Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Kataloge"
  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Tantner, A.: Suchen und Finden vor Google : eine Skizze (2011) 0.02
    0.016429678 = product of:
      0.032859355 = sum of:
        0.030200208 = weight(_text_:von in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030200208 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.23581557 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
        0.0026591495 = product of:
          0.007977448 = sum of:
            0.007977448 = weight(_text_:a in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007977448 = score(doc=188,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Inhalt 1. Einleitung 2. Verzeichnisse von Büchern 3. Anordnung und Erschließung des Wissens 4. Datensammlungen in staatlichem und privatem Auftrag 5. Menschliche Informationseinrichtungen 6. Institutionen der Informationsvermittlung 7. Adressbücher und Personensuche 8. Schluss
    Type
    a
  2. Umstätter, W.: Bibliographie, Kataloge, Suchmaschinen : Das Ende der Dokumentation als modernes Bibliothekswesen (2005) 0.01
    0.012030191 = product of:
      0.024060382 = sum of:
        0.022650154 = weight(_text_:von in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022650154 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.17686167 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
        0.001410227 = product of:
          0.004230681 = sum of:
            0.004230681 = weight(_text_:a in 4765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004230681 = score(doc=4765,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 4765, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4765)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Als Otlet und La Fontaine um 1900 den Begriff Bibliographie durch den moderneren Begriff Dokumentation ersetzten und im Sinne einer Dokumentationswissenschaft von Dokumentologie sprachen, um damit auch den Weg zu öffnen, immer mehr "Neue Medien", wie Lochkartensysteme, Filme, Mikrofiches, Schallplatten, Magnetbandaufzeichnungen, etc. in die bibliothekarische Wissensbewahrung zu integrieren, da geriet das Bibliothekswesen in eine Zerreißprobe, die für Deutschland besonders nachhaltig war. Eigentlich war es nur ein Zeichen dafür, dass die Bibliothekswissenschaft plötzlich eine so große Dynamik bekam, dass ein Teil ihrer Vertreter sich immer stärker an den rasanten Entwicklungen dieser "Neuen Medien", dann an den informationsverarbeitenden Maschinen und an der Digitalisierung orientierten, während sich andere um so mehr darum bemühten, alte Erfahrungen und das bereits etablierte Wissen nicht dem Untergang preis zu geben. Diese Zerreißprobe hat zunächst auch international eine tiefe Spaltung zwischen Dokumentation und Bibliothekswesen hervorgebracht. Die "alte" Bibliothek erschien zunehmend "verstaubt" gegenüber der modernen Dokumentation, die ihrerseits allerdings einen Namen trug, der sich als Berufsbild in der breiten Bevölkerung nie so recht durchsetzen konnte. Heute hat die Digitale Bibliothek beide wieder vereinigt und damit das Berufsbild Dokumentar auf einen speziellen Bereich, der Erschließung nicht publizierter Dokumente, neben dem Archivar fokussiert.
    Type
    a
  3. Miksa, F.: ¬The legacy of the library catalogue for the present (2012) 0.00
    7.883408E-4 = product of:
      0.0031533632 = sum of:
        0.0031533632 = product of:
          0.00946009 = sum of:
            0.00946009 = weight(_text_:a in 5556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00946009 = score(doc=5556,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 5556, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5556)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The specter of impending change in library catalogues is strong but not very clear. In an attempt to help the clarification process, the first part of the present report discusses historical themes from the modern library catalogue legacy that has developed since the mid-nineteenth century-the origins and subsequent dominance of the dictionary catalogue for more than a century, considerations of library catalogue users and use over the same period, developments apart from the library catalogue during the twentieth century that have affected it, and aspects of the idea of the objects of a catalogue. In a second part, the general environment for the most recent period of library catalogue development is described, after which aspects of the historical legacy are used as a basis for raising questions relevant to impending library catalogue change.
    Type
    a
  4. Eversberg, B.: Zur Katalogpolitik der alten Hochschulbibliotheken : Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung (1978) 0.00
    7.1242056E-4 = product of:
      0.0028496822 = sum of:
        0.0028496822 = product of:
          0.008549047 = sum of:
            0.008549047 = weight(_text_:a in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008549047 = score(doc=368,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    After a long delay the final edition of RAK has been published. The old university libraries have suffered for years from using the Prussian Instructions which are obsolete and time-consuming; they have hesitated to give their old catalogues up but should do so as soon as possible. A new cataloguing policy is now needed, moving away from traditional practices that still govern even RAK towards simplified rules suitable for future developments such as use in centralised regional catalogues and in automated data processing. Simplified rules are proposed and discussed in relation to American and British minimal cataloguing, with suggestions for changes in basic terminology, general rules, main and subordinate entries, personal name and corporate body entries and subject headings
    Type
    a
  5. Gödert, W.: Vom Zettelkatalog zum HyperOPAC (1996) 0.00
    5.875945E-4 = product of:
      0.002350378 = sum of:
        0.002350378 = product of:
          0.007051134 = sum of:
            0.007051134 = weight(_text_:a in 2860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007051134 = score(doc=2860,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2860, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2860)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  6. Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: From bibliographic models to cataloguing rules : remarks on FRBR, ICP, ISBD, and RDA and the relationships between them (2009) 0.00
    4.1131617E-4 = product of:
      0.0016452647 = sum of:
        0.0016452647 = product of:
          0.004935794 = sum of:
            0.004935794 = weight(_text_:a in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004935794 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04800207 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a

Years

Languages