Search (210 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985) 0.08 
    0.083886914 = product of:
  0.16777383 = sum of:
    0.16777383 = sum of:
      0.11964179 = weight(_text_:assessment in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11964179 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050750602 = queryNorm
          0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
      0.048132043 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048132043 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050750602 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    LIAS, the Pennsylvania State University's (Penn State) integrated interactive online system, provides for messaging by the user to inform library staff of errors found in bibliographic records. The message is sent by use of the OOPS command, and results in a printout which is used by processing staff for online catalog maintenance. This article describes LIAS, the use of the OOPS command, the processing of the resulting OOPS reports, an assessment of the effect of its use, and some speculation on the expansion of the LIAS message system for use in catalog maintenance.
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:30
  2. Stalberg, E.; Cronin, C.: Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control (2011) 0.08 
    0.083886914 = product of:
  0.16777383 = sum of:
    0.16777383 = sum of:
      0.11964179 = weight(_text_:assessment in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11964179 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050750602 = queryNorm
          0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
      0.048132043 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048132043 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050750602 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In June 2009, the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Heads of Technical Services in Large Research Libraries Interest Group established the Task Force on Cost/Value Assessment of Bibliographic Control to address recommendation 5.1.1.1 of On the Record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, which focused on developing measures for costs, benefits, and value of bibliographic control. This paper outlines results of that task force's efforts to develop and articulate metrics for evaluating the cost and value of cataloging activities specifically, and offers some next steps that the community could take to further the profession's collective understanding of the costs and values associated with bibliographic control.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012) 0.08 
    0.083886914 = product of:
  0.16777383 = sum of:
    0.16777383 = sum of:
      0.11964179 = weight(_text_:assessment in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11964179 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050750602 = queryNorm
          0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
      0.048132043 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048132043 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050750602 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011) 0.07 
    0.071903065 = product of:
  0.14380613 = sum of:
    0.14380613 = sum of:
      0.1025501 = weight(_text_:assessment in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1025501 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050750602 = queryNorm
          0.36599535 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
      0.041256037 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041256037 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050750602 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Educational standards are a central focus of the current educational system in the United States, underpinning educational practice, curriculum design, teacher professional development, and high-stakes testing and assessment. Digital library users have requested that this information be accessible in association with digital learning resources to support teaching and learning as well as accountability requirements. Providing this information is complex because of the variability and number of standards documents in use at the national, state, and local level. This article describes a cataloging tool that aids catalogers in the assignment of standards metadata to digital library resources, using natural language processing techniques. The research explores whether the standards suggestor service would suggest the same standards as a human, whether relevant standards are ranked appropriately in the result set, and whether the relevance of the suggested assignments improve when, in addition to resource content, metadata is included in the query to the cataloging tool. The article also discusses how this service might streamline the cataloging workflow.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:25:32
  5. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.04 
    0.038896564 = product of:
  0.07779313 = sum of:
    0.07779313 = product of:
      0.15558626 = sum of:
        0.15558626 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15558626 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050750602 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
  6. Boeuf, P. le: FRBR and further (2001) 0.03 
    0.034183368 = product of:
  0.068366736 = sum of:
    0.068366736 = product of:
      0.13673347 = sum of:
        0.13673347 = weight(_text_:assessment in 5550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13673347 = score(doc=5550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050750602 = queryNorm
            0.4879938 = fieldWeight in 5550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5550)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The conceptual data model developed by IFLA, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), is likely to induce profound changes in cataloguers' landscape. This article strives to gather as many comments on FRBR as possible, as they were found in professional literature all over the worlds (mostly on the Web). Many commentators actually suggest additions and modifications to the IFLA model, and it would be very useful if IFLA made an assessment of all of these suggestions, either to accept them or to reject them. In the next section, the potential consequences of FRBR on catalogues are outlined.
  7. Lange, H.R.: Creating core records for federal documents : does it make a difference? (1998) 0.03 
    0.034183368 = product of:
  0.068366736 = sum of:
    0.068366736 = product of:
      0.13673347 = sum of:
        0.13673347 = weight(_text_:assessment in 4632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13673347 = score(doc=4632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050750602 = queryNorm
            0.4879938 = fieldWeight in 4632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4632)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Over the past 18 months, Colorado State University Libraries has used the Library of Congress inspired Program in Cooperative Cataloging's (PCC) core record standard when cataloguing non depository and pre-1976 federal documents. Describes the libraries' decision to use the core standard, describes the core cataloguing standard, noting especially PCC's emphasis on the importance of the cataloguer's judgement in applying the standard and comments on the libraries' use and assessment of core cataloguing
  8. Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : an assessment and prospectus (1998) 0.03 
    0.029910447 = product of:
  0.059820894 = sum of:
    0.059820894 = product of:
      0.11964179 = sum of:
        0.11964179 = weight(_text_:assessment in 2541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11964179 = score(doc=2541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050750602 = queryNorm
            0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 2541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2541)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. Burnett, P.P.: Emerging from the bibliographic wilderness : Catalogue automation in the Bodleian Library, University of Oxford (2000) 0.03 
    0.029910447 = product of:
  0.059820894 = sum of:
    0.059820894 = product of:
      0.11964179 = sum of:
        0.11964179 = weight(_text_:assessment in 5370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11964179 = score(doc=5370,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050750602 = queryNorm
            0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 5370, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5370)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article provides a history of cataloguing and catalogue automation at the Bodleian Library, Oxford University and includes a description of the Catalogue Support Services within the Cataloguing Division of the Bodleian Technical Services Department. The 1995 decision to migrate to Geac and some subsequent development and implementation is described along with staff training for the cataloguing module. The article includes an assessment of the impact of automation and challenges for the future.
  10. DeZelar-Tiedman, C.; Camden, B.P.; Uhl, R.: Growing our own : mentoring the next generation of catalog librarians (2006) 0.03 
    0.029910447 = product of:
  0.059820894 = sum of:
    0.059820894 = product of:
      0.11964179 = sum of:
        0.11964179 = weight(_text_:assessment in 231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11964179 = score(doc=231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050750602 = queryNorm
            0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=231)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper traces the development of a mentoring program for aspiring catalogers, sponsored and administered by the ALCTS CCS Committee on Education, Training, and Recruitment for Cataloging (CETRC). Background is given on the reasons for establishing the program, as well as the two pilot programs that preceded the current, ongoing mentoring service. Results of the assessment of the second pilot are shared. Though CETRC still faces challenges in sustaining the program on an ongoing basis, the Committee feels it is a valuable endeavor worth continuing.
  11. Kranz, J.: Microcomputer software cataloging : the need for consistency (1988) 0.03 
    0.029910447 = product of:
  0.059820894 = sum of:
    0.059820894 = product of:
      0.11964179 = sum of:
        0.11964179 = weight(_text_:assessment in 437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11964179 = score(doc=437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050750602 = queryNorm
            0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=437)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic records for microcomputer software in the OCLC Online Union Catalog are evaluated primarily for the purpose of focusing catalogers' attention on selected record areas in need of more consistent treatment. The degree of cataloging inconsistency evident in these records is examined with respect to the application of rules and prescriptions embodied in AACR2 Chapter 9, the ALA Guidelines for cataloging microcomputer software, and the application of Library of Congress subject cataloging practice to these materials. A secondary purpose of this quantitative/qualitative study is to provide a general assessment of the overall composition of microcomputer software cataloging during this transition period between the use of available but disparate sources of descriptive cataloging guidance and their eventual consolidation in the future edition of AACR2.
  12. Terrill, L.J.: ¬The state of cataloging research : an analysis of peer-reviewed journal literature, 2010-2014 (2016) 0.03 
    0.029910447 = product of:
  0.059820894 = sum of:
    0.059820894 = product of:
      0.11964179 = sum of:
        0.11964179 = weight(_text_:assessment in 5137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11964179 = score(doc=5137,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050750602 = queryNorm
            0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 5137, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5137)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The importance of cataloging research was highlighted by a resolution declaring 2010 as "The Year of Cataloging Research." This study of the peer-reviewed journal literature from 2010 to 2014 examined the state of cataloging literature since this proclamation. The goals were to determine the percentage of cataloging literature that can be classified as research, what research methods were used, and whether the articles contributed to the library assessment conversation. Nearly a quarter of the cataloging literature qualifies as research; however, a majority of researchers fail to make explicit connections between their work and the missions of their libraries.
  13. Boruah, B.B.; Ravikumar, S.; Gayang, F.L.: Consistency, extent, and validation of the utilization of the MARC 21 bibliographic standard in the college libraries of Assam in India (2023) 0.03 
    0.029910447 = product of:
  0.059820894 = sum of:
    0.059820894 = product of:
      0.11964179 = sum of:
        0.11964179 = weight(_text_:assessment in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11964179 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050750602 = queryNorm
            0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper brings light to the existing practice of cataloging in the college libraries of Assam in terms of utilizing the MARC 21 standard and its structure, i.e., the tags, subfield codes, and indicators. Catalog records from six college libraries are collected and a survey is conducted to understand the local users' information requirements for the catalog. Places, where libraries have scope to improve and which divisions of tags could be more helpful for them in information retrieval, are identified and suggested. This study fulfilled the need for local-level assessment of the catalogs.
  14. Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993) 0.03 
    0.027504025 = product of:
  0.05500805 = sum of:
    0.05500805 = product of:
      0.1100161 = sum of:
        0.1100161 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1100161 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050750602 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
  15. Madison, O.M:A.: ¬The role of the name main-entry heading in the online environment (1992) 0.03 
    0.027504025 = product of:
  0.05500805 = sum of:
    0.05500805 = product of:
      0.1100161 = sum of:
        0.1100161 = weight(_text_:22 in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1100161 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050750602 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Serials librarian. 22(1992), S.371-391
  16. Lynch, C.A.: Building the infrastructure of resource sharing : union catalogs, distributed search, and cross database linkage (1997) 0.03 
    0.025637524 = product of:
  0.05127505 = sum of:
    0.05127505 = product of:
      0.1025501 = sum of:
        0.1025501 = weight(_text_:assessment in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1025501 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050750602 = queryNorm
            0.36599535 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Effective resourcesharing presupposes an infrastructure which permits users to locate materials of interest in both print and electronic formats. 2 approaches for providing this are union catalogues and Z39.50 based distributed search systems and computer to computer information retrieval protocols. The advantages and limitations of each approach are considered, paying particular attention to a relaistic assessment of Z39.50 implementations. Argues that the union catalogue is far from obsolete and the 2 approaches should be considered complementary rather than competitive. Technologies to create links between the bibliographic apparatus of catalogues and abstracting and indexing databases and primary content in electronic form, such as the new Serial Item and Contribution Identifier (SICI) standard are also discussed as key elements in the infrastructure to support resource sharing
  17. Hider, P.: Developing courseware for cataloguing (2000) 0.03 
    0.025637524 = product of:
  0.05127505 = sum of:
    0.05127505 = product of:
      0.1025501 = sum of:
        0.1025501 = weight(_text_:assessment in 2278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1025501 = score(doc=2278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050750602 = queryNorm
            0.36599535 = fieldWeight in 2278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2278)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article describes the development and application of the Cat with Moose courseware in the cataloging curricula at Temasek Polytechnic, Singapore, which offers diploma-level, paraprofessional training in library and information service (LIS). The aim of Cat with Mouse is to provide students with practice in cataloging a range of materials, both print and nonprint, in an online environment. The courseware checks the entries as students progress through the record template and allows them to simultaneously consult windows containing the relevant sources of information. The product is designed to be used as a revision tool and is accessible to students through the Internet. The development team revised a prototype version after feedback was collected by means of a questionnaire. Most students found the courseware useful and that it made revision easier. It is argued that, as an assessment tool, Cat with Mouse is also reliable and valid, and that the distinctive benefits the courseware offers has made the investment in the project worthwhile.
  18. Nero, L.M.: Cataloguing digital resources : the experience of the University of the West Indies, St Augustine Campus (2005) 0.03 
    0.025637524 = product of:
  0.05127505 = sum of:
    0.05127505 = product of:
      0.1025501 = sum of:
        0.1025501 = weight(_text_:assessment in 3118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1025501 = score(doc=3118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050750602 = queryNorm
            0.36599535 = fieldWeight in 3118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3118)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The objective is to describe the cataloguing component of a digitization project conducted by the University of the West Indies, St Augustine campus. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents a case study review of the planning and implementation phases of this project. Findings - The account demonstrates that planning and continuous assessments are necessary elements for successful project completion. Research limitations/implications - The paper highlights the need to adapt planning guidelines to fit a specific environment. Practical implications - The paper puts forward a model for managing the cataloguing aspect of a digitization project. It also provides MARC 21 fields that can be used in coding digital records. Originality/value - The paper emphasizes the value of team work, planning and assessment for managing cataloguing project.
  19. Bednar, M.; Brisson, R.; Hewes, J.: Pursuing the three Ts : how total quality management, technology, and teams transformed the cataloging department at Penn State (2000) 0.03 
    0.025637524 = product of:
  0.05127505 = sum of:
    0.05127505 = product of:
      0.1025501 = sum of:
        0.1025501 = weight(_text_:assessment in 5387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1025501 = score(doc=5387,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050750602 = queryNorm
            0.36599535 = fieldWeight in 5387, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5387)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Beginning in 1992 the University Libraries at the Pennsylvania State University embarked on a program to formally transform its organization following the principles of Continuous Quality Improvement, or, as it is more commonly known, Total Quality Management. The process by which the Cataloging Department underwent reorganization into teams is described, as well as its strategic use of computing technology in rationalizing and streamlining its workflows. In creating an organizational restructuring that permitted a more rapid and flexible response to new assignments and changing conditions, the Cataloging Department positioned itself to effectively assume new responsibilities as emerging formats and other library materials were acquired or made accessible to library patrons. The essay concludes with a frank assessment of the lessons learned in undergoing reorganization, as well as weighing the successes and failures experienced by the Cataloging Department.
  20. Bärhausen, A.; Euskirchen, A.: Nachbearbeitung der Katalog-Konversion oder : Es bleibt viel zu tun, packen wir's an! (1999) 0.02 
    0.024310352 = product of:
  0.048620705 = sum of:
    0.048620705 = product of:
      0.09724141 = sum of:
        0.09724141 = weight(_text_:22 in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09724141 = score(doc=4367,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050750602 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:36:10
    22. 1.2000 19:40:40

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 169
  • d 37
  • i 2
  • f 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 196
  • b 15
  • m 10
  • s 6
  • ? 1
  • el 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications