Search (1545 results, page 1 of 78)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Shoham, S.: Cataloging instruction in Israel (2005) 0.09
    0.08733534 = product of:
      0.24017218 = sum of:
        0.015832627 = weight(_text_:of in 5762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015832627 = score(doc=5762,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 5762, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5762)
        0.09139578 = weight(_text_:technological in 5762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09139578 = score(doc=5762,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18347798 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.49812943 = fieldWeight in 5762, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5762)
        0.105819434 = weight(_text_:innovations in 5762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105819434 = score(doc=5762,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23478 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.45071742 = fieldWeight in 5762, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5762)
        0.027124345 = weight(_text_:on in 5762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027124345 = score(doc=5762,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.35714048 = fieldWeight in 5762, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5762)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    Despite its young age compared to similar programs in the United States, cataloging instruction in Israel has also been transformed to reflect the changes in the work done in libraries based on technological innovations and conceptions held by those involved in academia. Cataloging instruction in Israel is marked by a number of factors: * There has always been a division, carried through to today, between distinct and independent courses on various aspects of cataloging: A course on classification, a course on descriptive cataloging and a course on indexing. Even today, these courses are requirements in all of the instructional frameworks, though the length of the course has been reduced over the years * Over the years additional courses have been introduced as a reflection of the technological developments and work in the field * The majority of courses are now taught in computer labs * Switch to instruction by academics and not by librarians, workers in the field, as was customary for many decades * Focus of instruction in university departments on theory and understanding of concepts.
  2. Condon, P.: ¬The end of an era? : the forces marshalling against cataloguing (1995) 0.08
    0.08477116 = product of:
      0.23312068 = sum of:
        0.0159967 = weight(_text_:of in 5750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0159967 = score(doc=5750,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 5750, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5750)
        0.07539768 = weight(_text_:technological in 5750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07539768 = score(doc=5750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18347798 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.41093582 = fieldWeight in 5750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5750)
        0.12345601 = weight(_text_:innovations in 5750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12345601 = score(doc=5750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23478 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.525837 = fieldWeight in 5750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5750)
        0.01827029 = weight(_text_:on in 5750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01827029 = score(doc=5750,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 5750, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5750)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    Challenges the mind sets that exist about cataloguing in libraries today by offereing arguments for new priorities based on a formula of blending the users' needs with the need for libraries to take a more proactive role in helping users find and use information relevant to their learning needs in a world of rapid and complex change. Argues that inhouse cataloguing is in decline due to the explosion of technological innovations and a high demand for new services pushing for a new order of priorities to ensure effective management at a time of shrinking resources. Focuses on examples from the university environment
  3. Tait, J.A.: Authors and titles : an analytical study of the author concept in codes of cataloguing rules in the English language, from that of the British Museum in 1841 to the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules 1967 (1969) 0.07
    0.07363072 = product of:
      0.2699793 = sum of:
        0.012927286 = weight(_text_:of in 2161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012927286 = score(doc=2161,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 2161, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2161)
        0.1368548 = weight(_text_:great in 2161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1368548 = score(doc=2161,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19443816 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.7038474 = fieldWeight in 2161, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2161)
        0.12019722 = product of:
          0.24039444 = sum of:
            0.24039444 = weight(_text_:britain in 2161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24039444 = score(doc=2161,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25769958 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.9328476 = fieldWeight in 2161, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2161)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    LCSH
    Descriptive cataloging / Great Britain / Rules / History
    Subject
    Descriptive cataloging / Great Britain / Rules / History
  4. Gilbert, J.: AACR2 headings for local churches and parishes in Great Britain (1997) 0.07
    0.06556306 = product of:
      0.24039787 = sum of:
        0.013193856 = weight(_text_:of in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013193856 = score(doc=694,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
        0.120963685 = weight(_text_:great in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.120963685 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19443816 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.62211907 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
        0.10624033 = product of:
          0.21248066 = sum of:
            0.21248066 = weight(_text_:britain in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21248066 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25769958 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.8245286 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Examines 2 categories of AACR2 headings where British Library and LoC practices are different: those for local churches and parishes. Suggests some interpretations of the relevant rules to reduce these differences
  5. Pazooki, F.; Zeinolabedini, M.H.; Arastoopoor, S.: Acceptance and viewpoint of iranian catalogers regarding RDA : the case of the National Library and Archive of Iran (2014) 0.06
    0.062313505 = product of:
      0.17136213 = sum of:
        0.091163956 = weight(_text_:higher in 1987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.091163956 = score(doc=1987,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.5026005 = fieldWeight in 1987, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1987)
        0.053516448 = weight(_text_:effect in 1987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053516448 = score(doc=1987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.2926002 = fieldWeight in 1987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1987)
        0.01745383 = weight(_text_:of in 1987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01745383 = score(doc=1987,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.32322758 = fieldWeight in 1987, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1987)
        0.009227889 = weight(_text_:on in 1987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009227889 = score(doc=1987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.121501654 = fieldWeight in 1987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1987)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    The general purpose of this study is to assess the amount of catalogers' familiarity with Resource Description and Access (RDA) and their readiness for acceptance of these rules and the effect of training on this issue. The methodology of the presented research is a survey study using a descriptive-analytic approach. In this research, the familiarity of 49 catalogers, working for the Cataloging In Publication (CIP) department at the National Library and Archive of Iran with RDA was monitored before and after a training session through a questionnaire. It was specifically prepared for measuring catalogers' familiarity with, and acceptance of, RDA and also highlighting the self-identified and actual levels of this familiarity and acceptance. The results show that before training, catalogers' self-identified familiarity with RDA was higher than the average level. But after the training session, both self-identified and actual familiarity raised dramatically. Furthermore, the significant difference between the research population's features and self-identified, actual familiarity and the rules' acceptance rate among catalogers was examined. In this study, it was confirmed that there is a significant difference between self-stated and actual familiarity of catalogers regarding RDA. According to the results, M.A. catalogers have a self-identified familiarity higher than B.A. catalogers. It was also confirmed that the actual familiarity of catalogers with an M.A. degree before training is higher than catalogers holding a B.A.
  6. Hider, P.: Information resource description : creating and managing metadata (2012) 0.06
    0.059190463 = product of:
      0.21703169 = sum of:
        0.016159108 = weight(_text_:of in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016159108 = score(doc=2086,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
        0.07616316 = weight(_text_:technological in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07616316 = score(doc=2086,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18347798 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.41510788 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
        0.12470941 = weight(_text_:innovations in 2086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12470941 = score(doc=2086,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23478 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.5311756 = fieldWeight in 2086, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2086)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    An overview of the field of information organization that examines resource description as both a product and process of the contemporary digital environment. This timely book employs the unifying mechanism of the semantic web and the resource description framework to integrate the various traditions and practices of information and knowledge organization. Uniquely, it covers both the domain-specific traditions and practices and the practices of the 'metadata movement' through a single lens - that of resource description in the broadest, semantic web sense. This approach more readily accommodates coverage of the new Resource Description and Access (RDA) standard, which aims to move library cataloguing into the centre of the semantic web. The work surrounding RDA looks set to revolutionise the field of information organization, and this book will bring both the standard and its model and concepts into focus.
    Content
    Information resource attributes - metadata for information retrieval - metadata sources and quality - economics and management of metadata - knowledge organization systems - the semantic web - books and e-books, websites and audiovisual resources - business and government documents - learning resources - the field of information/knowledge organization.
