Search (459 results, page 1 of 23)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Nieszkowska, E.; Daumont, A.; Grandguillotte, C.: ¬Le traitement des collections de monographies dans le cadre de la bibliographie nationale francaise (1998) 0.03
    0.025807291 = product of:
      0.3096875 = sum of:
        0.3096875 = weight(_text_:monographies in 2828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3096875 = score(doc=2828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36389852 = queryWeight, product of:
              11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.85102713 = fieldWeight in 2828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              11.00374 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2828)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
  2. Burrows, T.: ¬The virtual catalogue : bibliographic access for the virtual library (1993) 0.02
    0.023287011 = product of:
      0.13972206 = sum of:
        0.121799715 = weight(_text_:verteilte in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.121799715 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2134743 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.45514 = idf(docFreq=188, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.57055914 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.45514 = idf(docFreq=188, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
        0.017922351 = product of:
          0.035844702 = sum of:
            0.035844702 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035844702 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11580704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033070438 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:47:22
    Theme
    Verteilte bibliographische Datenbanken
  3. Quinn, A.C.: Cataloging the congressional serial set (2005) 0.02
    0.020700863 = product of:
      0.12420517 = sum of:
        0.10191332 = weight(_text_:205 in 5739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10191332 = score(doc=5739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20875357 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.48819917 = fieldWeight in 5739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5739)
        0.022291856 = weight(_text_:internet in 5739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022291856 = score(doc=5739,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09763186 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.22832564 = fieldWeight in 5739, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5739)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Many librarians question the usefulness of the traditional cataloging of difficult historic sets in a time when more and more information moves to either to the Internet or is digitized outright. One of the most challenging sets to catalog is the U.S. Congressional Serial Set, a 14,000 + (and growing) mega serial comprised of five monographic sub-series. The Congressional Serial Set is an anomaly since it is both monographic and serial in nature. This article examines the intricacies in cataloging government publications in an electronic atmosphere using one House document in the Serial Set as a guide and examines the two commercial digitization projects currently underway.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 41(2005) no.1, S.183-205
  4. Hamm, S.; Schneider, K.: Automatische Erschließung von Universitätsdissertationen (2015) 0.02
    0.016937703 = product of:
      0.10162622 = sum of:
        0.08370387 = weight(_text_:systeme in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08370387 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1769682 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.4729882 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
        0.017922351 = product of:
          0.035844702 = sum of:
            0.035844702 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035844702 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11580704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033070438 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Seit über 40 Jahren arbeiten Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare an der Automatisierung von Erschließungsprozessen. Von Anfang an war dabei ein zentrales Ziel, die Arbeit der formalen Erschließung zu unterstützen und zu beschleunigen, um eventuell vorhandene Bearbeitungsrückstände schneller abbauen oder eine Vielzahl bislang unzureichend erschlossener Bestandsgruppen überhaupt erst erschließen zu können. Trotz vielfältiger Forschungsansätze und praktischer Versuche sind bis heute nur wenige regelbasierte Systeme im Einsatz, die Bibliotheken bei der Erstellung einfacher Titelaufnahmen erfolgreich unterstützen.
