-
Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994)
0.08
0.07652673 = sum of:
0.058554024 = product of:
0.17566207 = sum of:
0.17566207 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17566207 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.017972711 = product of:
0.05391813 = sum of:
0.05391813 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05391813 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Theoretical considerations in the bibliographic control of music materials in libraries (1985)
0.07
0.069766074 = sum of:
0.058554024 = product of:
0.17566207 = sum of:
0.17566207 = weight(_text_:objects in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17566207 = score(doc=343,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.011212054 = product of:
0.03363616 = sum of:
0.03363616 = weight(_text_:12 in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03363616 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.21391137 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Bibliographic control does not differ in substance from one type of material to another. Therefore it is not possible to separate the bibliographic control of music materials entirely from the larger domain of bibliographic control activity. The literature of music librarianship is examined for relevant theoretical explanations. Specific problems of description and access are used to show that, in general, the requirements for bibliographic control of music fit neatly into the theoretical structure for all bibliographic control. The primary purpose of descriptive cataloging of musical objects is to identify and differentiate among objects in a library collection. Where the concept of responsibility is relevant, access is provided through the names of composers or performers. Systematic access is provided through co-equal facets: medium, manifestation, and form.
- Date
- 7. 1.2007 12:35:33
-
Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998)
0.06
0.059376657 = sum of:
0.041403946 = product of:
0.12421183 = sum of:
0.12421183 = weight(_text_:objects in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12421183 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.41106653 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.017972711 = product of:
0.05391813 = sum of:
0.05391813 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05391813 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
- Date
- 24. 1.2007 19:38:22
-
Madison, O.M.A.: ¬The IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : international standards for bibliographic control (2000)
0.05
0.054661952 = sum of:
0.041824304 = product of:
0.1254729 = sum of:
0.1254729 = weight(_text_:objects in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1254729 = score(doc=187,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.41523993 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.01283765 = product of:
0.03851295 = sum of:
0.03851295 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03851295 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The formal charge for the IFLA study involving international bibliography standards was to delineate the functions that are performed by the bibliographic record with respect to various media, applications, and user needs. The method used was the entity relationship analysis technique. Three groups of entities that are the key objects of interest to users of bibliographic records were defined. The primary group contains four entities: work, expression, manifestation, and item. The second group includes entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, production, or ownership of entities in the first group. The third group includes entities that represent concepts, objects, events, and places. In the study we identified the attributes associated with each entity and the relationships that are most important to users. The attributes and relationships were mapped to the functional requirements for bibliographic records that were defined in terms of four user tasks: to find, identify, select, and obtain. Basic requirements for national bibliographic records were recommended based on the entity analysis. The recommendations of the study are compared with two standards, AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) and the Dublin Core, to place them into pragmatic context. The results of the study are being used in the review of the complete set of ISBDs as the initial benchmark in determining data elements for each format.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Parent, I.: International and national cataloguing rules : current situation and future trends, Moscow, 20-24 April 1999 (2000)
0.05
0.05003102 = product of:
0.10006204 = sum of:
0.10006204 = product of:
0.15009306 = sum of:
0.05766199 = weight(_text_:12 in 6465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05766199 = score(doc=6465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.3667052 = fieldWeight in 6465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6465)
0.092431076 = weight(_text_:22 in 6465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092431076 = score(doc=6465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6465)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 11. 8.2001 17:22:42
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.1, S.9-12
-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.05
0.05003102 = product of:
0.10006204 = sum of:
0.10006204 = product of:
0.15009306 = sum of:
0.05766199 = weight(_text_:12 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05766199 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.3667052 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.092431076 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092431076 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 8.2005 15:12:32
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
-
Walker, K.; Kwasnik, B.: Providing access to collected works (2002)
0.05
0.04509943 = sum of:
0.035489097 = product of:
0.106467284 = sum of:
0.106467284 = weight(_text_:objects in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106467284 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.009610333 = product of:
0.028830996 = sum of:
0.028830996 = weight(_text_:12 in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028830996 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- How are the boundaries of information objects to be defined in the networked electronic environment and what is the role of our retrieval systems in providing access where these boundaries are uncertain? The authors consider these questions in light of longstanding problems surrounding the definition of the "work" in the print environment. In particular, they examine the role of the index in providing access to the collected works of the individual writer. They review the discussion in the indexing literature of the "long index," and the close relationship between the functions of indexer and editor in collected works projects. And they treat the role of the index in constituting as a self-contained corpus the disparate types of text that make up a writer's lifetime output. Finally, by way of example, the authors turn to the extensive indexes to Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic writings.
- Date
- 5. 6.2001 12:25:05
-
Boeuf, P. le: Musical works in the FRBR model or "Quasi la Stessa Cosa" : variations on a theme by Umberto Eco (2004)
0.05
0.04509943 = sum of:
0.035489097 = product of:
0.106467284 = sum of:
0.106467284 = weight(_text_:objects in 5853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106467284 = score(doc=5853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30216965 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.35234275 = fieldWeight in 5853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5853)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.009610333 = product of:
0.028830996 = sum of:
0.028830996 = weight(_text_:12 in 5853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028830996 = score(doc=5853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.1833526 = fieldWeight in 5853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5853)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In this paper, the FRBR model is approached through Umberto Eco's semiotic analysis of the translation notion as developed in his Dire quasi la stessa cosa: esperienze di traduzione. Eco's taxonomy of forms of interpretation is used as a basis for a tentative abstract definition of what constitutes a mere expression of a given musical work and what constitutes a new, distinct musical work. The issues of aggregates of musical works, fragments of musical works, and works of vocal music, are also addressed. FRBR can be used as a basis for a model for the complex processes involved in the production and reception of musical works. And FRBR highlights complex bibliographic relationships that put musical works at the very center of myriads of interrelated systems that make up the catalog, which is viewed as a set of circular objects such as atoms or solar systems rather than as a straight linear listing.
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 19:12:51
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.04
0.041862063 = product of:
0.083724126 = sum of:
0.083724126 = product of:
0.12558618 = sum of:
0.038441326 = weight(_text_:12 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038441326 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.24447013 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.08714486 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08714486 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8.10.2004 12:19:07
9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Kirfel, G.: Methodisch-didaktische Überlegungen zum Fach "Alphabetische Katalogisierung" nach den "Preußischen Instruktionen" (1976)
0.04
0.04169252 = product of:
0.08338504 = sum of:
0.08338504 = product of:
0.12507756 = sum of:
0.04805166 = weight(_text_:12 in 6492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04805166 = score(doc=6492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.30558768 = fieldWeight in 6492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6492)
0.0770259 = weight(_text_:22 in 6492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0770259 = score(doc=6492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6492)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2016 12:14:11
-
Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003)
0.04
0.04169252 = product of:
0.08338504 = sum of:
0.08338504 = product of:
0.12507756 = sum of:
0.04805166 = weight(_text_:12 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04805166 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.30558768 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
0.0770259 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0770259 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2016 12:15:46
-
Seminario FRBR : Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: reguisiti funzionali per record bibliografici, Florence, 27-28 January 2000, Proceedings (2000)
0.04
0.04169252 = product of:
0.08338504 = sum of:
0.08338504 = product of:
0.12507756 = sum of:
0.04805166 = weight(_text_:12 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04805166 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.30558768 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
0.0770259 = weight(_text_:22 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0770259 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 8.2005 12:54:22
-
Boeuf, P. le: ¬The Impact of the FRBR model an the future revisions of the ISBDs : a challenge for the IFLA Section an Cataloging (2002)
0.04
0.04169252 = product of:
0.08338504 = sum of:
0.08338504 = product of:
0.12507756 = sum of:
0.04805166 = weight(_text_:12 in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04805166 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.30558768 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
0.0770259 = weight(_text_:22 in 3954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0770259 = score(doc=3954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3954)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 8.2005 9:12:22
-
Thomas, A.R.: ¬The Work-Wide Web : a cataloging career for every librarian? (1997)
0.03
0.033354014 = product of:
0.06670803 = sum of:
0.06670803 = product of:
0.10006204 = sum of:
0.038441326 = weight(_text_:12 in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038441326 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.24447013 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
0.06162072 = weight(_text_:22 in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06162072 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.2006 12:32:36
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 24(1997) nos.1/2, S.5-22
-
Crocetti, L.: AACR2 in edizione italiana (1997)
0.03
0.033354014 = product of:
0.06670803 = sum of:
0.06670803 = product of:
0.10006204 = sum of:
0.038441326 = weight(_text_:12 in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038441326 = score(doc=1623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.24447013 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
0.06162072 = weight(_text_:22 in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06162072 = score(doc=1623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 7.1998 10:22:48
- Source
- Biblioteche oggi. 15(1997) no.8, S.12-19
-
Chang, H.-Y.: Cataloguing electronic resources (1997)
0.03
0.033354014 = product of:
0.06670803 = sum of:
0.06670803 = product of:
0.10006204 = sum of:
0.038441326 = weight(_text_:12 in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038441326 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.24447013 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
0.06162072 = weight(_text_:22 in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06162072 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 12:21:39
- Source
- DLA bulletin. 17(1997) no.1, S.22-24
-
Rolland-Thomas, P.: AACR2: one step towards an international code (1983)
0.03
0.033354014 = product of:
0.06670803 = sum of:
0.06670803 = product of:
0.10006204 = sum of:
0.038441326 = weight(_text_:12 in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038441326 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.24447013 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
0.06162072 = weight(_text_:22 in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06162072 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 1.2007 19:12:22
-
Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004)
0.03
0.033354014 = product of:
0.06670803 = sum of:
0.06670803 = product of:
0.10006204 = sum of:
0.038441326 = weight(_text_:12 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038441326 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.24447013 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.06162072 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06162072 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 8.10.2004 12:19:07
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
-
Grothe, E.: ¬Die kooperative Erschließung von Autographen und Nachlässen im digitalen Zeitalter : Probleme und Perspektiven (2006)
0.03
0.033354014 = product of:
0.06670803 = sum of:
0.06670803 = product of:
0.10006204 = sum of:
0.038441326 = weight(_text_:12 in 1758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038441326 = score(doc=1758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.24447013 = fieldWeight in 1758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1758)
0.06162072 = weight(_text_:22 in 1758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06162072 = score(doc=1758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1758)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 12:43:43
-
Jele, H.: Erkennung bibliographischer Dubletten mittels Trigrammen : Messungen zur Performanz (2009)
0.03
0.033354014 = product of:
0.06670803 = sum of:
0.06670803 = product of:
0.10006204 = sum of:
0.038441326 = weight(_text_:12 in 2562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038441326 = score(doc=2562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15724345 = queryWeight, product of:
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.24447013 = fieldWeight in 2562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.765864 = idf(docFreq=7562, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2562)
0.06162072 = weight(_text_:22 in 2562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06162072 = score(doc=2562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19908418 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056851476 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2562)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 21. 6.2010 19:30:22
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 12(2009) H.3, S.xxx-xxx