    LCSH
    Libraries / Technological innovations
    Subject
    Libraries / Technological innovations
  7. Ballard, T.; Grimaldi, A.: Improve OPAC searching by reducing tagging errors in MARC records (1997) 0.05
    0.048738964 = product of:
      0.13403215 = sum of:
        0.08562632 = weight(_text_:effect in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08562632 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.46816036 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
        0.014927144 = weight(_text_:of in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014927144 = score(doc=695,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
        0.014764623 = weight(_text_:on in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014764623 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
        0.018714061 = product of:
          0.037428122 = sum of:
            0.037428122 = weight(_text_:22 in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037428122 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    One of the most common errors in cataloguing library materials involves miscoding of the nonfiling indicator of title fields. Notes the extent of the problem and its negative effect on searching in the library's online catalogue and surveys how librarians have approached solutions to the problems. Describes how the major library automation system address this problem
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  8. Catalogue 2.0 : the future of the library catalogue (2013) 0.05
    0.048149955 = product of:
      0.13241237 = sum of:
        0.042106826 = weight(_text_:higher in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042106826 = score(doc=1339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.23214121 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
        0.012376934 = weight(_text_:of in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012376934 = score(doc=1339,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.2292085 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
        0.07054629 = weight(_text_:innovations in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07054629 = score(doc=1339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23478 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.30047828 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
        0.0073823114 = weight(_text_:on in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0073823114 = score(doc=1339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.097201325 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    Will there be a library catalogue in the future and, if so, what will it look like? In the last 25 years, the library catalogue has undergone an evolution, from card catalogues to OPACs, discovery systems and even linked data applications making library bibliographic data accessible on the web. At the same time, users expectations of what catalogues will be able to offer in the way of discovery have never been higher. This groundbreaking edited collection brings together some of the foremost international cataloguing practitioners and thought leaders, including Lorcan Dempsey, Emmanuelle Bermès, Marshall Breeding and Karen Calhoun, to provide an overview of the current state of the art of the library catalogue and look ahead to see what the library catalogue might become. Practical projects and cutting edge concepts are showcased in discussions of linked data and the Semantic Web, user expectations and needs, bibliographic control, the FRBRization of the catalogue, innovations in search and retrieval, next-generation discovery products and mobile catalogues.
    Content
    Foreword - Marshall Breeding Introduction - Sally Chambers 1. Next generation catalogues: what do users think? - Anne Christensen 2. Making search work for the library user - Till Kinstler 3. Next-generation discovery: an overview of the European Scene - Marshall Breeding 4. The mobile library catalogue - Lukas Koster and Driek Heesakkers 5. FRBRizing your catalogue - Rosemie Callewaert 6. Enabling your catalogue for the semantic web - Emmanuelle Bermes 7. Supporting digital scholarship: bibliographic control, library co-operatives and open access repositories - Karen Calhoun 8. Thirteen ways of look at the libraries, discovery and the catalogue: scale, workflow, attention - Lorcan Dempsey.
  9. Antelman, K.: Identifying the serial work as a bibliographic entity (2004) 0.05
    0.046597287 = product of:
      0.12814254 = sum of:
        0.08932207 = weight(_text_:higher in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08932207 = score(doc=130,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18138453 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.4924459 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
        0.013711456 = weight(_text_:of in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013711456 = score(doc=130,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
        0.011073467 = weight(_text_:on in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011073467 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
        0.014035545 = product of:
          0.02807109 = sum of:
            0.02807109 = weight(_text_:22 in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02807109 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    A solid theoretical foundation has been built over the years exploring the bibliographic work and developing cataloging rules and practices to describe the work in the traditional catalog. With the increasing prevalence of multiple manifestations of serial titles, as well as tools that automate discovery and retrieval, bibliographic control of serials at a higher level of abstraction is more necessary than ever before. At the same time, models such as the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records offer new opportunities to control all bibliographic entities at this higher level and build more useful catalog displays. The bibliographic mechanisms that control the work for monographs - author, title, and uniform title - are weak identifiers for serials. New identifiers being adopted by the content industry are built on models and practices that are fundamentally different from those underlying the new bibliographic models. What is needed is a work identifier for serials that is both congruent with the new models and can enable us to meet the objective of providing work-level access to all resources in our catalogs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985) 0.04
    0.044180106 = product of:
      0.12149529 = sum of:
        0.07492303 = weight(_text_:effect in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07492303 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
        0.01727841 = weight(_text_:of in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01727841 = score(doc=366,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
        0.012919044 = weight(_text_:on in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012919044 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
        0.016374804 = product of:
          0.03274961 = sum of:
            0.03274961 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03274961 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    LIAS, the Pennsylvania State University's (Penn State) integrated interactive online system, provides for messaging by the user to inform library staff of errors found in bibliographic records. The message is sent by use of the OOPS command, and results in a printout which is used by processing staff for online catalog maintenance. This article describes LIAS, the use of the OOPS command, the processing of the resulting OOPS reports, an assessment of the effect of its use, and some speculation on the expansion of the LIAS message system for use in catalog maintenance.
