-
Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994)
0.11
0.11435001 = product of:
0.28587502 = sum of:
0.21873574 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21873574 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.06713927 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06713927 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
-
Münnich, M.: RAK2: Sachstandsbericht : vom Bibliothekartag '95 zum Bibliothekartag '96 (1996)
0.10
0.09574725 = product of:
0.23936811 = sum of:
0.10508958 = weight(_text_:21 in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10508958 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.47918653 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
0.13427854 = weight(_text_:22 in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13427854 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 21. 9.1996 16:03:22
-
Baumann, S.; Tillett, B.: Interview: Barbara Tillett (2003)
0.10
0.09574725 = product of:
0.23936811 = sum of:
0.10508958 = weight(_text_:21 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10508958 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.47918653 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.13427854 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13427854 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 17.12.1996 21:11:09
17. 8.2003 15:50:22
-
Maxwell, R.L.: Handbook for RDA : Maxwell's handbook for RDA ; explaining and illustrating RDA: resource description and access using MARC 21 (2013)
0.09
0.09331312 = product of:
0.23328279 = sum of:
0.13257387 = weight(_text_:objects in 2085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13257387 = score(doc=2085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 2085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2085)
0.10070892 = weight(_text_:21 in 2085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10070892 = score(doc=2085,freq=10.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.45921162 = fieldWeight in 2085, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2085)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- IntroductionDescribing manifestations and items -- Describing persons -- Describing families -- Describing corporate bodies -- Describing geographic entities -- Describing works -- Describing expressions -- Recording relationships -- Appendix A. Printed books and sheets -- Appendix B. Cartographic resources -- Appendix C. Unpublished manuscripts and manuscript collections -- Appendix D. Notated music -- Appendix E. Audio recordings -- Appendix F. Moving image resources -- Appendix G. Two-dimensional graphic resources -- Appendix H. Three-dimensional resources and objects -- Appendix I. Digital resources -- Appendix J. Microform resources -- Appendix K. Bibliographic records serials and integrating resources -- Appendix L. Analytical description.
- LCSH
- MARC 21
- RSWK
- Resource description and access / MARC 21 / Einführung
- Subject
- Resource description and access / MARC 21 / Einführung
MARC 21
-
O'Neill, E.T.: ¬The FRBRization of Humphry Clinker : a case study in the application of IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (2002)
0.09
0.09301048 = product of:
0.23252618 = sum of:
0.18748778 = weight(_text_:objects in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18748778 = score(doc=2433,freq=4.0), product of:
0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
0.045038395 = weight(_text_:21 in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045038395 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The goal of OCLC's FRBR projects is to examine issues associated with the conversion of a set of bibliographic records to conform to FRBR requirements (a process referred to as "FRBRization"). The goals of this FRBR project were to: - examine issues associated with creating an entity-relationship model for (i.e., "FRBRizing") a non-trivial work - better understand the relationship between the bibliographic records and the bibliographic objects they represent - determine if the information available in the bibliographic record is sufficient to reliably identify the FRBR entities - to develop a data set that could be used to evaluate FRBRization algorithms. Using an exemplary work as a case study, lead scientist Ed O'Neill sought to: - better understand the relationship between bibliographic records and the bibliographic objects they represent - determine if the information available in the bibliographic records is sufficient to reliably identify FRBR entities.
- Date
- 11.12.2015 19:25:21
-
Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998)
0.09
0.08872351 = product of:
0.22180878 = sum of:
0.15466951 = weight(_text_:objects in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15466951 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.06713927 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06713927 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
- Date
- 24. 1.2007 19:38:22
-
Yee, M.M.: New perspectives on the shared cataloging environment and a MARC 21 shopping list (2004)
0.08
0.084403664 = product of:
0.21100916 = sum of:
0.13427857 = weight(_text_:21 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13427857 = score(doc=132,freq=10.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.61228216 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.076730594 = weight(_text_:22 in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076730594 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper surveys the cataloging literature to collect problems that have been identified with the MARC 21 format. The problems are sorted into (1) problems that are not the fault of MARC 21; (2) problems that perhaps are not problems at all; (3) problems that are connected with the current shared cataloging environment; and 4) other problems with MARC 21 and vendor implementation of it. The author makes recommendations to deal with the true MARC 21 problems that remain after this analysis.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Buckland, M.K.; Butler, M.H.; Norgard, B.A.; Plaunt, C.: Union records and dossiers : extended bibliographic information objects (1994)
0.08
0.08288572 = product of:
0.2072143 = sum of:
0.15466951 = weight(_text_:objects in 3028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15466951 = score(doc=3028,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 3028, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3028)
0.05254479 = weight(_text_:21 in 3028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05254479 = score(doc=3028,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.23959327 = fieldWeight in 3028, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3028)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Navigating the networks: Proceedings of the 1994 Mid-year Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994. Ed.: D.L. Andersen et al
-
Serra, L.G.; Schneider, J.A.; Santarém Segundo, J.E.: Person identifiers in MARC 21 records in a semantic environment (2020)
0.08
0.08288572 = product of:
0.2072143 = sum of:
0.15466951 = weight(_text_:objects in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15466951 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.05254479 = weight(_text_:21 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05254479 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.23959327 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This article discusses how libraries can include person identifiers in the MARC format. It suggests using URIs in fields and subfields to help transition the data to an RDF model, and to help prepare the catalog for a Linked Data. It analyzes the selection of URIs and Real-World Objects, and the use of tag 024 to describe person identifiers in authority records. When a creator or collaborator is identified in a work, the identifiers are transferred from authority to the bibliographic record. The article concludes that URI-based descriptions can provide a better experience for users, offering other methods of discovery.
-
Parent, I.: International and national cataloguing rules : current situation and future trends, Moscow, 20-24 April 1999 (2000)
0.08
0.08206907 = product of:
0.20517267 = sum of:
0.09007679 = weight(_text_:21 in 6465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09007679 = score(doc=6465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.41073132 = fieldWeight in 6465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6465)
0.11509588 = weight(_text_:22 in 6465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11509588 = score(doc=6465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6465)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 1. 7.1996 21:26:02
11. 8.2001 17:22:42
-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.08
0.08206907 = product of:
0.20517267 = sum of:
0.09007679 = weight(_text_:21 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09007679 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.41073132 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.11509588 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11509588 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 21. 1.2016 14:08:39
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
-
Madison, O.M.A.: ¬The IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : international standards for bibliographic control (2000)
0.08
0.08167857 = product of:
0.20419642 = sum of:
0.15623981 = weight(_text_:objects in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15623981 = score(doc=187,freq=4.0), product of:
0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
0.04795662 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04795662 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The formal charge for the IFLA study involving international bibliography standards was to delineate the functions that are performed by the bibliographic record with respect to various media, applications, and user needs. The method used was the entity relationship analysis technique. Three groups of entities that are the key objects of interest to users of bibliographic records were defined. The primary group contains four entities: work, expression, manifestation, and item. The second group includes entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, production, or ownership of entities in the first group. The third group includes entities that represent concepts, objects, events, and places. In the study we identified the attributes associated with each entity and the relationships that are most important to users. The attributes and relationships were mapped to the functional requirements for bibliographic records that were defined in terms of four user tasks: to find, identify, select, and obtain. Basic requirements for national bibliographic records were recommended based on the entity analysis. The recommendations of the study are compared with two standards, AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) and the Dublin Core, to place them into pragmatic context. The results of the study are being used in the review of the complete set of ISBDs as the initial benchmark in determining data elements for each format.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Cremer, M.: WebCAT: Erfahrungen bei der Katalogisierung von Internet-Dokumenten an der SUB Göttingen im Rahmen des WebDOC-Projektes (1996)
0.07
0.0683909 = product of:
0.17097723 = sum of:
0.07506399 = weight(_text_:21 in 5218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07506399 = score(doc=5218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.3422761 = fieldWeight in 5218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5218)
0.09591324 = weight(_text_:22 in 5218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09591324 = score(doc=5218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5218)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 21. 9.1996 16:03:22
-
Gorman, M.: Metadata or cataloguing? : a false choice (1999)
0.06
0.06466233 = product of:
0.16165581 = sum of:
0.08492521 = weight(_text_:21 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08492521 = score(doc=6095,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.3872412 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.076730594 = weight(_text_:22 in 6095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076730594 = score(doc=6095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6095)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 21. 3.1998 13:17:50
2. 8.2001 19:32:21
- Source
- Journal of Internet cataloging. 2(1999) no.1, S.5-22
-
Leazer, G.H.: ¬A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works (1994)
0.06
0.05920409 = product of:
0.14801022 = sum of:
0.11047824 = weight(_text_:objects in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11047824 = score(doc=3033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37626395 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
0.037531994 = weight(_text_:21 in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037531994 = score(doc=3033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- In this paper I describe a conceptual design of a bibliographic retrieval system that enables more thourough control of bibliographic entities. A bibliographic entity has 2 components: the intellectual work and the physical item. Users searching bibliographic retrieval systems generally do not search for a specific item, but are willing to retrieve one of several alternative manifestations of a work. However, contemporary bibliographic retrieval systems are based solely on the descriptions of items. Works are described only implcitly by collocating descriptions of items. This method has resulted in a tool that does not include important descriptive attributes of the work, e.g. information regarding its history, its genre, or its bibliographic relationships. A bibliographic relationship is an association between 2 bibliographic entities. A system evaluation methodology wasused to create a conceptual schema for a bibliographic retrieval system. The model is based upon an analysis of data elements in the USMARC Formats for Bibliographic Data. The conceptual schema describes a database comprising 2 separate files of bibliographic descriptions, one of works and the other of items. Each file consists of individual descriptive surrogates of their respective entities. the specific data content of each file is defined by a data dictionary. Data elements used in the description of bibliographic works reflect the nature of works as intellectual and linguistic objects. The descriptive elements of bibliographic items describe the physical properties of bibliographic entities. Bibliographic relationships constitute the logical strucutre of the database
- Source
- Navigating the networks: Proceedings of the 1994 Mid-year Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Portland, Oregon, May 21-25, 1994. Ed.: D.L. Andersen et al
-
Khurshid, Z.: ¬The impact of information technology an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers (2003)
0.06
0.05657953 = product of:
0.14144883 = sum of:
0.074309565 = weight(_text_:21 in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074309565 = score(doc=2323,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.33883607 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
0.06713927 = weight(_text_:22 in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06713927 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Information technology (IT) encompassing an integrated library system, computer hardware and software, CDROM, Internet, and other domains, including MARC 21 formats, CORC, and metadata standards (Dublin Core, TEI, XML, RDF) has produced far-reaching changes in the job functions of catalogers. Libraries are now coming up with a new set of recruiting requirements for these positions. This paper aims to review job advertisements published in American Libraries (AL) and College and Research Libraries News (C&RL NEWS) to assess the impact of the use of IT in libraries an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers.
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 22(2003) no. March, S.18-21
-
Khurshid, Z.: Cataloguing of audiovisual materials (1995)
0.05
0.054712713 = product of:
0.13678178 = sum of:
0.06005119 = weight(_text_:21 in 8305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06005119 = score(doc=8305,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 8305, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8305)
0.076730594 = weight(_text_:22 in 8305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076730594 = score(doc=8305,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 8305, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8305)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 13:09:02
- Source
- Audiovisual librarian. 21(1995) no.3, S.183-188
-
Rider, M.M.: Developing new roles for paraprofessionals in cataloging (1996)
0.05
0.054712713 = product of:
0.13678178 = sum of:
0.06005119 = weight(_text_:21 in 4831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06005119 = score(doc=4831,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 4831, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4831)
0.076730594 = weight(_text_:22 in 4831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076730594 = score(doc=4831,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4831, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4831)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 8. 8.1996 21:49:37
- Source
- Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.1, S.26-32
-
Martin, G.: Main entry : the argument for a defence of main entry in the OPAC (1996)
0.05
0.054712713 = product of:
0.13678178 = sum of:
0.06005119 = weight(_text_:21 in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06005119 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
0.076730594 = weight(_text_:22 in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076730594 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.21-25
-
Chang, H.-Y.: Cataloguing electronic resources (1997)
0.05
0.054712713 = product of:
0.13678178 = sum of:
0.06005119 = weight(_text_:21 in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06005119 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2193083 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.27382088 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
0.076730594 = weight(_text_:22 in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076730594 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24790114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.07079189 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 12:21:39
- Source
- DLA bulletin. 17(1997) no.1, S.22-24
