-
Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994)
0.09
0.085079916 = sum of:
0.058257412 = product of:
0.17477223 = sum of:
0.17477223 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17477223 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.026822504 = product of:
0.053645007 = sum of:
0.053645007 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053645007 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
-
Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998)
0.07
0.06801671 = sum of:
0.041194208 = product of:
0.123582624 = sum of:
0.123582624 = weight(_text_:objects in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.123582624 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.026822504 = product of:
0.053645007 = sum of:
0.053645007 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053645007 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
- Date
- 24. 1.2007 19:38:22
-
Madison, O.M.A.: ¬The IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : international standards for bibliographic control (2000)
0.06
0.06077137 = sum of:
0.04161244 = product of:
0.12483731 = sum of:
0.12483731 = weight(_text_:objects in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12483731 = score(doc=187,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.019158931 = product of:
0.038317863 = sum of:
0.038317863 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038317863 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The formal charge for the IFLA study involving international bibliography standards was to delineate the functions that are performed by the bibliographic record with respect to various media, applications, and user needs. The method used was the entity relationship analysis technique. Three groups of entities that are the key objects of interest to users of bibliographic records were defined. The primary group contains four entities: work, expression, manifestation, and item. The second group includes entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, production, or ownership of entities in the first group. The third group includes entities that represent concepts, objects, events, and places. In the study we identified the attributes associated with each entity and the relationships that are most important to users. The attributes and relationships were mapped to the functional requirements for bibliographic records that were defined in terms of four user tasks: to find, identify, select, and obtain. Basic requirements for national bibliographic records were recommended based on the entity analysis. The recommendations of the study are compared with two standards, AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) and the Dublin Core, to place them into pragmatic context. The results of the study are being used in the review of the complete set of ISBDs as the initial benchmark in determining data elements for each format.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000)
0.04
0.043351714 = product of:
0.08670343 = sum of:
0.08670343 = product of:
0.17340685 = sum of:
0.17340685 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17340685 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2000 19:22:27
-
Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993)
0.03
0.030654289 = product of:
0.061308578 = sum of:
0.061308578 = product of:
0.122617155 = sum of:
0.122617155 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.122617155 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
-
Madison, O.M:A.: ¬The role of the name main-entry heading in the online environment (1992)
0.03
0.030654289 = product of:
0.061308578 = sum of:
0.061308578 = product of:
0.122617155 = sum of:
0.122617155 = weight(_text_:22 in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.122617155 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Serials librarian. 22(1992), S.371-391
-
Koster, L.: Persistent identifiers for heritage objects (2020)
0.03
0.029424436 = product of:
0.058848873 = sum of:
0.058848873 = product of:
0.17654662 = sum of:
0.17654662 = weight(_text_:objects in 5718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17654662 = score(doc=5718,freq=8.0), product of:
0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 5718, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5718)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Persistent identifiers (PID's) are essential for getting access and referring to library, archive and museum (LAM) collection objects in a sustainable and unambiguous way, both internally and externally. Heritage institutions need a universal policy for the use of PID's in order to have an efficient digital infrastructure at their disposal and to achieve optimal interoperability, leading to open data, open collections and efficient resource management. Here the discussion is limited to PID's that institutions can assign to objects they own or administer themselves. PID's for people, subjects etc. can be used by heritage institutions, but are generally managed by other parties. The first part of this article consists of a general theoretical description of persistent identifiers. First of all, I discuss the questions of what persistent identifiers are and what they are not, and what is needed to administer and use them. The most commonly used existing PID systems are briefly characterized. Then I discuss the types of objects PID's can be assigned to. This section concludes with an overview of the requirements that apply if PIDs should also be used for linked data. The second part examines current infrastructural practices, and existing PID systems and their advantages and shortcomings. Based on these practical issues and the pros and cons of existing PID systems a list of requirements for PID systems is presented which is used to address a number of practical considerations. This section concludes with a number of recommendations.
-
Jeng, L.H.: ¬A converging vision of cataloging in the electronic world (1996)
0.03
0.029128706 = product of:
0.058257412 = sum of:
0.058257412 = product of:
0.17477223 = sum of:
0.17477223 = weight(_text_:objects in 7686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17477223 = score(doc=7686,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 7686, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7686)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Traditional cataloguing practices have been geared to printed materials or other materials that have fixed forms. The advent of electronic library materials poses new challenges for cataloguing as electronic objects may exist in multiple and changing versions. Discusses current attempts to organize electronic information objects in a world that is messy, volatile and uncontrolled and traces library cataloguing from manual to electronic organization. Electronic text may be available as a standalone ASCII, PostScript or another file. The file can reside on a floppy disk or on a minicomputer or mainframe computer as a file with a URL address and directory path. Briefly reviews some Internet indexing projects and prototypes, presents a vision of what cataloguing could evolve into the electronic world and discusses what needs to be done to realise this vision
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Theoretical considerations in the bibliographic control of music materials in libraries (1985)
0.03
0.029128706 = product of:
0.058257412 = sum of:
0.058257412 = product of:
0.17477223 = sum of:
0.17477223 = weight(_text_:objects in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17477223 = score(doc=343,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic control does not differ in substance from one type of material to another. Therefore it is not possible to separate the bibliographic control of music materials entirely from the larger domain of bibliographic control activity. The literature of music librarianship is examined for relevant theoretical explanations. Specific problems of description and access are used to show that, in general, the requirements for bibliographic control of music fit neatly into the theoretical structure for all bibliographic control. The primary purpose of descriptive cataloging of musical objects is to identify and differentiate among objects in a library collection. Where the concept of responsibility is relevant, access is provided through the names of composers or performers. Systematic access is provided through co-equal facets: medium, manifestation, and form.
-
Bärhausen, A.; Euskirchen, A.: Nachbearbeitung der Katalog-Konversion oder : Es bleibt viel zu tun, packen wir's an! (1999)
0.03
0.027094819 = product of:
0.054189637 = sum of:
0.054189637 = product of:
0.108379275 = sum of:
0.108379275 = weight(_text_:22 in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.108379275 = score(doc=4367,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2000 19:36:10
22. 1.2000 19:40:40
-
Houissa, A.: Arabic personal names : their components and rendering in catalog entries (1991)
0.03
0.026822504 = product of:
0.053645007 = sum of:
0.053645007 = product of:
0.107290015 = sum of:
0.107290015 = weight(_text_:22 in 2857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107290015 = score(doc=2857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2857)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) no.2, S.3-22
-
RAK-Mitteilung Nr.16 : Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung von Nichtbuchmaterialien (RAK-NBM). Entwurf (1995)
0.03
0.026822504 = product of:
0.053645007 = sum of:
0.053645007 = product of:
0.107290015 = sum of:
0.107290015 = weight(_text_:22 in 2391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107290015 = score(doc=2391,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2391, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2391)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- 22 S
-
Jones, E.: ¬The FRBR model as applied to continuing resources (2005)
0.03
0.026822504 = product of:
0.053645007 = sum of:
0.053645007 = product of:
0.107290015 = sum of:
0.107290015 = weight(_text_:22 in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107290015 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Münnich, M.: RAK2: Sachstandsbericht : vom Bibliothekartag '95 zum Bibliothekartag '96 (1996)
0.03
0.026822504 = product of:
0.053645007 = sum of:
0.053645007 = product of:
0.107290015 = sum of:
0.107290015 = weight(_text_:22 in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107290015 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 9.1996 16:03:22
-
Hirons, J.; Hawkins, L.; French, P.: AACR2 and you : revisiting AACR2 to accomodate seriality (2000)
0.03
0.026822504 = product of:
0.053645007 = sum of:
0.053645007 = product of:
0.107290015 = sum of:
0.107290015 = weight(_text_:22 in 6339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107290015 = score(doc=6339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 8.2002 17:22:13
-
Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001)
0.03
0.026822504 = product of:
0.053645007 = sum of:
0.053645007 = product of:
0.107290015 = sum of:
0.107290015 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107290015 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
-
Baumann, S.; Tillett, B.: Interview: Barbara Tillett (2003)
0.03
0.026822504 = product of:
0.053645007 = sum of:
0.053645007 = product of:
0.107290015 = sum of:
0.107290015 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107290015 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 8.2003 15:50:22
-
Henze, G.: Bericht über das öffentliche Stellungnahmeverfahren zum RAK-Musik-Entwurf 2003 (2004)
0.03
0.026822504 = product of:
0.053645007 = sum of:
0.053645007 = product of:
0.107290015 = sum of:
0.107290015 = weight(_text_:22 in 2196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107290015 = score(doc=2196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19807571 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 6.2004 10:37:22
-
O'Neill, E.T.: ¬The FRBRization of Humphry Clinker : a case study in the application of IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (2002)
0.02
0.024967462 = product of:
0.049934924 = sum of:
0.049934924 = product of:
0.14980477 = sum of:
0.14980477 = weight(_text_:objects in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14980477 = score(doc=2433,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The goal of OCLC's FRBR projects is to examine issues associated with the conversion of a set of bibliographic records to conform to FRBR requirements (a process referred to as "FRBRization"). The goals of this FRBR project were to: - examine issues associated with creating an entity-relationship model for (i.e., "FRBRizing") a non-trivial work - better understand the relationship between the bibliographic records and the bibliographic objects they represent - determine if the information available in the bibliographic record is sufficient to reliably identify the FRBR entities - to develop a data set that could be used to evaluate FRBRization algorithms. Using an exemplary work as a case study, lead scientist Ed O'Neill sought to: - better understand the relationship between bibliographic records and the bibliographic objects they represent - determine if the information available in the bibliographic records is sufficient to reliably identify FRBR entities.
-
Younger, J.A.: Resources description in the digital age (1997)
0.02
0.023539549 = product of:
0.047079097 = sum of:
0.047079097 = product of:
0.14123729 = sum of:
0.14123729 = weight(_text_:objects in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14123729 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30063897 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056563493 = queryNorm
0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the evolving ways of making documents and document like objects bibliographically accessible by the library cataloguing community and reports initiatives. Includes: definition of a basic set of data elements known as the Dublin Core; examination of library cataloguing objectives and record structures; proposals for persistent addresses for resources; and support for the idea of data registry to facilitate interoperability among metadata schemes
