-
Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996)
0.12
0.123742156 = sum of:
0.029744254 = product of:
0.11897702 = sum of:
0.11897702 = weight(_text_:authors in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11897702 = score(doc=6740,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0939979 = sum of:
0.04435761 = weight(_text_:r in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04435761 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
0.049640294 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049640294 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
- Abstract
- Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
- Series
- Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
-
Nistico, R.: Studio e indicizzazione delle dediche librarie (1998)
0.12
0.11503027 = sum of:
0.021032363 = product of:
0.08412945 = sum of:
0.08412945 = weight(_text_:authors in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08412945 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0939979 = sum of:
0.04435761 = weight(_text_:r in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04435761 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
0.049640294 = weight(_text_:22 in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049640294 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
- Abstract
- Book dedications by authors, often in verse form and appearing just before the title page, are one of the 6 elements describes by the French scholar Genette as paratextual. For some reasons dedications have failed to interest librarians, yet books containing them can be a valid object of bibliographic study, for the reasons that they carry special markings: are an example of a specific literary or semantic class; and reveal linguistic/stylistic features. Examines the history of literary dedications, citing examples by well-known writers, and suggests that cataloguing software should have a special field to record dedication
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 20:41:06
-
Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993)
0.10
0.10480574 = sum of:
0.048073974 = product of:
0.1922959 = sum of:
0.1922959 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1922959 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.056731764 = product of:
0.11346353 = sum of:
0.11346353 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11346353 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
-
Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001)
0.09
0.0939979 = product of:
0.1879958 = sum of:
0.1879958 = sum of:
0.08871522 = weight(_text_:r in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08871522 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
0.09928059 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09928059 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
-
Olson, N.B.: Cataloging computer files (1992)
0.07
0.06714136 = product of:
0.13428272 = sum of:
0.13428272 = sum of:
0.063368015 = weight(_text_:r in 7631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063368015 = score(doc=7631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 7631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7631)
0.07091471 = weight(_text_:22 in 7631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07091471 = score(doc=7631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.4, S.72 (R. Templeton); Technical services quarterly 11(1994) no.3, S.91-92 (P. Holzenberg)
-
Kirfel, G.: Methodisch-didaktische Überlegungen zum Fach "Alphabetische Katalogisierung" nach den "Preußischen Instruktionen" (1976)
0.07
0.06714136 = product of:
0.13428272 = sum of:
0.13428272 = sum of:
0.063368015 = weight(_text_:r in 6492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063368015 = score(doc=6492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.36573532 = fieldWeight in 6492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6492)
0.07091471 = weight(_text_:22 in 6492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07091471 = score(doc=6492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6492)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2016 12:14:11
- Source
- Methodisch-didaktische Probleme des Lehrfachs Alphabetische Katalogisierung: 5 Vorträge. Hrsg.: R. Jung
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.07
0.06546262 = product of:
0.13092524 = sum of:
0.13092524 = sum of:
0.05069441 = weight(_text_:r in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05069441 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.08023083 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08023083 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Ruiz-Perez, R.: Clasificacion y caracterizacion de las entidades : una propuesta para su tratamiento catalografico (1998)
0.06
0.05934064 = sum of:
0.033993434 = product of:
0.13597374 = sum of:
0.13597374 = weight(_text_:authors in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13597374 = score(doc=322,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.56985176 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.025347205 = product of:
0.05069441 = sum of:
0.05069441 = weight(_text_:r in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05069441 = score(doc=322,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Defines some problems and proposes methods for the classification and characterization of corporate authors on the basis of aspects that have caused the greatest problems in the past: jurisdictional area; its peculiarity, nature or condition; and its organizational chart within a hierarchical structure. Explains the resulting classification and characterization of corporate authors with examples
-
Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012)
0.05
0.0545644 = sum of:
0.029744254 = product of:
0.11897702 = sum of:
0.11897702 = weight(_text_:authors in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11897702 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.024820147 = product of:
0.049640294 = sum of:
0.049640294 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049640294 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Sheeran, R.: Maintaining the cohesive collection : the case for the local cataloger (1996)
