0.101698086 = sum of:
    0.101698086 = sum of:
      0.052191198 = weight(_text_:p in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052191198 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
      0.04950689 = weight(_text_:22 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04950689 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

28. 7.2006 20:09:22

0.047071442 = sum of:
  0.020975841 = product of:
    0.083903365 = sum of:
      0.083903365 = weight(_text_:authors in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083903365 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.026095599 = product of:
    0.052191198 = sum of:
      0.052191198 = weight(_text_:p in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052191198 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper reviews a project at the University of Colorado at Boulder Libraries utilizing the AMC format to u grade the P accessibility of a collection of Spanish plays cataloged in 956 as an unanalyzed set. The project used the original finding aid as a tool to create records providing access at box level to a collection of 3700 plays kept in 145 boxes. Results show 58 percent of authors traced in the project are unique to Colorado's on-line holdings, while another 12 percent are represented by just one other entry. Therefore, an enrichment of the coverage of Spanish literature at CU has been accomplished.

0.047071442 = sum of:
  0.020975841 = product of:
    0.083903365 = sum of:
      0.083903365 = weight(_text_:authors in 5704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083903365 = score(doc=5704,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5704, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5704)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.026095599 = product of:
    0.052191198 = sum of:
      0.052191198 = weight(_text_:p in 5704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052191198 = score(doc=5704,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 5704, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5704)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The persistent identification of authors and contributors plays a decisive role within the Open Science landscape. The increasing number of published research products and new open publishing models and infrastructures requires author identification which goes beyond fields or infrastructures and guarantees interoperability. ORCID iD is presented as a persistent identifier for researchers in this context. As information managers and organisers, many academic libraries have taken the lead in offering ORCID-related services and implementing it in their systems. This paper scans the implementation models across Europe and the actions carried out by libraries. Finally, it also depicts perspectives for integration in the Austrian library and research context.

0.046643797 = sum of:
  0.02542656 = product of:
    0.10170624 = sum of:
      0.10170624 = weight(_text_:authors in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10170624 = score(doc=6521,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.021217238 = product of:
    0.042434476 = sum of:
      0.042434476 = weight(_text_:22 in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042434476 = score(doc=6521,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Examines changes in the rules for cataloguing certein categories of printed material, anonymous works, including: those described as being 'by the author of' another named work; pseudonymous works; edited works (collections of writings of several authors); and conference proceedings. Discusses the relevant rules from the British Museum, the 1908 joint code, the Bodleian, Cambridge University Library and AACR2, Samples of London publications taken in specimen years between 1841 and 1991 show that there has been a decrease in anonymous works and in works with personal authors, offset by a sharp increase in multiple authorship, edited works and conference proceedings. Concludes that these changes have taken place in response to external forces. Some changes have been because the rules have been found to be unworkable or based on unnecessary or false distinctions which were impossible for the cataloguer to interpret

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.29-50

0.045729287 = sum of:
  0.020975841 = product of:
    0.083903365 = sum of:
      0.083903365 = weight(_text_:authors in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083903365 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024753446 = product of:
    0.04950689 = sum of:
      0.04950689 = weight(_text_:22 in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04950689 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Book dedications by authors, often in verse form and appearing just before the title page, are one of the 6 elements describes by the French scholar Genette as paratextual. For some reasons dedications have failed to interest librarians, yet books containing them can be a valid object of bibliographic study, for the reasons that they carry special markings: are an example of a specific literary or semantic class; and reveal linguistic/stylistic features. Examines the history of literary dedications, citing examples by well-known writers, and suggests that cataloguing software should have a special field to record dedication

Date

22. 2.1999 20:41:06

0.045729287 = sum of:
  0.020975841 = product of:
    0.083903365 = sum of:
      0.083903365 = weight(_text_:authors in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083903365 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024753446 = product of:
    0.04950689 = sum of:
      0.04950689 = weight(_text_:22 in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04950689 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The authors describe the creation of online series authority records on the University of Florida Libraries' NOTIS-based LUIS system. It is an original method that uses serial bibliographic records as a basis for series authority records. We hope that our explanation of this pioneering method will be useful in varying degrees to other libraries attempting to convert their series authorities to an online environment. We also hope that this paper will prompt discussion among catalogers about series authorities in the online environment.

Date

8. 1.2007 12:29:22

0.045729287 = sum of:
  0.020975841 = product of:
    0.083903365 = sum of:
      0.083903365 = weight(_text_:authors in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083903365 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024753446 = product of:
    0.04950689 = sum of:
      0.04950689 = weight(_text_:22 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04950689 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper reviews issues related to the cataloging of Internet resources and considers shortand long-term directions for cataloging and the general provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. The strengths and weakness of using a library catalog model to improve access to Internet resources are discussed and compared with a review of related efforts. Based on experience gained through two OCLC Internet cataloging projects, the authors recommend continued and vigorous appplication of library cataloging standards and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogs, cataloging, and libraries in general will continue to evolve.

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.197-238

0.045729287 = sum of:
  0.020975841 = product of:
    0.083903365 = sum of:
      0.083903365 = weight(_text_:authors in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.083903365 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.024753446 = product of:
    0.04950689 = sum of:
      0.04950689 = weight(_text_:22 in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04950689 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, to be known as Resource Description and Access (RDA), has indicated that the replacement for the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) will allow the use of family names as authors and will provide rules for their formation. This paper discusses what a family name describes; examines how information seekers look for family names and what they expect to find; describes the ways in which family names have been established in Anglo-American cataloging and archival traditions; asks how adequately the headings established under these rules help users seek such information; and suggests how revised cataloging rules might better enable users to identify resources that meet their needs.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.04404157 = product of:
  0.08808314 = sum of:
    0.08808314 = sum of:
      0.052721076 = weight(_text_:p in 5582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052721076 = score(doc=5582,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.28089944 = fieldWeight in 5582, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5582)
      0.035362065 = weight(_text_:22 in 5582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035362065 = score(doc=5582,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5582, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5582)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: JOHNSON, P.: Selecting electronic resources: developing a local decision-making matrix: MANDEL, C.A. u. R. WOLVEN: Intellectual access to digital documents: joining proven principles with new technologies; CAPLAN, P. u. R. GUENTHER: Metadata for Internet resources: the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC; BRUGGER, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries; SEAMAN, D.M.: Selection, access, and control in a library of electronic texts; MARTIN, G.: Control of electronic resources in Australia; HILLMANN, D.I.: 'Parallel universes' or meaningful relationships: envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net; McMILLAN, D.I.: Electronic theses and dissertations: merging perspectives; NICHOLSON, D. u. M. STEELE: CATRIONA: a distributed, locally-oriented, Z39.50 OPAC-based approach to cataloguing the Internet; MORGAN, E.L.: Possible solutions for incorporating digital information mediums into traditional library cataloguing services; DAVIS-BROWN, B. u. D. WILLIAMSON: Cataloging at the Library of Congress in the digital age; DILLON, M. u. E. JUL: Cataloging Internet resources: the convergence of libraries and Internet resources

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4