-
Pope, J.T.; Holley, R.P.: Google Book Search and metadata (2011)
0.10
0.10274376 = sum of:
0.02017808 = product of:
0.08071232 = sum of:
0.08071232 = weight(_text_:authors in 1887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08071232 = score(doc=1887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1887)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.08256568 = product of:
0.16513136 = sum of:
0.16513136 = weight(_text_:r.p in 1887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16513136 = score(doc=1887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.5043126 = fieldWeight in 1887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1887)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article summarizes published documents on metadata provided by Google for books scanned as part of the Google Book Search (GBS) project and provides suggestions for improvement. The faulty, misleading, and confusing metadata in current Google records can pose potentially serious problems for users of GBS. Google admits that it took data, which proved to be inaccurate, from many sources and is attempting to correct errors. Some argue that metadata is not needed with keyword searching; but optical character recognition (OCR) errors, synonym control, and materials in foreign languages make reliable metadata a requirement for academic researchers. The authors recommend that users should be able to submit error reports to Google to correct faulty metadata.
-
Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993)
0.10
0.10054879 = sum of:
0.046121325 = product of:
0.1844853 = sum of:
0.1844853 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1844853 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.05442746 = product of:
0.10885492 = sum of:
0.10885492 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10885492 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
-
Carpenter, M.: Does cataloging theory rest on a mistake? (1992)
0.08
0.08256568 = product of:
0.16513136 = sum of:
0.16513136 = product of:
0.33026272 = sum of:
0.33026272 = weight(_text_:r.p in 5324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.33026272 = score(doc=5324,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
1.0086251 = fieldWeight in 5324, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5324)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Origins, content, and future of AACR2 revisited. Ed.: R.P. Smiraglia
-
the use of the MARC, AMC format : Describing archival materials (1991)
0.08
0.08256568 = product of:
0.16513136 = sum of:
0.16513136 = product of:
0.33026272 = sum of:
0.33026272 = weight(_text_:r.p in 237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.33026272 = score(doc=237,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
1.0086251 = fieldWeight in 237, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=237)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Editor
- Smiraglia, R.P.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003)
0.07
0.073388405 = sum of:
0.014412914 = product of:
0.057651658 = sum of:
0.057651658 = weight(_text_:authors in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057651658 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.058975488 = product of:
0.117950976 = sum of:
0.117950976 = weight(_text_:r.p in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.117950976 = score(doc=5631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.3602233 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- From a historical perspective, one could consider the modern library catalog to be that bibliographical apparatus that stretches at least from Thomas Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian Library at Oxford to the near present. Mai and other recent authors have suggested postmodern approaches to knowledge organization. In these, we realize that there is no single and unique order of knowledge or documents but rather there are many appropriate orders, all of them contextually dependent. Works (oeuvres, opera, Werke, etc.), as are musical works, literary works, works of art, etc., are and always have been key entities for information retrieval. Yet catalogs in the modern era were designed to inventory (first) and retrieve (second) specific documents. From Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian until the late twentieth century, developments are epistemologically pragmatic--reflected in the structure of catalog records, in the rules for main entry headings, and in the rules for filing in card catalogs. After 1980 developments become empirical-reflected in research conducted by Tillett, Yee, Smiraglia, Leazer, Carlyle, and Vellucci. The influence of empiricism on the pragmatic notion of "the work" has led to increased focus on the concept of the work. The challenge for the postmodern online catalog is to fully embrace the concept of "the work," finally to facilitate it as a prime objective for information retrieval.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003)
0.07
0.073388405 = sum of:
0.014412914 = product of:
0.057651658 = sum of:
0.057651658 = weight(_text_:authors in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057651658 = score(doc=5652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.058975488 = product of:
0.117950976 = sum of:
0.117950976 = weight(_text_:r.p in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.117950976 = score(doc=5652,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.3602233 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- From a historical perspective, one could consider the modern library catalog to be that bibliographical apparatus that stretches at least from Thomas Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian Library at Oxford to the near present. Mai and other recent authors have suggested postmodern approaches to knowledge organization. In these, we realize that there is no single and unique order of knowledge or documents but rather there are many appropriate orders, all of them contextually dependent. Works (oeuvres, opera, Werke, etc.), as are musical works, literary works, works of art, etc., are and always have been key entities for information retrieval. Yet catalogs in the modern era were designed to inventory (first) and retrieve (second) specific documents. From Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian until the late twentieth century, developments are epistemologically pragmatic--reflected in the structure of catalog records, in the rules for main entry headings, and in the rules for filing in card catalogs. After 1980 developments become empirical-reflected in research conducted by Tillett, Yee, Smiraglia, Leazer, Carlyle, and Vellucci. The influence of empiricism on the pragmatic notion of "the work" has led to increased focus on the concept of the work. The challenge for the postmodern online catalog is to fully embrace the concept of "the work," finally to facilitate it as a prime objective for information retrieval.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Authority control of works: cataloging's chimera? (2004)