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 27(2015) H.1, S.18-22
  5. Pampel, H.; Fenner, M.: ORCID - Offener Standard zur Vernetzung von Forschenden (2016) 0.02
    0.016850863 = product of:
      0.101105176 = sum of:
        0.04020532 = product of:
          0.08041064 = sum of:
            0.08041064 = weight(_text_:vernetzung in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08041064 = score(doc=2839,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.2062703 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033070438 = queryNorm
                0.38983136 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.060899857 = weight(_text_:verteilte in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060899857 = score(doc=2839,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2134743 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.45514 = idf(docFreq=188, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.28527957 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.45514 = idf(docFreq=188, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Das internationale ORCID-Konsortium vernetzt Publizierende mit ihren Aufsätzen und Forschungsdaten über eine eindeutige ID. Weltweit besitzen bereits über 2 Millionen Forschende eine solche Kennung. Um ORCID in Deutschland zu fördern, wurde das Projektvorhaben "ORCID DE - Förderung der Open Researcher and Contributor ID in Deutschland" gebildet. Die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) hat die Förderung des auf drei Jahre angelegten Projekts im Februar 2016 bewilligt. Durch die Integration in über 230 digitale Informationsinfrastrukturen erleichtert die Open Researcher and Contributor ID, kurz ORCID, die Pflege der Publikationsliste für Forscherinnen und Forscher. Die Idee dahinter ist folgende: Jede Person, die im wissenschaftlichen Arbeitsprozess einen Beitrag leistet, kann sich über die eindeutige ORCID-Kennung mit ihren Publikationen, Forschungsdaten und anderen Produkten des Forschungsprozesses (zum Beispiel Software) eindeutig vernetzen. Damit werden diese Objekte sichtbar und technisch verlässlich mit ihren Erschafferinnen und Erschaffern verbunden. ORCID bietet das Potenzial, bisher verteilte Informationen standardisiert zusammenzuführen und damit einen Überblick auf die Forschungsleistung von Forschenden zu ermöglichen. Durch die Offenheit des Systems und des großen internationalen Konsortiums ist ORCID auf dem Weg, ein langfristig gültiger Identifikator im wissenschaftlichen Alltag zu werden.
    Ziel des DFG-Projekts ORCID DE ist es, die vielerorts erwogene Implementierung der ORCID an Hochschulen und außeruniversitären Forschungseinrichtungen durch einen übergreifenden Ansatz nachhaltig zu unterstützen. Dabei stehen organisatorische, technische und rechtliche Fragen gleichermaßen im Fokus. Neben der Schaffung einer zentralen Anlaufstelle für Hochschulen und außeruniversitäre Forschungseinrichtungen sind die Vernetzung und Verbreitung der ORCID im Bereich von Open-Access-Repositorien und -Publikationdiensten sowie die Verzahnung mit der Gemeinsame Normdatei (GND) wesentliche Aspekte des Projekts. Projektpartner von ORCID DE sind das Helmholtz Open Science Koordinationsbüro am Deutschen GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek und die Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld. Das Projekt wurde durch die Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerkinformation (DINI) initiiert.
  6. Seymour, C.: Cataloging Internet resources (1996) 0.02
    0.015601944 = product of:
      0.093611665 = sum of:
        0.07120872 = weight(_text_:internet in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07120872 = score(doc=4679,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09763186 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.7293595 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
        0.02240294 = product of:
          0.04480588 = sum of:
            0.04480588 = weight(_text_:22 in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04480588 = score(doc=4679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11580704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033070438 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the OCLC project for cataloguing Internet resources, a project aimed at developing rules for electronic material, and as a possible solution for the difficulty of locating materials on the Internet. No attempts is made to catalogue all the resources on the Internet and choice of materials is left to participating libraries
    Source
    Information and librarianship. 22(1996) no.1, S.33-35
    Theme
    Internet
  7. Gorman, M.: Control o caos bibliográfico : un programa para los servcos bibliográficos nacionales del siglo XXI (2004) 0.02
    0.015096675 = product of:
      0.090580046 = sum of:
        0.040142678 = product of:
          0.12042803 = sum of:
            0.12042803 = weight(_text_:21st in 3762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12042803 = score(doc=3762,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18985903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033070438 = queryNorm
                0.6343024 = fieldWeight in 3762, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3762)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.05043737 = product of:
          0.10087474 = sum of:
            0.10087474 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 3762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10087474 = score(doc=3762,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17376354 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033070438 = queryNorm
                0.5805288 = fieldWeight in 3762, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3762)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Bibliographic control or chaos: an agenda for national bibliographic services for the 21st century. - Vgl. auch: http://www.um.es/fccd/anales/ad06/ad0618.pdf.