0.05
0.053713087 = product of:
0.107426174 = sum of:
0.107426174 = sum of:
0.05069441 = weight(_text_:r in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05069441 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.056731764 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056731764 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.6, S.462-465
-
Münnich, M.: Katalogisieren auf dem PC : ein Pflichtenheft für die Formalkatalogisierung (1988)
0.05
0.05240287 = sum of:
0.024036987 = product of:
0.09614795 = sum of:
0.09614795 = weight(_text_:authors in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09614795 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.028365882 = product of:
0.056731764 = sum of:
0.056731764 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056731764 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856
-
Bothmann, R.: Cataloging electronic books (2004)
0.05
0.04699895 = product of:
0.0939979 = sum of:
0.0939979 = sum of:
0.04435761 = weight(_text_:r in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04435761 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
0.049640294 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049640294 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998)
0.05
0.04699895 = product of:
0.0939979 = sum of:
0.0939979 = sum of:
0.04435761 = weight(_text_:r in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04435761 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.049640294 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049640294 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 24. 1.2007 19:38:22
-
Bowman, J.H.: Changing cataloging rules in relation to changing patterns of publication (1996)
0.05
0.04676949 = sum of:
0.025495077 = product of:
0.101980306 = sum of:
0.101980306 = weight(_text_:authors in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101980306 = score(doc=6521,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021274412 = product of:
0.042548824 = sum of:
0.042548824 = weight(_text_:22 in 6521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042548824 = score(doc=6521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Examines changes in the rules for cataloguing certein categories of printed material, anonymous works, including: those described as being 'by the author of' another named work; pseudonymous works; edited works (collections of writings of several authors); and conference proceedings. Discusses the relevant rules from the British Museum, the 1908 joint code, the Bodleian, Cambridge University Library and AACR2, Samples of London publications taken in specimen years between 1841 and 1991 show that there has been a decrease in anonymous works and in works with personal authors, offset by a sharp increase in multiple authorship, edited works and conference proceedings. Concludes that these changes have taken place in response to external forces. Some changes have been because the rules have been found to be unworkable or based on unnecessary or false distinctions which were impossible for the cataloguer to interpret
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.29-50
-
Ruiz-Perez, R.: Consequences of applying cataloguing codes for author entries to the Spanish National Library online catalogs (2001)
0.05
0.046667036 = sum of:
0.033993434 = product of:
0.13597374 = sum of:
0.13597374 = weight(_text_:authors in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13597374 = score(doc=5435,freq=16.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.56985176 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.012673602 = product of:
0.025347205 = sum of:
0.025347205 = weight(_text_:r in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025347205 = score(doc=5435,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this empirical study of a sample of catalog records I investigate the implications for information retrieval of the rules for choosing author access points in online catalogs. Aims: To obtain data that can be used to inform a revision of current cataloguing rules, and to propose more functional criteria aimed at improving the retrieval of information located on the basis of author names. Material and methods: A total of 838 records from the Biblioteca Nacional Española (Spanish National Library) were examined to analyze the use of authorities as access points. Authors were classified as creative or non-creative to facilitate the analysis. The variables investigated were author source location, potential author access points, actual entries used in the record, and loss of potential entry points. Results: A total of 3566 potential author access points were identified (mean of 4.25 per record). The title page yielded 57.3% of all potential access points, the table of contents yielded 33.5%, and other sources accounted for the remaining 9.1%. A total of 2125 potential authors were not used as access points in the records (overall loss of 59.5%). A total of 960 authors named on the title page were not used as entries (30.23% loss). In works with up to three authors per responsibility function, 24.8% of the authors were not used as entry points. In works with more than three authors, 75.2% of the potential access points were unused. Discussion and conclusions: A significant proportion of potential access points from the table of contents and the title page went unused. If the access points from these sources were used, author indexes would be more complete and accurate, and retrieval with online catalogs would be more efficient. I suggest that losses for creative authors were caused by neglect of the table of contents as a source of entries, strict application of the rule of three, and other specific factors. Losses for non-creative authors were caused by ambiguities and gaps in current cataloguing rules for choosing added author entries. The findings support the urgent need to revise cataloguing rules for author access points to make them more flexible, more practical, and more in line with actual responsibility functions and types of authorship.
-
Botero, C.; Thorburn, C.; Williams, N.: Series in an online integrated system : an option beyond the MARC authority record (1990)
0.05
0.045852512 = sum of:
0.021032363 = product of:
0.08412945 = sum of:
0.08412945 = weight(_text_:authors in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08412945 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.024820147 = product of:
0.049640294 = sum of:
0.049640294 = weight(_text_:22 in 482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049640294 = score(doc=482,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 482, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=482)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The authors describe the creation of online series authority records on the University of Florida Libraries' NOTIS-based LUIS system. It is an original method that uses serial bibliographic records as a basis for series authority records. We hope that our explanation of this pioneering method will be useful in varying degrees to other libraries attempting to convert their series authorities to an online environment. We also hope that this paper will prompt discussion among catalogers about series authorities in the online environment.
- Date
- 8. 1.2007 12:29:22
-
Dillon, M.; Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : the convergence of libraries and Internet resources (1996)
0.05
0.045852512 = sum of:
0.021032363 = product of:
0.08412945 = sum of:
0.08412945 = weight(_text_:authors in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08412945 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.024820147 = product of:
0.049640294 = sum of:
0.049640294 = weight(_text_:22 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049640294 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper reviews issues related to the cataloging of Internet resources and considers shortand long-term directions for cataloging and the general provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. The strengths and weakness of using a library catalog model to improve access to Internet resources are discussed and compared with a review of related efforts. Based on experience gained through two OCLC Internet cataloging projects, the authors recommend continued and vigorous appplication of library cataloging standards and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogs, cataloging, and libraries in general will continue to evolve.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.197-238
-
Creider, L.S.: Family names and the cataloger (2007)
0.05
0.045852512 = sum of:
0.021032363 = product of:
0.08412945 = sum of:
0.08412945 = weight(_text_:authors in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08412945 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.024820147 = product of:
0.049640294 = sum of:
0.049640294 = weight(_text_:22 in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049640294 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, to be known as Resource Description and Access (RDA), has indicated that the replacement for the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) will allow the use of family names as authors and will provide rules for their formation. This paper discusses what a family name describes; examines how information seekers look for family names and what they expect to find; describes the ways in which family names have been established in Anglo-American cataloging and archival traditions; asks how adequately the headings established under these rules help users seek such information; and suggests how revised cataloging rules might better enable users to identify resources that meet their needs.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Martínez-Ávila, D.; Smiraglia, R.; Lee, H.-L.; Fox, M.: What is an author now? (2015)
0.04
0.04211278 = sum of:
0.029439176 = product of:
0.1177567 = sum of:
0.1177567 = weight(_text_:authors in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1177567 = score(doc=2321,freq=12.0), product of:
0.23861247 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.49350607 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.012673602 = product of:
0.025347205 = sum of:
0.025347205 = weight(_text_:r in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025347205 = score(doc=2321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss and shed light on the following questions: What is an author? Is it a person who writes? Or, is it, in information, an iconic taxonomic designation (some might say a "classification") for a group of writings that are recognized by the public in some particular way? What does it mean when a search engine, or catalog, asks a user to enter the name of an author? And how does that accord with the manner in which the data have been entered in association with the names of the entities identified with the concept of authorship? Design/methodology/approach - The authors use several cases as bases of phenomenological discourse analysis, combining as best the authors can components of eidetic bracketing (a Husserlian technique for isolating noetic reduction) with Foucauldian discourse analysis. The two approaches are not sympathetic or together cogent, so the authors present them instead as alternative explanations alongside empirical evidence. In this way the authors are able to isolate components of iconic "authorship" and then subsequently engage them in discourse. Findings - An "author" is an iconic name associated with a class of works. An "author" is a role in public discourse between a set of works and the culture that consumes them. An "author" is a role in cultural sublimation, or a power broker in deabstemiation. An "author" is last, if ever, a person responsible for the intellectual content of a published work. The library catalog's attribution of "author" is at odds with the Foucauldian discursive comprehension of the role of an "author." Originality/value - One of the main assets of this paper is the combination of Foucauldian discourse analysis with phenomenological analysis for the study of the "author." The authors turned to Foucauldian discourse analysis to discover the loci of power in the interactions of the public with the named authorial entities. The authors also looked to phenomenological analysis to consider the lived experience of users who encounter the same named authorial entities. The study of the "author" in this combined way facilitated the revelation of new aspects of the role of authorship in search engines and library catalogs.
-
Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009)
0.04
0.040284816 = product of:
0.08056963 = sum of:
0.08056963 = sum of:
0.03802081 = weight(_text_:r in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03802081 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17326194 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.042548824 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042548824 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18328895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05234091 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:20:24