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:30
  11. Stine, D.: ¬The effect of AACR2 and serials cataloging on medium-sized research libraries (1983) 0.04
    0.044122305 = product of:
      0.16178177 = sum of:
        0.12843947 = weight(_text_:effect in 303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12843947 = score(doc=303,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.7022405 = fieldWeight in 303, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=303)
        0.011195358 = weight(_text_:of in 303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011195358 = score(doc=303,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 303, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=303)
        0.022146935 = weight(_text_:on in 303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022146935 = score(doc=303,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 303, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=303)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
  12. Genetasio, G.: ¬The International Cataloguing Principles and their future", in: JLIS.it 3/1 (2012) (2012) 0.04
    0.04222946 = product of:
      0.15484135 = sum of:
        0.017701415 = weight(_text_:of in 2625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017701415 = score(doc=2625,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 2625, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2625)
        0.105819434 = weight(_text_:innovations in 2625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105819434 = score(doc=2625,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23478 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.45071742 = fieldWeight in 2625, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2625)
        0.031320494 = weight(_text_:on in 2625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031320494 = score(doc=2625,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.4123903 = fieldWeight in 2625, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2625)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    The article aims to provide an update on the 2009 Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) and on the status of work on the Statement by the IFLA Cataloguing Section. The article begins with a summary of the drafting process of the ICP by the IME ICC, International Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code, focusing in particular on the first meeting (IME ICC1) and on the earlier drafts of the 2009 Statement. It then analyzes both the major innovations and the unsatisfactory aspects of the ICP. Finally, it explains and comments on the recent documents by the IFLA Cataloguing Section relating to the ICP, which express their intention to revise the Statement and to verify the convenience of drawing up an international cataloguing code. The latter intention is considered in detail and criticized by the author in the light of the recent publication of the RDA, Resource Description and Access. The article is complemented by an updated bibliography on the ICP.