0.07
0.073388405 = sum of:
0.014412914 = product of:
0.057651658 = sum of:
0.057651658 = weight(_text_:authors in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057651658 = score(doc=5678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.058975488 = product of:
0.117950976 = sum of:
0.117950976 = weight(_text_:r.p in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.117950976 = score(doc=5678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.3602233 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Explicit authority control of works is essentially non-existent. Our catalogs are built on a principle of controlling headings, and primarily headings for names of authors. Our syndetic structure creates a spider's web of networked relationships among forms of headings, but it ends there, despite the potential richness of depth among bibliographic entities. Effective authority control of works could yield richness in the catalog that would enhance retrieval capabilities. Works are considered to constitute the intellectual content of informative artifacts that may be collected and ordered for retrieval. In a 1992 study the author examined a random sample of works drawn from the catalog of the Georgetown University Library. For each progenitor work, an instantiation network (also referred to as a bibliographic family) was constituted. A detailed analysis of the linkages that would be required for authority control of these networks is reviewed here. A new study is also presented, in which Library of Congress authority records for the works in this sample are sought and analyzed. Results demonstrate a near total lack of control, with only 5.6% of works for which authority records were found. From a sample of 410 works, of which nearly half have instantiation networks, only 23 works could be said to have implicit authority control. However, many instantiation networks are made up of successive derivations that can be implicitly linked through collocation. The difficult work of explicitly linking instantiations comes with title changes, translations, and containing relations. The empirical evidence in the present study suggests that explicit control of expressions will provide the best control over instantiation networks because it is instantiations such as translations, abridgments, and adaptations that require explicit linking.
-
Gorman, M.: After AACR2R : the future of the Anglo-American cataloguing rules (1992)
0.07
0.070770584 = product of:
0.14154117 = sum of:
0.14154117 = product of:
0.28308234 = sum of:
0.28308234 = weight(_text_:r.p in 5990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28308234 = score(doc=5990,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.86453587 = fieldWeight in 5990, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5990)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Origins, content, and future of AACR2 revisited. Ed.: R.P. Smiraglia
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The nature of "a work" : implications for the organization of knowledge (2001)
0.07
0.070770584 = product of:
0.14154117 = sum of:
0.14154117 = product of:
0.28308234 = sum of:
0.28308234 = weight(_text_:r.p in 5983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28308234 = score(doc=5983,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.86453587 = fieldWeight in 5983, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5983)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Bibliographic families and superworks (2007)
0.07
0.070770584 = product of:
0.14154117 = sum of:
0.14154117 = product of:
0.28308234 = sum of:
0.28308234 = weight(_text_:r.p in 1674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28308234 = score(doc=1674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.86453587 = fieldWeight in 1674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1674)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Describing music materials : a manual for descriptive cataloguing of printed and recorded music, music videos, and archival music collections; for use with AACR2 and APPM (1997)
0.06
0.058975488 = product of:
0.117950976 = sum of:
0.117950976 = product of:
0.23590195 = sum of:
0.23590195 = weight(_text_:r.p in 3345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23590195 = score(doc=3345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.7204466 = fieldWeight in 3345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3345)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996)
0.05
0.05234813 = sum of:
0.028536115 = product of:
0.11414446 = sum of:
0.11414446 = weight(_text_:authors in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11414446 = score(doc=6740,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023812013 = product of:
0.047624025 = sum of:
0.047624025 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047624025 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012)
0.05
0.05234813 = sum of:
0.028536115 = product of:
0.11414446 = sum of:
0.11414446 = weight(_text_:authors in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11414446 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023812013 = product of:
0.047624025 = sum of:
0.047624025 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047624025 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Münnich, M.: Katalogisieren auf dem PC : ein Pflichtenheft für die Formalkatalogisierung (1988)
0.05
0.050274394 = sum of:
0.023060663 = product of:
0.09224265 = sum of:
0.09224265 = weight(_text_:authors in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09224265 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02721373 = product of:
0.05442746 = sum of:
0.05442746 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05442746 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856
-
Bowman, J.H.: Changing cataloging rules in relation to changing patterns of publication (1996)
0.04
0.044869825 = sum of:
0.024459528 = product of:
0.09783811 = sum of:
0.09783811 = weight(_text_:authors in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09783811 = score(doc=6521,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020410296 = product of:
0.04082059 = sum of:
0.04082059 = weight(_text_:22 in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04082059 = score(doc=6521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Examines changes in the rules for cataloguing certein categories of printed material, anonymous works, including: those described as being 'by the author of' another named work; pseudonymous works; edited works (collections of writings of several authors); and conference proceedings. Discusses the relevant rules from the British Museum, the 1908 joint code, the Bodleian, Cambridge University Library and AACR2, Samples of London publications taken in specimen years between 1841 and 1991 show that there has been a decrease in anonymous works and in works with personal authors, offset by a sharp increase in multiple authorship, edited works and conference proceedings. Concludes that these changes have taken place in response to external forces. Some changes have been because the rules have been found to be unworkable or based on unnecessary or false distinctions which were impossible for the cataloguer to interpret
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.29-50
-
Nistico, R.: Studio e indicizzazione delle dediche librarie (1998)
0.04
0.04399009 = sum of:
0.02017808 = product of:
0.08071232 = sum of:
0.08071232 = weight(_text_:authors in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08071232 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023812013 = product of:
0.047624025 = sum of:
0.047624025 = weight(_text_:22 in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047624025 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Book dedications by authors, often in verse form and appearing just before the title page, are one of the 6 elements describes by the French scholar Genette as paratextual. For some reasons dedications have failed to interest librarians, yet books containing them can be a valid object of bibliographic study, for the reasons that they carry special markings: are an example of a specific literary or semantic class; and reveal linguistic/stylistic features. Examines the history of literary dedications, citing examples by well-known writers, and suggests that cataloguing software should have a special field to record dedication
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 20:41:06
-
Botero, C.; Thorburn, C.; Williams, N.: Series in an online integrated system : an option beyond the MARC authority record (1990)
0.04
0.04399009 = sum of:
0.02017808 = product of:
0.08071232 = sum of:
0.08071232 = weight(_text_:authors in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08071232 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023812013 = product of:
0.047624025 = sum of:
0.047624025 = weight(_text_:22 in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047624025 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The authors describe the creation of online series authority records on the University of Florida Libraries' NOTIS-based LUIS system. It is an original method that uses serial bibliographic records as a basis for series authority records. We hope that our explanation of this pioneering method will be useful in varying degrees to other libraries attempting to convert their series authorities to an online environment. We also hope that this paper will prompt discussion among catalogers about series authorities in the online environment.
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 12:29:22
-
Dillon, M.; Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : the convergence of libraries and Internet resources (1996)
0.04
0.04399009 = sum of:
0.02017808 = product of:
0.08071232 = sum of:
0.08071232 = weight(_text_:authors in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08071232 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023812013 = product of:
0.047624025 = sum of:
0.047624025 = weight(_text_:22 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047624025 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews issues related to the cataloging of Internet resources and considers shortand long-term directions for cataloging and the general provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. The strengths and weakness of using a library catalog model to improve access to Internet resources are discussed and compared with a review of related efforts. Based on experience gained through two OCLC Internet cataloging projects, the authors recommend continued and vigorous appplication of library cataloging standards and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogs, cataloging, and libraries in general will continue to evolve.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.197-238
-
Creider, L.S.: Family names and the cataloger (2007)
0.04
0.04399009 = sum of:
0.02017808 = product of:
0.08071232 = sum of:
0.08071232 = weight(_text_:authors in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08071232 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22892061 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.023812013 = product of:
0.047624025 = sum of:
0.047624025 = weight(_text_:22 in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047624025 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584419 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, to be known as Resource Description and Access (RDA), has indicated that the replacement for the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) will allow the use of family names as authors and will provide rules for their formation. This paper discusses what a family name describes; examines how information seekers look for family names and what they expect to find; describes the ways in which family names have been established in Anglo-American cataloging and archival traditions; asks how adequately the headings established under these rules help users seek such information; and suggests how revised cataloging rules might better enable users to identify resources that meet their needs.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Holley, R.P.: Cataloging : an exciting subject for exciting times (2002)
0.04
0.04128284 = product of:
0.08256568 = sum of:
0.08256568 = product of:
0.16513136 = sum of:
0.16513136 = weight(_text_:r.p in 5449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16513136 = score(doc=5449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3274385 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.050214946 = queryNorm
0.5043126 = fieldWeight in 5449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5207376 = idf(docFreq=176, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5449)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
