Search (203 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.13
    0.12797028 = product of:
      0.25594056 = sum of:
        0.19738029 = weight(_text_:themes in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19738029 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39696783 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.49721986 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
        0.05856026 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05856026 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007) 0.11
    0.1096888 = product of:
      0.2193776 = sum of:
        0.1691831 = weight(_text_:themes in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1691831 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39696783 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
        0.050194506 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050194506 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Denton, W.: FRBR and the history of cataloging (2007) 0.05
    0.049345072 = product of:
      0.19738029 = sum of:
        0.19738029 = weight(_text_:themes in 1677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19738029 = score(doc=1677,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39696783 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.49721986 = fieldWeight in 1677, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1677)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    An explanation of where FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) comes from, given by a look at the work of librarians such as Panizzi, Cutter, Ranganathan, and Lubetzky, and an examination of four themes in the history of library cataloging: the use of axioms to explain the purpose of catalogs, the importance of user needs, the idea of the "work," and standardization and internationalization.
  4. Joudrey, D.N.; McGinnis, R.: Graduate education for information organization, cataloging, and metadata (2014) 0.05
    0.049345072 = product of:
      0.19738029 = sum of:
        0.19738029 = weight(_text_:themes in 1980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19738029 = score(doc=1980,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39696783 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.49721986 = fieldWeight in 1980, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1980)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discussions of cataloging and metadata education are popular in social media outlets, scholarly literature, conference meetings, and so on. This article, the third installment of a longitudinal study on the state of information organization (IO) education, analyzes the recent literature to identify new and continuing themes related to IO education. It provides an overview of the curricula of the 58 library and information science graduate programs in the United States and Canada accredited by the American Library Association (ALA). It examines the current conditions in 2012-2013 and compares them to data from earlier studies. It provides an overview of the types of IO courses available, program requirements, the number of schools offering IO courses, and the number of schools teaching those courses.
  5. FictionFinder : a FRBR-based prototype for fiction in WorldCat (o.J.) 0.05
    0.049345072 = product of:
      0.19738029 = sum of:
        0.19738029 = weight(_text_:themes in 2432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19738029 = score(doc=2432,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39696783 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.49721986 = fieldWeight in 2432, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2432)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    http://www.oclc.org/research/themes/data-science/fictionfinder.html
  6. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.05
    0.047323838 = product of:
      0.18929535 = sum of:
        0.18929535 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18929535 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
  7. Joudrey, D.N.: ¬A new look at US graduate courses in bibliographic control (2002) 0.04
    0.042295776 = product of:
      0.1691831 = sum of:
        0.1691831 = weight(_text_:themes in 5452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1691831 = score(doc=5452,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39696783 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 5452, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5452)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The current state of graduate bibliographic control education in the United States is examined through reviewing the literature, analyzing Web sites for 48 LIS programs, and corresponding with and interviewing bibliographic control educators. In reviewing the recent bibliographic control education literature, six primary themes were identified: background/contextual information, theory versus practice, responsibilities and skills needed by catalogers, relations between educators and practitioners, the universality of cataloging, and curricular issues. Each of these areas is examined in depth. The study conducted examined the number and types of bibliographic control education available in LIS programs in the US. It also collected information on which textbooks were being used in each course. It appears from the study that some courses are increasing in number. The primary areas of bibliographic control education examined include organizing information, technical services, classification theory, indexing, thesaurus construction, cataloging technology, and basic, advanced, descriptive, subject, non-book, Internet resources, and music cataloging courses.
  8. Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013) 0.04
    0.035246477 = product of:
      0.1409859 = sum of:
        0.1409859 = weight(_text_:themes in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1409859 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39696783 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.
  9. Lee, W.-C.: Conflicts of semantic warrants in cataloging practices (2017) 0.04
    0.035246477 = product of:
      0.1409859 = sum of:
        0.1409859 = weight(_text_:themes in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1409859 = score(doc=3871,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39696783 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study presents preliminary themes surfaced from an ongoing ethnographic study. The research question is: how and where do cultures influence the cataloging practices of using U.S. standards to catalog Chinese materials? The author applies warrant as a lens for evaluating knowledge representation systems, and extends the application from examining classificatory decisions to cataloging decisions. Semantic warrant as a conceptual tool allows us to recognize and name the various rationales behind cataloging decisions, grants us explanatory power, and the language to "visualize" and reflect on the conflicting priorities in cataloging practices. Through participatory observation, the author recorded the cataloging practices of two Chinese catalogers working on the same cataloging project. One of the catalogers is U.S. trained, and another cataloger is a professor of Library and Information Science from China, who is also a subject expert and a cataloger of Chinese special collections. The study shows how the catalogers describe Chinese special collections using many U.S. cataloging and classification standards but from different approaches. The author presents particular cases derived from the fieldwork, with an emphasis on the many layers presented by cultures, principles, standards, and practices of different scope, each of which may represent conflicting warrants. From this, it is made clear that the conflicts of warrants influence cataloging practice. We may view the conflicting warrants as an interpretation of the tension between different semantic warrants and the globalization and localization of cataloging standards.
  10. Rafferty, P.: FRBR, information, and intertextuality (2015) 0.04
    0.035246477 = product of:
      0.1409859 = sum of:
        0.1409859 = weight(_text_:themes in 5533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1409859 = score(doc=5533,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39696783 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 5533, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5533)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Following from approaches that view information as documentary forms of specific communicative practices, this paper uses theoretical concepts derived from cultural theory to examine the concept of work in Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) in relation to authorship, the ur-text, and intertextuality. Historically, the practice of librarianship has existed on a foundation of standards, and among the earliest of the standards is the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR). The basis of this set of standards is materialist: the object of scrutiny is the document, and the document, whatever its specific form, is considered to possess materiality. This paper argues that unlike the AACR, FRBR lays bare its own ideological underpinnings, and in so doing, it dematerializes the text and mystifies the creative process. At the same time, it has really been with the development of FRBR and linked-data models that library and information science has considered intertextual analysis at the level of the document rather than at a more abstract level. The idealism that underpins FRBR's notion of work points to intertextuality, with all its potential for rich analysis, but at the same time embeds deep in its system the logocentrism of the ideal signified-another example of disciplining epistemology. The paper will examine these two interlinked themes through discussion of FRBR and the strange case of the vanishing text, the ur-text, and intertextuality.
  11. Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993) 0.03
    0.033463005 = product of:
      0.13385202 = sum of:
        0.13385202 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13385202 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
  12. Madison, O.M:A.: ¬The role of the name main-entry heading in the online environment (1992) 0.03
    0.033463005 = product of:
      0.13385202 = sum of:
        0.13385202 = weight(_text_:22 in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13385202 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Serials librarian. 22(1992), S.371-391
  13. Bärhausen, A.; Euskirchen, A.: Nachbearbeitung der Katalog-Konversion oder : Es bleibt viel zu tun, packen wir's an! (1999) 0.03
    0.029577397 = product of:
      0.11830959 = sum of:
        0.11830959 = weight(_text_:22 in 4367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11830959 = score(doc=4367,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4367, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4367)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:36:10
    22. 1.2000 19:40:40
  14. Houissa, A.: Arabic personal names : their components and rendering in catalog entries (1991) 0.03
    0.02928013 = product of:
      0.11712052 = sum of:
        0.11712052 = weight(_text_:22 in 2857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11712052 = score(doc=2857,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2857, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2857)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 13(1991) no.2, S.3-22
  15. RAK-Mitteilung Nr.16 : Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung von Nichtbuchmaterialien (RAK-NBM). Entwurf (1995) 0.03
    0.02928013 = product of:
      0.11712052 = sum of:
        0.11712052 = weight(_text_:22 in 2391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11712052 = score(doc=2391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2391)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  16. Jones, E.: ¬The FRBR model as applied to continuing resources (2005) 0.03
    0.02928013 = product of:
      0.11712052 = sum of:
        0.11712052 = weight(_text_:22 in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11712052 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Münnich, M.: RAK2: Sachstandsbericht : vom Bibliothekartag '95 zum Bibliothekartag '96 (1996) 0.03
    0.02928013 = product of:
      0.11712052 = sum of:
        0.11712052 = weight(_text_:22 in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11712052 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    21. 9.1996 16:03:22
  18. Hirons, J.; Hawkins, L.; French, P.: AACR2 and you : revisiting AACR2 to accomodate seriality (2000) 0.03
    0.02928013 = product of:
      0.11712052 = sum of:
        0.11712052 = weight(_text_:22 in 6339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11712052 = score(doc=6339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6339)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    18. 8.2002 17:22:13
  19. Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001) 0.03
    0.02928013 = product of:
      0.11712052 = sum of:
        0.11712052 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11712052 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
  20. Baumann, S.; Tillett, B.: Interview: Barbara Tillett (2003) 0.03
    0.02928013 = product of:
      0.11712052 = sum of:
        0.11712052 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11712052 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2162245 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.061746154 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    17. 8.2003 15:50:22

Years

Languages

  • e 162
  • d 37
  • i 2
  • f 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 189
  • b 15
  • m 9
  • s 5
  • el 3
  • ? 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…