-
Weitz, J.: Cataloger's judgment : music cataloging questions and answers from the music OCLC users group newsletter (2003)
0.15
0.14991523 = product of:
0.29983047 = sum of:
0.29983047 = sum of:
0.21922971 = weight(_text_:light in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21922971 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34357315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.63808745 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
0.080600746 = weight(_text_:22 in 4591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080600746 = score(doc=4591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20832387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4591)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this light hearted and practical compilation, Weitz collects and updates music cataloguing questions and answers featured in OCLC's "MOUG Newsletter."
- Date
- 25.11.2005 18:22:29
-
Walker, K.; Kwasnik, B.: Providing access to collected works (2002)
0.10
0.102905095 = sum of:
0.037136175 = product of:
0.111408524 = sum of:
0.111408524 = weight(_text_:objects in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.111408524 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3161936 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.06576892 = product of:
0.13153784 = sum of:
0.13153784 = weight(_text_:light in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13153784 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34357315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.3828525 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- How are the boundaries of information objects to be defined in the networked electronic environment and what is the role of our retrieval systems in providing access where these boundaries are uncertain? The authors consider these questions in light of longstanding problems surrounding the definition of the "work" in the print environment. In particular, they examine the role of the index in providing access to the collected works of the individual writer. They review the discussion in the indexing literature of the "long index," and the close relationship between the functions of indexer and editor in collected works projects. And they treat the role of the index in constituting as a self-contained corpus the disparate types of text that make up a writer's lifetime output. Finally, by way of example, the authors turn to the extensive indexes to Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic writings.
-
Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994)
0.09
0.08948183 = sum of:
0.06127157 = product of:
0.1838147 = sum of:
0.1838147 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1838147 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3161936 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.02821026 = product of:
0.05642052 = sum of:
0.05642052 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05642052 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20832387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
-
Madison, O.M.A.: Standards in light of new technologies : functional requirements for bibliographic records (1999)
0.08
0.07673041 = product of:
0.15346082 = sum of:
0.15346082 = product of:
0.30692163 = sum of:
0.30692163 = weight(_text_:light in 4182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30692163 = score(doc=4182,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34357315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.89332247 = fieldWeight in 4182, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4182)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998)
0.07
0.071535796 = sum of:
0.04332554 = product of:
0.12997662 = sum of:
0.12997662 = weight(_text_:objects in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12997662 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3161936 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.02821026 = product of:
0.05642052 = sum of:
0.05642052 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05642052 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20832387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
- Date
- 24. 1.2007 19:38:22
-
Madison, O.M.A.: ¬The IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : international standards for bibliographic control (2000)
0.06
0.063915595 = sum of:
0.043765407 = product of:
0.13129622 = sum of:
0.13129622 = weight(_text_:objects in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13129622 = score(doc=187,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3161936 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.020150186 = product of:
0.040300373 = sum of:
0.040300373 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040300373 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20832387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The formal charge for the IFLA study involving international bibliography standards was to delineate the functions that are performed by the bibliographic record with respect to various media, applications, and user needs. The method used was the entity relationship analysis technique. Three groups of entities that are the key objects of interest to users of bibliographic records were defined. The primary group contains four entities: work, expression, manifestation, and item. The second group includes entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, production, or ownership of entities in the first group. The third group includes entities that represent concepts, objects, events, and places. In the study we identified the attributes associated with each entity and the relationships that are most important to users. The attributes and relationships were mapped to the functional requirements for bibliographic records that were defined in terms of four user tasks: to find, identify, select, and obtain. Basic requirements for national bibliographic records were recommended based on the entity analysis. The recommendations of the study are compared with two standards, AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) and the Dublin Core, to place them into pragmatic context. The results of the study are being used in the review of the complete set of ISBDs as the initial benchmark in determining data elements for each format.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000)
0.05
0.045594666 = product of:
0.09118933 = sum of:
0.09118933 = product of:
0.18237866 = sum of:
0.18237866 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18237866 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20832387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2000 19:22:27
-
Gorman, M.: Searching for the green light : the Anglo-American cataloguing rules in an electronic environment (1991)
0.04
0.043845944 = product of:
0.08769189 = sum of:
0.08769189 = product of:
0.17538378 = sum of:
0.17538378 = weight(_text_:light in 5987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17538378 = score(doc=5987,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34357315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.51047 = fieldWeight in 5987, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5987)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bagley, S.: Towards a policy for cataloguing CD-ROMs and other electronic media : Part 2 (1997)
0.04
0.043845944 = product of:
0.08769189 = sum of:
0.08769189 = product of:
0.17538378 = sum of:
0.17538378 = weight(_text_:light in 6398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17538378 = score(doc=6398,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34357315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.51047 = fieldWeight in 6398, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6398)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the challenges encountered in the cataloguing of electronic media in the light of proposed changes to legal deposit. These included: how to install and de-install the software and application of the 20 per cent rule of LCSH. The British Library is now prepared for the possibility of extended legal deposit for electronic media
-
Jacobowitz, N.A.: ¬A comparison of AACR2R and French cataloging rules (1995)
0.04
0.043845944 = product of:
0.08769189 = sum of:
0.08769189 = product of:
0.17538378 = sum of:
0.17538378 = weight(_text_:light in 2362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17538378 = score(doc=2362,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34357315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.51047 = fieldWeight in 2362, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2362)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In light of the increasing availability and use of foreign MARC records, this article explores French cataloging rules in relation to AACR2R. After providing background on the French rules and discussing their format, the article compares them with AACR2R in detail. All areas compared reveal noteworthy differences. The most significant ones are found in the rules for choice of access points, for uniform titles, and for reduced bibliographic description
-
Tillett, B.: Report on the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, held October 23-25, 1997 in Toronto, Canada (1998)
0.04
0.043845944 = product of:
0.08769189 = sum of:
0.08769189 = product of:
0.17538378 = sum of:
0.17538378 = weight(_text_:light in 3717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17538378 = score(doc=3717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34357315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.51047 = fieldWeight in 3717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3717)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Report of the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, 23-25 Oct 1997, Toronto. This conference examined cataloguing principles and rules in light of both description and access within the framework of library catalogues. In particular it focused on bibliographic and authority records and the usability of the library catalogue
-
Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: ¬The international diffusion of RDA : a wide overview on the new guidelines (2016)
0.04
0.043845944 = product of:
0.08769189 = sum of:
0.08769189 = product of:
0.17538378 = sum of:
0.17538378 = weight(_text_:light in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17538378 = score(doc=2944,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34357315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.51047 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This issue of Jlis.it is focused on RDA, Resource Description and Access. In light of increasing international acceptance of this new cataloging content standard, the editors of Jlis.it wish to capture the background of how RDA came to be and the implications of its implementation at this time. This special issue offers a wide overview on the new guidelines from their making to their spreading around the world.
-
Farmer, L.S.J.: Cataloging children's materials : issues and solutions (2021)
0.04
0.038365204 = product of:
0.07673041 = sum of:
0.07673041 = product of:
0.15346082 = sum of:
0.15346082 = weight(_text_:light in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15346082 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34357315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.44666123 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Library catalogs remain challenging for children to use, especially because children have difficulty with multi-step processes, have less semantic and technical knowledge, and often search differently from adults. Child-friendly catalogs should have clear, simple protocols and visual guides that are standardized yet include flexible options for differentiated manipulation. Materials should be described accurately and in ways that connect meaningfully to children. More fundamentally, cataloging children's materials needs to be done in light of children as potential users and limitations of the integrated library management system itself. Getting children's feedback in the process can optimize the results.
-
Boruah, B.B.; Ravikumar, S.; Gayang, F.L.: Consistency, extent, and validation of the utilization of the MARC 21 bibliographic standard in the college libraries of Assam in India (2023)
0.04
0.038365204 = product of:
0.07673041 = sum of:
0.07673041 = product of:
0.15346082 = sum of:
0.15346082 = weight(_text_:light in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15346082 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34357315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.44666123 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper brings light to the existing practice of cataloging in the college libraries of Assam in terms of utilizing the MARC 21 standard and its structure, i.e., the tags, subfield codes, and indicators. Catalog records from six college libraries are collected and a survey is conducted to understand the local users' information requirements for the catalog. Places, where libraries have scope to improve and which divisions of tags could be more helpful for them in information retrieval, are identified and suggested. This study fulfilled the need for local-level assessment of the catalogs.
-
Hider, P.: Familial authorship in the Anglo-American cataloging tradition (2007)
0.03
0.03288446 = product of:
0.06576892 = sum of:
0.06576892 = product of:
0.13153784 = sum of:
0.13153784 = weight(_text_:light in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13153784 = score(doc=785,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34357315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.3828525 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In the light of a proposal for names of families to be treated as a separate form of name heading in the forthcoming Resource Description and Access, this article examines the treatment of families in the Anglo-American descriptive cataloging tradition and the extent to which names of families have been assigned as non-subject access points. It contrasts manuscript catalogers' practice of assigning family name headings with the general binary division of personal and corporate names, and discusses how an expansion of the library definition of authorship, so as to accommodate the archival concept of provenance, may more readily allow for familial and other non-corporate group authors. It concludes by suggesting that a corporate and non-corporate group categorisation may be unnecessary, and that instead the corporate body class should be revised, so as to encompass all groups of persons.
-
Hunter, E.J.; Bakewell, K.G.B.: Cataloguing (1983)
0.03
0.03288446 = product of:
0.06576892 = sum of:
0.06576892 = product of:
0.13153784 = sum of:
0.13153784 = weight(_text_:light in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13153784 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34357315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.3828525 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Originally published in 1979 as a title in the Outlines of Modern Librarianship' series this new edition has been expanded and updated in the light of recent developments in this rapidly developing field of librarianship, with particular reference to automation. As a consequence, this edition is substantially more than an outline of the subject. The authors take the reader through a comprehensive exposition of cataloguing - the definitions, arrangement and role of the catalogue: the history of its development; standardization and AACR2; the subject approach via pre-and post-coordinate indexing; analysis; filing rules and methods; the physical forms of the catalogue; the use of the computer in cataloguing; the role of networks; the management of cataloguing; and the relevance of book indexing. There is a detailed index, as well as a list of abbreviations and acronyms and a glossary of terms.
-
Genetasio, G.: ¬The International Cataloguing Principles and their future", in: JLIS.it 3/1 (2012) (2012)
0.03
0.03288446 = product of:
0.06576892 = sum of:
0.06576892 = product of:
0.13153784 = sum of:
0.13153784 = weight(_text_:light in 2625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13153784 = score(doc=2625,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34357315 = queryWeight, product of:
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.3828525 = fieldWeight in 2625, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.7753086 = idf(docFreq=372, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2625)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The article aims to provide an update on the 2009 Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) and on the status of work on the Statement by the IFLA Cataloguing Section. The article begins with a summary of the drafting process of the ICP by the IME ICC, International Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code, focusing in particular on the first meeting (IME ICC1) and on the earlier drafts of the 2009 Statement. It then analyzes both the major innovations and the unsatisfactory aspects of the ICP. Finally, it explains and comments on the recent documents by the IFLA Cataloguing Section relating to the ICP, which express their intention to revise the Statement and to verify the convenience of drawing up an international cataloguing code. The latter intention is considered in detail and criticized by the author in the light of the recent publication of the RDA, Resource Description and Access. The article is complemented by an updated bibliography on the ICP.
-
Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993)
0.03
0.032240298 = product of:
0.064480595 = sum of:
0.064480595 = product of:
0.12896119 = sum of:
0.12896119 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12896119 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20832387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
-
Madison, O.M:A.: ¬The role of the name main-entry heading in the online environment (1992)
0.03
0.032240298 = product of:
0.064480595 = sum of:
0.064480595 = product of:
0.12896119 = sum of:
0.12896119 = weight(_text_:22 in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12896119 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20832387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Serials librarian. 22(1992), S.371-391
-
Koster, L.: Persistent identifiers for heritage objects (2020)
0.03
0.030946817 = product of:
0.061893634 = sum of:
0.061893634 = product of:
0.1856809 = sum of:
0.1856809 = weight(_text_:objects in 5718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1856809 = score(doc=5718,freq=8.0), product of:
0.3161936 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059490006 = queryNorm
0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 5718, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5718)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Persistent identifiers (PID's) are essential for getting access and referring to library, archive and museum (LAM) collection objects in a sustainable and unambiguous way, both internally and externally. Heritage institutions need a universal policy for the use of PID's in order to have an efficient digital infrastructure at their disposal and to achieve optimal interoperability, leading to open data, open collections and efficient resource management. Here the discussion is limited to PID's that institutions can assign to objects they own or administer themselves. PID's for people, subjects etc. can be used by heritage institutions, but are generally managed by other parties. The first part of this article consists of a general theoretical description of persistent identifiers. First of all, I discuss the questions of what persistent identifiers are and what they are not, and what is needed to administer and use them. The most commonly used existing PID systems are briefly characterized. Then I discuss the types of objects PID's can be assigned to. This section concludes with an overview of the requirements that apply if PIDs should also be used for linked data. The second part examines current infrastructural practices, and existing PID systems and their advantages and shortcomings. Based on these practical issues and the pros and cons of existing PID systems a list of requirements for PID systems is presented which is used to address a number of practical considerations. This section concludes with a number of recommendations.