  13. Charbonneau, M.D.: Production benchmarks for catalogers in academic libraries : are we there yet? (2005) 0.04
    0.042010278 = product of:
      0.115528256 = sum of:
        0.07492303 = weight(_text_:effect in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07492303 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.4096403 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
        0.011311376 = weight(_text_:of in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011311376 = score(doc=128,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
        0.012919044 = weight(_text_:on in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012919044 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
        0.016374804 = product of:
          0.03274961 = sum of:
            0.03274961 = weight(_text_:22 in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03274961 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examines existing library and personnel literature to determine whether any strides have been made among academic libraries in determining cataloging productivity benchmarks. The perceived importance of performance evaluations based on quantitative and qualitative standards is explored, as is the intended effect of established cataloging production norms. The pros and cons of cataloging benchmarks are analyzed from four different perspectives: library administration, library human resources, cataloging managers, and cataloging staff. The paper concludes that additional research is needed in order to determine whether established production cataloging benchmarks are feasible and meaningful within academic libraries.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Kim, J.(im); Kim, J.(enna): Effect of forename string on author name disambiguation (2020) 0.04
    0.041884135 = product of:
      0.115181364 = sum of:
        0.07568369 = weight(_text_:effect in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07568369 = score(doc=5930,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.41379923 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
        0.014751178 = weight(_text_:of in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014751178 = score(doc=5930,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
        0.013050207 = weight(_text_:on in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013050207 = score(doc=5930,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.1718293 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
        0.011696288 = product of:
          0.023392577 = sum of:
            0.023392577 = weight(_text_:22 in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023392577 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    In author name disambiguation, author forenames are used to decide which name instances are disambiguated together and how much they are likely to refer to the same author. Despite such a crucial role of forenames, their effect on the performance of heuristic (string matching) and algorithmic disambiguation is not well understood. This study assesses the contributions of forenames in author name disambiguation using multiple labeled data sets under varying ratios and lengths of full forenames, reflecting real-world scenarios in which an author is represented by forename variants (synonym) and some authors share the same forenames (homonym). The results show that increasing the ratios of full forenames substantially improves both heuristic and machine-learning-based disambiguation. Performance gains by algorithmic disambiguation are pronounced when many forenames are initialized or homonyms are prevalent. As the ratios of full forenames increase, however, they become marginal compared to those by string matching. Using a small portion of forename strings does not reduce much the performances of both heuristic and algorithmic disambiguation methods compared to using full-length strings. These findings provide practical suggestions, such as restoring initialized forenames into a full-string format via record linkage for improved disambiguation performances.
    Date
    11. 7.2020 13:22:58
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.7, S.839-855
  15. Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.04
    0.04135029 = product of:
      0.113713294 = sum of:
        0.01939093 = weight(_text_:of in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01939093 = score(doc=2766,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.064626575 = weight(_text_:technological in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064626575 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18347798 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3522307 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.015660247 = weight(_text_:on in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015660247 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.014035545 = product of:
          0.02807109 = sum of:
            0.02807109 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02807109 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:20:24
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.844-857
  16. Little, J.: ¬The impact of technology on cataloguing (1997) 0.04
    0.04109032 = product of:
      0.15066451 = sum of:
        0.021659635 = weight(_text_:of in 1620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021659635 = score(doc=1620,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 1620, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1620)
        0.10662842 = weight(_text_:technological in 1620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10662842 = score(doc=1620,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18347798 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.581151 = fieldWeight in 1620, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1620)
        0.022376444 = weight(_text_:on in 1620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022376444 = score(doc=1620,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.29462588 = fieldWeight in 1620, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1620)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the management of the impact of technological change on technical services, especially cataloguing. Describes a number of library applications of recent and developing technologies, starting with the more familiar and firmly established such as OPACs and library networks then moving to less established applications such as electronic publishing and expert systems. Considers the impact these will have on the work and workflow of cataloguing including changing the mission of the library, providing alternatives to original cataloguing, changes to the number and training level of staff required, and reducing the gap between technical and public services. Argues that some of the effects of technological change are predictable and as libraries introduce changes they need to plan for the effects
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 12th Biennal Convention of the Fiji Library Association, Suva, Fiji, 30 Nov 1996
  17. DeSitey, J.M.: Cataloguing microcomputer software : alternatives to Chapter 9 (1990) 0.04
    0.040755354 = product of:
      0.1494363 = sum of:
        0.0130612515 = weight(_text_:of in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0130612515 = score(doc=4058,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
        0.12345601 = weight(_text_:innovations in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12345601 = score(doc=4058,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23478 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.525837 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
        0.012919044 = weight(_text_:on in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012919044 = score(doc=4058,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Contribution to an issue devoted in part to microcomputer software: Proceedings of the Resources and Technical Services Division (RTSD). Audio-Visual Committee's programme held during the 1988 Annual Conference of the American Library Association. Based on a paper by Susan Nesbitt, 'Microcomputer software cataloguing: a practical approach' which was published in Cataloguing Special Materials: Critiques and Innovations edited ba Sanford Berman. Discusses issues to be addressed before cataloguing a new format. Suggestions are offered based upon the Hennepin County Library experience. Discusses types of information to be included in the physical description and notes for nonprint material allowed by AACR2. Describes the assiging of subject headings to software.
  18. Bourdenet, P.: ¬The catalog resisting the Web : an historical perspective (2012) 0.04
    0.040574223 = product of:
      0.14877215 = sum of:
        0.008079554 = weight(_text_:of in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008079554 = score(doc=324,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.1496253 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
        0.12470941 = weight(_text_:innovations in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12470941 = score(doc=324,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23478 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.5311756 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
        0.015983174 = weight(_text_:on in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015983174 = score(doc=324,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.21044704 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries are currently seeking to restructure their services and develop new cataloguing standards to position themselves on the web, which has become the main source of information and documents. The current upheaval within the profession is accompanied by the belief that libraries have a major role to play in identifying and supplying content due to their extensive high quality databases, which remain untapped despite efforts to increase catalog performance. They continue to rely on a strategy that has been proven successful since the mid-nineteenth century while seeking other models for their data. Today, they aim to exploit changes brought about by the web to improve content identification. The current intense debate on RDA implementation mirrors this desire for change. The debate is rooted in past efforts and yet tries to incite radical changes as it provides for interoperability from the creation of records through an object modeling in line with web standards and innovations. These innovations are presented through an historical perspective inspired by writings by librarians who are entrusted with helping in the development of bibliographic description standards.
  19. Kellsey, C.: Cooperative cataloging, vendor records, and European language monographs (2002) 0.04
    0.03953443 = product of:
      0.108719684 = sum of:
        0.064219736 = weight(_text_:effect in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064219736 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.35112026 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
        0.01939093 = weight(_text_:of in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01939093 = score(doc=160,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
        0.011073467 = weight(_text_:on in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011073467 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
        0.014035545 = product of:
          0.02807109 = sum of:
            0.02807109 = weight(_text_:22 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02807109 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12092275 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.034531306 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    The appearance in OCLC and RLIN of minimal level catalog records from European book vendors for European language monographs and their effect on cataloging department workflows and cooperative cataloging efforts have been matters of concern expressed recently at ALA meetings and in the library literature. A study of 8,778 catalog records was undertaken to discover how many current European language monographs were being cataloged by the Library of Congress, by member libraries, and by vendors. It was found that vendor records accounted for 16. 7% of Spanish books, 18% of French books, 33.6% of German books, and 52.5% of those in Italian. The number of libraries enhancing vendor records in OCLC was found to be only approximately one-third the number of libraries contributing original records for European language books. Ongoing increases in European book publishing and the increasing globalization of cataloging databases mean that the results of this study have implications not only for local cataloging practice but for cooperative cataloging as a whole.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Jones, W.; Queinnec, Y.-H.: L'integration des formats et le catalogue des publications en série (1994) 0.04
    0.039312985 = product of:
      0.1441476 = sum of:
        0.107032895 = weight(_text_:effect in 1851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.107032895 = score(doc=1851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18289955 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.5852004 = fieldWeight in 1851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.29663 = idf(docFreq=601, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1851)
        0.01865893 = weight(_text_:of in 1851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01865893 = score(doc=1851,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053998582 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 1851, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1851)
        0.018455777 = weight(_text_:on in 1851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018455777 = score(doc=1851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07594867 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034531306 = queryNorm
            0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 1851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1851)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the origins and developments of machine readble cataloguing. Examines the results of the integration of bibliographic formats and evaluates their effect on the work of serial cataloguers in Canada and the USA

Languages

Types

  • a 1396
  • m 85
  • el 75
  • s 28
  • b 17
  • r 10
  • n 9
  • p 3
  • ag 2
  • l 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications