Search (229 results, page 1 of 12)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Khurshid, Z.: ¬The impact of information technology an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers (2003) 0.12
    0.11884008 = product of:
      0.23768017 = sum of:
        0.23768017 = sum of:
          0.18066338 = weight(_text_:news in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18066338 = score(doc=2323,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31512353 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                0.060118705 = queryNorm
              0.5733097 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
          0.057016782 = weight(_text_:22 in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057016782 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21052547 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.060118705 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information technology (IT) encompassing an integrated library system, computer hardware and software, CDROM, Internet, and other domains, including MARC 21 formats, CORC, and metadata standards (Dublin Core, TEI, XML, RDF) has produced far-reaching changes in the job functions of catalogers. Libraries are now coming up with a new set of recruiting requirements for these positions. This paper aims to review job advertisements published in American Libraries (AL) and College and Research Libraries News (C&RL NEWS) to assess the impact of the use of IT in libraries an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers.
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 22(2003) no. March, S.18-21
  2. Delozier, E.P.: Identifying and documenting objects and services on the Internet : the Uniform Resource Locator (1996) 0.09
    0.09227791 = sum of:
      0.037528638 = product of:
        0.11258591 = sum of:
          0.11258591 = weight(_text_:objects in 7271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11258591 = score(doc=7271,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3195352 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.060118705 = queryNorm
              0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 7271, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7271)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.05474927 = product of:
        0.10949854 = sum of:
          0.10949854 = weight(_text_:news in 7271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10949854 = score(doc=7271,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31512353 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                0.060118705 = queryNorm
              0.34747815 = fieldWeight in 7271, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7271)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the role of the URL as a menas od uniquely identifying an item of information on the WWW in the context of traditional methods. Includes: standard bibliographic description; LoC card number; ISBN, ISSN; MEDLINE Unique Identifier and OCLC Control Number. Presents the general URL model and the basic structure of URL codes. Discusses specific URL structures: file related URLs (file and ftp); WWW URLs (http); Gopher URLs (gopher); electronic mail URLs (mailto); Usenet newsgroups URLs (news); and remote login URLs (telnet and tn3270). Notes other proposals for identifying Internet resources and services that often become misinterpreted as URLs and lists some of the characters which may not be used within a URL. Although the URL is an official standard for referencing WWW resources, it is not yet recognized as a universal citation model for Internet resources
  3. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994) 0.09
    0.09042749 = sum of:
      0.061919093 = product of:
        0.18575728 = sum of:
          0.18575728 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18575728 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.3195352 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.060118705 = queryNorm
              0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.028508391 = product of:
        0.057016782 = sum of:
          0.057016782 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057016782 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21052547 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.060118705 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
  4. Russell, B.M.: Looking for someone special : special collections cataloging, 1980-2000 and beyond (2003) 0.08
    0.07918503 = product of:
      0.15837006 = sum of:
        0.15837006 = sum of:
          0.10949854 = weight(_text_:news in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10949854 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31512353 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                0.060118705 = queryNorm
              0.34747815 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
          0.04887153 = weight(_text_:22 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04887153 = score(doc=150,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21052547 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.060118705 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The provision of access to materials in special collections intersects the fields of cataloging and special collections librarianship, sharing characteristics and challenges with both. In order to reveal the changing expectations regarding special collections cataloging professionals, the author examined job notices for positions advertised in C&RL News from 1980 to 2000. Three related hypotheses were tested in this study: fixed-term appointments would become more common; published requirements for consideration would be more rigorous; and positions would offer less relative compensation than in the past. These hypotheses were demonstrated to be untrue. In a larger context, the results of this study can be extrapolated to suggest means of improving education and training for professionals in special collections cataloging, highlighting the skills and abilities future employing institutions will be seeking.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998) 0.07
    0.0722918 = sum of:
      0.043783408 = product of:
        0.13135022 = sum of:
          0.13135022 = weight(_text_:objects in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13135022 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.3195352 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.060118705 = queryNorm
              0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.028508391 = product of:
        0.057016782 = sum of:
          0.057016782 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057016782 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21052547 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.060118705 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
    Date
    24. 1.2007 19:38:22
  6. Henze, G.: First IFLA Meeting of Experts an an International Cataloguing Code (2003) 0.07
    0.06598753 = product of:
      0.13197505 = sum of:
        0.13197505 = sum of:
          0.09124878 = weight(_text_:news in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09124878 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31512353 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                0.060118705 = queryNorm
              0.28956512 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
          0.040726274 = weight(_text_:22 in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040726274 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21052547 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.060118705 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2003 19:22:45
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: http://www.ddb.de/news/ifla_conf_index.htm
  7. Madison, O.M.A.: ¬The IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : international standards for bibliographic control (2000) 0.06
    0.064591065 = sum of:
      0.044227924 = product of:
        0.13268377 = sum of:
          0.13268377 = weight(_text_:objects in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13268377 = score(doc=187,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.3195352 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.060118705 = queryNorm
              0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.020363137 = product of:
        0.040726274 = sum of:
          0.040726274 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040726274 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21052547 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.060118705 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The formal charge for the IFLA study involving international bibliography standards was to delineate the functions that are performed by the bibliographic record with respect to various media, applications, and user needs. The method used was the entity relationship analysis technique. Three groups of entities that are the key objects of interest to users of bibliographic records were defined. The primary group contains four entities: work, expression, manifestation, and item. The second group includes entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, production, or ownership of entities in the first group. The third group includes entities that represent concepts, objects, events, and places. In the study we identified the attributes associated with each entity and the relationships that are most important to users. The attributes and relationships were mapped to the functional requirements for bibliographic records that were defined in terms of four user tasks: to find, identify, select, and obtain. Basic requirements for national bibliographic records were recommended based on the entity analysis. The recommendations of the study are compared with two standards, AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) and the Dublin Core, to place them into pragmatic context. The results of the study are being used in the review of the complete set of ISBDs as the initial benchmark in determining data elements for each format.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Hirons, J.; Randall, K.M.: ¬The latest on latest (entry) and other hot news on seriality (1999) 0.06
    0.06387415 = product of:
      0.1277483 = sum of:
        0.1277483 = product of:
          0.2554966 = sum of:
            0.2554966 = weight(_text_:news in 3943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2554966 = score(doc=3943,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31512353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060118705 = queryNorm
                0.8107823 = fieldWeight in 3943, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3943)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Turner, J.; Goodrum, A.: Modeling videos as works (2002) 0.06
    0.05531664 = product of:
      0.11063328 = sum of:
        0.11063328 = product of:
          0.22126655 = sum of:
            0.22126655 = weight(_text_:news in 5624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22126655 = score(doc=5624,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.31512353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060118705 = queryNorm
                0.70215815 = fieldWeight in 5624, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5624)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Defining works is complex, but defining video works is extremely complex because of the large number of instantiations available and because of the intricate relationships among them. The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 and other important news events offer rich examples of the complexity of the problem and help us gain an understanding of how managing video news material can be modelled. The need for a taxonomy of some of the instantiations of material that need to be managed in the context of a news video library is identified.
  10. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.05
    0.04607652 = product of:
      0.09215304 = sum of:
        0.09215304 = product of:
          0.18430609 = sum of:
            0.18430609 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18430609 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21052547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060118705 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
  11. Eliot, J.: MARC and OPAC systems : discussion document (1994) 0.04
    0.03649951 = product of:
      0.07299902 = sum of:
        0.07299902 = product of:
          0.14599805 = sum of:
            0.14599805 = weight(_text_:news in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14599805 = score(doc=10,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31512353 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060118705 = queryNorm
                0.4633042 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.2416887 = idf(docFreq=635, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    UBIS news. 1994, Feb., S.9-11
  12. Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993) 0.03
    0.03258102 = product of:
      0.06516204 = sum of:
        0.06516204 = product of:
          0.13032408 = sum of:
            0.13032408 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13032408 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21052547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060118705 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
  13. Madison, O.M:A.: ¬The role of the name main-entry heading in the online environment (1992) 0.03
    0.03258102 = product of:
      0.06516204 = sum of:
        0.06516204 = product of:
          0.13032408 = sum of:
            0.13032408 = weight(_text_:22 in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13032408 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21052547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060118705 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Serials librarian. 22(1992), S.371-391
  14. Koster, L.: Persistent identifiers for heritage objects (2020) 0.03
    0.031273868 = product of:
      0.062547736 = sum of:
        0.062547736 = product of:
          0.1876432 = sum of:
            0.1876432 = weight(_text_:objects in 5718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1876432 = score(doc=5718,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.3195352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060118705 = queryNorm
                0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 5718, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5718)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Persistent identifiers (PID's) are essential for getting access and referring to library, archive and museum (LAM) collection objects in a sustainable and unambiguous way, both internally and externally. Heritage institutions need a universal policy for the use of PID's in order to have an efficient digital infrastructure at their disposal and to achieve optimal interoperability, leading to open data, open collections and efficient resource management. Here the discussion is limited to PID's that institutions can assign to objects they own or administer themselves. PID's for people, subjects etc. can be used by heritage institutions, but are generally managed by other parties. The first part of this article consists of a general theoretical description of persistent identifiers. First of all, I discuss the questions of what persistent identifiers are and what they are not, and what is needed to administer and use them. The most commonly used existing PID systems are briefly characterized. Then I discuss the types of objects PID's can be assigned to. This section concludes with an overview of the requirements that apply if PIDs should also be used for linked data. The second part examines current infrastructural practices, and existing PID systems and their advantages and shortcomings. Based on these practical issues and the pros and cons of existing PID systems a list of requirements for PID systems is presented which is used to address a number of practical considerations. This section concludes with a number of recommendations.
  15. Jeng, L.H.: ¬A converging vision of cataloging in the electronic world (1996) 0.03
    0.030959547 = product of:
      0.061919093 = sum of:
        0.061919093 = product of:
          0.18575728 = sum of:
            0.18575728 = weight(_text_:objects in 7686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18575728 = score(doc=7686,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.3195352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060118705 = queryNorm
                0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 7686, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7686)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Traditional cataloguing practices have been geared to printed materials or other materials that have fixed forms. The advent of electronic library materials poses new challenges for cataloguing as electronic objects may exist in multiple and changing versions. Discusses current attempts to organize electronic information objects in a world that is messy, volatile and uncontrolled and traces library cataloguing from manual to electronic organization. Electronic text may be available as a standalone ASCII, PostScript or another file. The file can reside on a floppy disk or on a minicomputer or mainframe computer as a file with a URL address and directory path. Briefly reviews some Internet indexing projects and prototypes, presents a vision of what cataloguing could evolve into the electronic world and discusses what needs to be done to realise this vision
  16. Smiraglia, R.P.: Theoretical considerations in the bibliographic control of music materials in libraries (1985) 0.03
    0.030959547 = product of:
      0.061919093 = sum of:
        0.061919093 = product of:
          0.18575728 = sum of:
            0.18575728 = weight(_text_:objects in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18575728 = score(doc=343,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.3195352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060118705 = queryNorm
                0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic control does not differ in substance from one type of material to another. Therefore it is not possible to separate the bibliographic control of music materials entirely from the larger domain of bibliographic control activity. The literature of music librarianship is examined for relevant theoretical explanations. Specific problems of description and access are used to show that, in general, the requirements for bibliographic control of music fit neatly into the theoretical structure for all bibliographic control. The primary purpose of descriptive cataloging of musical objects is to identify and differentiate among objects in a library collection. Where the concept of responsibility is relevant, access is provided through the names of composers or performers. Systematic access is provided through co-equal facets: medium, manifestation, and form.
  17. Bärhausen, A.; Euskirchen, A.: Nachbearbeitung der Katalog-Konversion oder : Es bleibt viel zu tun, packen wir's an! (1999) 0.03
    0.028797824 = product of:
      0.057595648 = sum of:
        0.057595648 = product of:
          0.115191296 = sum of:
            0.115191296 = weight(_text_:22 in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.115191296 = score(doc=4367,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21052547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060118705 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:36:10
    22. 1.2000 19:40:40
  18. Houissa, A.: Arabic personal names : their components and rendering in catalog entries (1991) 0.03
    0.028508391 = product of:
      0.057016782 = sum of:
        0.057016782 = product of:
          0.114033565 = sum of:
            0.114033565 = weight(_text_:22 in 2857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.114033565 = score(doc=2857,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21052547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060118705 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2857, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2857)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) no.2, S.3-22
  19. RAK-Mitteilung Nr.16 : Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung von Nichtbuchmaterialien (RAK-NBM). Entwurf (1995) 0.03
    0.028508391 = product of:
      0.057016782 = sum of:
        0.057016782 = product of:
          0.114033565 = sum of:
            0.114033565 = weight(_text_:22 in 2391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.114033565 = score(doc=2391,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21052547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060118705 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2391, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2391)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  20. Jones, E.: ¬The FRBR model as applied to continuing resources (2005) 0.03
    0.028508391 = product of:
      0.057016782 = sum of:
        0.057016782 = product of:
          0.114033565 = sum of:
            0.114033565 = weight(_text_:22 in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.114033565 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21052547 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060118705 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 187
  • d 37
  • i 2
  • f 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 211
  • b 15
  • m 12
  • s 5
  • el 4
  • ? 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…