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  8. Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.01
    0.0145680625 = product of:
      0.17481674 = sum of:
        0.17481674 = sum of:
          0.12104969 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12104969 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17376354 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.033070438 = queryNorm
              0.69663453 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
          0.05376705 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05376705 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11580704 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.033070438 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:22:27
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  9. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.01
    0.0145680625 = product of:
      0.17481674 = sum of:
        0.17481674 = sum of:
          0.12104969 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12104969 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17376354 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.033070438 = queryNorm
              0.69663453 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
          0.05376705 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05376705 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11580704 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.033070438 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  10. Nafzger-Glöser, J.: Formalerschließung zwischen PI und AUTOCAT (1988) 0.01
    0.014559045 = product of:
      0.17470855 = sum of:
        0.17470855 = weight(_text_:205 in 7781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17470855 = score(doc=7781,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20875357 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.8369129 = fieldWeight in 7781, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7781)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Pages
    S.200-205
  11. Ferguson, B.: MARC/AACR2/authority control tagging : a blitz cataloging workbook (2005) 0.01
    0.014559045 = product of:
      0.17470855 = sum of:
        0.17470855 = weight(_text_:205 in 4602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17470855 = score(doc=4602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20875357 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.8369129 = fieldWeight in 4602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.312392 = idf(docFreq=217, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4602)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Isbn
    1-59158-205-9
  12. Cochenour, D.: Linking remote users and information : cataloguing Internet publications (1994) 0.01
    0.012481555 = product of:
      0.07488933 = sum of:
        0.05696698 = weight(_text_:internet in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05696698 = score(doc=2170,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09763186 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.58348763 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
        0.017922351 = product of:
          0.035844702 = sum of:
            0.035844702 = weight(_text_:22 in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035844702 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11580704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033070438 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries can add value to Internet resources by adding them to the library's catalogue in a manner consistent with the other resources held within the collection. Reports on OCLC studies into cataloguing Internet resources and accessing electronic periodicals. Existing retrieval methods on the Internet are limited because of shallow directory structures and idiosyncratic naming conventions. Catalogue entries for electronic resources need to provide a complete description of the access methodology if they are to satisfactorily connect remote users without the immediate possibility of backup from reference staff
    Date
    17.10.1995 18:22:54
    Theme
    Internet
  13. Moir, S.; Wells, A.: Descriptive cataloguing and the Internet : recent research (1996) 0.01
    0.012481555 = product of:
      0.07488933 = sum of:
        0.05696698 = weight(_text_:internet in 7230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05696698 = score(doc=7230,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09763186 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.58348763 = fieldWeight in 7230, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7230)
        0.017922351 = product of:
          0.035844702 = sum of:
            0.035844702 = weight(_text_:22 in 7230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035844702 = score(doc=7230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11580704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033070438 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the Coalition for Networked Information's (CNI) analysis of the networked electronic environment where the chief problem for the users appears to be finding resources on the Internet. Presents the CNI's arguments for surrogates and describes one approach to the identification and description of resources on the Internet: the OCLC Internet Cataloguing Project
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.8-16
    Theme
    Internet
  14. Dillon, M.; Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : the convergence of libraries and Internet resources (1996) 0.01
    0.0124434605 = product of:
      0.07466076 = sum of:
        0.05897871 = weight(_text_:internet in 6737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05897871 = score(doc=6737,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09763186 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.6040929 = fieldWeight in 6737, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6737)
        0.015682057 = product of:
          0.031364113 = sum of:
            0.031364113 = weight(_text_:22 in 6737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031364113 = score(doc=6737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11580704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033070438 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews issues related to the cataloguing of Internet resources and considers short term and long term directions for cataloguing and the gereal provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. Discusses the strengths and weaknesses of using a library catalogue model to improve access to Internet resources. Based on experience gained through 2 OCLC Internet cataloguing projects, recommends continued application of library cataloguing standard and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogues, cataloguing and libraries in general will continue to evolve. Points to problems inherent in the MARC field 856
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
    Theme
    Internet
  15. Dillon, M.; Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : the convergence of libraries and Internet resources (1996) 0.01
    0.011714287 = product of:
      0.07028572 = sum of:
        0.05460367 = weight(_text_:internet in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05460367 = score(doc=602,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.09763186 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.5592813 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
        0.015682057 = product of:
          0.031364113 = sum of:
            0.031364113 = weight(_text_:22 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031364113 = score(doc=602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11580704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033070438 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews issues related to the cataloging of Internet resources and considers shortand long-term directions for cataloging and the general provision of library services for remotely accessible, electronic information resources. The strengths and weakness of using a library catalog model to improve access to Internet resources are discussed and compared with a review of related efforts. Based on experience gained through two OCLC Internet cataloging projects, the authors recommend continued and vigorous appplication of library cataloging standards and methods for Internet resources with the expectation that catalogs, cataloging, and libraries in general will continue to evolve.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.197-238
  16. Cremer, M.: WebCAT: Erfahrungen bei der Katalogisierung von Internet-Dokumenten an der SUB Göttingen im Rahmen des WebDOC-Projektes (1996) 0.01
    0.011239883 = product of:
      0.067439295 = sum of:
        0.045036353 = weight(_text_:internet in 5218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045036353 = score(doc=5218,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09763186 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.46128747 = fieldWeight in 5218, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5218)
        0.02240294 = product of:
          0.04480588 = sum of:
            0.04480588 = weight(_text_:22 in 5218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04480588 = score(doc=5218,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11580704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033070438 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5218, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5218)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Date
    21. 9.1996 16:03:22
    Theme
    Internet
  17. Managing cataloging and the organization of information : philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century (2000) 0.01
    0.010839692 = product of:
      0.06503815 = sum of:
        0.014049936 = product of:
          0.04214981 = sum of:
            0.04214981 = weight(_text_:21st in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04214981 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18985903 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033070438 = queryNorm
                0.22200581 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.74105 = idf(docFreq=385, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.050988216 = sum of:
          0.03530616 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03530616 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17376354 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.033070438 = queryNorm
              0.20318508 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
          0.015682057 = weight(_text_:22 in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015682057 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.11580704 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.033070438 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in ZfBB 51(2004) H.1, S.54-55 (G. Pflug): "Unter dem wachsenden Einfluss der Informationstechnologie auf den Bibliotheksbereich nimmt die Katalogisierung eine Schlüsselstellung ein. Das vorliegende Werk gliedert sich in zwei Teile. Der erste Abschnitt ist mit »National Libraries« überschrieben, befasst sich jedoch nur mit der Library of Congress und der National Library of Canada. Ihm folgen Artikel über »Libraries around the world«. Dabei fälltjedoch auf, dass diese Studien zwar Bibliotheken in Großbritannien, Australien, Mittel- und Südamerika und selbst Afrika (Botswana) behandeln, nicht jedoch aus Kontinentaleuropa, trotz entsprechender Aktivitäten etwa in den Niederlanden, in Frankreich oder den deutschsprachigen Ländern. Nur DOBIS/LIBIS wird erwähnt, aber nur, weil es für kurze Zeit die kanadische Entwicklung beeinflusst hat. Im zweiten Teil kommen Katalogisierungsfachleute aus vier Spezial- und neun akademischen Bibliotheken - ausschließlich aus Nordamerika und Großbritannien - zu Wort. So enthält das Werk in 22 Beispielen Berichte über individuelle und regionale Lösungen. Dabei steht die Frage im Vordergrund, zu welchen Änderungen in der Katalogisierungs- und Sacherschließungspraxis die neuen elektronischen Techniken geführt haben. So streben z.B. die englischen Hochschulbibliotheken ein koordiniertes System an. Mit dem Übergang der British Library zu MARC 21 wird das Katalogsystem in Großbritannien nachhaltig beeinflusst - um nur zwei nahe liegende Beispiele zu nennen. Insgesamt werden drei Aspekte behandelt, die Automatisierungstechnik; die dabei einzusetzende Kooperation und das Outsourcing - nicht nur durch Übernahme von Daten anderer Bibliotheken oder durch Verbundsysteme, vor allem der Library of Congress, sondern auch durch Buchhandelsfirmen wie Blackwell North America Authority Control Service. In der Frage der Sacherschließung befassen sich die Beiträge mit den im amerikanischen Bereich üblichen Klassifikationssystemen, vor allem der Colon Classification, Dewey in seinen beiden Formen oder der Library of Congress Classification. Für die deutsche Diskussion sind diese Aspekte vor allem wegen des Übergangs der Deutschen Bibliothek in ihrer Nationalbibliografie zur DDC von großem Interesse (vgl. Magda Heiner-Freiling: Die DDC in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie. In Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 15. 2003, Nr. 3, S. 8-13). Doch stellen auch die unterschiedlichen Überlegungen zur alphabetischen Katalogisierung, verbunden mit den da zugehörigen Datenbanken, einen interessanten Beitrag zur augenblicklichen Diskussion in Deutschland dar, da auch hier seit einigen Jahren die Katalogisierung nach RAK und ihre Ablösung eine lebhafte Diskussion ausgelöst hat, wie unter anderem der zusammenfassende Beitrag von Elisabeth Niggemann in: Dialog mit Bibliotheken (15. 2003, Nr. 2, S. 4-8) zeigt. Auch die angloamerikanischen und die mit ihnen zum Beispiel in Mexiko, Südamerika oder Australien verbundenen Bibliotheken - das zeigt das Buch deutlich - diskutieren die Frage der alphabetischen Katalogisierung kontrovers. So werden z.B. neben den dominanten AACR-Regeln mit ihrer Weiterentwicklung mehr als zehn andere Katalogisierungssysteme und rund 20 Online-Datenbanken behandelt. Damit liefert das Buch für die Diskussion in Deutschland und die anstehenden Entscheidungen in seiner Grundtendenz wie in den unterschiedlichen-auch widersprüchlichen-Aspekten dereinzelnen Beiträge wertvolle Anregungen."
    Theme
    Katalogfragen allgemein
  18. Gradmann, S.: Katalogisierung mit dem PC : Microrechnergestützte Datenbanksysteme für die Verarbeitung bibliothekarischer Daten: Allegro-C, LIDOS, TINman im Vergleich (1989) 0.01
    0.010462984 = product of:
      0.12555581 = sum of:
        0.12555581 = weight(_text_:systeme in 5975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12555581 = score(doc=5975,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1769682 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.7094823 = fieldWeight in 5975, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5975)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
    Footnote
    Beschreibung der untersuchten Systeme erfolgt zwangsläufig nicht aufgrund der aktuellsten Version
  19. Gradmann, S.: Katalogisierung mit dem PC : datenbankgestützte Systeme für die Verarbeitung bibliographischer Daten: allegro-C, BIS-LOK, IBAS IV/Biblio (1992) 0.01
    0.010462984 = product of:
      0.12555581 = sum of:
        0.12555581 = weight(_text_:systeme in 5976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12555581 = score(doc=5976,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1769682 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.7094823 = fieldWeight in 5976, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3512506 = idf(docFreq=569, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5976)
      0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    
  20. Rogers, D.: Cataloguing Internet resources : the evolution of the Dublin Core metadata set (1997) 0.01
    0.010341465 = product of:
      0.062048785 = sum of:
        0.044126432 = weight(_text_:internet in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044126432 = score(doc=903,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09763186 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033070438 = queryNorm
            0.45196757 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
        0.017922351 = product of:
          0.035844702 = sum of:
            0.035844702 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035844702 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11580704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033070438 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Recently the view has developed that electronic resources require the same level of cataloguing as the physical resources found in libraries, with the effect that a number of guidelines for cataloguing Internet resources have appeared. Describes one such standard for resource description, the Dublin Core metadata set, the ongoing refinement of the metadata elements and the application of the Dublin Core metadata set
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22
    Theme
    Internet

Languages

Types

  • a 415
  • el 26
  • m 21
  • b 16
  • s 8
  • r 4
  • x 3
  • n 2
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…